Microtubule-Associated Proteins and Their Essential Roles During Mitosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(04)41002-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Microtubules play essential roles during mitosis, including chromosome capture, congression, and segregation. In addition, microtubules are also required for successful cytokinesis. At the heart of these processes is the ability of microtubules to do work, a property that derives from their intrinsic dynamic behavior. However, if microtubule dynamics were not properly regulated, it is certain that microtubules alone could not accomplish any of these tasks. In vivo, the regulation of microtubule dynamics is the responsibility of microtubule-associated proteins. Among these, we can distinguish several classes according to their function: (1) promotion and stabilization of microtubule polymerization, (2) destabilization or severance of microtubules, (3) functioning as linkers between various structures, or (4) motility-related functions. Here we discuss how the various properties of microtubule-associated proteins can be used to assemble an efficient mitotic apparatus capable of ensuring the bona fide transmission of the genetic information in animal cells.

Introduction

Mitosis is a fundamental biological process that has captured the imagination of researchers for more than a century. During this process, the previously duplicated genome is structurally reorganized into compact chromosomes, each made up of two sister chromatids, which are then equally segregated into daughter cells. Mitosis was first described by Walter Flemming in the late 1870s and consists of two distinct processes: division of the nucleus, or karyokinesis, and division of the cytoplasm, or cytokinesis. Traditionally, the division of the nucleus occurs in five stages: prophase, prometaphase, metaphase, anaphase, and telophase. In prophase, chromatin starts to condense, to form clearly defined chromosomes (Fig. 1). By this time, centrosomes, which are the major microtubule-organizing centers (MTOCs) in animals (Doxsey, 2001), have already migrated to opposite sides of the nucleus, and a bipolar microtubule-based structure, known as the mitotic spindle, is assembled (Fig. 2). This structure is responsible for chromosome segregation during mitosis (Wittmann et al., 2001). In vertebrates, the end of prophase and the beginning of prometaphase are marked by nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB). During prometaphase, each chromosome initially orients to one pole of the spindle, a process that is mediated by attachment of microtubules (MTs) to the kinetochore, a protein-based structure located on the surface of the primary constriction of each chromatid. Subsequently, MTs derived mostly from the opposite pole bind the other sister kinetochore, and the chromosome becomes bioriented, moving toward the center of the cell and aligning at the spindle equator during metaphase. Later, during anaphase, sister chromatids separate and migrate toward opposite poles of the spindle. This stage can be subdivided into anaphase A and B. During anaphase A, the two chromatids from each chromosome lose their cohesion, split apart, and move toward opposite poles, while during anaphase B, the spindle usually elongates, thereby increasing the distance between the two poles. Finally, during telophase, each set of chromatids decondenses to form two daughter nuclei, and a cleavage furrow forms between them. This cleavage furrow then contracts and eventually gives rise to the midbody, a structure formed by bundled MTs. This structure participates in the division of the cytoplasm and the formation of the two daughter cells during cytokinesis.

MTs are highly dynamic polymers that alternate between states of growth and shrinkage, a phenomenon known as dynamic instability (Mitchison and Kirschner, 1984b). Modulation of MT's dynamic behavior is thought to be due primarily to association with a broad class of proteins known as microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs). However, the definition of MAPs has changed significantly since the time the first of these proteins were isolated (Olmsted, 1986). MAPs were originally identified as proteins that copurified with tubulin through repeated cycles of MT polymerization and depolymerization and were shown to stimulate MT assembly, suggesting a possible role for them in stabilizing the polymer. Subsequently, it was proposed that MAPs be defined as proteins that bind MTs in vivo (Solomon et al., 1979). Since spindle organization and function are now known to be governed by many different types of proteins that associate transiently or constitutively with MTs and can modify their dynamic properties, we have chosen a broader definition for MAPs, to include all of those proteins that are found at least transiently associated with MTs, either in vitro or in vivo, regardless of their functional, regulatory, or motility properties. Of course, we have to be careful, when considering a protein to be a MAP according to this definition, to exclude all of the proteins that may bind to MTs indirectly but yet play no role in modulating MT properties or function.

In this review we will first provide a short description of the major components of the mitotic apparatus and the major mitotic events. We will then focus on the roles of various MAPs as the cell transits from interphase into mitosis (see Table I for general references), including (1) organization and maintenance of the bipolar spindle, (2) attachment of MTs to kinetochores, (3) chromosome movement, and (4) cleavage-furrow formation during cytokinesis. The results obtained to date reveal that MAPs are essential to coordinately regulate the dynamic properties of MTs and their interactions with various cellular structures so that MTs can effectively be used by the cell to move chromosomes during mitosis.

Section snippets

Structure

MTs are anisotropic polymers of α- and β-tubulin heterodimer subunits. In cells, these are normally organized into 13 linear protofilaments to form a 25-nm-diameter cylindrical structure (Nogales 2001, Tilney 1973, Wade 1997). MT subunits were first purified on the basis of their affinity for colchicine, a natural drug that arrests cells in mitosis (Borisy 1967a, Borisy 1967b, Kiefer 1966, Shelanski 1967, Weisenberg 1968), and later β-tubulin was shown to hydrolyze guanosine triphosphate (GTP) (

MAPs Required for Cell Division: Identification and Properties

Since the pioneering isolation of the mitotic apparatus from sea urchin eggs (Mazia and Dan, 1952), attempts have been made to identify the proteins that constitute the mitotic spindle. Early reports estimated that tubulin (Mohri, 1968) constitutes only 5–15% of the total protein fraction present in the spindle (excellent reviews on the initial characterization of MTs and isolation of the mitotic apparatus were compiled by Olmsted 1973, Sakai 1978). This important observation led to further

Organization of the Mitotic Spindle

During interphase, MTs are relatively long and stable; however, at the G2⧸M transition, the interphase MT network is disassembled and MTs become highly dynamic, showing high frequencies of both rescue and catastrophe (Belmont 1990, Rusan 2001). The transition from interphase to mitosis is accompanied by an increase in MT dynamics (Saxton 1984, Zhai 1996) and a concomitant decrease in the overall MT polymer level that occurs at the time of NEB. Despite net negative pressures on MT

Microtubule–Kinetochore Attachment and Metaphase Chromosome Alignment

Spindle MTs interact directly with chromosomes, and are required to mediate chromosome movements at various stages of mitosis. However, tubulin, the major constituent of MTs, while unable to bind DNA directly in vitro, can do so in the presence of MAPs. Because of these observations, it was originally proposed that the binding of MTs to chromosomes might take place through MAPs that worked as linkers (Corces 1978, Wiche 1978). In support of this view, several MAPs had been localized to the

Anaphase A

Once all of the chromosomes have congressed, sister kinetochores oscillate within a relatively narrow region, and the cell is considered to be at metaphase. At this stage, spindle MTs display one of their most enigmatic properties, known as poleward MT flux: this, in practical terms, resembles the previously observed MT treadmilling at steady-state tubulin concentrations in vitro. Studies in living cells have shown that during metaphase, there is a flux of tubulin that results from tubulin

Mitotic Exit and Cytokinesis

Mitosis is separated into two distinct events: karyokinesis and cytokinesis. Cytokinesis is most often defined as the final stage of mitosis, or the stage at the end of mitosis when division of the cytoplasm between the two daughter cells takes place. However, this definition involves several conceptual difficulties, since it is known that the initial formation of the contractile ring that will divide the cytoplasm begins during anaphase B. The contractile ring is an actin–myosin structure that

Concluding Remarks

In this review we have attempted to comprehensively organize the mitotic roles of the many types of MAPs (Fig. 6 and Table I). In summary, we can conclude that most MAPs described here are essential for at least one aspect of mitosis, including the regulation of MT dynamics in order to build a functional mitotic spindle, the capture and movement of chromosomes, the correction of improper interactions between MTs and chromosomes, and the closure of the contractile ring during cytokinesis. Some

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Conly Rieder, Bob Palazzo, and Jesus Avila for the critical reading of the manuscript. H.M is financed by a postdoctoral fellowship from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia of Portugal. The work in the laboratory of C.E.S. is financed by the FCT of Portugal and the European Union.

References (730)

  • P.D. Andrews et al.

    Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere

    Dev. Cell

    (2004)
  • C. Antonio et al.

    Xkid, a chromokinesin required for chromosome alignment on the metaphase plate

    Cell

    (2000)
  • J.G. Ault et al.

    Centrosome and kinetochore movement during mitosis

    Curr. Opin. Cell Biol

    (1994)
  • A.S. Bajer et al.

    Microtubule dynamics determine chromosome lagging and transport of acentric fragments

    Mutat. Res

    (1988)
  • D.L. Beach et al.

    The role of the proteins Kar9 and Myo2 in orienting the mitotic spindle of budding yeast

    Curr. Biol

    (2000)
  • J. Beaudouin et al.

    Nuclear envelope breakdown proceeds by microtubule-induced tearing of the lamina

    Cell

    (2002)
  • J.M. Bellanger et al.

    TAC-1 and ZYG-9 form a complex that promotes microtubule assembly in C. elegans embryos

    Curr. Biol

    (2003)
  • L.D. Belmont et al.

    Identification of a protein that interacts with tubulin dimers and increases the catastrophe rate of microtubules

    Cell

    (1996)
  • L.D. Belmont et al.

    Real-time visualization of cell cycle-dependent changes in microtubule dynamics in cytoplasmic extracts

    Cell

    (1990)
  • L. Berrueta et al.

    The APC-associated protein EB1 associates with components of the dynactin complex and cytoplasmic dynein intermediate chain

    Curr. Biol

    (1999)
  • R.N. Bhattacharjee et al.

    The tumor suppressor gene product APC is hyperphosphorylated during the M phase

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun

    (1996)
  • S. Biggins et al.

    Captivating capture: How microtubules attach to kinetochores

    Curr. Biol

    (2003)
  • J.R. Bischoff et al.

    The Aurora⧸Ipl1p kinase family: Regulators of chromosome segregation and cytokinesis

    Trends Cell Biol

    (1999)
  • A. Blangy et al.

    Phosphorylation by p34cdc2 regulates spindle association of human Eg5, a kinesin-related motor essential for bipolar spindle formation in vivo

    Cell

    (1995)
  • A. Blangy et al.

    Phosphorylation by p34cdc2 protein kinase regulates binding of the kinesin-related motor HsEg5 to the dynactin subunit p150

    J. Biol. Chem

    (1997)
  • H. Boleti et al.

    Xklp2, a novel Xenopus centrosomal kinesin-like protein required for centrosome separation during mitosis

    Cell

    (1996)
  • M. Bornens

    Centrosome composition and microtubule anchoring mechanisms

    Curr. Opin. Cell Biol

    (2002)
  • D. Brunner et al.

    CLIP170-like tip1p spatially organizes microtubular dynamics in fission yeast

    Cell

    (2000)
  • J.C. Bulinski et al.

    Microtubule-associated proteins from cultured HeLa cells. Analysis of molecular properties and effects on microtubule polymerization

    J. Biol. Chem

    (1980)
  • S. Busson et al.

    Dynein and dynactin are localized to astral microtubules and at cortical sites in mitotic epithelial cells

    Curr. Biol

    (1998)
  • J.C. Canman et al.

    The role of pre- and post-anaphase microtubules in the cytokinesis phase of the cell cycle

    Curr. Biol

    (2000)
  • M. Caplow

    Microtubule dynamics

    Curr. Opin. Cell Biol

    (1992)
  • L. Cassimeris

    The oncoprotein 18⧸stathmin family of microtubule destabilizers

    Curr. Opin. Cell Biol

    (2002)
  • R.R. Adams et al.

    Pavarotti encodes a kinesin-like protein required to organize the central spindle and contractile ring for cytokinesis

    Genes Dev

    (1998)
  • R.R. Adams et al.

    Essential roles of Drosophila inner centromere protein (INCENP) and aurora B in histone H3 phosphorylation, metaphase chromosome alignment, kinetochore disjunction, and chromosome segregation

    J. Cell Biol

    (2001)
  • K. Afshar et al.

    Identification of the chromosome localization domain of the Drosophila nod kinesin-like protein

    J. Cell Biol

    (1995)
  • J.R. Aist et al.

    Astral and spindle forces in PtK2 cells during anaphase B: A laser microbeam study

    J. Cell Sci

    (1993)
  • G.B. Alsop et al.

    Microtubules are the only structural constituent of the spindle apparatus required for induction of cell cleavage

    J. Cell Biol

    (2003)
  • G. Ambrosini et al.

    A novel anti-apoptosis gene, survivin, expressed in cancer and lymphoma

    Nat. Med

    (1997)
  • S.S. Andersen

    Xenopus interphase and mitotic microtubule-associated proteins differentially suppress microtubule dynamics in vitro

    Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton

    (1998)
  • S.S. Andersen et al.

    Effect on microtubule dynamics of XMAP230, a microtubule-associated protein present in Xenopus laevis eggs and dividing cells

    J. Cell Biol

    (1994)
  • S.S. Andersen et al.

    Mitotic chromatin regulates phosphorylation of Stathmin⧸Op18

    Nature

    (1997)
  • S.S. Andersen et al.

    Toward reconstitution of in vivo microtubule dynamics in vitro

    Bioessays

    (2002)
  • A. Ando et al.

    Cloning of a new kinesin-related gene located at the centromeric end of the human MHC region

    Immunogenetics

    (1994)
  • P.R. Andreassen et al.

    Telophase disc: A new mammalian mitotic organelle that bisects telophase cells with a possible function in cytokinesis

    J. Cell Sci

    (1991)
  • I. Arnal et al.

    Structural transitions at microtubule ends correlate with their dynamic properties in Xenopus egg extracts

    J. Cell Biol

    (2000)
  • L. Arnaud et al.

    GFP tagging reveals human Polo-like kinase I at the kinetochore⧸centromere region of mitotic chromosomes

    Chromosoma

    (1998)
  • J.M. Askham et al.

    Regulation and function of the interaction between the APC tumour suppressor protein and EB1

    Oncogene

    (2000)
  • J.M. Askham et al.

    Evidence that an interaction between EB1 and p150Glued is required for the formation and maintenance of a radial microtubule array anchored at the centrosome

    Mol. Biol. Cell

    (2002)
  • A.S. Bajer

    Functional autonomy of monopolar spindle and evidence for oscillatory movement in mitosis

    J. Cell Biol

    (1982)
  • Cited by (63)

    • Mitosis under the macroscope

      2021, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology
    • AimB Is a Small Protein Regulator of Cell Size and MreB Assembly

      2020, Biophysical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Purified MreB filaments are quite stable in vitro (10), suggesting that MreB dynamics may be stimulated by accessory factors that have yet to be discovered. For other well-characterized cytoskeletal systems such as eukaryotic actin and tubulin and bacterial FtsZ, there are multiple known regulators of filament dynamics (reviewed in (11–13)). By contrast, for MreB, RodZ is the only confirmed regulator, and it functions to increase the number of MreB filaments (14) and regulate filament properties (15), leaving MreB disassembly mysterious.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text