Elsevier

Icarus

Volume 85, Issue 2, June 1990, Pages 394-443
Icarus

Tidal evolution of the Uranian satellites: III. Evolution through the Miranda-Umbriel 3:1, Miranda-Ariel 5:3, and Ariel-Umbriel 2:1 mean-motion commensurabilities

https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(90)90125-SGet rights and content

Abstract

Tidal evolution has significantly affected the history of the Uranian satellite system. The presence of large chaotic zones at past mean-motion commensurabilities among the Uranian satellites has resulted in significant changes in the orbital elements of some of the satellites, while allowing them to escape from the commensurabilities and evolve to their present nonresonant configuration. Miranda and Umbriel have probably passed through the 3:1 commensurability, resulting in Miranda's current anomalously high inclination, and constraining the Q of Uranus to be less than 39,000 (W. C. Tittemore and J. Wisdom 1989, Icarus 78, 63–89). The orbits of both satellites become chaotic during evolution through the eccentricity resonances associated with the 3:1 commensurability. During this phase of evolution, the orbital eccentricity of Miranda can be driven up to a value of about 0.05. Miranda can then escape from the 3:1 commensurability with a relatively large orbital eccentricity, which can damp to the current value in the time since resonance passage. Tidal friction may have heated the interior of Miranda to a temperature near the eutectic melting point of NH3 · H2O, but most likely did not result in the melting of significant quantities of water ice. Miranda and Ariel passed through the 5:3 mean-motion commensurability if the Q of Uranus is less than about 12,000. During evolution through this commensurability, the semimajor axis ratio (aM/aA) decreased. As the orbits enter a large chaotic zone associated with this commensurability, both the eccentricity and inclination of Miranda's orbit jump to values up to six times higher than the values approaching the resonance. Upon escaping from the resonance, the orbit of Miranda may have retained moderately high eccentricity and inclination, or eM and iM may have decreased back to values comparable to those approaching the resonance. If the Q of Uranus is smaller than about 11,000, Ariel and Umbriel would have encountered the 2:1 mean-motion commensurability. However, capture into this resonance is very likely if the eccentricities of the orbits approaching the resonance were comparable to the current values: the probability of escape would not have been significant unless the initial eccentricities were of order 0.03 or larger. It is therefore unlikely that these satellites encountered this resonance, constraining the Q of Uranus to be greater than 11,000. The specific dissipation function of Uranus is therefore well constrained: 11,000 < Q < 39,000.

References (64)

  • W.C. Tittemore et al.

    Tidal evolution of the Uranian satellites. II. An explanation of the anomalously high orbital inclination of Miranda

    Icarus

    (1989)
  • J. Wisdom

    Chaotic behavior and the origin of the 3/1 Kirkwood gap

    Icarus

    (1983)
  • J. Wisdom

    Chaotic dynamics in the solar system

    Icarus

    (1987)
  • J. Wisdom et al.

    The chaotic rotation of Hyperion

    Icarus

    (1984)
  • V.I. Arnold

    Small denominators and problems of stability of motion in classical and celestial mechanics

    Russ. Math. Surv.

    (1963)
  • N. Borderies et al.

    A simple derivation of capture probabilities for the J + 1 : J and J + 2 : J orbit-orbit resonance problems

    Celest. Mech.

    (1984)
  • R. Brown et al.

    The goodness of ergodic adiabatic invariants

    J. Stat. Phys.

    (1987)
  • R. Bulirsch et al.

    Numerical treatment of ordinary differential equations by extrapolation methods

    Numer. Math.

    (1966)
  • R. Bulirsch et al.

    Asymptotic upper and lower bounds for results of extrapolation methods

    Numer. Math.

    (1966)
  • J.A. Burns

    The evolution of satellite orbits

  • C.C. Counselman et al.

    Spin-orbit resonance of Mercury

    Symp. Math.

    (1970)
  • G.H. Darwin

    On the secular changes in the elements of the orbit of a satellite revolving about a tidally distorted planet

    Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (London)

    (1880)
  • S.F. Dermott

    Tidal dissipation in the solid cores of the major planets

    Icarus

    (1979)
  • S.F. Dermott

    Origin and evolution of the Uranian and Neptunian satellites: Some dynamical considerations

  • S.F. Dermott et al.

    Masses of the satellites of Uranus

    Nature

    (1986)
  • R.G. French et al.

    Structure of the Uranian rings. II. Perturbations of the ring orbits and widths

    Icarus

    (1985)
  • P. Goldreich

    On the eccentricity of satellite orbits in the solar system

    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.

    (1963)
  • P. Goldreich

    An explanation of the frequent occurrence of commensurable mean motions in the solar system

    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.

    (1965)
  • P. Goldreich et al.

    Spin-orbit coupling in the solar system

    Astron. J.

    (1966)
  • R. Greenberg

    Commensurabilities of satellites' apsidal precession periods

    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.

    (1975)
  • M. Hénon

    Numerical exploration of Hamiltonian systems

  • M. Hénon et al.

    The applicability of the third integral of motion: Some numerical experiments

    Astron. J.

    (1964)
  • Cited by (0)

    Contribution 89-07 of the University of Arizona Theoretical Astrophysics Program.

    View full text