ArticlesA bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system for patients with single de-novo coronary artery lesions (ABSORB): a prospective open-label trial
Introduction
Conventional stents restrict restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention by scaffolding intimal flaps that have separated from deeper arterial layers, by control of early elastic recoil, and prevention of the subsequent constrictive remodelling that were major limitations of balloon angioplasty.1, 2 The neointimal growth response to stenting that contributes to restenosis can be largely abolished by coating stents with antiproliferative drugs. However, there is a low incidence of late stent thrombosis, which is probably because the antiproliferative drugs delay the growth of healthy endothelium over stent struts and their durable polymer coating.3, 4, 5 The need for vessel scaffolding and drug delivery is temporary, and permanent scaffolding is superfluous after the vessel has healed. A bioabsorbable stent might have less potential for late stent thrombosis because there will eventually be no foreign material exposed to blood if endothelialisation is delayed or incomplete.3, 4 Furthermore, permanent metallic stenting can preclude surgical revascularisation, jail side branches, prevent expansive remodelling, eliminate reactive vasomotion, and impair non-invasive imaging of coronary arteries with multislice CT and MRI.
Tamai and colleagues6 examined the safety and feasibility of the bioabsorbable but non-drug-eluting poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) Igaki-Tamai stent (IgakiMedical, Kyoto, Japan) in a prospective unblinded clinical investigation of 50 patients. The rate of major adverse cardiac events was 14% at 12 months, 16% at 36 months, and 18% at 48 months. These results are similar to those after metallic non-drug-eluting stent implantation, reporting the feasibility and safety of a bioabsorbable PLLA polymer stent.2 Erbel and co-workers7 have described the outcome of a metallic biocorrodable stent. However, the neointimal hyperplasia and the recoil that was recorded with this stent resulted in a high restenosis rate, precluding further clinical use.7 Bioabsorbable polymer drug-eluting stents are an alternative approach, providing short-term vessel scaffolding combined with drug delivery capability but avoiding the long-term restrictions of metallic stents.
The bioasorbable everolimus-eluting stent system (BVS; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) is made from a bioabsorbable polylactic acid backbone which is coated with a more rapidly absorbed polylactic acid layer that contains and controls the release of the antiproliferative drug, everolimus (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland). The ABSORB study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of the BVS stent in patients with single de-novo coronary artery lesions.
Section snippets
Study design and population
We undertook a single-arm, prospective, open-label study that enrolled 30 patients from four centres: Auckland, Rotterdam, Krakow, and Skejby. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years and older and had a diagnosis of stable, unstable, or silent ischaemia. Additional key eligibility criteria were the presence of a single, de-novo lesion in a native coronary artery, which was visually assessed to be less than 8 mm in length for the 12 mm stent, or less than 14 mm in length for the 18 mm
Results
Figure 1 shows the study profile, and table 1 the baseline characteristics of the population. The procedure was a success in all 30 patients, and device success (calculated on a per-device basis) was 94% (29 of 31 attempts at BVS implantation in 30 patients). In two patients, the BVS stent became dislodged—in one patient the device was successfully retrieved and a new BVS implanted without complications and in the second the BVS stent was implanted in a non-target lesion and Cypher stents were
Discussion
In this prospective, single-arm, open-label study, the BVS stent has shown excellent clinical safety up to 1 year after the index procedure. We noted only one major adverse cardiac event (a patient with a non-Q wave myocardial infarction) and no instance of stent thrombosis.
The in-stent late loss that we recorded is similar to that reported with polymeric paclitaxel-eluting metallic stents (0·39 [SD 0·50] mm),23 more than that with metallic everolimus-eluting stents (about 0·15 mm),24, 25 less
References (28)
- et al.
Incomplete neointimal coverage of sirolimus-eluting stents: angioscopic findings
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2006) - et al.
Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study
Lancet
(2007) - et al.
Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial
Lancet
(2007) - et al.
Assessing spectral algorithms to predict atherosclerotic plaque composition with normalized and raw intravascular ultrasound data
Ultrasound Med Biol
(2001) - et al.
Angiographic results of the first human experience with everolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary lesions (the FUTURE I trial)
Am J Cardiol
(2005) - et al.
Arterial remodeling after coronary angioplasty: a serial intravascular ultrasound study
Circulation
(1996) - et al.
Coronary-artery stents
N Engl J Med
(2006) - et al.
Pathological correlates of late drug-eluting stent thrombosis: strut coverage as a marker of endothelialization
Circulation
(2007) - et al.
Initial and 6-month results of biodegradable poly-l-lactic acid coronary stents in humans
Circulation
(2000) - et al.
Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions
Circulation
(2007)