A multielement geochronologic study of the Great Dyke, Zimbabwe: significance of the robust and reset ages
Introduction
The Great Dyke is a major intrusion of mafic and ultramafic rocks that cuts across the dominantly Archean rocks of the Zimbabwe Craton and is regarded as a major magmatic event that marks the Archean–Proterozoic boundary in that province [1]. Based on Nd model ages, the Archean craton of Zimbabwe appears to have undergone two episodes of crustal generation at 3.5 and 2.9 Ga [2] by the development of dominantly tonalite–trondhjemite intrusions subsequently metamorphosed to orthogneisses. These granitoid domains were the basement to the major greenstone belt sequences and comprise up to 60% of preserved Archean crust in Zimbabwe [3]. The craton is bounded by the Zambezi metamorphic belt in the north, the Mozambique belt to the east and the Limpopo belt to the south. Proterozoic and Phanerozoic basin deposits cover the Archean rocks in the northern part of the craton (Fig. 1).
The earliest widespread formation of greenstones in Zimbabwe, together with associated granitoid suites, was the Lower Greenstone sequences of the Belingwean Group emplaced at 2.9–2.8 Ga. These comprised mafic volcanic sequences in the lower parts passing upwards into a dominantly bimodal succession with alternating mafic and felsic volcanic rocks. The upper part of the Belingwean Group is a komatiite and mafic rock volcanic sequence that also incorporates sedimentary rocks [4]. An unconformity separates the Upper Belingwean from the base of the Upper Greenstone succession. The latter is called the Lower Bulawayan and consists of intermediate to felsic volcanic rocks and volcaniclastic sediments yielding single zircon U–Pb ages of 2.83–2.79 Ga [4]. Where not in contact with Belingwean rocks it is intruded by granitoids. The extensive Upper Bulawayan Group includes clastic sediments, argillites and limestones together with basalts and komatiitic basalts. The Upper Bulawayan Group has yielded Rb–Sr whole rock ages of 2.66±7 to 2.48±14 Ga [5][6]. Single zircon U–Pb dating [4] shows the Upper Bulawayan to have been emplaced at 2.70–2.64 Ga. The locally occurring Shamvaian Group comprises sedimentary associations intercalated with felsic volcanic rocks and is the youngest of the greenstone successions but single zircon U–Pb determinations yielded an array for which the concordia upper intercept is 2.66±17 Ga [4]. Intrusive into the Lower Greenstone successions are a number of granitoid bodies, some of which may be correlated with felsic volcanism [4].
The younger granites post-date the Upper Greenstones and the Shamvaian Group and consist of two groups [7]: (1) the earlier tonalite–granodiorite Sesombi suite was dated at approximately 2.7 Ga [5][8] and more recently has been dated at 2673±5 Ma [9]; (2) the later group comprises tabular monzogranites of large areal extent and generally similar composition. This craton-wide multiphase granitoid Chilimanzi suite marks the last major pre-Great Dyke granitic event [4]. The post-tectonic Murahwa granite (north), also associated with the Chilimanzi granitoid suite, has been dated at 2601±14 [10] utilizing U–Pb, which agrees well with the Rb–Sr ages of 2574±14 Ma [11] and 2583±52 Ma [12] for the southern area of this large body near Masvingo. The compositionally and tectonically equivalent Glendale tonalite in the north has been dated using U–Pb at 2618±6 Ma. These post-tectonic granitoids are characterized by relatively high Sr initial ratios (0.7040±10 to 0.706±14) and were generated through remobilization of basement granitoid [10]. The Great Dyke is the first magmatic event in the stabilized Zimbabwe Craton, and therefore, new age data on this major intrusion have important implications for the stabilization of the crust as well as the intrusion's temporal relation to the prevailing tectonism and extensive late granitoid magmatism. Hence the main purpose of this study is to determine the time of crystallization for the Great Dyke using the Sm–Nd and U–Pb methods and to compare the results to our new and previously published Rb–Sr ages.
Section snippets
General geology of the Great Dyke
The Great Dyke (Fig. 2), aligned approximately NNE, is 550 km in length and 3 to 11 km wide [13]. Parallel to the intrusion and almost over the same length are a number of gabbro or quartz gabbro satellite dikes. The most prominent of these are the Umvimeela and East Dykes situated on the west and east sides of the Great Dyke, respectively, and between 3 and 25 km distance from it. These satellite dikes are closely associated with a major fracture pattern postulated to be the result of the
Previous isotopic studies on the Great Dyke
All previous age determinations of the Great Dyke were carried out using Rb–Sr (all Rb–Sr ages discussed here were recalculated for an 87Rb–decay constant of 1.42×10−11 yr−1). The first isotopic investigation of the Great Dyke was by Faure et al. [24] which suggested an equivalent age to the Bushveld Complex of 1950±150 Ma obtained by Nicolaysen et al. [25]. Allsopp [26] on the basis of Rb–Sr and Ar–Ar age determination on two biotites set a lower limit of 2476±30 Ma for the layered sequence.
Analytical procedures
Samples were chosen as those having the least alteration. Rocks of the Great Dyke show strong alteration in general and care must be exercised in their selection. In particular the gabbroic rocks show some alteration of the feldspars even in least altered samples. Pyroxenite may show pervasive and intense alteration even in drill core from depths up to 400 m. This is generally the result of the high magnesian nature of the rocks which renders them susceptible to alteration and also the
Rb–Sr
Rb–Sr data for whole–rock samples of orthopyroxenite, gabbronorite and websterite and mineral separates of clinopyroxene and plagioclase from the GDX17 drill core of the Darwendale Subchamber (Table 1) cannot be fitted to a straight line if it is assumed that all scatter is due to analytical error. If some of the scatter is attributed to normally distributed errors in the initial 87Sr/86Sr, then an errorchron of 2467±85 Ma and an initial Sr ratio of 0.7026±4 are produced (Fig. 4). Although
Significance of the Rb–Sr ages
There is fairly good agreement between the Rb–Sr isochron of 2467±85 Ma presented here (Table 1 and Fig. 4) and decay constant-adjusted isochrons of 2455±16 Ma and 2477±90 Ma by Hamilton [29] and Davies et al. [27], respectively. Our isochron and the one by Davies et al. [27] show similar scatter and imprecision compared to the isochron produced by Hamilton [29]. However, these ages are at least 100 million years younger than ages obtained by the Sm–Nd isochron and rutile U–Pb methods. Sm–Nd
Conclusions
Our new Sm–Nd, U–Pb, and Pb–Pb age determinations indicate that the Great Dyke of Zimbabwe and its satellite dikes are over 100 Myr older than previously believed based on Rb–Sr ages. The Rb–Sr method records a resetting probably related to high-temperature hydrothermal processes.
The Sm–Nd method has yielded a combined mineral/whole–rock isochron of 2586±16 Ma and εNd(t) of +1.1 for samples from the Darwendale, Sebakwe, and Wedza Subchambers as well as the satellite East Dyke. This isochron age
Supplementary data
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to Charlie Murahwi of Anglo American Corporation, Zimbabwe, for facilitating our field work and the sampling of drill cores, and Sandy Zeff for the analytical work performed at the University of Michigan. We also acknowledge the constructive reviews provided by K. Condie and S.A. Morse. This work was supported by a grant from the Office of the Vice Provost for Academic and Multicultural Affairs at the University of Michigan. [CL]
References (51)
Definition of `Archaean' — comment on a proposal on the recommendations of the International Sub-Commission on Precambrian Stratigraphy
Precambrian Res.
(1982)- et al.
Further Rb–Sr age and isotope data on early and late Archaean rocks from the Rhodesian Craton
Precambrian Res.
(1977) Improved accuracy of U–Pb zircon ages by the creation of more concordant systems using an air abrasion technique
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
(1982)An improved micro-capsule for zircon dissolution in U–Pb geochronology
Chem. Geol.
(1987)- et al.
Pb-isotopic compositions of volcanic rocks in the West and East Philippine island arcs: presence of the Dupal isotopic anomaly
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
(1987) - et al.
A Sm–Nd and Pb isotope study of Archean greenstone belts in the southern Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
(1989) - et al.
U–Pb ages of metamorphic rutiles: Application to the cooling history of high grade terranes
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
(1989) - et al.
Lead diffusion in apatite and zircon using ion-implantation and Rutherford backscattering techniques
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
(1991) - et al.
High closure temperatures of the U–Pb system in large apatites from the Tin Mountain pegmatite, Black Hills, South Dakota, USA
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
(1994) - et al.
The Shabogamo Intrusive Suite, Labrador: Sr and Nd isotopic evidence for contaminated mafic magmas in the Proterozoic
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
(1981)
Sm–Nd age of the Stilwater complex and the mantle evolution curve for neodymium
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
The craton and its cracks: some of the behaviour of the Zimbabwe blocks from the Late Archaean to the Mesozoic in response to horizontal movements, and the significance of some of its mafic dyke fracture patterns
J. Afr. Earth Sci.
Tectonic model for the evolution of the Limpopo Belt
Precambrian Res.
The generation of continental crust: An integrated study of crust-forming processes in the Archean of Zimbabwe
J. Petrol.
Age relationships between greenstone belts and `granites' in the Rhodesian Archean craton
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
On the age of Rhodesian greenstones
Contrib. Mineral. Petrol.
The granite–greenstone terrains of the Rhodesian Archaean Craton
Nature
Constraints on Archean crustal evolution of the Zimbabwe craton: A U–Pb zircon, Sm–Nd and Pb–Pb whole–rock isotope study
Contrib. Mineral. Petrol.
The differentiation and structure of the Great Dyke of Southern Rhodesia
Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Afr.
Cited by (57)
Sources, behaviour, and environmental and human health risks of high-technology rare earth elements as emerging contaminants
2018, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Environmental monitoring data from developing countries including those in sub-Saharan Africa are scarce. Sub-Saharan Africa is host to several geological formations which are potential REE sources, including; (1) the mafic and ultramafic Great Dyke in Zimbabwe (Mukasa et al., 1998; Maier et al., 2015), (2) the Bushveld Complex in South Africa (Maier et al., 2015), and (3) the Rift Valley covering Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Ethiopia and Mozambique (Reimann et al., 2003; Maier et al., 2015). Yet besides exploration and environmental research focusing on traditional contaminants such as heavy metals, fluoride, and arsenic (e.g., Tekle-Haimanot et al., 2006), little is known about the occurrence and severity of REEs in the environment.
Investigating promises of nanotechnology for development: A case study of the travelling of smart nano water filter in Zimbabwe
2016, Technology in SocietyCitation Excerpt :The pebbles, stones and fine sand which are used in the filter come from the river beds in the villages, while the magnetite is derived from iron ore which is mined in abundance at Buchwa mine in Zimbabwe. The country boasts huge deposits of the iron ore that are concentrated along a geographical landform called Great Dyke, which stretches from the North to the South of the country [46,47]. The ceramic found in huge deposits in Dorowa is common in the rural areas of Zimbabwe, where people use it to make clay pots.
A re-appraisal of the Epoch nickel sulphide deposit, Filabusi Greenstone Belt, Zimbabwe: A hydrothermal nickel mineral system?
2013, Ore Geology ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Most of the greenstone lithologies in the Zimbabwe Craton were formed during the 2.75–2.58 Ga events (Dirks and Jelsma, 2002; Kusky, 1998; Prendergast, 2004). Following cratonization, the Great Dyke was emplaced at ~ 2.6 Ga (e.g., Mukasa et al., 1998; Wilson, 1990; Wingate, 2000). The Great Dyke is the most characteristic geological feature in Zimbabwe as a north-trending linear intrusive mafic-ultramafic system that traverses the entire Zimbabwe Craton from north to south (see inset of Fig. 1).