Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Practices: A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons in India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) has become the standard of care in orthopaedic surgery. Inappropriate usage of antibiotics (dosage, strength, and/or administration time and duration) can inadvertently result in superadded infections and antimicrobial resistance. The purpose of this study was to document and analyse the prescription patterns for SAP, and to investigate the factors associated with divergence from standard guidelines.

Methods

We conducted an online cross-sectional questionnaire-based study to collect information about the SAP practices of the members of the Indian Orthopaedic Association (IOA) using Google forms. A link to the questionnaire was sent by e-mails.

Results

The overall response rate was 5.73%. While 97.3% respondents practised SAP routinely, the practice was not aligned with standard guidelines’ recommendations. There was heterogeneity in the use of SAP in terms of choice of antibiotic(s), number of co-prescribed drugs, single- versus multiple-dose regimens, and the duration of therapy. The prescription practice patterns showed that orthopaedic surgeons almost always used broad-spectrum antibiotics for long durations, regardless of the type of surgery.

Conclusion

While Orthopaedic surgeons in India are practicing SAP, the pattern of antibiotic usage is heterogeneous. Variations were noted in the choice of antibiotics for different types of surgeries, time of administration, duration of usage in the postoperative period as well as co-prescriptions. This study highlights the urgent need for a comprehensive, rational, and robust national SAP policy for orthopaedic surgeries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yeap, J. S., Lim, J. W., Vergis, M., Au Yeung, P. S., Chiu, C. K., & Singh, H. (2006). Prophylactic antibiotics in orthopaedic surgery: guidelines and practice. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 61(2), 181–188.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mathur, P., Trikha, V., Farooque, K., Sharma, V., Jain, N., Bhardwaj, N., et al. (2013). Implementation of a short course of prophylactic antibiotic treatment for prevention of postoperative infections in clean orthopaedic surgeries. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 137(1), 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hawn, M. T., & Knowlton, L. M. (2019). Balancing the risks and benefits of surgical prophylaxis: timing and duration do matter. JAMA Surgery, 154(7), 598–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sewell, M., Adebibe, M., Jayakumar, P., Jowett, C., Kong, K., Vemulapalli, K., et al. (2011). Use of the WHO surgical safety checklist in trauma and orthopaedic patients. International Orthopaedics, 35(6), 897–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Argaw, N. A., Shumbash, K. Z., Asfaw, A. A., & Hawaze, S. (2017). Assessment of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in Orthopaedics and Traumatology Surgical Unit of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Addis Ababa. BMC Research Notes, 10(1), 160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Andersson, A. E., Bergh, I., Karlsson, J., Eriksson, B. I., & Nilsson, K. (2012). The application of evidence-based measures to reduce surgical site infections during orthopedic surgery—report of a single-center experience in Sweden. Patient Safety in Surgery, 6(1), 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Queiroz, R., Grinbaum, R. S., Galvão, L. L., Tavares, F. G., & Bergsten-Mendes, G. (2005). Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopedic surgeries: the results of an implemented protocol. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Disease, 9(4), 283–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. İnan, A. (2011). Antibiotic use and cost in a teaching hospital in İstanbul. Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1(3), 128–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Şengel, B. E., Bilgin, H., Bilgin, B. Ö., Gidener, T., Saydam, S., Pekmezci, A., et al. (2019). The need for an antibiotic stewardship program in a hospital using a computerized pre-authorization system. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 82, 40–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhatnagar, N., Sural, S., Arora, S., Lingaiah, P., & Dhal, A. (2017). Efficacy of single dose versus multiple dose injectable antibiotics in hip joint surgery. Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma Surgery and Related Research, 12(2), 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jaggi, N., Nirwan, P., & Chakraborty, M. (2018). Adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in an Indian tertiary care hospital. Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control, 6, 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumari, P., Siddegowda, J. B., & Krishnaiah, V. (2019). Appropriateness and pharmacoeconomics of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in open reduction internal fixation surgery practiced in a tertiary hospital compared to recommendations in the national center for disease control guidelines. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 10(4), 172–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance (NAP-AMR) 2017–2021 [Internet]. National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC); 2017. https://www.ncdc.gov.in/WriteReadData/linkimages/AMR/File645.pdf. Accessed 08 Oct 2020

  14. Ranjalkar, J., & Chandy, S. J. (2019). India’s National Action Plan for antimicrobial resistance—an overview of the context, status, and way ahead. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 8(6), 1828–1834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hand, T. L., Hand, E. O., Welborn, A., & Zelle, B. A. (2020). Gram-negative antibiotic coverage in Gustilo–Anderson type-III open fractures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 102(16), 1468–1474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bratzler, D. W., Dellinger, E. P., Olsen, K. M., Perl, T. M., Auwaerter, P. G., Bolon, M. K., et al. (2013). Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. American Journal of Health System Pharmacy, 70(3), 195–283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organization. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. 2016. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250680/9789241549882-eng.pdf?sequence=8. Accessed 08 Oct 2020

  18. National treatment guidelines for antimicrobial use in infectious diseases version 1.0. National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC); 2016. https://www.ncdc.gov.in/WriteReadData/l892s/File622.pdf. Accessed 08 Oct 2020

  19. Gans, I., Jain, A., Sirisreetreerux, N., Haut, E. R., & Hasenboehler, E. A. (2017). Current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical fixation of closed long bone fractures: a survey of 297 members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Patient Safety in Surgery, 11(1), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Garner, M. R., Sethuraman, S. A., Schade, M. A., & Boateng, H. (2020). Antibiotic prophylaxis in open fractures: evidence, evolving issues, and recommendations. Journal of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 28(8), 309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lingaraj, R., Santoshi, J. A., Devi, S., Najimudeen, S., Gnanadoss, J. J., Kanagasabai, R., et al. (2015). Predebridement wound culture in open fractures does not predict postoperative wound infection: A pilot study. Journal of Natural Science Biology and Medicine, 6(Suppl 1), S63–S68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Carver, D. C., Kuehn, S. B., & Weinlein, J. C. (2017). Role of systemic and local antibiotics in the treatment of open fractures. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 48(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kandel, C. E., Gill, S., McCready, J., Matelski, J., & Powis, J. E. (2016). Reducing co-administration of proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics using a computerized order entry alert and prospective audit and feedback. BMC Infectious Diseases, 16, 355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ogawa, R., & Echizen, H. (2011). Clinically significant drug interactions with antacids: An update. Drugs, 71(14), 1839–1864.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shahzad, S., Ashraf, M. A., Sajid, M., Shahzad, A., Rafique, A., & Mahmood, M. S. (2018). Evaluation of synergistic antimicrobial effect of vitamins (A, B1, B2, B6, B12, C, D, E and K) with antibiotics against resistant bacterial strains. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 13, 231–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodgers, B., Kirley, K., & Mounsey, A. (2013). Prescribing an antibiotic? Pair it with probiotics. Journal of Family Practice, 62(3), 148–150.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Norlin, A. C., Hansen, S., Wahren-Borgström, E., Granert, C., Björkhem-Bergman, L., & Bergman, P. (2016). Vitamin D3 supplementation and antibiotic consumption—results from a prospective, observational study at an Immune-Deficiency Unit in Sweden. PLoS ONE, 11(9), e0163451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cursino, L., Chartone-Souza, E., & Nascimento, A. M. A. (2005). Synergic interaction between ascorbic acid and antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 48(3), 379–384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kwiecińska-Piróg, J., Skowron, K., Bogiel, T., Białucha, A., Przekwas, J., & Gospodarek-Komkowska, E. (2019). Vitamin C in the presence of sub-inhibitory concentration of aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones alters proteus mirabilis biofilm inhibitory rate. Antibiotics, 8(3), 116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dhammi, I. K., Ul Haq, R., & Kumar, S. (2015). Prophylactic antibiotics in orthopedic surgery: Controversial issues in its use. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 49(4), 373–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualisation: JAS, PB. Methodology: JAS, MN, RS. Formal analysis and investigation: PB, AC. Writing—original draft preparation: JAS, PB, MN. Writing—review and editing: RS. Funding acquisition: not applicable. Resources: AC (software for statistical analysis). Supervision: RS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prateek Behera.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Human Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, MP, India, IHEC-LOP/2020/IM0243, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

43465_2020_306_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Supplementary file1 Shows the relation of the age of the respondent and the years of experience in relation to their major field of orthopaedic practice (PDF 153 KB)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 77 KB)

Supplementary file3 (PDF 126 KB)

Supplementary file4 (PDF 76 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santoshi, J.A., Behera, P., Nagar, M. et al. Current Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Practices: A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons in India. JOIO 55, 749–757 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00306-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00306-0

Keywords

Navigation