Correction of Class II malocclusion with Class II elastics: A systematic review

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.015

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volume 143, Issue 3, March 2013, Pages 383-392

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.015 Get rights and content

Introduction

Although Class II elastics have been widely used in the correction of Class II malocclusions, there is still a belief that their side effects override the intended objectives. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the true effects of Class II elastics in Class II malocclusion treatment.

Methods

A search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases, complemented by a hand search. Study eligibility criteria were the application of Class II elastics in Class II malocclusion treatment and the presentation of dental or skeletal outcomes of treatment. All age groups were included.

Results

The search indentified 417 articles, of which 11 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Four studied the isolated effects of Class II elastics, and 7 were comparisons between a single use of elastics and another method for Class II malocclusion correction. Because of the differences in treatment modalities in these articles, a meta-analysis was not possible.

Conclusions

Based on the current literature, we can state that Class II elastics are effective in correcting Class II malocclusions, and their effects are primarily dentoalveolar. Therefore, they are similar to the effects of fixed functional appliances in the long term, placing these 2 methods close to each other when evaluating treatment effectiveness. Little attention has been given to the effects of Class II elastics on the soft tissues in Class II malocclusion treatment.

Section snippets

Material and methods

With the objective to determine the most frequent uses and the main effects of Class II elastics in Class II malocclusion treatment, a search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases, complemented by a hand search, with no date limitation (Table I). The keywords were chosen with the help of a senior librarian.

To be accepted in this review, the application of Class II elastics in Class II malocclusion treatment should have been used in the clinical

Results

In total, 417 articles were retrieved. Starting from PubMed, a comparison between bases was made to eliminate duplicated articles. As a result, 162 articles were retrieved from these databases.

Among the 162 retrieved articles, 11 dealt with clinical studies of Class II elastics applied in Class II malocclusion correction. When we separated the articles based on the type of study, 4 articles fell into the category of elastics only, with Class II elastics used to treat Class II malocclusions

Discussion

The aim of this systematic review was to obtain every article on Class II elastics published in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases, and by hand searching. This sort of review reduces the tendency to favor 1 particular point of view and allows acquiring all data published in the most respected journals, indexed in these databases.

From the 162 retrieved articles, only 11 met the final criteria and were selected for this review. With these data, we determined

Conclusions

Class II elastics are effective in correcting Class II malocclusions, and their effects are mainly dentoalveolar, including lingual tipping, retrusion, and extrusion of the maxillary incisors; labial tipping and intrusion of the mandibular incisors; and mesialization and extrusion of the mandibular molars. Little attention has been given to the soft-tissue effects of this treatment modality.

These effects are similar on a long-term basis to those produced by functional appliances; this places

References (36)

T. Baccetti et al.
Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(2009)
T. Baccetti et al.
Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(2009)
S.E. Bishara et al.
Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(1997)
G. Janson et al.
Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division 1 malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(2006)
D.E. Paquette et al.
A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in “borderline” Class II patients
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(1992)
P. Reddy et al.
Skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction Begg mechanotherapy in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(2000)
S.M. Bien
Analysis of the components of force used to effect distal movement of teeth
Am J Orthod
(1951)
E.K. Ellen et al.
A comparative study of anchorage in bioprogressive versus standard edgewise treatment in Class II correction with intermaxillary elastic force
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(1998)
H. Wehrbein et al.
Palatal implant anchorage reinforcement of posterior teeth: a prospective study
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(1999)
B. Nelson et al.
Overjet reduction and molar correction in fixed appliance treatment of Class II, Division 1, malocclusions: sagittal and vertical components
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(1999)

B. Nelson et al.

Class II correction in patients treated with Class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

(2000)

B. Nelson et al.

A long-term follow-up study of Class II malocclusion correction after treatment with Class II elastics or fixed functional appliances

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

(2007)

A.A. Gianelly et al.

A comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the light wire, edgewise, and Frankel appliances

Am J Orthod

(1984)

G.J. Huang

Functional appliances and long-term effects on mandibular growth

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

(2005)

J.P. DeVincenzo

Changes in mandibular length before, during, and after successful orthopedic correction of Class II malocclusions, using a functional appliance

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

(1991)

C. Nelson et al.

Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

(1993)

D.G. Woodside

Do functional appliances have an orthopedic effect?

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

(1998)

B.C. Fidler et al.

Long-term stability of Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at end of active treatment

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

(1995)

Cited by (120)

Influence of orthodontic bracket prescription on smile attractiveness in patients with different sagittal skeletal patterns: A 3-dimensional cross-sectional study
2024, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of orthodontic bracket prescription on smile attractiveness.
Three women were chosen according to their sagittal skeletal pattern: skeletal Class I, II, or III malocclusion. For each, 3 smiling pictures were taken in frontal, oblique, and lateral views. The maxillary arch was then scanned, and a 3-dimensional digital model was constructed on the OrthoAnalyzer software. The information of 3 orthodontic prescriptions, namely Roth, MBT, and Ricketts, was simulated after the virtual placement of orthodontic brackets on 10 maxillary teeth. The simulations were then superimposed on the smile photographs in the 3 views, creating a total of 27 images. Groups of orthodontists, dentists, and laypeople rated the attractiveness of each smile using the visual analog scale.
This study included 167 evaluators: 54 orthodontists, 54 dentists, and 59 laypersons. In terms of orthodontic prescription, MBT esthetic scores were 4% lower than Roth scores (P <0.001), and Ricketts scores were 13.6% lower than Roth scores (P <0.001). In terms of skeletal pattern, Class II and III scores were 15.0% and 16.4% lower than Class I scores, respectively (P <0.001). Regarding the smiling view, oblique view scores were 3.1% lower than frontal view scores (P = 0.031), whereas lateral view scores were 8.4% lower than frontal view scores (P <0.001). In contrast to gender and age, the specialty of the evaluators significantly affected the esthetic rating of the smiles.
The attractiveness of a smile is affected by the prescription of the brackets. The Roth prescription tends to obtain the most favorable esthetic scores, especially in sagittal smiling images. Profile smiles with excessively proclined incisors are considered unattractive. Different views of the same smile do not get similar esthetic scores because sagittal views are rated the most severely.
Three-dimensional Evaluation of the Carriere Motion 3D Appliance in the treatment of Class II malocclusion
2023, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
This study aimed to quantify the outcomes of adolescent patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the Carriere Motion 3D Appliance (CMA) combined with full fixed appliances.
Cone-beam computed tomography scans of 22 patients were available before orthodontic treatment (T1), at removal of the CMA (T2), and posttreatment (T3). The average age of the patients was 13.5 ± 1.6 years at T1, 14.1 ± 0.2 years at T2, and 15.6 ± 0.5 years at T3. The 3-dimensional image analysis procedures were performed using ITK-SNAP (version 3.6.0; www.itksnap.org, Hatfield, Pa) and SlicerCMF (version 4.11.0; http://www.slicer.org, Cambridge, Mass); skeletal and dentoalveolar changes relative to cranial base, maxillary, and mandibular regional superimpositions were evaluated.
Changes were analyzed with 1 sample t tests using the mean differences during the CMA phase (T1 to T2) and total treatment time (T1 to T3). Significant skeletal changes included a slight reduction of ANB from T1 to T3, mandibular growth (Co-Gn increment of 1.2 mm and 3.3 mm from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3, respectively), inferior displacement of point A, and anterior and inferior displacement of point B. The mandibular plane did not change significantly during treatment. During the CMA treatment, posterior tipping and distal rotation of the maxillary molars, tip back and inferior displacement of the maxillary canines, significant mesial rotation, and superior displacement of the mandibular molars were observed. These movements rebounded during the full fixed appliance phase except for the molar and canine vertical displacements. Clinically significant dental changes during treatment included a reduction in overjet and overbite, Class II correction of the molar and canine relationship, and proclination of the mandibular incisors.
The CMA is an effective treatment modality for Class II correction in growing patients because of a combination of mesial movement of the mandibular molar, distal rotation of the maxillary molar, and anterior displacement of the mandible.
Actual contribution ratio of maxillary and mandibular molars for total molar relationship correction during maxillary molar sequential distalization using clear aligners with Class II elastics: A finite element analysis
2023, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Class II elastics, in combination with clear aligners (CA), are efficient for molar distalization. However, the effects of this combination on intermaxillary molar relationship correction have yet to be investigated. This study aimed to investigate the actual contribution ratio of the maxillary and mandibular molars for total molar relationship correction during maxillary molar distalization using Class II elastics with CA and further explore therapeutic recommendations for clinical practice.
Finite element models (FEMs) were established, including the distalization of the second molars (Set I), followed by the distalization of the first molars (Set II). Model A simulated elastics attached by precision cutting, whereas Model B simulated elastics attached to buttons. Force magnitudes of 100 g, 150 g, and 200 g of force were applied. We recorded the contribution ratio of the maxillary and mandibular molars for total molar relationship correction, effective distalizing distance in 0.25 mm step distance, tipping and rotation angles, and the hydrostatic stress in the periodontal ligament.
During maxillary molar distalization, mesialization of the mandibular molar had a notable contribution ratio for molar relationship correction. The mandibular first molar was mesialized with mesiolingual rotation tendency. Approximately half of the 0.25 mm step distance was occupied by maxillary molar distalization; the remainder was occupied by anchorage teeth mesialization and tipping or rotation. When traction forces increased, the total molar relationship correction and effective distalization increased; the mandibular molars mesialization contribution ratio also increased, as did rotation and inclination tendency. Precision cutting had a higher total molar relationship correction and more effective distalization than a button but also had a larger contribution ratio of mandibular molar mesialization and inclination or rotation.
Mandibular molar mesialization should be considered when correcting the molar relationship using CA with intermaxillary elastics during maxillary molar distalization. It is also important to consider the anchorage teeth mesialization and undesired tipping or rotation.
The effects of aligner anchorage preparation on mandibular first molars during premolar-extraction space closure with clear aligners: A finite element study
2023, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of different aligner anchorage preparations on mandibular first molars during premolar-extraction space closure with clear aligners and to assess the effects of different modes of Class II elastics on mandibular first molars.
Finite element models were constructed on the basis of cone-beam computed tomography data from an orthodontic patient. The models comprised maxilla, mandible, maxillary and mandibular teeth without first premolars, periodontal ligaments, attachments and aligners. Tooth displacement tendencies were calculated using different aligner anchorage preparations and Class II elastics on the models from the same patient. Three group sets were designed on the basis of the positions of aligner cutouts and buttons (mesiobuccal, distobuccal and lingual). Four groups were established in each of the 3 group sets. Four groups were created: (1) no elastic traction + no anchorage preparation, (2) anchorage preparation only, (3) elastic traction only, and (4) elastic traction + anchorage preparation. Different aligner anchorage preparations (0°, 1°, 2°, 3°) were applied on mandibular second premolars and molars. The Class II traction force was set to 100 g.
With clear aligners, mandibular first molars were subject to mesial tipping, lingual tipping and intrusion. In the condition of no elastic traction, aligner anchorage preparation resulted in distal tipping, buccal tipping, and extrusion effect on mandibular first molars. Aligner anchorage preparation was more effective in the distal and lingual cutout groups than in the mesial cutout group. In the condition of Class II elastic traction, the bodily movement of mandibular first molars was achieved with a 3° anchorage preparation for the mesial cutout group and a 1.7° anchorage preparation for distal and lingual cutout groups. Absolute maximal anchorage was achieved with a 2° anchorage preparation for distal and lingual cutout groups.
Clear aligner therapy caused mesial tipping, lingual tipping and intrusion of mandibular first molars during premolar-extraction space closure. Aligner anchorage preparation effectively prevented mesial and lingual tipping of mandibular molars. Distal and lingual cutout modes were more effective than mesial cutout modes in aligner anchorage preparation. For each aligner stage (0.25 mm), 1.7° aligner anchorage preparation and Class II elastics with distal or lingual cutouts led to the bodily movement of mandibular first molars, whereas 2° anchorage preparation reached absolute maximal anchorage.
Query on evaluation of changes in the maxillary sinus of orthodontic patients with maxillary molar distalization using cone-beam computed tomography
2023, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Stability of Class II malocclusion treatment with Class II elastics
2023, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
The objective of this study was to compare the long-term cephalometric stability after successful therapy of nonextraction Class II malocclusion with elastics and with headgear.
The sample comprised 43 patients with Class II malocclusion and was divided into 2 groups. The elastic group (EG) consisted of 20 patients treated with fixed appliances associated with Class II elastics, and the headgear group (HG) consisted of 23 patients treated with fixed appliances and extraoral headgear. Pretreatment, posttreatment, and long-term posttreatment lateral radiographs were evaluated; t tests were used to compare the long-term posttreatment changes between the groups.
The groups were matched regarding initial age, time of long-term posttreatment evaluation, initial malocclusion severity, quality of treatment result, and all pretreatment cephalometric variables. Intergroup comparisons of long-term posttreatment changes showed that the HG group presented significantly greater mandibular protrusion, occlusal plane angle decrease, and maxillary molar mesialization. However, long-term posttreatment stability was similar in overjet, overbite, and molar relationships.
Nonextraction Class II malocclusion treatment with elastics or extraoral headgear have similar long-term posttreatment stability.

View all citing articles on Scopus

: The authors report no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

View full text

Systematic reviewCorrection of Class II malocclusion with Class II elastics: A systematic review

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Section snippets

Material and methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Systematic review
Correction of Class II malocclusion with Class II elastics: A systematic review