From certainty factors to belief networks
References (48)
- et al.
Thinking backward for knowledge acquisition
AI Mag.
(1987) - et al.
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
Science
(1974) A probability model of medical reasoning and the MYCIN model
Mathemat. Biosci.
(1976)- et al.
MUNIN: A causal proabilistic network for interpretation of electromyographic findings
- et al.
The ALARM monitoring system: A case study with two probabilistic inference techniques for belief networks
Bayesian belief-network inference using recursive decomposition
Special issue on probabilistic inference
IEEE Trans. Human Factors in Electronics
(1956)- et al.
Identifying independence in Bayesian networks
Networks
(1990)
A causal calculus (I)
British J. Philosophy Sci.
(1961)
Toward normative expert systems: Part I. The Pathfinder project
An evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of Pathfinder
Comput. Biomed. Res.
(1992)
Toward normative expert systems: Part II. Probability-based representations for efficient knowledge acquisition
Probabilistic interpretations for MYCIN's certainty factors
Formalizing heuristic methods for reasoning with uncertainty
Probabilistic similarity networks
Networks
(1990)
Probabilistic Similarity Networks
The myth of modularity in rule-based systems
On the expressiveness of rule-based systems for reasoning under uncertainty
Should we use probability in uncertain inference systems?
Uncertainty in artificial intelligence: is probability epistemologically and heuristically adequate?
Decision theory in expert systems and artificial intelligence
Internat. J. Approximate Reasoning
(1988)
Cited by (71)
Bipolar ordered weighted averages: BIOWA operators
2022, Fuzzy Sets and SystemsA decision support system for urban infrastructure inter-asset management employing domain ontologies and qualitative uncertainty-based reasoning
2020, Expert Systems with ApplicationsCitation Excerpt :However, research warned that certainty factors could yield disastrously incorrect degrees of belief through over-counting of evidence in several circumstances (Heckerman, 1986), especially when the rule sets become larger. So almost all CFs based rule systems were either purely diagnostic (e.g. MYCIN) or predictive (Heckerman, 1986; Heckerman & Shortliffe, 1992). Additionally, the belief in rules is usually specified by domain experts using numerical values, whereas human judgemental reasoning is often more qualitative than numerical (Parsons & Parsons, 2001).
ST-ONCODIAG: A semantic rule-base approach to diagnosing breast cancer base on Wisconsin datasets
2018, Informatics in Medicine UnlockedFault Diagnosis for Oil Immersed Transformer Using Certainty Factor
2024, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical InsulationArtificial intelligence in veterinary medicine requires regulation
2023, Canadian Veterinary JournalGeneration of Rule-Based Expert Systems with Certainty Factors from Datasets
2023, Proceedings - International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI
- ∗
Current address: Departments of Computer Science and Pathology, University of Southern California, HMR 204, 2025 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Copyright © 1992 Published by Elsevier B.V.