Original article
Imported fire ant immunotherapy: Effectiveness of whole body extracts

https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(92)90073-BGet rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if whole body extract (WBE) immunotherapy for imported fire ant (IFA) hypersensitivity is effective. This evaluation was carried out by retrospectively interviewing 76 patients with a history of generalized allergic reactions to IFA stings and positive skin tests to IFA-WBE. The study groups consisted of 65 patients on immunotherapy and 11 similar patients who were not treated for various reasons. In addition, an IFA sting challenge was performed in 30 volunteers of the 65 patients on immunotherapy. The retrospective review showed that of the 65 patients on immunotherapy there had been 112 subsequent field-sting episodes in 47 patients. Only one sting episode in this group (2.1%) produced an anaphylactic reaction. Six of the 11 patients not on immunotherapy have had subsequent field re-sting episodes, and each has had a systemic reaction. Repeat skin testing on 31 of the 65 patients in the immunotherapy group showed persistent positive responses in five (16%), but each was at a lower dilution than initially. Responses of the other 26 of the 31 patients who had skin testing had become negative. The four untreated patients who were available for skin testing continued to have positive responses at comparable dilutions on skin testing. Sting challenges carried out on 30 volunteers from the 65 patients (all from the 31 who had repeat skin tests) on immunotherapy resulted in only local reactions. Therefore it appears IFA-WBE is effective in decreasing the incidence of anaphylaxis during subsequent field stings; reducing specific immunoglobulin E as demonstrated by skin testing; and protecting against systemic reactions provoked by a sting challenge with a single IFA.

Cited by (0)

The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Air Force or the Department of Defense.

View full text