Skip to main content
Log in

The incidence and risk factors for perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in primary idiopathic scoliosis surgery

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study design

Case–control study.

Objectives

Evaluate the rate and risk factors for perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) in primary idiopathic scoliosis surgery at a single institution.

Summary of background data

Avoiding perioperative ABT is ideal as transfusions are associated with adverse reactions, increased rates of infection, prolonged hospitalization, additional laboratory testing, and increased cost. Risk factors identified in other studies have differed, and to our knowledge, few studies have identified clinical strategies to predict patients at high risk for ABT.

Methods

We reviewed 402 idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent primary posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation (PSFI) at a single institution from 2015 to 2017. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed for all patients. Transfused patients were compared to the remaining cohort to find significant differences and identify predictors of higher ABT risk.

Results

ABT occurred in 73 patients (18.2%), with the majority of transfusions occurring intraoperatively (41%) or postoperatively on the day of surgery (25%). The seven surgeons involved varied significantly in incidence of ABT (2.4–35.8%, p = 0.002). Patients who had ABT were younger (13.3 vs. 14.1 years, p < 0.01), had lower BMI (48th vs. 61st percentile, p < 0.001), and lower preoperative hemoglobin (13.1 vs. 13.7 g/dL, p < 0.01). Greater preoperative major Cobb angle (69° vs. 61.5°, p < 0.001), number of fusion levels (11.8 vs. 10.3, p < 0.001), and estimated blood loss (770 vs. 448 mL, p < 0.001) also predicted ABT.

Conclusions

ABT was associated with several risk factors, five of which are known preoperatively. Surgeons can use knowledge of these risk factors to assess transfusion risk preoperatively and plan surgery, blood management, and laboratory testing accordingly. The development of best practices for ordering ABT is possible given the variation amongst providers.

Level of evidence

Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoshihara H, Yoneoka D (2014) Predictors of allogeneic blood transfusion in spinal fusion for pediatric patients with idiopathic scoliosis in the United States, 2004–2009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(22):1860–1867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koerner JD et al (2014) Blood loss during posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(18):1479–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McLeod LM et al (2015) Antifibrinolytic use and blood transfusions in pediatric scoliosis surgeries performed at US Children's hospitals. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(8):E460–E466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Minhas SV et al (2015) Assessing the rates, predictors, and complications of blood transfusion volume in posterior arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(18):1422–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohrt-Nissen S et al (2017) Blood transfusion in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—a single-center experience of patient blood management in 210 cases. Transfusion 57(7):1808–1817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liang J et al (2015) Does intraoperative cell salvage system effectively decrease the need for allogeneic transfusions in scoliotic patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion? A prospective randomized study. Eur Spine J 24(2):270–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang M, Zheng XF, Jiang LS (2015) Efficacy and safety of antifibrinolytic agents in reducing perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0137886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Loughenbury PR et al (2016) Benefits of the use of blood conservation in scoliosis surgery. World J Orthop 7(12):808–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmotzer CL et al (2010) Procedure-specific preoperative red blood cell preparation and utilization management in pediatric surgical patients. Transfusion 50(4):861–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cristante AF et al (2014) Predictive factors for perioperative blood transfusion in surgeries for correction of idiopathic, neuromuscular or congenital scoliosis. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 69(10):672–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dupuis C et al (2015) Predictive factors for homologous transfusion during paediatric scoliosis surgery. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 34(6):327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson ME et al (2014) Predicting excessive hemorrhage in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion. Spine J 14(8):1392–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ialenti MN et al (2013) Predicting operative blood loss during spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 33(4):372–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berney MJ et al (2015) Eliminating the use of allogeneic blood products in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(Suppl 1):S219–S223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Everhart JS et al (2018) Perioperative allogeneic red blood-cell transfusion associated with surgical site infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 100(4):288–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwarzkopf R et al (2010) Effects of perioperative blood product use on surgical site infection following thoracic and lumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(3):340–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuczmarski RJ et al (2002) CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11(246):1–190

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bosch P et al (2016) Coagulation profile of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion. J Bone Jt Surg Am 98(20):e88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goodnough LT et al (2014) Restrictive blood transfusion practices are associated with improved patient outcomes. Transfusion 54(10 Pt 2):2753–2759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Markiewicz MR et al (2017) Does receiving a blood transfusion predict for length of stay in children undergoing cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis? Outcomes using the pediatric national surgical quality improvement program dataset. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 75(8):1732–1741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Klika AK et al (2014) Primary total knee arthroplasty allogenic transfusion trends, length of stay, and complications: nationwide inpatient sample 2000–2009. J Arthroplasty 29(11):2070–2077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogala EJ, Drummond DS, Gurr J (1978) Scoliosis: incidence and natural history. A prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 60(2):173–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Murphy WG, Tong E, Murphy C (2010) Why do women have similar erythropoietin levels to men but lower hemoglobin levels? Blood 116(15):2861–2862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zavatsky JM et al (2015) Disease severity and treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the impact of race and economic status. Spine J 15(5):939–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nuno M, Drazin DG, Acosta FL Jr (2013) Differences in treatments and outcomes for idiopathic scoliosis patients treated in the United States from 1998 to 2007: impact of socioeconomic variables and ethnicity. Spine J 13(2):116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children Research Department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This was an IRB-approved study. Tyler R. Mange, Daniel J. Sucato, Kiley F. Poppino, Brandon R. Ramo—Concept; Tyler R. Mange, Daniel J. Sucato, Kiley F. Poppino, Brandon R. Ramo—data curation; Tyler R. Mange, Daniel J. Sucato, Kiley F. Poppino, Chan-hee Jo, Brandon R. Ramo—formal analysis; Tyler R. Mange, Daniel J. Sucato, Kiley F. Poppino, Brandon R. Ramo—methodology; Tyler R. Mange—writing: original draft; Tyler R. Mange, Daniel J. Sucato, Kiley F. Poppino, Chan-hee Jo, Brandon R. Ramo—Writing: review and editing; Tyler R. Mange, Daniel J. Sucato, Kiley F. Poppino, Chan-hee Jo, Brandon R. Ramo—final approval prior to admission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Sucato.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mange, T.R., Sucato, D.J., Poppino, K.F. et al. The incidence and risk factors for perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in primary idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine Deform 8, 695–702 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00093-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00093-6

Keywords

Navigation