Rotted wood–alga–fungus: the history and life of Prototaxites Dawson 1859
Introduction
Among the fossil plants that were collected by W.E. Logan along the shores of Gaspé Bay (1843), the most enigmatic specimen resembled a fragment of a small tree. That resemblance seemed to have influenced subsequent interpretations of the permineralized anatomy of the specimen (Dawson, 1857) as well as the anatomy of other specimens collected later by Dawson (1858). Microscopical examinations of ground thin-sections concluded that all of the specimens were silicified, partially rotted wood, as indicated by the very loose organization of the tissues and the presence of an entangled meshwork resembling fungal mycelia. The wood was not so rotted to preclude naming the species Prototaxites logani and classifying it with the conifers, particularly among the Taxineae (Dawson, 1859). The etymology of the generic name indicated his interpretation, and for 29 years, Dawson, in his several papers (Dawson, 1859, Dawson, 1860, Dawson, 1861, Dawson, 1862, Dawson, 1863, Dawson, 1869a,b, Dawson, 1869c, Dawson, 1870, Dawson, 1871, Dawson, 1873, Dawson, 1875, Dawson, 1881a, Dawson, 1881b, Dawson, 1882a, Dawson, 1882b, Dawson, 1888) dogmatically repeated and supported his conclusions.
Carruthers (1872), in the meantime, was the first to change the concept of Prototaxites by disclaiming any relationship of the genus with the conifers. He proposed an illegitimate substitution of the name Nematophycus for Prototaxites; formally classed it with the Codiaceae among the green algae; informally compared it with Lessonia among the brown algae; and set into motion the concept that the genus was a marine alga. That concept has not been rejected in any descriptive papers since the date of his publication. New species have proliferated.
The purpose of this report does not include a synonymy of all of the species, even though years of personal research have gone into the study of Prototaxites and all of its species based on available, original material. On the subject of original material, I have found that no undoubted original specimens studied by Dawson, 1857, Dawson, 1859, Dawson, 1871 are extant. There is no nomenifer, nor are there specimens from which a lectotype might be named. Locality and stratigraphic data are available for the specimen used by Penhallow (1889) in his emended diagnosis of “Nematophyton”–Prototaxites. The specimen is in the collections of the Peter Redpath Museum, Montreal, Quebec, Canada and is designated the neotype of Prototaxites. A fragment of the specimen in the Paleobotanical Collections of the United States National Museum, Washington, DC is used to emend the genus and to establish its classification with the Fungi.
Section snippets
Brief history
W.E. Logan was the first person to collect and document the occurrences of fossil plants in the well-exposed sections of Devonian strata along the shores of Gaspé Bay, Quebec, Canada. He accomplished this in the summer of 1843 during his mapping and exploration of the Gaspé Peninsula for coal and other mineral resources. In his field note book (1843, p. 62, August 14–17) he commented on collecting fossil plant remains at a site named earlier by Bayfield (1837) as Cape Bréhaut. At the time of
Specimen No. 5
(A) A fragment from “Specimen No. 5” (Penhallow, 1889), 6.5 cm high, 6 cm wide and up to 5.2 cm thick, is in the Paleobotanical Collections of the United States National Museum (USNM #510098). The specimen is in a very large collection acquired as a gift from R.D. Lacoe (USNM Accession #70216, 6/25–7/5, 1923). Mr Lacoe was a private collector who concentrated on acquiring fossil plant specimens from the great Carboniferous coal fields in the State of Pennsylvania. He used his surpluses of
Systematics
This classification above the rank of Order is based on the discussions in C.J. Alexopoulos et al. (1996) and definitions in Hawksworth et al. (1995).
Super Kingdom Eukaryonta
Kingdom Fungi
Division Amastogomycota
Subdivision Basidiomycotina
Class Basidiomycetes
Subclass Holobasidiomycetidae
Order Prototaxales
Suborder Prototaxineae
Family Prototaxaceae
Genus Prototaxites Dawson, 1859, emend
Neotype: Prototaxites loganii (“logani”) Dawson, 1859: PLATE I, PLATE II, PLATE III, PLATE IV, PLATE V. Fig. 14b.
Syn.
Neotype: morphology
Penhallow's description (1889) of the surface of “Specimen No. 5” included such details as numerous, fine longitudinal ridges, a very friable, thin coaly layer and to quote: “At about its central portion, the specimen shows a node-like swelling, which is traversed by a narrow furrow passing quite around the stem, thereby imparting an appearance closely resembling the node of a grass, and conveying the impression that it must represent the insertion of a broad-based, sheathing leaf”. The lack of
Ontogeny of the sporophore
A hypothetical description of the ontogeny of the sporophore of Prototaxites suggests that it began with the production of a mound of generative hyphae arising directly from some predetermined site on the mycelial mass (Fig. 12). The mound was probably 0.7–1.0 cm in diameter as suggested from the measurable diameters of the central cores of specimens from Gaspé and New Brunswick, Canada, northern Saudi Arabia and north Queensland, Australia. Upward growth of the generative hyphae continued,
Discussion
Prototaxites was the most bizarre and, for the greater part of its existence, the largest and tallest element in the terrestrial floras of the Devonian. Its height would have dominated the landscapes during the Early Devonian (Fig. 15) and early Middle Devonian but would have given way to the shrubs, arborescent lycopsids and progymnosperms in the Late Devonian. It is useful as an index fossil spanning the whole of the Devonian but cannot be used in determining smaller time/biostratigraphic
Conclusion
Hypothetically, Prototaxites was heterotrophic, absorptive, and saprobic in nutrition; possessed an extensive filamentous perennial soma of persistently dikaryotic, septate and aseptate hyphae; reproduced by spores on an enormous phototropic amphigenous sporocarp or possibly by fragmentation of the soma.
The hypotheses may never be satisfied from the fossil record but the existence of a huge organism faithfully preserved by the impermeation of minerals has been the source of anatomical data
Acknowledgements
Through many years during which I have studied nearly all species of Prototaxites, I have received assistance and encouragement from many friends to whom I extend my thanks: Donald A. Dean, Senior Museum Specialist for exceptional preparations of ground thin-sections and assistance in printing photographs; Susann G. Braden, Heidi Wolf, and Mary-Jacque Mann for technical assistance in the SEM laboratory; Mary E. Parrish, Scientific Illustrator, for art work, particularly for the exceptional
References (66)
On the occurrence of Prototaxites in the Cleveland Black Shale of Ohio, USA
Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.
(1992)A Fomes with two systems of hyphae
Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.
(1932)Chemotaxonomy of Prototaxites and evidence for possible terrestrial adaptation
Rev. Paleobot. Palynol.
(1976)Organic geochemistry of silicified wood, Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
(1978)- et al.
Introductory Mycology
(1996) Bibliography of Sir John William Dawson
Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, Second Series
(1900)Sir John William Dawson. A Brief Biographical Sketch
The American Geologist, Minneapolis
(1901)
A specimen of Prototaxites from the Kettle Point Black Shale of Ontario
Palaeontographica B
Occurrence of Prototaxites in Saudi Arabia
Bull. Fac. Earth Sci. King Abdulaziz University
Nineteenth century shaman grave guardians are carved Fomitopsis officinalis sporophores
Mycologia
On the history, histological structure, and affinities of Nematophycus logani Carr. (Prototaxites logani Dawson), an alga of Devonian age
Monthly Microscopical Journal
Silicification of fossils
Thallasiophyta and the Subaerial Transmigration
A monograph of Clavaria and allied genera
Ann. Bot. Mem.
Remarks on a specimen of fossil wood from the Devonian rocks, (Gaspé Sandstones) of Gaspé, Canada East
Proc. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci.
A week in Gaspé
Canadian Naturalist and Geologist
On the fossil plants from the Devonian rocks of Canada
Quart. J. Geol. Soc. London
On fossil plants from the Devonian rocks of Canada
Canadian Naturalist and Geologist
On the pre-carboniferous flora of New Brunswick, Maine, and eastern Canada
Canadian Naturalist and Geologist
On the flora of the Devonian Period in northeastern America
Quart. J. Geol. Soc. London
Further observations on the Devonian plants of Maine, Gaspe and New York
Quart. J. Geol. Soc. London.
On some new fossil plants, etc. from Gaspé
Canadian Naturalist and Quarterly Journal of Science, New Series
The primitive vegetation of the Earth
Nature
Fossil plants of the Devonian and Upper Silurian Formations of Canada
Geological Survey of Canada
Remarks on Mr Carruther's views of Prototaxites
Monthly Microscopical Journal.
Notes on Prototaxites
Canadian Naturalist and Quarterly Journal of Science, New Series
Cited by (102)
Biogeomorphology of Ireland's oldest fossil forest: Plant-sediment and plant-animal interactions recorded in the Late Devonian Harrylock Formation, Co. Wexford
2023, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, PalaeoecologyPlants and palynomorphs from the Lower Devonian (upper Emsian) of the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland
2022, Review of Palaeobotany and PalynologyCitation Excerpt :In places, tubes of smaller diameter are observed among the larger tubes (see Plate IX, 8). The above features show some similarity to Prototaxites, (Hueber, 2001). Palynofacies and phytoclast analyses provide insights into the depositional environments of the Bukowa Góra biota.
Plant–insect interactions from the Late Pennsylvanian of the Iberian Peninsula (León, northern Spain)
2022, Review of Palaeobotany and PalynologyOrdovician-Devonian lichen canopies before evolution of woody trees
2022, Gondwana ResearchCitation Excerpt :In the case of Prototaxites honeggeri, the spheroidal cells were similar, 7–9 μm in diameter and in cortical nests (Retallack, 2020). All nematophytes are united by large, constructional, aseptate hyphae (Fleming and Rigby, 1972; Strother, 1988; Hueber, 2001; Edwards and Axe, 2012). Although nematophytes can be considered lichens, the kinds of fungus in Prototaxites are uncertain.