Elsevier

Handbook of Algebra

Volume 5, 2008, Pages 87-140
Handbook of Algebra

Operads and PROPs

Dedicated to the memory of Jakub Jan Ryba (1765–1815)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-7954(07)05002-4Get rights and content

Abstract

We review definitions and basic properties of operads, PROPs and algebras over these structures.

Section snippets

Operads

Although operads, operad algebras and most of related structures can be defined in an arbitrary symmetric monoidal category with countable coproducts, we decided to follow the choice of [58] and formulate precise definitions only for the category Modk=(Modk,) of modules over a commutative unital ring k, with the monoidal structure given by the tensor product =k over k. The reason for such a decision was to give, in Section 4, a clean construction of free operads. In a general monoidal

Non-unital operads

It turns out that the combinatorial structure of the moduli space of stable genus zero curves is captured by a certain non-unital version of operads. Let M0,n+1 be the moduli space of (n+1)-tuples (x0,,xn) of distinct numbered points on the complex projective line CP1 modulo projective automorphisms, that is, transformations of the formCP1[ξ1,ξ2][aξ1+bξ2,cξ1+dξ2]CP1, where a,b,c,dC with adbc0.

The moduli space M0,n+1 has, for n2, a canonical compactification M¯0(n)M0,n+1 introduced by

Operad algebras

As we already remarked, operads are important through their representations called operad algebras or simply algebras.

Definition 23

Let V be a k-module and EndV the endomorphism operad of V recalled in Example 2. A P-algebra is a homomorphism of operads ρ:PEndV.

The above definition admits an obvious generalization for an arbitrary symmetric monoidal category with an internal hom-functor. The last assumption is necessary for the existence of the ‘internal’ endomorphism operad, see [83, Definition II.1.20].

Free operads and trees

The purpose of this section is three-fold. First, we want to study free operads because each operad is a quotient of a free one. The second reason why we are interested in free operads is that their construction involves trees. Indeed, it turns out that rooted trees provide ‘pasting schemes’ for operads and that, replacing trees by other types of graphs, one can introduce several important generalizations of operads, such as cyclic operads, modular operads, and PROPs. The last reason is that

Unbiased definitions

In this section, we review the definition of a triple (monad) and give, in Theorem 40, a description of unital and non-unital operads in terms of algebras over a triple. The relevant triples come from the endofunctors Ψ and Γ recalled in Section 4. Let End(C) be the strict symmetric monoidal category of endofunctors on a category C where multiplication is the composition of functors.

Definition 38

A triple (also called a monad) T on a category C is an associative and unital monoid (T,μ,υ) in End(C). The

Cyclic operads

In the following two sections we use the approach developed in Section 5 to introduce cyclic and modular operads. We recalled, in Example 14, the operad Mˆ0={Mˆ0(n)}n0 of Riemann spheres with parametrized labeled holes. Each Mˆ0(n) was a right Σn-space, with the operadic right Σn-action permuting the labels 1,,n of the holes u1,,un. But each Mˆ0(n) obviously admits a higher type of symmetry which interchanges the labels 0,,n of all holes, including the label of the ‘output’ hole u0. Another

Modular operads

Let us consider again the Σ+-module Mˆ0={Mˆ0(n)}n0 of Riemann spheres with punctures. We saw that the operation M,NMiN of sewing the 0-th hole of the surface N to the i-th hole of the surface M defined on Mˆ0 a cyclic operad structure. One may generalize this operation by defining, for MMˆ0(m), NMˆ0(n), 0im, 0jn, the element MjiNMˆ0(m+n1) by sewing the j-th hole of M to the i-th hole of N. Under this notation, i=0i. In the same manner, one may consider a single surface MMˆ0(n),

PROPs

Operads are devices invented to describe structures consisting of operations with several inputs and one output. There are, however, important structures with operations having several inputs and several outputs. Let us recall the most prominent one.

Example 53

A (associative) bialgebra is a k-module V with a multiplicationμ:VVV and a comultiplication (also called a diagonal) Δ:VVV. The multiplication is associative:μ(μidV)=μ(idVμ), the comultiplication is coassociative:(ΔidV)Δ=(idVΔ)Δ and the

Properads, dioperads and 12PROPs

As we saw in Proposition 33, under some mild assumptions, the components of free operads are finite-dimensional. In contrast, PROPs are huge objects. For example, the component ΓP(,)(m,n) of the free PROP ΓP(,) used in the definition of the bialgebra PROP B in Example 59 is infinite-dimensional for each m,n1, and also the components of the bialgebra PROP B itself are infinite-dimensional, as follows from the fact that the Enriquez–Etingof basis (46) of B(m,n) has, for m,n1, infinitely many

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my gratitude to Ezra Getzler, Michiel Hazewinkel, Tom Leinster, Peter May, Jim Stasheff, Bruno Vallette and Rainer Vogt for careful reading the manuscript and useful suggestions. I am also indebted to the Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques, Bures-sur-Yvette, for hospitality during the period when this article was completed.

References (118)

  • A. Beilinson et al.

    Chiral Algebras

    (2004)
  • C. Berger et al.

    Axiomatic homotopy theory for operads

    Comment. Math. Helv.

    (2003)
  • C. Berger et al.

    Resolution of coloured operads and rectification of homotopy algebras

  • J.M. Boardman et al.

    Homotopy-everything H-spaces

    Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.

    (1968)
  • J.M. Boardman et al.

    Homotopy Invariant Algebraic Structures on Topological Spaces

    (1973)
  • A. Burroni

    T-catégories (catégories dans un triple)

    Cah. Topol. Géom. Différ.

    (1971)
  • P. Cartier

    Homologie cycliques: rapport sur des travaux récents de Connes, Karoubi, Loday, Quillen ...

    Sémin. Bourbaki Exp. no. 621, 1983–1984

    Astérisque

    (1985)
  • M. Chas et al.

    String topology

  • F.R. Cohen et al.

    Notes on string topology

  • A. Connes et al.

    Renormalization in quantum field theory and the Riemann–Hilbert problem I: The Hopf algebra structure of graphs and the main theorem

    Comm. Math. Phys.

    (2000)
  • P. Deligne

    Resumé des premiérs exposés de A. Grothendieck

  • P. Deligne, A letter to Stasheff, Gerstenhaber, May, Schechtman and Drinfel'd, 1993,...
  • P. Deligne et al.

    The irreducibility of the space of curves of given genus

    Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math.

    (1969)
  • S.L. Devadoss

    Tessellations of moduli spaces and the mosaic operad

  • S. Eilenberg et al.

    Adjoint functors and triples

    Illinois J. Math.

    (1965)
  • A.D. Elmendorf

    The development of structured ring spectra

  • A.D. Elmendorf et al.

    Modern foundations of stable homotopy theory

  • A.D. Elmendorf et al.

    Rings, Modules, and Algebras in Stable Homotopy Theory

    (1997)
  • B. Enriquez et al.

    On the invertibility of quantization functors

  • P. Etingof et al.

    The cohomology ring of the real locus of the moduli space of stable curves of genus 0 with marked points

  • T.F. Fox et al.

    Distributive laws, bialgebras, and cohomology

  • B. Fresse

    Koszul duality of operads and homology of partition posets

  • W.L. Gan

    Koszul duality for dioperads

    Math. Res. Lett.

    (2003)
  • M. Gerstenhaber

    The cohomology structure of an associative ring

    Ann. of Math.

    (1963)
  • E. Getzler

    Operads and moduli spaces of genus 0 Riemann surfaces

  • E. Getzler et al.

    Operads, homotopy algebra, and iterated integrals for double loop spaces

  • E. Getzler et al.

    Cyclic operads and cyclic homology

  • E. Getzler et al.

    Modular operads

    Compos. Math.

    (1998)
  • V. Ginzburg et al.

    Koszul duality for operads

    Duke Math. J.

    (1994)
  • V.K.A.M. Gugenheim et al.

    On perturbations and A-structures

    Bull. Soc. Math. Belg.

    (1986)
  • S. Halperin

    Lectures on minimal models

    Mem. Soc. Math. France (N.S.) 9–10

    (1983)
  • R. Hartshorne

    Algebraic Geometry

    (1977)
  • P.J. Hilton et al.

    A Course in Homological Algebra

    (1971)
  • V. Hinich

    Homological algebra of homotopy algebras

    Comm. Algebra

    (1997)
  • V. Hinich

    Tamarkin's proof of Kontsevich formality theorem

    Forum Math.

    (2003)
  • V. Hinich et al.

    Homotopy Lie algebras

    Adv. Soviet Math.

    (1993)
  • V. Hinich et al.

    Cyclic operads and algebra of chord diagrams

    Selecta Math. (N.S.)

    (2002)
  • P. Hu

    Higher string topology on general spaces

  • P. Hu et al.

    On Kontsevich's Hochschild cohomology conjecture

  • Y.-Z. Huang

    Operadic formulation of topological vertex algebras and Gerstenhaber or Batalin–Vilkovisky algebras

    Comm. Math. Phys.

    (1994)
  • Cited by (140)

    • Operads, Operadic Categories and the Blob Complex

      2024, Applied Categorical Structures
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Supported by the grant GA ČR 201/05/2117 and by the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institutional Research Plan No. AV0Z10190503.

    View full text