Abstract
In spite of substantial progress made toward understanding cancer pathogenesis, this disease remains one of the leading causes of mortality. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop novel, more effective anticancer therapeutics. Thiadiazole ring is a versatile scaffold widely studied in medicinal chemistry. Mesoionic character of this ring allows thiadiazole-containing compounds to cross cellular membrane and interact strongly with biological targets. Consequently, these compounds exert a broad spectrum of biological activities. This review presents the current state of knowledge on thiadiazole derivatives that demonstrate in vitro and/or in vivo efficacy across the cancer models with an emphasis on targets of action. The influence of the substituent on the compounds’ activity is depicted. Furthermore, the results from clinical trials assessing thiadiazole-containing drugs in cancer patients are summarized.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
According to the most recent data provided by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million cancer deaths were registered worldwide in 2018 [1]. Due to the population aging and growth, the number of new cancer cases is expected to increase. Although a substantial progress was made in the understanding of molecular biology of particular cancer types, and numerous potential specific therapeutic targets were identified in recent years, there is an urgent necessity for the development of improved anticancer therapeutic strategies.
Thiadiazole is a five-membered heterocyclic compound containing one sulfur and two nitrogen atoms. It occurs in nature in four isoforms: 1,2,3-thiadiazole, 1,2,4-thiadizaole, 1,2,5-thiadiazole and 1,3,4-thiadiazole (Fig. 1). Taking into account that thiadiazole is the bioisostere of pyrimidine and oxadiazole, it is not surprising that compounds bearing this moiety present a broad spectrum of pharmacological properties, including antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, antiparasitic, anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities [2]. Due to the mesoionic nature, thiadiazoles are able to cross the cellular membranes. Their relatively good liposolubility is most likely attributed to the presence of the sulphur atom [3]. The thiadiazole-containing drugs, including diuretics acetazolamide and methazolamide or antibiotics cefazedone and cefazolin sodium, are already used in clinics. Accumulating evidence has also revealed numerous thiadiazole derivatives that display anticancer activities in various in vitro and in vivo models (summarized in Table 1). Moreover, several thiadiazole-containing compounds have moved into clinical trials either as single agents or in combination with existing anticancer drugs (summarized in Table 2).
Core structures of the thiadiazole isoforms occurring in nature. Sulphur and nitrogen atoms are marked as yellow or blue circles, respectively
Derivatives of 1,2,3-thiadiazole
Inhibitors of tubulin polymerization
Microtubules are cytoskeleton filamentous proteins built by tubulin. They are involved in numerous cellular processes such as intracellular transport, cell signaling, mitosis, cellular integrity and gene expression, but also contribute to polarity and shape of cells. A growing body of evidence documents anticancer activity of different heterocyclic compounds inhibiting tubulin polymerization [4].
Wu and co-workers focused on analogs of the cis stilbene derivative combretastatin A-4 (CA-4), an anticancer agent which binds to tubulin and inhibits microtubule polymerization. Cis configuration of the double bond in olefin group and 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl group are crucial for the CA-4’s activity. The newly designed and synthetized analogs contained 1,2,3-thiadiazole instead of the CA-4’s olefin group. They exhibited a diverse cytotoxicity against human myeloid leukemia HL-60 cell line, human colon adenocarcinoma HCT-116 cell line, and immortalized human microvascular endothelial (HMEC-1) cells. In all three cell lines, several tested compounds presented cytotoxic activity similar to that of CA-4 or lower, but still considerable (IC50 ranging from 13.4 to 86.6 nM). Of note, if the 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl was at 4th position in 1,2,3-thiadiazole, six out of nine tested compounds displayed significant activity in all three cell lines, while if this substituent was at 5th position, only one out of nine compounds was cytotoxic. These compounds inhibited tubulin polymerization with activities quantitatively similar to those of CA-4 and arrested the cell cycle at G2/M phase. Two of these derivatives significantly reduced tumor growth in mice S180 sarcoma model with the inhibition rate comparable or even higher to that of CA-4 [5].
Inhibitors of Hsp90
The other group of 1,2,3-thiadiazole derivatives appeared to block the activity of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90). Hsp90 displays a chaperone activity and controls the folding of numerous proteins. Inhibition of its activity results in the degradation of several oncoproteins. A growing body of evidence shows that tumor cells are more susceptible to blocking of Hsp90 compared to normal cells, therefore, this protein seems to be a promising anticancer target [6].
Cikotine et al. synthesized a series of 5-aryl-4-(5-substituted-2-4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,2,3-thiadiazoles bearing at the position 5 of the thiadiazole ring one of the following groups: 4-MeOC6H4, 4-EtOC6H4, 4-MeC6H4 or 3,4-di-MeOC6H3 and either chloro- or ethyl- substituent at the position 5 of the dihydroxyphenyl moiety. Each of these derivatives tightly bound to Hsp90 (Fig. 2), and the strongest binding (dissociation constant (Kd) of 4.8 nM) displayed compound 3b, bearing a 4-EtOC6H4 substituent at position 5 of thiadiazole and a chlorine atom at position 5 of dihydroxyphenyl. Each of the derivatives significantly inhibited viability of both human cervical carcinoma HeLa and osteosarcoma U2OS cells and the most potent inhibitor appeared to be compound 3e bearing 4-EtOC6H4 group at the position 5 of the thiadiazole ring and an ethyl substituent at the position 5 of dihydroxyphenyl. The GI50 values of this compound were 0.70 μM for HeLa and 0.69 μM for U2OS cells, respectively. Of note, the other group of 5-aryl-4-(5-substituted-2-4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,2,3-thiadiazoles bearing chloro-substituent at position 3 of the dihydroxyphenyl moiety did not bind to Hsp90 and was a very weak inhibitor of cancer cell viability. Most likely, the presence of this chloro-substituent prevented the formation of the extensive H-bonding network which in turn led to a lack of activity [7].
The molecular targets of the thiadiazole derivatives. Thiadiazole derivatives are shown in red. Molecular targets (yellow boxes): CA carbonic anhydrase, Abl Abl kinase; GA glutaminase, IMPDH inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, Hsp90 heat shock protein 90, LOX lipoxygenase, Eg5 kinesin spindle protein, HDAC histone deacetylase, TopoII topoisomerase II. The other molecules: Gln glutamine, Glu glutamate, IMP inosine monophosphate, XMP xanthosine monophosphate, GMP guanosine monophosphate, PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acid, HETE hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid
Three of the compounds, confirmed to bind Hsp90 most effectively, were subjected to further analysis. They exhibited antiproliferative activity against human colon cancer HCT-116 cells with GI50 values ranging from 3.2 to 4.6 μM. Treatment of HCT-116 cells with each of the compounds resulted in a depletion of Hsp90 client proteins, CRAF, ERBB2 and CDK4, confirming that antiproliferative activity was linked to the inhibition of Hsp90 activity. Furthermore, such treatment caused upregulation of Hsp27 and Hsp72 expression, suggesting an induction of the heat shock response. Moreover, an increase in PARP cleavage evoked by the tested compounds indicated the induction of apoptosis [8].
Miscellaneous 1,2,3-thiadiazole derivatives
Aside from the derivatives presented above, there are also some other compounds containing 1,2,3-thiadiazole moiety which display an anticancer activity, but their molecular targets remain unknown. Among a series of d-ring fused 1,2,3-thiadiazole dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) derivatives, the most potent compounds 22, 23 and 25 presented antitumor activity against human breast cancer T47D cells with IC50 values ranging between 0.042 and 0.058 μM. These values were comparable to that of reference drug adriamycin (IC50 = 0.04 μM). Of note, compound 25 possessed a considerable selectivity towards T47D cells. Its activity against the other breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7, as well as human prostate cancer (DU-145 and LNCaP), colon carcinoma (HCT-116 and HT-29), promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) and immortalized T lymphocyte (Jurkat) cell lines ranged between 2.49 and 46.0 μM. Moreover, IC50 of compound 25 in normal human fibroblast was > 50 μM, while adriamycin presented IC50 of 0.068 μM in these cells. Further analysis revealed that compound 25 significantly inhibited the ability of T47D cells to form colonies and migrate as well as induced apoptosis. It also increased the phosphorylation level of ephrin (Eph) receptors, EphA2 and EphB3, proteins involved in the pathogenesis of breast cancer [9]. Clearly further studies are required to elucidate whether the deregulation of EphA2 and EphB3 contributes to the anticancer activity of compound 25 or not. Of note, compound 25 significantly inhibited tumor growth and metastatic ability in T47D xenografts [10].
Another example of derivatives bearing the 1,2,3-thiadiazole ring are pyrazole oxime compounds designed and synthesized by Dai et al. [11]. The activity of these compounds towards human pancreatic cancer Panc-1 cells, hepatocarcinoma Huh-7 cells, colon cancer HCT-116 cells, and gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells was evaluated. The most potent among 23 tested compounds appeared to be compounds 8e and 8l bearing methyl substituent at position 4 of the thiadiazole ring. These compounds differed in terms of substituents in the phenyl ring as compound 8e was 4-bromo substituted, while compound 8l was 2,3-difluoro substituted. In Panc-1 cells each of the compounds displayed anticancer effect (IC50 of 12.79 and 12.22 μM, respectively) similar to that of sorafenib (IC50 of 11.50 μM). In Huh-7 cells these compounds presented activity (IC50 of 11.84 and 10.11 μM, respectively) comparable to that of cisplatin (IC50 of 12.70 μM). In HCT-116 cells the anticancer activity of compound 3e and 3l was much stronger (IC50 of 7.19 and 6.56μM, respectively) compared to that of 5-fluorouracil (IC50 of 29.50 μM). Similarly, in SGC-7901 cells both compounds displayed much stronger activity (IC50 of 15.50 and 25.65 μM, respectively) than 5-fluorouracil (IC50 of 56.12 μM) [11].
Derivatives of 1,2,4-thiadiazole
Resveratrol is a naturally occurring trans stilbene with anticancer and cancer chemopreventive potential. However, due to rapid and extensive metabolism, its bioavailability is poor. A growing body of evidence indicates that various chemical modifications may significantly improve resveratrol’s bioavailability and potency against different types of cancer [12]. Mayhoub and co-workers replaced the trans stilbene ethylenic bridge of the resveratrol scaffold with a 1,2,4-thiadiazole heterocycle and next modified the substituents on the two aromatic rings and evaluated cytotoxicity of these compounds against human breast cancer MCF-7 cell line. These compounds displayed the IC50 values ranging from 4.7 to 39.8 μM and the most potent turned out to be 3-hydroxyderivative termed 3jj. Although modifications introduced to the compounds’ structure altered their potency and specificity against three enzymes inhibited by resveratrol, i.e. aromatase, NF-κB and quinone reductase 1, it did not translate to the anticancer activity towards MCF-7 cells [13].
Derivatives based on 3-substituted benzo[4,5]imidazo[1,2-d] [1,2,4]thiadiazole linked with a polymethylene spacer to α-bromoacryloyl amido benzoheterocycles are another example of compounds carrying 1,2,4-thiadiazole moiety with an anticancer activity. These compounds showed a considerable activity in human myeloid leukemia cell lines HL-60 and U937 (IC50 values from 0.24 to 1.72 μM), as well as in melanoma SK-MEL-1 cell line (IC50 from 2.09 to 8.95 μM). The most active were compounds 1 and 2 containing N-unsubstituted indole in the benzoheterocycle. Comparing these two derivatives, the anticancer activity decreased on increasing the length of the chain from three (compound 1) to six (compound 2) methylene units. Among the derivatives characterized by the same alkyl chain (6 methylene units), the greatest potency was exhibited by compound 2 bearing α-bromoacrylamidoindole moiety (IC50 values from 0.40 to 3.02 μM). A replacement of indole (compound 2) with N-methyl indole (compound 3) decreased an anticancer activity. Further decrease was observed when indole was replaced with benzofuran (compound 4) and benzothiophene (compound 5). Treatment with each of compounds induced apoptosis in HL-60 and U937 cells, although most effective anticancer compound 1 appeared to be a less potent apoptosis inducer compared to the rest of derivatives, suggesting that this compound may trigger also some other mechanisms underlying cell death [14].
Derivatives of 1,2,5-thiadiazole
Anthra[2,1-c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-6,11-dione, further termed as NSC745885, turned out to be the most potent among a series of anthra[1,2-d]imidazole-6,11-dione tetracyclic analogues with different side chain. Out of 60 cancer cell lines of different origin, the most remarkable sensitivity to NSC745885 displayed leukemia, melanoma, ovarian, breast, prostate cancer as well as glioma cell lines (GI50 values between 0.16 and 7.71 μM). The relatively lower, yet significant sensitivity to NSC745885 presented colon and non-small cell lung cancer cell lines (GI50 values between 1.28 and 17.40 μM) [15].
Further analysis revealed that NSC745885 was also effective in oral cancer cell lines, but anticancer concentrations of this compound, up to 4 μM, did not significantly affect the viability of normal lung fibroblasts. Treatment with NSC745885 reduced tumor growth iv vivo, but did not decrease the bodyweight of the animals. This compound displayed anti-tumor efficiency similar to that of doxorubicin, an anthraquinone derivative, but higher safety. Induction of apoptosis was observed upon treatment with NSC745885 both in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 3) [16].
Anticancer activity of NSC745885 (anthra[2,1-c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-6,11-dione). NSC745885 induces apoptosis in oral cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, but does not affect the viability of lung fibroblasts. In bladder cancer cells, NSC745885 downregulates expression of the enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), which results in up-regulation of EZH2-silenced tumor suppressor genes, CDKN1C, DAB2IP, and WNT5a. Those alterations contribute to cancer cell death in vitro and in vivo and are not observed in normal fibroblasts 3T3 or urothelial cells SV-HUC-1, which are resistant to NSC745885 treatment
In another study from the same group, 2.5 μM NSC745885 reduced the viability of bladder cancer T24 and MBT2 cell lines and induced G2/M cell cycle arrest, but did not harm immortalized normal urothelial cells SV-HUC-1 or normal fibroblasts 3T3. Of note, the same inhibitory effect on viability was observed when the cancer cells were treated either with 2.5 μM doxorubicin or 40 μM emodin, a natural anthraquinone, but both of these compounds presented significant toxicity towards SV-HUC-1 and 3T3 cells. Moreover, treatment with 2.5 μM NSC745885 suppressed the viability of multi-drug resistant bladder cancer MGH-U1R cells. This compound also displayed a remarkable antitumor activity in vivo. NSC745885 treatment downregulated expression of the enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) in cancer cells, but not SV-HUC-1 cells. EZH2 is a member of the polycomb repressive complexes 2 (PRC2) that catalyzes the methylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27), which in turn mediates chromatin compaction. Overexpression of EZH2 is observed in numerous cancer of different origin and its inactivation was therapeutically effective in several cancer models [17]. Of note, the other components of PRC2 and the global H3K27 methylation, modified by EZH2, remained unaffected by NSC745885 treatment. The up-regulation of EZH2-silenced tumor suppressor genes, CDKN1C, DAB2IP, and WNT5a, was found in NSC745885-treated cancer cells, but not SV-HUC-1 cells (Fig. 3). More detailed molecular analysis revealed that suppression of the cancer cells’ viability by NSC745885 treatment was indeed causatively linked to downregulation of EZH2 [18].
The same group further investigated anticancer activity of NSC745885 and its 4-chloro derivative, NSC757963. While melanoma and ovarian cancer cell lines were particularly sensitive to NSC745885 (GI50 values ranging from 0.55 to 7.71 μM), leukemia cell lines were notably susceptible to NSC757963 (GI50 values from 0.33 to 3.15 μM). Colon and non-small cell lung cancer cell lines presented the lowest sensitivity to NSC745885 (GI50 values from 1.28 to 19.00 μM) and NSC757963 (GI50 values from 1.43 to > 100 μM). Either of compounds inhibited translocation of NF-κB to the nucleus, which in turn suppressed constitutive activation of this transcription factor. Docking studies revealed favorable binding of both compounds to the ATP site of the N-terminal kinase domain of the IKKβ subunit, a very potent activator of NF-κB [19].
In a subsequent analysis, the same group examined an anticancer activity of a series of sulfur-substituted anthra[1,2-c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-6,11-dione derivatives. Among these compounds, 4-(isopropylthio)anthra[1,2-c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-6,11-dione, termed NSC763968, appeared to be most active. Leukemia and prostate cancer cell lines were particularly sensitive to this compound (GI50 values ranging from 0.18 to 1.45 μM). Slightly lower toxicity of NSC763968 was observed in ovarian cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, renal cancer, glioma and non-small cell lung cancer cell lines (GI50 values from 0.20 to 5.68 μM). Colon cancer cell lines were the least sensitive to NSC763968 (GI50 values ranging from 0.29 to 13.30 μM). Of note, 10 μM concentration of this compound was relatively not toxic towards human non-cancerous cell lines, as it reduced the viability of urothelial SV-HUC-1 cells to 80%, prostatic stromal myofibroblasts WMPY-1 to 60%, and prostate epithelial cells RWPE-1 to 90%. At the same time, 10 μM doxorubicin decreased the viability of SV-HUC-1, WMOY-1 and RWPE-1 cells to 50%, 20%, and 40%, respectively. In prostate cancer DU-145 cells, NSC763968 induced apoptosis and inhibited phosphorylation of ERK and p38 kinases [20]. As both ERK and p38 pathways are involved in the pathogenesis of cancers of different origin [21, 22], it is tempting to speculate that NSC763968 treatment inhibits those pathways, which in turn contributes to the anticancer activity of this compound.
In very recent research from the same group, a nitrogen-substituted anthra[1,2-c] [1,2,5]thiadiazole-6,11-dione derivative, RV-59, turned out to be particularly toxic to human colon cancer HCT116 cells with high cytoplasmic level of a transcription factor Nrf2 (cNrf2). A significant contribution of a cytoplasmic, but not nuclear, localization of Nrf2 to aggressive phenotype of colorectal cancer cells has previously been documented by the same group [23]. The IC50 value of RV-59 was 3.55 μM for HCT116 cells with high cNrf2, and 16.81 μM for Nrf2-knockdown HCT116 cells. The IC50 value of 5-FU, a drug used to treat colon cancer [24], was 17.74 μM for the cells with high cNrf2, and 5.35 μM for the cells not expressing Nrf2. These results indicate that RV-59 predominantly kills and overcomes cNrf2-mediated resistance to 5-FU. Further analysis clearly showed that RV-59 remarkably suppressed xenograft tumor growth induced by the cells with cNrf2-mediated 5-FU resistance. Of note, RV-59 treatment did not affect the body weights of the animals, suggesting that this drug may not be toxic to normal cells [25].
Derivatives 1,3,4-thiadiazole
Inhibitors of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH)
One of the first studies documenting anticancer activity of 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives was published by Shapiro et al. in 1957 [26]. In this paper, 2-ethylamino-1,3,4-thiadiazole (EATDA), an analog of niacin, inhibited the growth of mammary adenocarcinomas induced in mice. The tumor-inhibitory effect of this compound was prevented by the prior injection of nicotinamide, supporting the evidence that it is a niacin antagonist. Moreover, the addition of EATDA to the combination of 8-azaguanine, deoxypyridoxine and testosterone improved anticancer activity of this three-drug combination [26].
EATDA and 2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole (ATDA) displayed anti-cancer properties in mice surviving systemic leukemia L1210. These compounds not only inhibited tumor growth but also prolonged survival time of the animals. The anti-leukemic activity and host toxicity of either compound were blocked by the administration of nicotinamide [27]. Later study revealed that treatment of L1210-bearing mice with ATDA, further referred to as NSC 4728 (Fig. 4), diminished adenine and guanine ribonucleotide pools and increased uridine triphosphate (UTP) and inosine monophosphate (IMP) pools in the tumor cells. This effect was prevented by simultaneous administration of nicotinamide. Taking into account that nicotinamide prevents anti-leukemic activity of ATDA, it might suggest that the inhibition of guanosine monophosphate synthesis was related to the anti-leukemic action of this compound [28]. In further mechanistic studies, NSC 4728 and its derivatives appeared to be potent inhibitors of IMP dehydrogenase (EC 1.2.1.14), an enzyme involved in the conversion of IMP to xanthosine monophosphate (XMP), a substrate for the production of guanosine monophosphate (GMP) (Fig. 2) [29].
Schematic chemical structure of 2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole (ATDA; NSC 4728). Sulphur, nitrogen, and hydrogen atoms are marked as yellow, blue or green circles, respectively
In phase I clinical trials, NSC 4728 was administered daily, twice a week or weekly in a range of doses from 2 to 200 mg/m2 to 42 patients suffering from different cancers. One patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung and one with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervical esophagus exhibited a partial response to a total dose of 550 or 575 mg/m2, respectively. In either patient, a progression of disease was observed after 2 months despite continued treatment. In phase II, 125 mg/m2 of NSC 4728 was given once a week to 29 patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. A partial response was observed in one patient after receiving a total of 1200 mg/m2 and another one after two doses of 125 mg/m2 of NSC 4728. In either patient, the progression was observed despite continued treatment. Stomatitis was the most common adverse effect, but dermatitis, nausea vomiting, lethargy, and hyperuricemia were observed as well [30].
Out of 46 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma one patient, treated with NSC 4728 in a daily dose of 125 mg/m2, experienced partial remission. Leukopenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia were the most common side effects in patients enrolled in this phase II clinical trials [31].
Asbury and co-workers conducted several phase II clinical trials of NSC 4728 in a dose of 125 mg/m2 weekly in patients with different tumor types. Partial response to treatment was observed in 12% of patients with advanced colon cancer. Gastrointestinal toxicity was severe in l6% of patients [32]. A partial response was also observed in 5% of patients with squamous carcinoma of the cervix and 28% of patients had stable disease. The patients exhibited mild renal toxicity and a single life-threatening toxic episode was observed [33]. Complete response was observed in 8% of patients with non-squamous cervical carcinoma, and 35% had stable disease. Anemia and emesis were the main side effects [34]. Partial response was exhibited by 5% of patients with mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterine corpus. Severe nausea and anemia were often [35]. No response was observed in patients with either advanced or recurrent leiomyosarcoma [36] or advanced epidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus [37] treated in the same way. Clinical trials with NSC 4728 are summarized in Table 1.
Inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase (CA)
Some of the 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives turned out to inhibit the activity of human carbonic anhydrase (CA; EC 4. 2. 1. 1). This zinc metalloprotein catalyzes CO2/HCO3− interconversion and is thereby involved in several physiological and pathological processes. So far, 14 humans CA isoforms have been identified and each of them serves as biomarker for various diseases, including cancers of several origin [38].
A CA inhibitor acetazolamide (5-acetamido-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-sulfonamide, AZA) (Fig. 2, Fig. 5) displaying diuretic effects is already used in clinics. There are two currently ongoing phase I clinical trials with AZA (Diamox) in cancer patients. In one of them AZA in combination with platinum and etoposide-based radiochemotherapy is evaluated in patients with small-cell lung cancer (NCT03467360). In the other one, AZA in combination with temozolomide is assessed in patients with malignant glioma (NCT03011671) (Table 1).
Schematic chemical structure of acetazolamide (5-acetamido-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-sulfonamide, AZA). Sulphur, nitrogen, hydrogen, and oxygen atoms are marked as yellow, blue, green or red circles, respectively
Supuran and Scozzafava documented inhibitory effect of the other 1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-sulfonamide derivatives on CA isoforms [39]. Nanomolar concentrations of compounds 10–13 remarkably inhibited the activity of CA II and CA IV but were less potent towards CA I. Nanomolar concentrations of the urea/thiobiguanide derivatives 14–16 inhibited CA I and CA II and to the lesser extend CA IV. Most of these compounds were more potent CA inhibitors than AZA. Compounds 14–16 were much more cytotoxic (GI50 values from 12 to 70 μM) than compounds 10–13 which in most cancer cell lines displayed GI50 values > 100 μM. The exception was the OVCAR-4 ovarian cancer cell line, susceptible to compounds 10 and 11 (GI50 values of 0.5 and 0.1 μM, respectively). The exact mechanism underlying anticancer activity of these derivatives was not elucidated, but the authors postulated that the acidification of the intracellular environment resulted from CA inhibition might be of crucial importance [39].
In the later study from the same group, compound 14, a biphenyl-disulfonamide derivative bearing 5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-sulfonamide, inhibited CA II and CA IX, and to the lesser extend also CA XII and CA I. This compound displayed cytotoxicity towards human colon cancer HCT116 cell line with GI50 value of 3.789 μg/mL but was less potent against non-small cell lung cancer H460 and breast cancer MCF7 cells [40].
Inhibitors of glutaminase (GA)
Glutamine (Gln) plays the versatile and crucial role in tumors regardless of the driving oncogene or tissue of origin. Increased metabolism of Gln, of which the first step is catabolized by glutaminase (GA; EC 3.5.1.2), is a hallmark of cancer. Therefore, GA is a potential therapeutic target for different cancer types [41].
Treatment with 2 μM 10 μM of bis-2-(5-phenylacetamido-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)ethyl sulfide (BPTES), a specific inhibitor of kidney type GA (GLS), diminished the proliferation of human Burkitt lymphoma P493 cells [42]. Higher concentrations (10–40 μM) of this compound decreased the viability of glioblastoma [43], non-small cell lung cancer [44] and acute myeloid leukemia [45] cells. Moreover, BPTES injected daily in a dose of 12.5 mg/kg body weight inhibited lymphoma and hepatocellular carcinoma xenograft growth [42, 46]. Poor drug-like molecular properties of BPTES, mainly extremely poor aqueous solubility (< 1 μg/mL) ruled out the feasibility of further development of this compound as a therapeutic agent. Of a number of BPTES-derived GLS inhibitors displaying much better drug-like properties compared to BPTES recently synthesized [47], only those already tested in cancer models will be presented below.
A truncated analog of BPTES, N-(5-{2-[2-(5-Amino-[1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl)-ethylsulfanyl]-ethyl}-[1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-phenyl-acetamide, referred to as compound 6, exhibited potency similar to that of BPTES, but much better aqueous solubility of 13 μg/mL. Treatment with 20 μM concentration of this compound significantly attenuated the growth of lymphoma B P493 cells in vitro as well as in a mouse xenograft model while injected daily in doses of 12.5 mg/kg [48].
Gross and co-workers discovered N-[5-[4-[6-[[2-[3-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl]acetyl]amino]-3-pyridazinyl]butyl]-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-pyridineacetamide, referred to as CB-839 (Fig. 6). Its IC50 value for GA inhibition (Fig. 2) was < 50 nmol/L, 13-fold lower than that of BPTES. CB-839 treatment inhibited the proliferation of the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines, HCC1806 and MDA-MB-231, (IC50 of 49.0 and 26.0 nmol/L, respectively), but had no effect on the viability of the breast cancer ER+/HER2− cell line T47D. The rates of Gln consumption were reduced for HCC1806 and MDA-MB-231 cells treated with CB-839, indicating that the antitumor activity of this compound was indeed linked to the diminished Gln metabolism. The in vivo efficacy of CB-839 was further examined in two breast cancer xenograft models, a primary patient-derived TNBC xenograft and an HER2+ basal-like cell line JIMT-1-based xenograft. In either model, oral dosing of 200 mg/kg of CB-839 twice daily remarkably inhibited xenografts’ growth and was well tolerated, with no overt signs of toxicity [49].
Schematic chemical structure of CB-839 (N-[5-[4-[6-[[2-[3-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl]acetyl]amino]-3-pyridazinyl]butyl]-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-pyridineacetamide). Sulphur, nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen or fluorine atoms are marked as yellow, blue, green, red or purple circles, respectively
In EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer HCC827 cells, treatment with 300 nM CB-839 resulted in approximately 50% reduction of the viability. Administration of this compound twice daily in a dose of 200 mg/kg inhibited xenograft growth. Furthermore, the combination of an EGFR inhibitor, erlotinib, and CB-839 cooperated to inhibit the growth of HCC827 cells in vitro and in vivo [50]. For the other lung cancer cell lines, A427, A549 and H460, the CB-839 ED50 values for inhibition of colony formation were 9.1, 27.0 and 217 nM, respectively. Treatment with 1 μM CB-839 increased response of H460 cells to radiation. The short-term CB-839 dosing at 200 mg/kg did not affect xenograft tumor growth, but the combination of CB-839 administration with the radiation dose of 12 Gy reduced tumor growth by 15–30% [51].
Treatment with 500 nM CB-839 inhibited the viability of NF1 mutant/null malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cell lines (MPNST), ST8814 and S462. Administration of 200 mg/kg of CB-839 significantly suppressed the volume of MPNST xenografts [52]. In chondrosarcoma cell lines, CB-839 activity correlated with the status of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2), as the cells carrying IDH1/2 mutation were more susceptible to this compound than the wild type cells [53]. In a very recent study, CB-839 administered twice daily at dose 200 mg/kg significantly reduced undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) tumor growth and weight but did not alter animal weights [54].
Taken together, data presented above clearly indicate that CB-839 exhibits high therapeutic potential. Indeed, this drug was evaluated either as a single agent in patients with leukemia (NCT02071927), hematologic malignancies (NCT02071888), and solid tumors (NCT02071862), as well as in combination with paclitaxel in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (NCT03057600) or in combination with panitumumab and irinotecan in patients with colorectal cancer (NCT03263429). However, detailed results of any of those trials are not yet available. Numerous clinical trials evaluating anticancer activity of CB-839 are still ongoing (Table 1).
Recently, 2-phenyl-N-(5-(4-((5-(2-phenylacetamido)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)amino)piperidin-1-yl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)acetamide (UPGL00004), another analog of BPTES, turned out to be a promising anti-cancer agent. In this compound, previously termed 7c, the flexible region of BPTES or CB-839 has been replaced by relatively rigid heterocyclic core [55]. UPGL00004 inhibited the enzymatic activity of GLS more potently than BPTES and displayed binding affinity for this protein similar to that of CB-839 (Fig. 2). Crystallographic studies revealed that UPGL00004 occupied the same binding site as CB-839 or BPTES and that all three compounds inhibited the enzymatic activity of GLS via a similar allosteric mechanism. The anticancer activity of UPGL00004 was examined in a triple-negative breast cancer patient-derived tumor graft model. Neither UPGL00004 in a dose 1 mg/kg body weight nor approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer bevacizumab in a dose 2.5 mg/kg body weight reduced tumor growth. However, a combination of these compounds completely prevented an increase in tumor size during the course of treatment [56].
Inhibitors of histone deacetylase (HDAC)
Histone deacetylase (HDAC, EC 3.5.1.98) removes acetyl groups from DNA-binding histone proteins, which in turn decreases chromatin accessibility for transcription factors and blocks the transcription. The human HDAC family consists of 18 proteins divided into 4 classes. These proteins modulate, among others, the transcription of genes encoding proteins involved in carcinogenesis [57].
Rajak and co-workers designed and synthesized a series of 2-[5-(4-substitutedphenyl)-[1, 3, 4]-thiadiazol-2-ylamino]-pyrimidine-5-carboxylic acid hydroxyamides, which exhibited the HDAC1 inhibitory activity with IC50 values between 0.008 and 0.018 μM (Fig. 2). Treatment with these compounds decreased the viability of human colorectal carcinoma HCT-116 cells (IC50 values ranging from 0.08 to 0.31 μM). Moreover, each of the compounds administered at seven doses of 0.2 mmol/kg significantly inhibited weight and growth of tumors formed by Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells inoculated into mice. The antitumor activity of compounds changed on varying para-substituted group on aryl moiety attached to 1,3,4-thiadiazole as follows: hydroxy > methoxy > methyl > amino > dimethylamino > nitro > chloro > fluoro > no substitution [58].
Guan and co-workers designed and synthesized a series of amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole-based hydroxamic acid derivatives with different linkers and substitution in thiadiazole ring. Both the length of the linker chain and the substitution in 1,3,4-thiadiazole turned out to be important for the HDAC inhibitory activity. Compounds with the linker comprised of five or six methylene units inhibited HDAC in the nanomolar range, while the rest derivatives showed only micromolar activity. Compounds with the phenyl or benzyl substitution in 1,3,4-thiadiazole were more potent than the those substituted with phenethyl or (E)-styryl. The linker between zinc-binding group and 1,3,4-thiadiazole ring was more important for the anti-HDAC activity than the substitutions in 1,3,4-thiadiazole moiety. Compound 6i presented an increased HDAC inhibitory activity (IC50 0.089 μM) compared to that of suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), an HDAC inhibitor (IC50 0.15 μM). Docking studies revealed that this compound had a similar binding mode to SAHA in the active site of HDAC1. Treatment with each of four most potent HDAC inhibitors (IC50 0.089–0.26 μM) decreased the viability of the human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells (IC50 2.98–6.14 μM) as well as chronic myelogenous leukemia K562 cells (IC50 6.75–12.9 μM). The IC50 values displayed in MDA-MB-231 and K562 cells by SAHA were 1.32 and 1.69 μM, respectively [59].
In the next study, the same group attempted to increase the anticancer activity of 1,3,4-thiadiazole bearing hydroxamates. Substitution of the phenyl ring did not increase the HDAC inhibitory activity. Three important findings appeared from this part of the experiments: i. phenyl substitution with a bulky group resulted in the loss of the HDAC inhibitory activity; ii. compounds with an electron-withdrawing group exhibited poorer HDAC inhibition than those with an electron-donating group; iii. following tendency in enzymatic potency was found: para-< meta-< ortho-substitution. Replacement of the phenyl ring with a naphthalenyl group led to a loss in HDAC inhibition, while analogues containing pyridine or thiophene displayed higher or similar activity (IC50 286–411 nM) compared to SAHA (IC50 416 nM). Compound 35 bearing thiophen-2-yl and 6 carbon units in the linker appeared to be the more active against three cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231, K562 and human prostate cancer PC3 (IC50 1.21, 1.56 and 3.6 μM, respectively) compared to SAHA (IC50 2.29, 1.61 and 5.79 μM, respectively) [60].
A series of 5-substitutedphenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-based hydroxamic acids was also evaluated by Nam and co-workers [61]. In this study, compound 5a, of which the HDAC inhibitory activity (Fig. 2), but not cytotoxicity has been previously examined [59], showed strong cytotoxicity against human colon cancer SW620, breast cancer MCF7, prostate cancer PC3, pancreas cancer AsPC1 and lung cancer NCI-H460 cells (IC50 0.70, 1.80, 0.88, 2.71, 1.07 μM, respectively). Analogs bearing one halogen atom on the phenyl ring, either at position 2, 3 or 4, presented the cytotoxicity comparable or slightly higher to that of compound 5a. Substitution of a chlorine atom at position 2 was the most favorable for cytotoxicity (IC50 between 0.11 and 1.23 μM). In the same assay, SAHA displayed IC50 values between 2.77 and 6.42 μM. Of note, the introduction of an additional chlorine at position 6 or nitro substituent at position 2 or 4 remarkably decreased cytotoxicity. Western blot analysis revealed that treatment with compounds showing cytotoxicity comparable or higher to that of SAHA increased level of histone acetylation, suggesting that the anticancer activity of those compounds might be linked to their HDAC inhibitory activity. Results of docking studies indicated that two compounds 5b (bearing 2-chlorophenyl) and 5c (bearing 3-chlorophenyl) had higher binding affinities to HDAC8 compared to SAHA [61].
Inhibitors of kinesin spindle protein
The mitotic kinesins are the proteins responsible for force generators in the process of cell division. The most extensively studied of these proteins is Eg5 (also known as KIF11, kinesin-5 or KSP). Due to its role in cell division, Eg5 is a potential cancer-selective therapeutic target. Indeed, overexpression of this protein is observed in tumors of different origin [62].
Based on the results of a phenotype-based forward chemical genetics screen, Nakai and co-workers selected K858 (N-(4-Acetyl-4,5-dihydro-5-methyl-5-phenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)acetamide) as an antimitotic agent. This compound induced mitotic arrest, caspase-dependent apoptosis, and cell growth inhibition in human colon cancer HCT-116 cells, but had no effect on microtubule polymerization. K858 blocked centrosome separation and induced the formation of a monopolar spindle during mitosis as well as inhibited the ATPase activity of Eg5 with an IC50 of 1.3 μM. Of note, this compound appeared to be 150-fold more selective for Eg5 than other members of the kinesin superfamily. It should be also emphasized that K858 induced mitotic cell death in HCT-116 cells, but not in non-cancerous retinal pigment epithelial ARPE-19 cells. Moreover, treatment of mice with 150 mg/kg K858 suppressed tumor growth in a human A2780 ovarian cancer model but no overt evidence of toxicity was found [63].
K858 and its derivative bearing an ethyl moiety at C5 position of the thiadiazole ring, compound 33, displayed significant antitumor activity against human prostate cancer PC3 and melanoma SK-MEL-5 and SK-MEL-28 cells. Both K858 and compound 33 presented the ability to inhibit Eg5 enzymatic activity (Fig. 2) [64]. K858 diminished the viability and induced apoptosis in human breast cancer MCF7, MDA-MB231, BT474 and SKBR3 cells [65] as well as in human glioblastoma U87 and U251 cells [66].
The enzymatic activity of Eg5 is also blocked by the other 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivative, (2S)-2-(3-Aminopropyl)-5-(2,5-difluorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methyl-2-phenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-3(2H)-carboxamide trifluoroacetate, termed Filanesib or ARRY-520 (Fig. 2, Fig. 7). Treatment of leukemic U937, Jurkat, and HL-60, Molm13 and OCI-AML3 cells with nanomolar concentrations of this compound induced G2/M cell cycle block and cell death. This compound (at dose 27 mg/kg) significantly inhibited tumor growth of HL-60 xenografts in mice. Moreover, it diminished the colony formation capacity of blasts from patients with acute myeloid leukemia but not normal blood cells [67]. A similar regimen inhibited volume of xenografts formed by colon cancer HT-29, breast cancer UISO-BCA-1, prostate cancer PC3 and myeloma RPMI8226, JJN3, U266, and NCI H929 cells [68, 69].
Schematic chemical structure of filanesib ((2S)-2-(3-Aminopropyl)-5-(2,5-difluorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methyl-2-phenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-3(2H)-carboxamide trifluoroacetate, ARRY-520). Sulphur, nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen or fluorine atoms are marked as yellow, blue, green, red or purple circles, respectively
Filanesib has already been evaluated in clinical trials in patients with different cancers (summarized in Table 1). Filanesib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile at dose levels up to 4.5 mg/m2 in patients with advanced myeloid leukemia (AML). Partial response was observed in 3% and stable disease in 28% of patients. Drug-related serious adverse events, mainly mucositis and neutropenic fever, were observed in 28% of patients and led to study discontinuation in 8% [70]. No partial or complete response was noted in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with filanesib at dose levels up to 2.50 mg/m2 [71].
In a cohort of 55 patients with multiple myeloma (MM), a combination of filanesib plus bortezomib and dexamethasone demonstrated a favorable safety profile. The overall response rate (ORR) was 20%, the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 33%, and the disease control rate was 65% [72]. Later, filanesib 1.50 mg/m2/day alone or in combination with dexamethasone was evaluated in phase 2 trials in 25 patients with MM. Filanesib has single-agent an ORR of 16% and a clinically meaningful CBR of 23%. The response rates in filanesib/dexamethasone population were also clinically relevant (ORR 15%; CBR 20%) [73]. The results of the most recent clinical trials with filanesib in patients with MM remain unknown.
More recently, another Eg5 inhibitor, N-[(5R)-4-(2,2-dimethylpropanoyl)-5-[[2-(ethylamino)ethylsulfonylamino]methyl]-5-phenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-2,2-dimethylpropanamide, referred to as litronesib or LY2523355 (Fig. 2, Fig. 8), has been discovered and characterized. Treatment with this compound resulted in a dose-dependent mitotic arrest of HCT-116 cells and subsequent cell death. Furthermore, LY2523355 showed marked antitumor activity in most of the xenograft tumor models, including patient-derived xenografts [74].
Schematic chemical structure of litronesib (N-[(5R)-4-(2,2-dimethylpropanoyl)-5-[[2-(ethylamino)ethylsulfonylamino]methyl]-5-phenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-2,2-dimethylpropanamide, LY2523355). Sulphur, nitrogen, hydrogen and oxygen atoms are marked as yellow, blue, green or red circles, respectively
In phase I of trials in patients with solid tumors (NCT01358019), the recommended dose of litronesib was determined to be 5 mg/m2/day. No tumor responses were observed in this study [75]. In more recent trials, partial response to litronesib plus pegfilgrastim was observed in 2% of patients with advanced solid tumors and 20% of patients maintained stable disease (NCT01214629; NCT01214642) [76]. Phase II trials evaluating litronesib in patients with different cancer types (NCT01416389; NCT01025284; NCT01059643) have recently been completed and are summarized in Table 1.
Inhibitors of tubulin polymerization
Kamal and co-workers synthesized a series of compounds with imidazothiadiazole linked with a 3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl ring, an indolinone ring, and a phenyl group. These imidazo[2,1‐b][1,3,4]thiadiazolindolin‐2‐ones showed considerable cytotoxicity, with IC50 values ranging from 1.1 to 8.9 μM against human lung A549, cervical HeLa, breast MCF‐7, and colon HCT-116 cancer cell lines. Among them, compounds 7 ((E)‐5‐fluoro‐3‐((6‐p ‐tolyl‐2‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)‐imidazo[2,1‐b][1,3,4]thiadiazol‐5‐yl)methylene)indolin‐2-one) and 11 ((E)‐3‐((6‐p ‐tolyl‐2‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)imidazo[2,1‐b][1,3,4]thiadiazol‐5‐yl)methylene)indolin‐2‐one) appeared to be most potent with IC50 values ranging from 1.1 to 1.6 μM and from 2.5 to 2.9 μM, respectively. Compounds 7 and 11 presented anti-tubulin polymerization activity with IC50 of 0.15 and 1.23 μM, respectively (Fig. 2). Treatment of A549 cells with either of these compounds decreased the level of a polymerized fraction of tubulin and increased the level of its soluble fraction. Docking studies showed that compounds 7 and 11 bound in the colchicine binding site of polymerized tubulin [77].
The same group synthesized a series of conjugates with a core unit of imidazothiadiazole linked with a cyclopropyl ring, an oxindole moiety and an aryl ring. Among these conjugates, compounds 7 ((E)-3-((2-cyclopropyl-6-(4-methoxyphenyl)imidazo[2,1-b] [1,3,4]thiadiazol-5-yl)methylene)indolin-2-one), 14 (((E)-3-((6-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-cyclopropylimidazo[2,1-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-5-yl)methylene)-5-methoxyindolin-2-one) and 15 ((E)-5-chloro-3-((6-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-cyclopropylimidazo[2,1-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-5-yl)methylene)indolin-2-one) exhibited cytotoxicity towards the cell lines used in the previous study with GI50 values from 0.13 to 3.8 μΜ. They also displayed the anti-tubulin activity (IC50 between 2.8 and 5.6 μM). Treatment with these compounds decreased the level of polymerized fraction of tubulin, induced the cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase and apoptosis. Similarly to the compounds described in the earlier report, also conjugates 7, 14 and 15 of this study bound in the colchicine-binding site of the tubulin [78].
Abl kinase inhibitors
The Abelson tyrosine kinase (Abl) regulates cytoskeletal dynamics, organelle trafficking, cell proliferation and survival. Its contribution to the initiation and progression of leukemia is relatively well understood, but recent studies indicate the involvement of this protein in pathogenesis of solid tumors as well [79]. Some of the Abl inhibitors turned out to inhibit also Src kinase, the other protein involved in tumor pathogenesis [80].
Radi and co-workers synthesized a series of substituted benzoylamino-2-[(4-benzyl)thio]-1,3,4-thiadiazole which turned out to inhibit either both Abl and Src kinases, or only one of them. The Abl inhibitory activity of those compounds ranged between 0.044 and 1.26 μM, and their Src inhibitory activity was between 0.064 and 1.137 μM (Fig. 2). In the same assay, imatinib, used as a reference drug, displayed inhibitory activity with IC50 of 0.013 and 31 μM towards Abl and Src, respectively. The most potent Abl inhibitor, 5-[(4-fluorobenzoyl)amino]-2-[(4-fluorobenzyl)thio]-1,3,4-thiadiazole, referred to as compound 6a, significantly reduced the clonogenic activity (LD50 2.2 μM) of distinct clones of myeloid progenitors, varying with respect to sensitivity to Gleevec. Compound 6a diminished proliferation of leukemia HL-60 cells and induced their differentiation [81].
More recently, N-(5-Nitrothiazol-2-yl)-2-((5-((4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)amino)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)thio)acetamide, termed as compound 2, turned out to inhibit Abl kinase with an IC50 value of 7.4 µM. Docking studies revealed the role of the distal nitro group in the formation of a crucial hydrogen bond with the key amino acid residues of Abl protein. Treatment with this compound inhibited the viability of human leukemia K562, MT-2, Jurkat and cervical carcinoma HeLa cells with IC50 values of 33.0, 166.8, 17.9 and 12.4 μM, respectively. In the same assay, imatinib displayed IC50 values of 5.0, 9.7, 6.7 and 15.2 μM, respectively. Compound 2 turned out to be 5 times less toxic towards peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) (IC50 141.3 μM) than imatinib (IC50 28.3 μM). Aside from the inhibitory effect on Abl kinase, compound 2 diminished to the lesser extent activity of BTK, CSK, FYN A, and LCK kinases [82].
Lipoxygenase inhibitors
Lipoxygenases (LOX, EC 1.13.11) catalyze the oxygenation of the polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) to form the hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids (HETEs). Among these enzymes, 15-lipoxygense-1 (15-LOX-1) was found to be involved in the pathogenesis of tumors of different origin, therefore, its targeting may contribute to cancer treatment [83].
Aliabadi and co-workers synthesized a series of compounds bearing 1,3,4-thiadiazole and phthalimide residues and examined the inhibitory effect of these compounds towards 15-LOX-1 (Fig. 2). Compound 4d with meta positioning of the methoxy group afforded the highest inhibitory effect (38%) but did not display a remarkable activity against human prostate cancer PC3, colon adenocarcinoma HT29 or neuroblastoma SKNMC cells. The most toxic towards HT29 cells (IC50 10.91 μM) was compound 4f with ortho positioning of the fluorine atom. This compound inhibited the activity of 15-LOX-1 in 31%. Compound bearing the fluorine substituent at meta-position displayed some cytotoxicity in SKNMC cells (IC50 of 50.2 μM) and inhibited the activity of 15-LOX-1 in 26%. Nitro containing derivatives (4a, 4b, 4c) and compound 4 k with para positioning of the chlorine substituent did not show any inhibitory activity against 15-LOX-1, although the latter was cytotoxic towards HT29 and SKNMC cells (IC50 of 24.06 and 69.7 μM, respectively) [84].
In a recent study, the same group synthesized a series of N-(5-(pyridin-2-yl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)benzamide derivatives. Among them, compounds 4j (o-methoxy) and 4 k (m-methoxy) displayed the best inhibitory activity towards 15-LOX-1 (28 and 26%, respectively). Compound 4j turned out to be more toxic to PC3, HT29 and SKNMC cell lines with IC50 values of 4.96, 16.00 and 15.28 μM, respectively [85].
Compounds interacting with DNA
Numerous drugs, including those displaying anticancer properties, exert their activity by binding to DNA [86]. Ibuprofen and ciprofloxacin, two commercially available drugs, display the ability to bind to DNA, but hybridization of either compound with 1,3,4-thiadiazoles increases this ability. A hybrid molecule of ciprofloxacin and 1,3,4-thiadiazole, ({(3-(5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-7-(piperazin-1-yl)quinolin-4(1H)-one)}), termed compound 2, exhibits greater binding constant than ibuprofen linked with 1,3,4-thiadiazole ({(5-(1-(4-isobutylphenyl)ethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-amine)}), termed compound 1. Both derivatives display anticancer activity towards human hepatocellular carcinoma Huh-7 cells with IC50 values of 64.90 and 25.75 μM for compound 1 and 2, respectively. These results suggest that increased DNA binding correlates with enhanced anticancer properties of compound [87].
The hybrids of 1,3,4-thiadiazole and chalcone containing phenolic moiety are the other example of molecules binding to DNA. These derivatives exerted the strong cytotoxic activity against leukemia HL-60 cells with IC50 values in a range from 6.92 to 16.35 μM. Some of the compounds, termed 5a, 5f, 5 h, 5 l, and 5 m, presented cytotoxicity towards cervical cancer HeLa cells, with IC50 values from 9.12 to 12.72 μM. Lung carcinoma A549 cells were much less susceptible to those compounds (IC50 values between 21.80 and 92.14 μM). Unfortunately, more sensitive turned out be normal lung cells MRC-5 (IC50 values from 18.56 to 81.33 μM). The electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups of the acetophenone moiety seemed to have no influence on the cytotoxic activity against cancer cells, suggesting that the thiadiazole–chalcone pharmacophore played the crucial role in the cytotoxicity of these compounds. The derivatives most potent in HeLa cells, 5a ((E)-N-(5-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-4-(3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-en-1-yl)benz-amide), 5c ((E)-N-(5-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-4-(3-oxo-3-(m-tolyl)prop-1-en-1-yl)benz-amide), 5f ((E)-N-(5-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-4-(3-(3-methoxyphenyl)-3-oxoprop-1-en-1-yl)benzamide) and 5 m ((E)-N-(5-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-4-(3-oxo-3-(thiophen-2-yl)prop-1-en-1-yl)benzamide), were subjected to further analyses. Treatment with these compounds caused G2/M cell cycle arrest, triggered caspase-dependent apoptosis and induced DNA damage [88].
Conformational changes in DNA topology, necessary for transcription, replication and recombination of genetic material, are catalyzed by topoisomerases (Topo). Inhibition of the activity of these enzymes reduces DNA synthesis and cell division. Aside from the molecules that inhibit the catalytic activity of Topo, there are also Topo poisons converting this enzyme into a cell poison, leading to irreversible damage of genetic material [89]. Plech and co-workers synthesized 1,3,4-thiadizole derivatives of which two (compound 3 and 4) stabilized the DNA-TopoII cleavable complex, thus acting as topoII poisons. Among them, compound 3, 2-(4-bromophenylamino)-5-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole, displayed toxicity towards breast cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells (IC50 values of 120 and 70 μM, respectively), but did not harm fibroblasts. It diminished DNA synthesis in cancer cells, but not in fibroblasts, and inhibited the activity of topoII (Fig. 2) [90].
Miscellaneous compounds
Anticancer activity of a series of 5-substituted 2(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazoles was examined by Matysiak and co-workers [91]. Those compounds displayed cytotoxicity towards human cell lines derived from bladder cancer (HCV29T), non-small lung carcinoma (A549), rectal adenocarcinoma (SW707), and breast cancer (T47D). The most active against HCV29T cells were compound 7, bearing 4-(CH3)3C–C6H4 group, and compound 26, bearing 4-CH3O–C6H4–CH2O group (IC50 values of 3.7 and 1.1 μg/mL, respectively). Cisplatin, used as a reference drug, was much more toxic (IC50 of 0.7 μg/mL). Compounds 7 and 26 displayed significant cytotoxicity towards SW707 (IC50 values of 4.5 and 5.0 μg/ml, respectively), A549 (IC50 values of 12.8 and 7.9 μg/mL, respectively) and T47D (IC50 values of 4.0 and 3.0 μg/mL, respectively) cell lines. The activity of cisplatin was comparable against SW707 (IC50 value of 4.9 μg/mL), higher against A549 (IC50 value of 3.3 μg/mL), but lower against T47D (IC50 value of 6.2 μg/mL) cells. The structure–activity relationship (SAR) analysis indicated that aryl derivatives were more active compared to alkyl derivatives, but the influence of the type of aryl ring substituent on the activity was not significant. Joining the aryl ring by means of either –CH2– or –OCH2– link also did not improve the anticancer activity of compounds [91]. A further detailed quantitative SAR analysis revealed that electron properties of 1,3,4-thiadiazole ring was the most important factor for the activity of these derivatives. The type of substitution at the fifth carbon atom changed charge distribution of this moiety. Molar refractivity (CMR) turned out to be another parameter influencing the activity of 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives [92].
In the next study, cytotoxicity of a series of differently substituted in N-aryl ring 2-phenyloamino-5-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazoles against four aforementioned cell lines was examined. Compound I, with an unsubstituted amine group, showed a weak activity against HCV29T cells with IC50 value of 205.7 μM. All N-substituted derivatives, except for compounds bearing either 4-CH3–3-Cl–C6H3- or 4-CH3O–C6H4 group, were significantly more potent in this cell line and displayed IC50 ranging from 20.7 to 115 μM. Compound VIII with iodine atom in the para-position of the N-phenyl ring was the most active of the tested derivatives, yet less potent than cisplatin which IC50 value was 2.3 μM. This reference drug presented also considerable cytotoxicity in A549, SW707, and T47D cells (IC50 values of 11, 16.3 and 20.7 μM, respectively). None of the tested 2-phenyloamino-5-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives appeared to be more active than cisplatin in either A549 or SW707 cells (IC50 values ranging from 17.0 to 98.5 μM and from 19.5 to 96.7 μM, respectively). However, in T47D cell line, most of the tested compounds were more active (IC50 values from 9.7 to 19.9 μM) compared to cisplatin (IC50 value 20.7 μM). The highest activity displayed derivatives bearing either bromine or iodine atom in the para-position of aryl ring as well as 2-methyl-5-chlorophenyl derivative, suggesting an advantageous influence of electron-withdrawing (σ > 0) and hydrophobic (π > 0) substituents and polarizability of bromine and iodine atoms [93].
Among another series of N-substituted 2-amino-5-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazoles, phenyl derivatives turned out to be relatively active, although their potency was dependent on N-aromatic ring-substitution degree. In SW707 cells, the parent compound 4 displayed cytotoxicity comparable to that of cisplatin (IC50 values of 4.3 and 4.9 μg/mL, respectively). In three other cell lines, this compound was slightly less active compared to the reference drug. Substitution of phenyl ring with either the lipophilic electron-donating or morpholinoalkyl groups decreased the activity of the parent compound. On the contrary, the compound with the hydrophobic substituents (π > 0) of electron-withdrawing character (α > 0) appeared to be much more promising anticancer agents. Thus, the substitution of the ring with a fluorine atom in the para-position resulted in the activity towards HCV29T, SW707, T47D cells (IC50 values 6.2, 3.6 and 4.2 μg/mL, respectively) comparable or slightly higher than parent compound 4 and cisplatin. Similarly, the compound with a chlorine atom in the meta-position displayed cytotoxicity in HCV29T, SW707 and T47D cells (IC50 values 5.4, 3.7 and 3.9 μg/mL, respectively) comparable to that of the parent compound and the reference drug. Either modification did not increase the activity towards A549 cells. However, the substitution of the ring with two chlorine atoms in positions 2 and 4 resulted in the cytotoxicity comparable (IC50 value 5.3 μg/mL) in A549 cells or remarkably higher (IC50 values of 2.8 and 1.5 μg/mL, respectively) in SW707 and T47D cells to that of compound 4 and cisplatin. This compound turned out to be much less active in HCV29T cells (IC50 value 22.8 μg/mL). These results supported the previous notion that 2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole acts as pharmacophore of anticancer activity and 2,4-dihydroxyphenyl moiety in position 5 significantly contributes to cytotoxicity. Most likely, such a substituent not only contributes to the favorable hydrophobic-hydrophilic character but also affects electronic properties crucial in compound-target(s) interactions responsible for cytotoxic properties [94].
The promising results obtained for N-halogenphenyl derivatives resulted in a further in-depth analysis of those compounds. Among them, 2-(4-chlorophenylamino)-5-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole (herein referred to as CPDT) displayed the ability to diminish the viability of cancer cells. This compound turned out to be most toxic towards human thyroid carcinoma FTC238, colon carcinoma HT-29 and leukemia Jurkat cells (IC50 values from 6.4 to 6.7 μM) and mouse teratoma P19 cells (IC50 value 8.5 μM). Less susceptible to CPDT treatment were human breast carcinoma T47D, medulloblastoma TE671, astrocytoma MOGGCCM and rat glioma C6 cells (IC50 values of 10.7, 15.3, 19.4 and 12.7 μM, respectively). CPDT treatment diminished cancer cell proliferation and migration but did not affect the viability of non-cancerous rat astrocytes, neurons, hepatocytes as well as human fibroblasts [95].
The other derivative, 2-(4-fluorophenyloamino)-5-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole, herein termed FPDT, also diminished the viability of several cancer cell lines. Threshold concentrations of this compound required to elicit cytotoxic effect were as low as 5 μM (human colon cancer HT-29 cells), 10 μM (human lung carcinoma A549 and medulloblastoma TE671 cells), and 25 μM (human neuroblastoma SK-N-AS and rat glioma C6 cells). Moreover, FPDT treatment diminished proliferation and migration of C6 and A549 cells. It should be emphasized that FPDT did not affect non-cancerous cells, as rat astrocytes, neurons and hepatocytes were resistant to this compound up to 100 μM. Furthermore, neurotoxicity caused either by serum-deprivation or glutamate treatment was ameliorated by co-exposure to FPDT, indicating a neuroprotective activity of this compound. Quantum-chemical calculations confirmed that aminothiadiazole moiety acted as pharmacophore of cytotoxic activity of FPDT, and both the 2,4-dihydroxyphenyl and para-fluorophenyl substituents intensified its properties [96].
The more detailed molecular analysis revealed that in A549 cells treatment with FPDT decreased phosphorylation level of kinases involved in tumorigenesis, MEK1/2 and ERK1/2, as well as its downstream target, a transcription factor CREB. Furthermore, FPDT treatment enhanced the expression of p27/Kip1, members of the Cip/Kip family of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors which block cell cycle progression through the G1/S phase [97]. Indeed, treatment of A549 cells with FPDT increased the number of cells in the G0/G1 phase and decreased the number of cells in the S and G2/M phases [98]. Clearly further studies are required to elucidate whether and to what extend downregulation of the ERK pathway contributes to the anti-cancer properties of FPDT. Of note, our unpublished data strongly indicate that anticancer activity of this compound observed in human glioblastoma cells is causatively linked to downregulation of the AKT pathway, a cascade crucial for the pathogenesis of these tumors. It is, therefore, tempting to speculate that the mechanism underlying FPDT’s activity is related to some upstream signal molecules of the AKT and ERK pathways. For instance, several receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) have been shown to activate RAS proteins, which in turn modulate both AKT and ERK pathways [99].
Modulation of the other kinases upon treatment with 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives was also observed by Cascioferro and co-workers [100]. In this study, a series of 3-(imidazo [2,1-b] [1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl)-1H indole analogues were synthesized and their anticancer activity was evaluated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells. Compounds 12a (3-[6-(Thiophen-3-yl)imidazo[2,1-b] [1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-1H-indole hydrobromide) and 12b (1-Methyl-3-[6-(thiophen-3-yl)imidazo[2,1-b] [1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-1H-indole hydrobromide), exhibited a remarkable antiproliferative activity in SUIT-2, Capan-1 and Panc-1 cell lines with IC50 values ranging from 0.85 to 1.70 μM. Moreover, both compounds significantly inhibited the growth and migration of primary patient-derived adenocarcinoma cells and resistant to gemcitabine Panc-1R cells. Treatment with either compound decreased proteolytic activity of matrix metalloproteinases MMP2 and MMP9 and compound 12b diminished the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), a non-receptor tyrosine kinase which regulates cell proliferation and motility [100].
In another study from the same group, 5-Methoxy-3-[6-(4-nitrophenyl)imidazo[2,1-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-1H-indole, referred to as compound 9c, displayed anticancer activity in the cell lines mentioned above with IC50 values of 5.5–5.18 μM. Furthermore, this compound inhibited migration of SUIT-2 and Capan-1 cells more than gemcitabine [101], confirming the previous notion that imidazo[2,1-b][1,3,4]thiadiazole derivatives might be interesting scaffolds for designing new drugs (see “Inhibitors of tubulin polymerization”).
Conclusions
The anticancer potential of numerous thiadiazole derivatives is undeniable. However, the studies reviewed above have several limitations. First, caution needs to be taken when comparing compounds’ efficacy determined by different assay methods. Second, the activity of the majority of thiadiazole derivatives was evaluated in cancer cells, while their activity in non-cancerous cells remains unknown. Third, in most of the cited studies, the compounds’ efficacy was evaluated in models in vitro. Finally, the molecular targets of the majority of thiadiazole derivatives have not been identified so far. Further in-depth analyses are needed to determine compounds’ selectivity, bioavailability and mode of action. Nevertheless, data depicted above clearly indicate that thiadiazole moiety may be valuable lead structure in the development of new compounds with improved anticancer activity.
References
Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144:1941–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31937.
Li Y, Geng J, Liu Y, Yu S, Zhao G. Thiadiazole-a promising structure in medicinal chemistry. ChemMedChem. 2013;8:27–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201200355.
Haider S, Alam MS, Hamid H. 1,3,4-Thiadiazoles: a potent multi targeted pharmacological scaffold. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;6(92):156–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.12.035.
Haider K, Rahaman S, Yar MS, Kamal A. Tubulin inhibitors as novel anticancer agents: an overview on patents (2013–2018). Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2019;29:623–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2019.1648433.
Wu M, Sun Q, Yang C, Chen D, Ding J, Chen Y, et al. Synthesis and activity of combretastatin A-4 analogues: 1,2,3-thiadiazoles as potent antitumor agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007;17:869–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.11.060.
Bagatell R, Whitesell L. Altered Hsp90 function in cancer: a unique therapeutic opportunity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004;3:1021–30.
Cikotiene I, Kazlauskas E, Matuliene J, Michailoviene V, Torresan J, Jachno J, et al. 5-Aryl-4-(5-substituted-2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,2,3-thiadiazoles as inhibitors of Hsp90 chaperone. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009;19:1089–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.01.003.
Sharp SY, Roe SM, Kazlauskas E, Cikotienė I, Workman P, Matulis D, et al. Co-crystalization and in vitro biological characterization of 5-aryl-4-(5-substituted-2-4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,2,3-thiadiazole Hsp90 inhibitors. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e44642. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044642.
Nikas I, Ryu HS, Theocharis S. Viewing the Eph receptors with a focus on breast cancer heterogeneity. Cancer Lett. 2018;434:160–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2018.07.030.
Cui HW, Peng S, Gu XZ, Chen H, He Y, Gao W, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of d-ring fused 1,2,3-thiadiazole dehydroepiandrosterone derivatives as antitumor agents. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;111:126–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.01.058.
Dai H, Ge S, Li G, Chen J, Shi Y, Ye L, et al. Synthesis and bioactivities of novel pyrazole oxime derivatives containing a 1,2,3-thiadiazole moiety. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016;26:4504–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.07.068.
Ferraz-da-Costa DC, Pereira-Rangel L, Martins-Dinis MMDDC, Ferretti GDDS, Ferreira VF, Silva JL. Anticancer potential of resveratrol, β-lapachone and their analogues. Molecules. 2020;25:893. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040893.
Mayhoub AS, Marler L, Kondratyuk TP, Park EJ, Pezzuto JM, Cushman M. Optimizing thiadiazole analogues of resveratrol versus three chemopreventive targets. Bioorg Med Chem. 2012;20:510–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2011.09.031.
Romagnoli R, Baraldi PG, Carrion MD, Cruz-Lopez O, Preti D, Tabrizi MA, et al. Hybrid molecules containing benzo[4,5]imidazo[1,2-d][1,2,4]thiadiazole and alpha-bromoacryloyl moieties as potent apoptosis inducers on human myeloid leukaemia cells. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007;17:2844–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.02.048.
Huang HS, Chen TC, Chen RH, Huang KF, Huang FC, Jhan JR, et al. Synthesis, cytotoxicity and human telomerase inhibition activities of a series of 1,2-heteroannelated anthraquinones and anthra[1,2-d]imidazole-6,11-dione homologues. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009;17:7418–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2009.09.033.
Chen YW, Huang HS, Shieh YS, Ma KH, Huang SH, Hueng DY, et al. A novel compound NSC745885 exerts an anti-tumor effect on tongue cancer SAS cells in vitro and in vivo. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e104703. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104703.
Shi Y, Wang XX, Zhuang YW, Jiang Y, Melcher K, Xu HE. Structure of the PRC2 complex and application to drug discovery. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38:963–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2017.7.
Tang SH, Huang HS, Wu HU, Tsai YT, Chuang MJ, Yu CP, et al. Pharmacologic down-regulation of EZH2 suppresses bladder cancer in vitro and in vivo. Oncotarget. 2014;5:10342–55. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.1867.
Ali AA, Lee YR, Chen TC, Chen CL, Lee CC, Shiau CY, et al. Novel anthra[1,2-c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-6,11-diones as promising anticancer lead compounds: biological evaluation, characterization and molecular targets determination. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(4):e0154278. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154278(eCollection 2016).
Lee YR, Chen TC, Lee CC, Chen CL, Ahmed Ali AA, Tikhomirov A, et al. Ring fusion strategy for synthesis and lead optimization of sulfur-substituted anthra[1,2-c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-6,11-dione derivatives as promising scaffold of antitumor agents. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;102:661–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.07.052.
Degirmenci U, Wang M, Hu J. Targeting Aberrant RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling for cancer therapy. Cells. 2020;9:198. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9010198.
Martínez-Limón A, Joaquin M, Caballero M, Posas F, de Nadal E. The p38 pathway: from biology to cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21061913.
Lin PL, Chang JT, Wu DW, Huang CC, Lee H. Cytoplasmic localization of Nrf2 promotes colorectal cancer with more aggressive tumors via upregulation of PSMD4. Free Radic Biol Med. 2016;95:121–32.
Gelibter AJ, Caponnetto S, Urbano F, Emiliani A, Scagnoli S, Sirgiovanni G, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in resected colon cancer: when, how and how long? Surg Oncol. 2019;30:100–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2019.06.003.
Shen CJ, Lin PL, Lin HC, Cheng YW, Huang HS, Lee H. RV-59 suppresses cytoplasmic Nrf2-mediated 5-fluorouracil resistance and tumor growth in colorectal cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9:2789–96.
Shapiro DM, Shils ME, Fugmann RA, Friedland IM. Quantitative biochemical differences between tumor and host as a basis for cancer chemotherapy. IV. Niacin and 2-ethylamino-1, 3, 4-thiadiazole. Cancer Res. 1957;17:29–33.
Ciotti MM, Humphreys SR, Venditti JM, Kaplan NO, Goldin A. The antileukemic action of two thiadiazole derivatives. Cancer Res. 1960;20:1195–201.
Nelson JA, Rose LM, Bennett LL. Effects of 2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole on ribonucleotide pools of leukemia L1210 cells. Cancer Res. 1976;36:1375–8.
Nelson JA, Rose LM, Bennett LL Jr. Mechanism of action of 2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole (NSC 4728). Cancer Res. 1977;37:182–7.
Stewart JA, Ackerly CC, Myers CF, Newman RA, Krakoff IH. Clinical and clinical pharmacologic studies of 2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole (A-TDA:NSC 4728). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1986;16:287–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293994.
Elson PJ, Kvols LK, Vogl SE, Glover DJ, Hahn RG, Trump DL, et al. Phase II trials of 5-day vinblastine infusion (NSC 49842), l-alanosine (NSC 153353), acivicin (NSC 163501), and aminothiadiazole (NSC 4728) in patients with recurrent or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Invest New Drugs. 1988;6:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00195367.
Asbury RF, Kramar A, Haller DG. Aminothiadiazole (NSC #4728) in patients with advanced colon cancer. A phase II study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1987;10:380–2. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-198710000-00003.
Asbury RF, Blessing JA, Mortel R, Homesley HD, Malfetano J. Aminothiadiazole (NSC #4728) in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma. A phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1987;10:299–301. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-198708000-00008.
Asbury RF, Blessing JA, DiSaia PJ, Malfetano J. Aminothiadiazole (NSC 4728) in patients with advanced nonsquamous carcinoma of the cervix. A phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1989;12:375–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-198910000-00002.
Asbury R, Blessing JA, Moore D. A phase II trial of aminothiadiazole in patients with mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterine corpus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Clin Oncol. 1996;19:400–2. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-199608000-00017.
Asbury R, Blessing JA, Smith DM, Carson LF. Aminothiadiazole in the treatment of advanced leiomyosarcoma of the uterine corpus. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Am J Clin Oncol. 1995;18:397–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-199510000-00007.
Engstrom PF, Ryan LM, Falkson G, Haller DG. Phase II study of aminothiadiazole in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Am J Clin Oncol. 1991;14:33–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-199102000-00007.
Zamanova S, Shabana AM, Mondal UK, Ilies MA. Carbonic anhydrases as disease markers. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2019;29:509–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2019.1629419.
Supuran CT, Scozzafava A. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors—part 94. 1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-sulfonamidederivatives as antitumor agents? Eur J Med Chem. 2000;35:867–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0223-5234(00)00169-0.
Morsy SM, Badawi AM, Cecchi A, Scozzafava A, Supuran CT. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Biphenylsulfonamides with inhibitory action towards the transmembrane, tumor-associated isozymes IX possess cytotoxic activity against human colon, lung and breast cancer cell lines. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2009;24:499–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/14756360802218441.
Matés JM, Campos-Sandoval JA, Santos-Jiménez JL, Márquez J. Dysregulation of glutaminase and glutamine synthetase in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2019;467:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.09.011.
Le A, Lane AN, Hamaker M, Bose S, Gouw A, Barbi J, et al. Glucose-independent glutamine metabolism via TCA cycling for proliferation and survival in B cells. Cell Metab. 2012;15:110–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2011.12.009.
Seltzer MJ, Bennett BD, Joshi AD, Gao P, Thomas AG, Ferraris DV, et al. Inhibition of glutaminase preferentially slows growth of glioma cells with mutant IDH1. Cancer Res. 2010;70:8981–7. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1666.
Lee JS, Kang JH, Lee SH, Lee CH, Son J, Kim SY. Glutaminase 1 inhibition reduces thymidine synthesis in NSCLC. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;477:374–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.06.095.
Emadi A, Jun SA, Tsukamoto T, Fathi AT, Minden MD, Dang CV. Inhibition of glutaminase selectively suppresses the growth of primary acute myeloid leukemia cells with IDH mutations. Exp Hematol. 2014;42:247–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2013.12.001.
Xiang Y, Stine ZE, Xia J, Lu Y, O'Connor RS, Altman BJ, et al. Targeted inhibition of tumor-specific glutaminase diminishes cell-autonomous tumorigenesis. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:2293–306. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI75836.
Zimmermann SC, Duvall B, Tsukamoto T. Recent progress in the discovery of allosteric inhibitors of kidney-type glutaminase. J Med Chem. 2019;62:46–59. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00327.
Shukla K, Ferraris DV, Thomas AG, Stathis M, Duvall B, Delahanty G, et al. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of bis-2-(5-phenylacetamido-1,2,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)ethyl sulfide 3 (BPTES) analogs as glutaminase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2012;55:10551–63. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm301191p.
Gross MI, Demo SD, Dennison JB, Chen L, Chernov-Rogan T, Goyal B, et al. Antitumor activity of the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:890–901. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0870.
Momcilovic M, Bailey ST, Lee JT, Fishbein MC, Magyar C, Braas D, et al. Targeted inhibition of EGFR and glutaminase induces metabolic crisis in EGFR mutant lung cancer. Cell Rep. 2017;18:601–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.061.
Boysen G, Jamshidi-Parsian A, Davis MA, Siegel ER, Simecka CM, Kore RA, et al. Glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 increases radiation sensitivity of lung tumor cells and human lung tumor xenografts in mice. Int J Radiat Biol. 2019;95:436–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2018.1558299.
Sheikh TN, Patwardhan PP, Cremers S, Schwartz GK. Targeted inhibition of glutaminase as a potential new approach for the treatment of NF1 associated soft tissue malignancies. Oncotarget. 2017;8:94054–68. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21573.
Peterse EFP, Niessen B, Addie RD, de Jong Y, Cleven AHG, Kruisselbrink AB, et al. Targeting glutaminolysis in chondrosarcoma in context of the IDH1/2 mutation. Br J Cancer. 2018;118:1074–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0050-9.
Lee P, Malik D, Perkons N, Huangyang P, Khare S, Rhoades S, et al. Targeting glutamine metabolism slows soft tissue sarcoma growth. Nat Commun. 2020;11:498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14374-1.
McDermott LA, Iyer P, Vernetti L, Rimer S, Sun J, Boby M, et al. Design and evaluation of novel glutaminase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem. 2016;24:1819–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2016.03.009.
Huang Q, Stalnecker C, Zhang C, McDermott LA, Iyer P, O'Neill J, et al. Characterization of the interactions of potent allosteric inhibitors with glutaminase C, a key enzyme in cancer cell glutamine metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:3535–45. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M117.810101.
Wawruszak A, Kalafut J, Okon E, Czapinski J, Halasa M, Przybyszewska A, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and phenotypical transformation of cancer cells. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11:148. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020148.
Rajak H, Agarawal A, Parmar P, Thakur BS, Veerasamy R, Sharma PC, et al. 2,5-Disubstituted-1,3,4-oxadiazoles/thiadiazole as surface recognition moiety: design and synthesis of novel hydroxamic acid based histone deacetylase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011;21:5735–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.08.022.
Guan P, Sun F, Hou X, Wang F, Yi F, Xu W, et al. Design, synthesis and preliminary bioactivity studies of 1,3,4-thiadiazole hydroxamic acid derivatives as novel histone deacetylase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem. 2012;20:3865–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2012.04.032.
Guan P, Wang L, Hou X, Wan Y, Xu W, Tang W, et al. Improved antiproliferative activity of 1,3,4-thiadiazole-containing histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors by introduction of the heteroaromatic surface recognition motif. Bioorg Med Chem. 2014;22:5766–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2014.09.039.
Nam NH, Huong TL, Dung-do TM, Dung PT, Oanh DT, Park SH, et al. Synthesis, bioevaluation and docking study of 5-substitutedphenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-based hydroxamic acids as histone deacetylase inhibitors and antitumor agents. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2014;29:611–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/14756366.2013.832238.
Myers SM, Collins I. Recent findings and future directions for interpolar mitotic kinesin inhibitors in cancer therapy. Future Med Chem. 2016;8:463–89. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc.16.5.
Nakai R, Iida S, Takahashi T, Tsujita T, Okamoto S, Takada C, et al. K858, a novel inhibitor of mitotic kinesin Eg5 and antitumor agent, induces cell death in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3901–9. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4373.
De Monte C, Carradori S, Secci D, D'Ascenzio M, Guglielmi P, Mollica A, et al. Synthesis and pharmacological screening of a large library of 1,3,4-thiadiazolines as innovative therapeutic tools for the treatment of prostate cancer and melanoma. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;105:245–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.10.023.
De Iuliis F, Taglieri L, Salerno G, Giuffrida A, Milana B, Giantulli S, et al. The kinesin Eg5 inhibitor K858 induces apoptosis but also survivin-related chemoresistance in breast cancer cells. Invest New Drugs. 2016;34:399–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-016-0345-8.
Taglieri L, Rubinacci G, Giuffrida A, Carradori S, Scarpa S. The kinesin Eg5 inhibitor K858 induces apoptosis and reverses the malignant invasive phenotype in human glioblastoma cells. Invest New Drugs. 2018;36:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-017-0517-1.
Carter BZ, Mak DH, Woessner R, Gross S, Schober WD, Estrov Z, et al. Inhibition of KSP by ARRY-520 induces cell cycle block and cell death via the mitochondrial pathway in AML cells. Leukemia. 2009;23:1755–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2009.101.
Woessner R, Tunquist B, Lemieux C, Chlipala E, Jackinsky S, Dewolf W Jr, et al. ARRY-520, a novel KSP inhibitor with potent activity in hematological and taxane-resistant tumor models. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:4373–80.
Tunquist BJ, Woessner RD, Walker DH. Mcl-1 stability determines mitotic cell fate of human multiple myeloma tumor cells treated with the kinesin spindle protein inhibitor ARRY-520. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9:2046–56. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0033.
Khoury HJ, Garcia-Manero G, Borthakur G, Kadia T, Foudray MC, Arellano M, et al. A phase 1 dose-escalation study of ARRY-520, a kinesin spindle protein inhibitor, in patients with advanced myeloid leukemias. Cancer. 2012;118:3556–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26664.
LoRusso PM, Goncalves PH, Casetta L, Carter JA, Litwiler K, Roseberry D, et al. First-in-human phase 1 study of filanesib (ARRY-520), a kinesin spindle protein inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2015;33:440–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-015-0211-0.
Chari A, Htut M, Zonder JA, Fay JW, Jakubowiak AJ, Levy JB, et al. A phase 1 dose-escalation study of filanesib plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with recurrent/refractory multiple myeloma. Cancer. 2016;122:3327–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30174.
Shah JJ, Kaufman JL, Zonder JA, Cohen AD, Bensinger WI, Hilder BW, et al. A Phase 1 and 2 study of filanesib alone and in combination with low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Cancer. 2017;123:4617–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30892.
Ye XS, Fan L, Van Horn RD, Nakai R, Ohta Y, Akinaga S, et al. A novel Eg5 inhibitor (LY2523355) causes mitotic arrest and apoptosis in cancer cells and shows potent antitumor activity in xenograft tumor models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14:2463–72. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0241.
Wakui H, Yamamoto N, Kitazono S, Mizugaki H, Nakamichi S, Fujiwara Y, et al. A phase 1 and dose-finding study of LY2523355 (litronesib), an Eg5 inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;74:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-014-2467-z.
Infante JR, Patnaik A, Verschraegen CF, Olszanski AJ, Shaheen M, Burris HA, et al. Two Phase 1 dose-escalation studies exploring multiple regimens of litronesib (LY2523355), an Eg5 inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;79:315–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3205-5.
Kamal A, Rao MP, Das P, Swapna P, Polepalli S, Nimbarte VD, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of imidazo[2,1-b][1,3,4]thiadiazole-linked oxindoles as potent tubulin polymerization inhibitors. Chem Med Chem. 2014;9:1463–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201400069.
Narasimha Rao MP, Nagaraju B, Kovvuri J, Polepalli S, Alavala S, Vishnuvardhan MVPS, et al. Synthesis of imidazo-thiadiazole linked indolinone conjugates and evaluated their microtubule network disrupting and apoptosis inducing ability. Bioorg Chem. 2018;76:420–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2017.11.021.
Khatri A, Wang J, Pendergast AM. Multifunctional Abl kinases in health and disease. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.175521.
Musumeci F, Schenone S, Brullo C, Botta M. An update on dual Src/Abl inhibitors. Future Med Chem. 2012;4:799–822. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc.12.29.
Radi M, Crespan E, Botta G, Falchi F, Maga G, Manetti F, et al. Discovery and SAR of 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives as potent Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors and cytodifferentiating agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18:1207–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.11.112.
Altıntop MD, Ciftci HI, Radwan MO, Sever B, Kaplancıklı ZA, Ali TFS, et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives as potential antitumor agents against chronic myelogenous leukemia: striking effect of nitrothiazole moiety. Molecules. 2017;23:59. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23010059.
Klil-Drori AJ, Ariel A. 15-Lipoxygenases in cancer: a double-edged sword? Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2013;106:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2013.07.006.
Aliabadi A, Mohammadi-Farani A, Hosseinzadeh Z, Nadri H, Moradi A, Ahmadi F. Phthalimide analogs as probable 15-lipoxygenase-1 inhibitors: synthesis, biological evaluation and docking studies. Daru. 2015;23:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40199-015-0118-5.
Aliabadi A, Mohammadi-Farani A, Roodabeh S, Ahmadi F. Synthesis and biological evaluation of N-(5-(pyridin-2-yl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)benzamide derivatives as lipoxygenase inhibitor with potential anticancer activity. Iran J Pharm Res. 2017;16:165–72.
Portugal J. Challenging transcription by DNA-binding antitumor drugs. Biochem Pharmacol. 2018;155:336–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2018.07.030.
Farooqi SI, Arshad N, Channar PA, Perveen F, Saeed A, Larik FA, et al. Synthesis, theoretical, spectroscopic and electrochemical DNA binding investigations of 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives of ibuprofen and ciprofloxacin: Cancer cell line studies. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2018;189:104–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.10.006.
Jakovljević K, Joksović MD, Matić IZ, Petrović N, Stanojković T, Sladić D, et al. Novel 1,3,4-thiadiazole-chalcone hybrids containing catechol moiety: synthesis, antioxidant activity, cytotoxicity and DNA interaction studies. Medchemcomm. 2018;9:1679–97. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8md00316e.
Delgado JL, Hsieh CM, Chan NL, Hiasa H. Topoisomerases as anticancer targets. Biochem J. 2018;475:373–98. https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160583.
Plech T, Kaproń B, Paneth A, Wujec M, Czarnomysy R, Bielawska A, et al. Search for human DNA topoisomerase II poisons in the group of 2,5-disubstituted-1,3,4-thiadiazoles. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2015;30:1021–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/14756366.2014.995179.
Matysiak J, Nasulewicz A, Pełczyńska M, Switalska M, Jaroszewicz I, Opolski A. Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of some 5-substituted 2-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazoles. Eur J Med Chem. 2006;41:475–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2005.12.007.
Matysiak J. Evaluation of electronic, lipophilic and membrane affinity effects on antiproliferative activity of 5-substituted-2-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazoles against various human cancer cells. Eur J Med Chem. 2007;42:940–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2006.12.033.
Matysiak J. Evaluation of antiproliferative effect in vitro of some 2-amino-5-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2006;54:988–91. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.54.988.
Matysiak J, Opolski A. Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of N-substituted 2-amino-5-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazoles. Bioorg Med Chem. 2006;14:4483–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2006.02.027.
Juszczak M, Matysiak J, Niewiadomy A, Rzeski W. The activity of a new 2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole derivative 4ClABT in cancer and normal cells. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2011;49:436–44. https://doi.org/10.5603/fhc.2011.0062.
Rzeski W, Matysiak J, Kandefer-Szerszeń M. Anticancer, neuroprotective activities and computational studies of 2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole based compound. Bioorg Med Chem. 2007;15:3201–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2007.02.041.
Wei J, Zhao J, Long M, Han Y, Wang X, Lin F, et al. p21WAF1/CIP1 gene transcriptional activation exerts cell growth inhibition and enhances chemosensitivity to cisplatin in lung carcinoma cell. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:632. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-632.
Juszczak M, Matysiak J, Szeliga M, Pożarowski P, Niewiadomy A, Albrecht J, et al. 2-Amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole derivative (FABT) inhibits the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway and induces cell cycle arrest in human non-small lung carcinoma cells. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012;22:5466–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.07.036.
Simanshu DK, Nissley DV, McCormick F. RAS proteins and their regulators in human disease. Cell. 2017;170:17–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009.
Cascioferro S, Petri GL, Parrino B, Carbone D, Funel N, Bergonzini C, et al. Imidazo[2,1-b] [1,3,4]thiadiazoles with antiproliferative activity against primary and gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;189:112088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112088.
Cascioferro S, Li Petri G, Parrino B, El Hassouni B, Carbone D, Arizza V, et al. 3-(6-Phenylimidazo [2,1-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl)-1H-Indole derivatives as new anticancer agents in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Molecules. 2020;25:329. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020329.
Acknowledgements
This invited review was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education under the agreement No. 879/P-DUN/2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Szeliga, M. Thiadiazole derivatives as anticancer agents. Pharmacol. Rep 72, 1079–1100 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-020-00154-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-020-00154-7