Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals, romantic partners, and families wrestled with the challenges of managing day-to-day functioning. Although some couples struggled to manage the pandemic, others worked together to strengthen their relationship and navigate this unknown transition. This study, informed by the communication theory of resilience, offers a dyadic test of relational turbulence theory to explore how resilience can buffer couples’ experiences of turbulence. Specifically, this study examines actors’ and partners’ forms of communicated resilience as predictors of relational uncertainty, interdependence processes, and relational turbulence. The sample included 151 romantic dyads (N = 302) from across the United States who completed weekly surveys over the course of four weeks during the early stages of the pandemic. We analyzed the data using multi-level modeling to document between- and within-person effects for actors and partners. Our results generally support our hypotheses such that, across different types of resilience, both actors’ and partners’ enacted resilience predict actors’ experiences with relational uncertainty, partner interference, partner facilitation, and relational turbulence. We discuss our results in terms of the theoretical utility of the communication theory of resilience and relational turbulence theory and the practical utility of our findings for helping couples manage turmoil associated with COVID-19 and similar crises.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Due to the nature of this research, participants of this study did not agree for their data to be shared publicly, so supporting data is not available.
References
Afifi, T. D. (2018). Individual/relational resilience. Journal of Applied. Communication, 46(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2018.1426707
Afifi, T. D., Merrill, A. F., & Davis, S. (2016). The theory of resilience and relational load. Personal Relationships, 23(4), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12159
Aloia, L. S., & Solomon, D. H. (n.d.). Conflict intensity, family history, and physiological stress reactions to conflict within romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 41(3), 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12049
Balzarini, R. N., Muise, A., Zoppolat, G., Di Bartolomeo, A., Rodrigues, D. L., Alonso-Ferres, M., Urganci, B., Debrot, A., Pichayayothin, N. B., Dharma, C., Chi, P., Karremans, J., Schoebi, D., & Slatcher, R. B. (2020). Love in the time of COVID: Perceived partner responsiveness buffers people from lower relationship quality associated with COVID-related stressors. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/e3fh4
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications.
Buzzanell, P. M. (2010). Resilience: Talking, resisting, and imagining new normalcies into being. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01469.x
Brisini, K. S. C., & Solomon, D. H. (2020). Children’s transitions and relational turbulence in marriage: Can transition processing communication help? Journal of Family Communication, 20(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2019.1662421
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenbery, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8
Chernichky-Karcher, S., Venetis, M. K., & Lillie, H. (2019). The dyadic communicative resilience scale (DCRS): Scale development, reliability, and validity. Supportive Care in Cancer, 27(12), 4555–4564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04763-8
Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 665–697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665
Eisman, A. B., Stoddard, S. A., Heinze, J., Caldwell, C. H., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2015). Depressive symptoms, social support, and violence exposure among urban youth. A longitudinal study of resilience. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1307–1316. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039501
Florian, V., Mikulincer, M., & Hirschberger, G. (2002). The anxiety-buffering function of close relationships: Evidence that relationship commitment acts as a terror management mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.527
Goodboy, A. K., Dillow, M. R., Knoster, K. C., & Howard, H. A. (2021). Relational turbulence from the COVID-19 pandemic: Within-subjects mediation by romantic partner interdependence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211000135
Goodwin, R., Hou, W. K., Sun, S., & Ben-Ezra, M. (2020). Quarantine, distress and interpersonal relationships during COVID-19. General Psychiatry, 33(6), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2020-100385
Hall, E. D., & Scharp, K. M. (2021). Communicative predictors of social network resilience skills during the transition to college. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(4), 1238–1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520983467
Kahn, K. S., Mamun, M. A., Griffiths, M. D., & Ullah, I. (2020). The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across different cohorts. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20, 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00367-0
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford.
Knobloch, L. K. (2007). Perceptions of turmoil within courtship: Associations with intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507077227
Knobloch, L. K., & Solomon, D. H. (1999). Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty. Communication Studies, 50(4), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979909388499
Knobloch, L. K., & Solomon, D. H. (2004). Interference and facilitation from partners in the development of interdependence within romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 11(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00074.x
Knobloch, L. K., & Theiss, J. A. (2011). Depressive symptoms and mechanisms of relational turbulence as predictors of relational satisfaction among returning service members. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(4), 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024063
Lam, C. B., Lam, C. S., & Chung, K. K. H. (2022). Does mindfulness moderate the link of worry about COVID-19 with adjustment? An actor-partner interdependence model approach. Mindfulness, 13, 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01818-y
Lester, P., Stein, J. A., Saltzman, W., Woodward, K., MacDermid, S. W., Milburn, N., Mogil, C., & Beardslee, W. (2013). Psychological health of military children: Longitudinal evaluation of a family-centered prevention program to enhance family resilience. Military Medicine, 178(8), 838–845. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00502
Lee, S., Benedict, B. C., Jarvis, C. M., Siebeneck, L., & Kuenanz, B. (2020). Support and barriers in long-term recovery after Hurricane Sandy: Improvisation as a communicative process of resilience. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(4), 438–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2020.1797142
Lillie, H. M., Chernichky-Karcher, S., & Venetis, M. K. (2021). Dyadic coping and discrete emotions during COVID-19: Connecting the communication theory of resilience with relational uncertainty. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(6), 1844–1868. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211009302
Lillie, H. M., Venetis, M. K., & Chernichky-Karcher, S. M. (2018). “He would never let me just give up”: Communicatively constructing dyadic resilience in the experience of breast cancer. Health Communication, 33(12), 1516–1524. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1372049
Luetke, M., Hensel, D., Herbenick, D., & Rosenberg, M. (2020). Romantic relationship conflict due to the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in intimate and sexual behaviors in a nationally representative sample of American adults. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 46(8), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/009263X
Luthar, S. S. (2003). Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities. Cambridge University Press.
Melvin, K. C., Gross, D., Hayat, M. J., Jennings, B. M., & Campbell, J. C. (2011). Couple functioning and post-traumatic stress symptoms in US army couples: The role of resilience. Research in Nursing & Health, 35(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21459
Overall, N. C., Chang, V. T., Pietromonaco, P. R., Low, R. S. T., & Henderson, A. M. E. (2020). Partners’ attachment insecurity and stress predict poorer relationship functioning during COVID-19 quarantines. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7cvdm
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Overall, N. C. (2020). Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships. American Psychologist, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000714
Prime, H., Wade, M., & Browne, D. T. (2022). Pandemic-related disruption and positive adaptation: Profiles of family function at the onset of the pandemic. Adversity and Resilience Science, 3, 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42844-022-00077-7
Sherblom, J. C., Umphrey, L. R., & Swiatkowski, P. (2022). Resilience, identity tension, hope, social capital, and psychological stress during a pandemic. Adversity & Resilience Science, 3, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42844-021-00049-3
Solomon, D. H., & Brisini, K. S. (2017). Operationalizing relational turbulence theory: Measurement and construct validation. Personal Relationships, 24(4), 768–789. 10.111/pere12212.
Solomon, D. H., & Knobloch, L. K. (2001). Relationship uncertainty, partner interference, and intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(6), 804–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407501186004
Solomon, D. H., Knobloch, L. K., Theiss, J. A., & McLaren, R. M. (2016). Relational turbulence theory: Explaining variation in subjective experiences and communication within romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 507–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12091
Sanford, K., Backer-Fulghum, L., & Carson, C. (2016). Couple resilience inventory: Two dimensions of naturally occurring relationship behavior during stressful life events. Psychological Assessment, 28(10), 1243–1254. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000256
Theiss, J. A., & Weber, K. M. (2016). Antecedents and outcomes of relationship maintenance behaviors during the transition to parenthood. Paper Presented at the Meeting of the National Communication Association, Philadelphia, PA.
Tian, Z., & Bush, H. R. (2019). Half the sky: Interwoven resilience processes of women political leaders in China. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(1), 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1704829
Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320
Usher, K., Bhullar, N., Durkin, J., Gyamfi, N., & Jackson, D. (2020). Family violence and COVID-19: Increased vulnerability and reduced options for support. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 29(4), 549–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12735
Venetis, M. K., Chernichky-Karcher, S. M., & Lillie, H. M. (2020). Communicating resilience: Predictors and outcomes of dyadic communication resilience processes among both cancer patients and cancer partner. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1706098
Wieland, S. M. B. (2020). Constituting resilience at work: Maintaining dialectics and cultivating dignity throughout a worksite closure. Management Communication Quarterly, 34(4), 463–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318920949314
Yoon, D. B., & Theiss, J. A. (2019). The role of identity uncertainty in predicting perceived support quality and relational turbulence for individuals coping with infertility. Paper presented at the National Communication Association, Baltimore, MD.
Funding
This study was funded through faculty research funds provided by the School of Communication and Information at Rutgers University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure Statement
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, H.E., Theiss, J.A., Austin, J.T. et al. Examining Actor-Partner Effects in the Associations between Dyadic Resilience and Conditions of Relational Turbulence During the COVID-19 Pandemic. ADV RES SCI 5, 91–103 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42844-023-00107-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42844-023-00107-y