Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Land, ethics, justice, and Aldo Leopold

  • Perspective Essay
  • Published:
Socio-Ecological Practice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The legacy of racism, inequity, and injustice in the history of conservation and the contemporary environmental movement is being scrutinized as never before. The American ecologist, conservationist, and author Aldo Leopold (1887–1948) is among the influential historical figures whose attitudes and actions have been sharply criticized. Especially because Leopold was devoted to protecting wildlands and expressed concern about the impacts of human population growth, detractors have characterized him as callously misanthropic at best, racist and fascistic at worst. These representations can be weighed against Leopold’s personal and professional record, and his views on such themes as the Native American experience, the eugenics movement of the early twentieth century, cultural diversity, and the rise of fascism. In his late years, and in the final formulation of his influential essay “The Land Ethic,” Leopold was increasingly explicit in framing his value system as one grounded in a commitment to just human relations. Moreover, the ethic he expressed was not static and could not be exclusionary. It expanded the purview of ethical consideration in the conservation movement and provided new foundations for the expansion of environmental awareness in the mainstream of American society. Viewed in this way, Leopold may be regarded not as an apotheosis of conservation thinking, but as an essential transitional figure within a still broader, ongoing movement, informed by an ever-evolving ethic of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Baldwin’s essay first appeared as “Letter from a region of my mind” in the November 17, 1962 issue of The New Yorker, pp.59–144.

  2. Lopez delivered these remarks on April 23, 2017, in the 1st Annual Leopold Lecture at the National Hispanic Cultural Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico. I am grateful to Dr. Pricilla Solis Ybarra for sharing her recording of Lopez’ lecture. Lopez died on December 25, 2020, as this essay was being prepared. Lopez’ work informs this discussion in so many ways, and I honor his life and words.

  3. Earlier discussions of race, class, gender, and diversity in the history of the conservation and environmental movements include Melosi 1980; Fox 1981; Rydell 1987; Gottlieb 1993b; Hurley 1995; Melosi 1995; Merchant 1995; Catton 1997; Judd 1997; Warren 1997; Spence 1999; Merchant 2003; and White 2004.

  4. Taylor 2016 provides an essential historical overview. Jacoby 2014 details exclusionary practices behind the establishment of parklands. Spears (2019) provides a more intersectional history of the environmental movement. Nijhuis 2021a is a compact overview of the history of wildlife and biodiversity conservation. Among other recent commentaries, see Purdy 2015; Santana 2019; NoiseCat 2019; Amend 2020; and Colman 2021.

  5. Commentaries on the legacy of John Muir are compiled in “Sierra Club vs. John Muir,” John Muir Global Network, https://johnmuir.org/sierra-club-vs-john-muir/. See, for example, Moreno 2020; Worster 2020; Robbins and Moore 2021; Mair et al. 2021; and Nijuis 2021b. On Theodore Roosevelt, see McGreevy 2020; Gessner 2020; and Washington Post 2021. Lanham 2021a considers the legacy of John James Audubon.

  6. For overviews of Leopold’s life and thought, see Flader 1994; Meine 2010; Lorbiecki 2016; Warren 2016; and Lin 2020a, b.

  7. For broader discussion of the theme, see Shoreman-Ouimet and Kopnina 2015 and Attfield and Reed 2021.

  8. See Andrews 2019; Braun 2020; Gatheru 2020; Kashwan 2020; Nocco et al. 2021. These posts and publications draw directly or apparently indirectly on Powell 2015 and Powell 2016. However, the characterization of Leopold as a racist and ecofascist is not new. To cite one example, Lepine (1993) regarded Leopold as a “Nazi” and “racist” who “rejected the sanctity of life and… scorned human beings.” See Meine 2004, p. 179.

  9. For the purposes of this article, and in the absence of specific journal style recommendations, I have opted to use the term Native American, while cognizant of the inadequacy of that terminology in different contexts and circumstances.

  10. The historian’s term for this tendency is presentism, defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as “a bias toward the present or present-day attitudes, esp. in the interpretation of history” (https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/266885). For several decades, presentism has been an active theme of debate among academic historians (e.g., Hunt 2002; Wilson 2019).

  11. This passage appears in Leopold’s 1993a, b article “The Conservation Ethic,” first published in the Journal of Forestry. Lin (2020a, pp. 10–11) notes, the article “was reprinted in 1946 under the title ‘Racial Wisdom and Conservation’ in [the] Journal of Heredity. Leopold’s conservation ethic was introduced in the preamble as providing an ecological basis for eugenics. How the article came to be republished here is unclear. There is no evidence that Leopold was aware of or acceded to this use of his article.”.

  12. See n. 7. These arguments are most pronounced in Powell (2015; 2016). Other reviewers have responded to these arguments as they pertain to Aldo Leopold; e.g., MacEachern 2018.

  13. For overviews of current approaches to Indigenous protected areas and conservation more generally, see Tran et al. 2020 and Dawson et al. 2021. For a broad set of perspectives on wildland protection see Minteer and Pyne 2015.

  14. For a compendium of commentaries on the forthcoming centenary of the Gila Wilderness Area, see Allen 2022.

  15. In “The Land Ethic” in A Sand County Almanac, Leopold changed “pioneering philosophy” to “our current philosophy” (p. 220).

  16. The literature on this point is, of course, vast. Research and commentary on the relative impact of human population growth on the environment remains active and unsettled, as evidenced in recent articles, e.g., de Sherbinin et al. 2007; Weber and Sciubba 2018; Crist et al. 2017; and Nasrollahi et al. 2020.

  17. Several volumes of Leopold’s collected writings are available: Flader and Callicott 1991; Brown and Carmony 1990; Callicott and Freyfogle 1999; Meine 2013; and Meunier and Meine 2018. In addition, the Aldo Leopold Archives at the University of Wisconsin-Madison hold the vast majority of documentary materials related to Leopold. The collection is digitized and available for readers and researchers at https://search.library.wisc.edu/digital/AAldoLeopold.

  18. One youthful encounter did evidently leave a strong (if naïve) impression on Leopold. As a seventeen-year-old he had the opportunity to attend a lecture by Charles Eastman (Ohíye S’a), the prominent Santee Dakota (Isáŋyathi) physician, writer, and reformer. “Some words and phrases which I have never heard anywhere else impressed me particularly,” Leopold wrote to his mother. “He said, after speaking of the Indian’s knowledge of nature, ‘Nature is the gate to the Great Mystery.’ The words are simple enough, but the meaning unfathomable” (Meine 2013, p. 705).

  19. See Mullin 2001 and Soliz 2019.

  20. In Game Management (Leopold 1933a, b, p. vii), he wrote, “The central thesis of game management is this: game can be restored by the creative use of the same tools which have heretofore destroyed it—axe, plow, cow, fire, and gun.” See Way 2011 and Court 2014.

  21. For background on Traditional Ecological Knowledge, see Berkes 1999; Kimmerer 2000; Anderson 2001; and Nelson and Shilling 2018.

  22. See also Whaley 1994; Ybarra 2016; and Wald et al. 2019.

  23. See also Lorbiecki 2016, pp. 178–183, 194–201.

  24. Hine, the first woman to earn a Ph.D. in zoology at the University of Wisconsin, remained a close friend of the Leopold family, and credited Leopold’s writing with “[having] had more of an effect on me than anything in my thinking.”

  25. It is possible that Leopold favored accepting only men as students in the immediate postwar rush of student applications under the G.I. Bill.

  26. See n. 7 above. Gatheru (2020) includes Leopold alongside Madison Grant and John Muir as “white supremacists that created the language of conservation to accommodate racialized conceptions of nature.” Braun (2020) similarly places Leopold in the company of William T. Hornaday in maintaining a “casual racism against Native peoples.” Nocco et al. (2021) regard Leopold as an “ecofascist” with an “exclusionary legac[y].”.

  27. Aldo Leopold to W. Redmond Cross, 15 December 1930, UW Archives, Aldo Leopold papers, Series 9/25/10–2: Organizations, Committees.

  28. The passage appears in Leopold’s 1946 article “Erosion as a menace to the social and economic future of the southwest,” drafted in 1922, but not published until 1946; and also in a popular article (Leopold 1924c/1991, p. 246) “Pioneers and Gullies.”.

  29. A cursory review of Leopold’s archival papers does not provide any indication that Leopold was aware of the anthropologist Franz Boas, who countered the eugenicists’ racist pseudoscience. See King 2019.

  30. For additional background, see Uekoetter 2006 and Motadel 2008.

  31. See also Millstein 2018 and Meine 2020a.

  32. Luna offered similar remarks, refuting the charge of ecofascism, in his foreword to McCabe 1987: “Rather than interpreting the concept of the land ethic as an indication of disregard for the individual in favor of the species or the ecosystem, my view is quite different. I see the concept of the land ethic as the outgrowth and extension of his deep personal concern for the individual. Accepting the idea that the cooperations and competitions in human society are eased and facilitated by concern for others, he saw that the same consideration extended to other parts of the ecosystem would tend to add integrity, beauty and stability to the whole.” See also Kobylecky 2015.

  33. See n. 2 above.

  34. Warren continues: “Unlike Leopold, I went on to develop a different position, ecofeminism, which explores important connections between the domination of women, people of color, children, the poor, Third World and indigenous peoples, and the domination of nonhuman nature. Unlike Leopold, I went on to argue that an environmental ethic which fails in theory or practice to reflect ecofeminist insights into the nature of these connections is inadequate. Still, it was Leopold’s description of land as property and his association of land with ‘slave-girls’ which first inspired me to think not only about ‘an ethic, ecologically’ but about the gendering of human-nonhuman relationships.”.

  35. Whyte (2015) notes that such comparisons “can be considered important today because they are a potential option for bringing together environmentalists of all heritages in North America based on a common ethical orientation.” As noted above Whyte also cautions, critically, that “any potential comparison” necessarily entails “sobering acknowledgment of and openness to differences between Leopoldian and Indigenist ethics.” See also Hausdoerffer (2015).

  36. Kimmerer writes: “The next step in our cultural evolution, if we are to persist as a species on this beautiful planet, is to expand our protocols for gratitude to the living Earth. Gratitude is most powerful as a response to the Earth because it provides an opening to reciprocity, to the act of giving back.” See also Nelson and Shilling 2018.

  37. Savoy’s book chapter as a whole constitutes a response to her question. She writes: “The scope of America’s thinking community’ remains narrow. A democratic dream of individual liberties and rights hasn’t yet contributed to a ‘co-ordinated whole’—whether human, biotic, or the land. Danger lies in equating theory with practice, or ideal with committed action, as personal responsibility and respect for others, and for the land, can be lost to lip service, disingenuous manners, and legislated gestures to an ideal.”.

  38. In addition to references included above, a sample of recent literature at the intersection of land, history, conservation, ethics, identity, cultural diversity, and social justice includes Berry 2010; Cole and Foster 2001; Finney 2014; Forbes 2011; Francis 2009; Kimmerer 2013a, b; Lanham 2016; Lanham 2021b; Middleton 2011; Moore and Nelson 2010; Nabhan 1997; Peña 2005; Penniman 2018; Savoy 2016; Deming and Savoy 2002; Wakild 2011, and White 2018. More theoretical approaches can be found, for example, in Pretty et al 2009; Rozzi et al. 2013; Sikor et al. 2014; Martin et al. 2016; and Meyfroidt et al. 2022.

References

  • Allen GE (2013) “Culling the herd”: eugenics and the conservation movement in the United States, 1900–1940. J Hist Biol 46(1):31–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9317-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen EH (ed) (2022) First and wildest: the Gila Wilderness at 100. Torrey House Press, Salt Lake City

    Google Scholar 

  • Amend A (2020) Blood and vanishing topsoil: American ecofascism past, present, and in the coming climate crisis. politicalresearch.org, 9 July 2020 https://politicalresearch.org/2020/07/09/blood-and-vanishing-topsoil

  • Anderson MK (2001) The contribution of ethnobiology to the reconstruction and restoration of historic ecosystems. In: Egan D, Howell EA (eds) The historical ecology handbook: a restorationist’s guide to reference ecosystems. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews E (2019) Why does environmentalism have a dark side? Grist, 29 August 2019 https://grist.org/article/why-does-environmentalism-have-a-dark-side/

  • Attfield N, Reed J (2021) Eco-social justice in an anthropocentric world. The Ecological Citizen 4(2):111–12 [epub-036] https://www.ecologicalcitizen.net/article.php?t=eco-social-justice-anthropocentric-world

  • Baldwin J (1963) The fire next time. Dial Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (1999) Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Taylor & Francis, Oxfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2017) Environmental governance for the anthropocene? Social-ecological systems, resilience, and collaborative learning. Sustainability 9(7):1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Doubleday NC, Cumming GS (2012) Aldo Leopold’s land health from a resilience point of view: self-renewal capacity of social–ecological systems. EcoHealth 9(3):278–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-012-0796-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard T (2010) Hope and hard times: communities, collaboration and sustainability. New Society Publishers, Gabriola

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry W (2010) The hidden wound. Counterpoint Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun S (2020) Letter: Catt Hall in a middle ground, Iowa State Daily, 16 July 2020

  • Brechin G (1996) Conserving the race: natural aristocracies, eugenics and the U.S. conservation movement. Antipode 28:229–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1996.tb00461.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown PG, Garver G (2009) Right relationship: building a whole earth economy. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown DE, Carmony NB (eds) (1990) Aldo Leopold’s Southwest. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque NM

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard RD (2021) Environmental justice—once a footnote, now a headline. Harv Envtl L Rev 45:243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB (1989) American Indian land wisdom? Sorting out the issues. For Cons Hist 33(1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/4005055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB (1991) The wilderness idea revisited: the sustainable development alternative. Environ Prof 13(3):235–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB, Nelson MP (eds) (1998) The great new wilderness debate. University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB, Freyfogle ET (eds) (1999) Aldo Leopold: for the health of the land. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB (2013) Thinking like a planet: the land ethic and the earth ethic. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB (2022) Three project ideas to fill research gaps in Aldo-Leopold scholarship. Socio Ecol Pract Res 4(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-021-00102-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB, Nelson MP (2004) American Indian environmental ethics: an Ojibwa case study. Prentice Hall, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter LJ (1980) The Leopolds: a family of naturalists. Science 207(4435):1051–1055. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.207.4435.1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catton T (1997) Inhabited wilderness: Indians, Eskimos, and national parks in Alaska. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin M (2004) A challenge to conservationists. Worldwatch Mag 17(6):17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole LW, Foster SR (2001) From the ground up: environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement. NYU Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Colman Z (2021) Environmental groups’ greatest obstacle may not be Republican opposition. Politico Magazine, 5 February 2021. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/02/05/environmental-movement-racial-reckoning-green-diversity-465501

  • Cooke SJ, Lynch AJ, Piccolo JJ, Olden JD, Reid AJ, Ormerod SJ (2021) Stewardship and management of freshwater ecosystems: from Leopold’s land ethic to a freshwater ethic. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 31(6):1499–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Court FE (2014) Pioneers of ecological restoration: the people and legacy of the University of Wisconsin Arboretum. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist E, Mora C, Engelman R (2017) The interaction of human population, food production, and biodiversity protection. Science 356(6335):260–264. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronon W (1996) The trouble with wilderness: or, getting back to the wrong nature. Environ Hist 1(1):7–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cryer DA (2015) A contradictory ethos: sportsman citizenship and native exclusion in Aldo Leopold’s Pine Cone. New Mexico Hist Rev 90(4):489–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson NM, Coolsaet B, Sterling EJ, Loveridge R, Gross-Camp ND, Wongbusarakum S, Sangha KK, Scherl LM, Phuong Phan H, Zafra-Calvo N, Lavey WG, Byakagaba P, Idrobo CJ, Chenet A, Bennett NJ, Mansourian S, RosadoMay FJ (2021) The role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in effective and equitable conservation. Ecol Soc 26(3):19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12625-260319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Sherbinin A, Carr D, Cassels S, Jiang L (2007) Population and environment. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:345–373. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.041306.100243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehler GJ (2013) The most defiant devil: William Temple Hornaday and his controversial crusade to save American wildlife. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming A, Savoy L (eds) (2002) The colors of nature: culture, identity, and the natural world. Milkweed Editions, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevan W (1992) The pristine myth: the landscape of the Americas in 1492. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 82:369–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1992.tb01965.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelley S (2018) Frog pond philosophy: essays on the relationship between humans and nature. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dowie M (2011) Conservation refugees: the hundred-year conflict between global conservation and native peoples. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel JR (1988) Ecology and social justice: the search for a public environmental ethic. In: Copeland WR, Hatch RD (eds) Issues of justice: social sources and religious meaning. Mercer University Press, Macon GA, pp 243–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel JR (2012) What covenant sustains us? In: Westra L, Bosselmann K, Westra R (eds) Reconciling human existence with ecological integrity: science, ethics, economics and law. Routledge, New York, pp 303–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington PL (1948) In appreciation of Aldo Leopold. J Wildlife Manag 12(4):341–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Etter AG (1988) A day with Aldo Leopold. In: Pittmen NP (ed) From The land: articles compiled from The Land, 1941–1954. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 384–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabiani L (2017) When wilderness was strictly whites-only. Pacific Standard, 14 June 2017. https://psmag.com/news/when-wilderness-was-strictly-whites-only

  • Farber SA (2008) US scientists’ role in the eugenics movement (1907–1939): a contemporary biologist’s perspective. Zebrafish 5(4):243–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feygina I (2013) Social justice and the human-environment relationship: common systemic, ideological, and psychological roots and processes. Soc Just Res 26:363–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-013-0189-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finney C (2014) Black faces, white spaces: reimagining the relationship of African Americans to the great outdoors. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) (1991) The river of the mother of god and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Flader SL (1994) Thinking like a mountain: Aldo Leopold and the evolution of an ecological attitude toward deer, wolves, and forests, 1994th edn. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Flader S (2003) Building conservation on the land: Aldo Leopold and the tensions of professionalism and citizenship. In: Minteer BA, Manning RE (eds) Reconstructing conservation: finding common ground. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 115–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes P (2011) Transforming conservation for the 21st century. Cons Biol 25(2):209–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox S (1981) John Muir and his legacy: the American conservation movement. Little, Brown and Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis J (2009) Planetwalker: 22 years of walking, 17 years of silence. National Geographic Books, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis P (2015) Laudato si’: on care for our common home. Vatican Press, The Vatican

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatheru W (2020) It’s time for environmental studies to own up to erasing Black people. Vice, 11 June 2020. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/889qxx/its-time-for-environmental-studies-to-own-up-to-erasing-black-people

  • Gessner D (2020) Taking down Teddy. The American Scholar, 10 September 2020. https://theamericanscholar.org/taking-down-teddy/

  • Goldberg TL, Patz JA (2015) The need for a global health ethic. The Lancet 386(10007):e37–e39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Pompa A, Kaus A (1992) Taming the wilderness myth. Bioscience 42(4):271–279. https://doi.org/10.2307/1311675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb R (1993a) Forcing the spring: the transformation of the American environmental movement. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb R (1993b) Reconstructing environmentalism: complex movements, diverse roots. Environ Hist Rev 17(4):1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/3984644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan WT (1959) The Sac and Fox nations. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausdoerffer J (2015) The Akiing ethic: seeking ancestral wildness beyond Aldo Leopold’s wilderness. In: Van Horn G, Hausdoerffer J (eds) Wildness: relations of people and place Chicago. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 195–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausdoerffer J (2020) "What anything is for”: resilience-as-pragmatism in Aldo Leopold’s “Living Democracy” and Vandana Shiva’s “Earth Democracy." In: Parker KA, Keith HE (eds) Pragmatist and American philosophical perspectives on resilience. Lexington Books, Lanham, pp 95–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausdoerffer J, Hecht BP, Nelson MK, Cummings KK (eds) (2021) What kind of ancestor do you want to be? University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisel A (2015) The rise and fall of an all-American catchphrase: ‘Free, White, and 21.’ Jezebel, 10 September 2015. https://theattic.jezebel.com/the-rise-and-fall-of-an-all-american-catchphrase-free-1729621311

  • Held V (2006) The ethics of care: personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester L, McPherson D, Booth A, Cheney J (2002) Callicott’s last stand. In: Ouderkirk W, Hill J (eds) Land, value, community: Callicott and environmental philosophy. SUNY Press, Albany, pp 253–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt L (2002) Against presentism. Perspect Hist 40(5):7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley A (1995) Environmental inequalities: class, race, and industrial pollution in Gary, Indiana, 1945–1980. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikerd J (2015) Toward a food ethic. J Agric Food Syst Commun Dev 6(1):3–5. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2015.061.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby K (2014) Against nature: squatters, poachers, thieves, and the hidden history of American conservation. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Judd RW (1997) Common lands, common people: the origins of conservation in northern New England. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashwan P (2020) American environmentalism’s racist roots have shaped global thinking about conservation. The Conversation, 2 September 2020. https://theconversation.com/american-environmentalisms-racist-roots-have-shaped-global-thinking-about-conservation-143783

  • Kimmerer R (2000) Native knowledge for native ecosystems. J For 98(8):4–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/98.8.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer R (2011) Restoration and reciprocity: the contributions of traditional ecological knowledge. In: Egan D, Hjerpe EE, Abrams J (eds) Human dimensions of ecological restoration. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 257–276

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer R (2013a) Returning the gift. Center for Humans and Nature, 1 October 2013. https://humansandnature.org/earth-ethic-robin-kimmerer/

  • Kimmerer RW (2013b) Braiding sweetgrass: indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • King C (2019) Gods of the upper air: how a circle of renegade anthropologists reinvented race, sex, and gender in the twentieth century. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight RL, Bates SF (eds) (1995) A new century for natural resources management. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobylecky J (2015) Understanding the land ethic, Aldo Leopold Foundation blog, 29 May 2015. https://www.aldoleopold.org/post/understanding-land-ethic/

  • Lanham JD (2016) The home place: memoirs of a colored man’s love affair with nature. Milkweed Editions, Minneapolis, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanham JD (2021a) What do we do about John James Audubon? Audubon Magazine, Spring 2021a. https://www.audubon.org/magazine/spring-2021a/what-do-we-do-about-john-james-audubon

  • Lanham, JD (2021b) A convergent imagining. Emergence Magazine, 5 February 2021b https://emergencemagazine.org/story/a-convergent-imagining/

  • Leopold A (1933b) Game management. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1934b) The game cycle: a challenge to science. Outdoor Nebraska 9(4):14

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1940) Wisconsin wildlife chronology. Wisc Conserv Bull 5(11):8–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1944) Post-war prospects. Audubon Mag 46(1):27–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1946) Erosion as a menace to the social and economic future of the southwest. J for 44(9):627–633. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/44.9.627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1949) A sand county almanac and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB (ed) (1953) Round river: from the journals of Aldo Leopold. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1987) Foreword. In: Callicott JB (ed) Companion to a sand county almanac: interpretive and critical essays. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 281–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold E (2016) Stories from the shack: sand county revisited. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1920) “Piute forestry” vs. forest fire prevention. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of god and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 68–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1921) The wilderness and its place in forest recreational policy. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of god and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 78–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1923) A criticism of the booster spirit. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of god and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 98–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1924a) The river of the mother of god. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of God and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 123–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1924b) Grass, brush, timber, and fire in southern Arizona. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of God and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 114–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1924c) Pioneers and gullies. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of God and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 106–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1925a) Conserving the covered wagon. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of God and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 128–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1925b) Wilderness as a form of land use. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of God and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 134–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1933a) The conservation ethic. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of God and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1934a) The arboretum and the university. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of God and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 209–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1935a) Coon valley: an adventure in cooperative conservation. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of god and other essays. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 218–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1935b) Notes on wild life conservation in Germany. Game Research News Letter 6(3) UW-Madison Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology

  • Leopold A (1939a) The farmer as a conservationist. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of God and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 255–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1939b) A biotic view of land. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of God and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 266–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1942) Land-use and democracy. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of God and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 295–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1947) The ecological conscience. In: Flader SL, Callicott JB (eds) The river of the mother of God and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 338–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepine F (1993) Shut down Leopold. Iowa State University Daily, 26 February 1993

  • Lin QF (2014) Aldo Leopold’s unrealized proposals to rethink economics. Ecol Econ 108:104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin QF (2020a) Aldo Leopold’s life–work and the scholarship it inspired. Socio Ecol Pract Res 2(1):3–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-020-00043-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin QF (2020b) A Sand County Almanac at 70: the significance of Leopold’s life–work for socio-ecological practice and research. Socio Ecol Pract Res 2(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-020-00046-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorbiecki M (2016) A fierce green fire: Aldo Leopold’s life and legacy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lunney D, Recher HF, Hutchings P (2013) The critical importance of an ecological conscience. In: Lunney D, Hutchings P, Recher HF (eds) Grumpy scientists: the ecological conscience of a nation. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman NSW, pp 126–138

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacEachern A (2018) Review of vanishing America: species extinction, racial peril, and the origins of conservation by Miles A. Powell. Can J Hist 53(1):127–129. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjh.ach.53.1.rev16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair A, Hanson C, Nelson MA (2021) Who was John Muir, really? Earth Island Journal, 11 August 2021. https://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/articles/entry/who-was-john-muir-really/

  • Mann CC (2018) The wizard and the prophet: two remarkable scientists and their dueling visions to shape tomorrow’s world. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin A, Coolsaet B, Corbera E, Dawson NM, Fraser JA, Lehmann I, Rodriguez I (2016) Justice and conservation: the need to incorporate recognition. Biol Cons 197:254–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez D (2003) Protected areas, indigenous peoples, and the Western idea of nature. Ecol Restor 21(4):247–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matteson S (2020) Afield: portraits of Wisconsin naturalists, empowering Leopold’s legacy. Little Creek Press, Mineral Point, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe RA (1987) Aldo Leopold: the professor. Rusty Rock Press, Madison WI

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe RA (ed) (1988) Aldo Leopold: mentor. UW-Madison Department of Wildlife Ecology, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • McGreevy N (2020) The racist statue of Theodore Roosevelt will no longer loom over the American Museum of Natural History. Smithsonianmag.com, 23 June 2020. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/statue-theodore-roosevelt-removed-reexamination-racist-acts-180975154/

  • McNeill JR, Engelke P (2014) The great acceleration: an environmental history of the anthropocene since 1945. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meffe G, Nielsen L, Knight RL, Schenborn D (2012) Ecosystem management: adaptive, community-based conservation. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine C (1992a) The utility of preservation and the preservation of utility: Leopold’s fine line. In: Oelschlaeger M (ed) The wilderness condition: essays on environment and civilization. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, pp 131–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine C (1992b) Conservation biology and sustainable societies: a historical perspective. In: Oelschlaeger M (ed) After earth day: continuing the conservation effort. University of North Texas Press, Denton, Texas, pp 35–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine C, Knight RL (eds) (1999) The essential Aldo Leopold: quotations and commentaries. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine C (2010) Aldo Leopold: his life and work, 2010 edn. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine C (ed) (2013) Aldo Leopold: a sand county almanac and other writings on ecology and conservation. Library of America, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine C (2015) A letter to the editors: in defense of the relative wild. In: Minteer BA, Pyne SJ (eds) After preservation: saving American nature in the age of humans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 84–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine C (2017) Restoration and “novel ecosystems”: priority or paradox. Ann Mo Bot Gard 102(2):217–226. https://doi.org/10.3417/2016037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meine C (2020a) From the land to socio-ecological systems: the continuing influence of Aldo Leopold. Socio Ecol Pract Res 2(1):31–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-020-00044-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meine C (2020b) The crucible of conservation: land, science, community, and the Wisconsin idea. In: Goldberg CA (ed) Educating for democracy: renewing the Wisconsin idea. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 120–148

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meine C, Nabhan GP (2014) Historic precedents to collaborative conservation in working landscapes: the Coon Valley “cooperative conservation” initiative, 1934. In: Charnley S, Sheridan TE, Nabhan GP (eds) Stitching the west back together: conservation of working landscapes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 77–80

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meine C (2004) Correction lines: essays on land, Leopold, and conservation. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine C (2014a) Aldo Leopold: connecting conservation science, ethics, policy, and practice. In: Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C, Armesto JJ, Callicott JB (eds) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: values, philosophy, and action. Springer, Berlin Germany, pp 173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine C (2014b) What’s so new about the ‘new conservation’? In: Wuerthner G, Crist E, Butler T (eds) Keeping the wild: against the domestication of Earth. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 45–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meine C (2021) Healing sacred earth. In: Van Horn G, Kimmerer RW, Hausdoerffer J (eds) Kinship: belonging in a world of relations, vol 2. Center for Humans and Nature Press, Libertyville, pp 126–135. https://humansandnature.org/healing-sacred-earth/

    Google Scholar 

  • Melosi MV (1995) Equity, eco-racism and environmental history. Environ Hist Rev 19(3):1–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/3984909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melosi MV (ed) (1980) Pollution and reform in American cities, 1870–1930. University of Texas Press, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant C (1995) Earthcare: women and the environment. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant C (2003) Shades of darkness: race and environmental history. Environ Hist 8(3):380–394. https://doi.org/10.2307/3986200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton T (1968) The ecological conscience. The Catholic Worker 34(5):4. https://www.scholaministries.org/lectory/the-ecological-conscience/

  • Meunier J, Meine C (eds) (2018) Aldo Leopold on forestry and conservation: toward a durable scale of values. Society of American Foresters, Bethesda MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer T, Kiener H, Křenová Z (2009) The wild heart of Europe. Int J Wildern 15(3):33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyfroidt P, de Bremond A, Ryan CM, Archer E, Aspinall R, Chhabra A, Camara G, Corbera E, DeFries R, Díaz S, Dong J (2022) Ten facts about land systems for sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109217118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton BR (2011) Trust in the land: new directions in tribal conservation. University of Arizona Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Millstein RL (2018) Debunking myths about Aldo Leopold’s land ethic. Biol Cons 217:391–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.11.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minteer BA, Pyne SJ (eds) (2015) After preservation: saving American nature in the age of humans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Momaday NS (1997) The man made of words: essays, stories, passages. St. Martine’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore KD, Nelson MP (eds) (2010) Moral ground: ethical action for a planet in peril. Trinity University Press, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno JE (2020) Sierra Club to remove monuments of founder John Muir over his racist history, The Hill, 22 July 2020. https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/508473-sierra-club-to-remove-founder-john-muir-monument-over-racist

  • Motadel D (2008) Review: the German nature conservation movement in the twentieth century. J Contem Hist 43(1):137–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0022009407084564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullin MH (2001) Culture in the marketplace: gender, art, and value in the American Southwest. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford L (1951) The conduct of life. Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Murie OJ (1954) Ethics in wildlife management. J Wildl Manag 18(3):289–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/3797014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabhan GP (1997) Cultures of habitat: on nature, culture, and story. Counterpoint Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabhan GP (2018) Food from the radical center: healing our land and communities. Island Press, Washington DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nabhan GP (2020) Biocultural restoration of sacred sites, Earth Day, and restoration ecology’s patron saint. Ecol Rest 38(1):54–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasrollahi Z, Hashemi M, Bameri S, Taghvaee VM (2020) Environmental pollution, economic growth, population, industrialization, and technology in weak and strong sustainability: using STIRPAT model. Environ Dev Sust 22(2):1105–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0237-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson MP, Callicott JB (eds) (2008) The wilderness debate rages on: continuing the great new wilderness debate. University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson MK, Shilling D (eds) (2018) Traditional ecological knowledge: learning from indigenous practices for environmental sustainability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson G (1970) Partial text for Senator Gaylord Nelson, Denver, Colo, April 22, 1970. UW-Madison Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies. http://www.nelsonearthday.net/docs/nelson_26-18_ED_

  • Nelson MP (1996) Holists and fascists and paper tigers... Oh my! Ethics and the Environment 1(2):103–117. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27766017

  • Nijhuis M (2021a) Beloved beasts: fighting for life in an age of extinction. WW Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhuis M (2021b) Don’t cancel John Muir, but don’t excuse him either. The Atlantic, 12 April 2021b. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021b/04/conservation-movements-complicated-history/618556/

  • Nixon R (2011) Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press, Camruiidge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nocco MA, McGill BM, MacKenzie CM, Tonietto RK, Dudney J, Bletz MC, Young T, Kuebbing SE (2021) Mentorship, equity, and research productivity: lessons from a pandemic. Biol Cons 255:108966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NoiseCat JB (2019) The environmental movement needs to reckon with its racist history. Vice, 13 September 2019. https://www.vice.com/en/article/bjwvn8/the-environmental-movement-needs-to-reckon-with-its-racist-history

  • Norlock KJ (2011) Building receptivity: Leopold’s land ethic and critical feminist interpretation. J Study Relig Nat Cult 5(4):493–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss R (1998) Aldo Leopold was a conservation biologist. Wildl Soc Bull 26(4):713–718

    Google Scholar 

  • Oglesby C (2021) The generational rift over “intersectional environmentalism.” Grist, 10 February 2021. https://grist.org/justice/intersectional-environmentalism-justice-language/

  • Osborn F (1948) Our plundered planet. Little, Brown and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña DG (2005) Mexican Americans and the environment: tierra y vida. University of Arizona Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Penniman L (2018) Farming while Black: Soul Fire Farm’s practical guide to liberation on the land. Chelsea Green Publishing, Hartford VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington Post (2022) Teddy Roosevelt’s legacy, and complexities, are with us still, 24 January 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/01/24/teddy-roosevelts-legacy-complexities-are-with-us-still/

  • Powell MA (2015) ‘Pestered with inhabitants’: Aldo Leopold, William Vogt, and more trouble with wilderness. Pac Hist Rev 84(2):195–226. https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2015.84.2.195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell MA (2016) Vanishing America: species extinction, racial peril, and the origins of conservation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J, Adams B, Berkes F, De Athayde SF, Dudley N, Hunn E, Maffi L, Milton K, Rapport D, Robbins P, Sterling E (2009) The intersections of biological diversity and cultural diversity: towards integration. Conserv Soc 7(2):100–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdy J (2015) Environmentalism’s racist history. The New Yorker, 13 August 2015. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/environmentalisms-racist-history

  • Rabb G, Ogorzalek K (2018) Caring to unify the future of conservation. Mind Nat 11(1):12–20. https://humansandnature.org/caring-to-unify-the-future-of-conservation/

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford KH, Robinson JG, Adams WM (2006) Parks as shibboleths. Conserv Biol 20(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00350.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restoule J-P (2004) Review of Callicott and Nelson, American Indian environmental ethics: an Ojibwa case study. Environments 32(3):111–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds GC (2003) A native American water ethic. Trans Wis Acad Sci Arts Lett 90:143–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P, Moore S (2021) John Muir’s tormented landscape. Breakthrough Institute, 16 August 2021. https://thebreakthrough.org/journal/no-14-summer-2021/john-muir-tormented-landscape

  • Robertson T (2012) The Malthusian moment: global population growth and the birth of American environmentalism. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R, Pickett ST, Palmer C, Armesto JJ, Callicott JB (eds) (2013) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydell RW (1987) All the world’s a fair: visions of empire at American International Expositions, 1876–1916. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmón E (2000) Kincentric ecology: indigenous perceptions of the human-nature relationship. Ecol Appl 10(5):1327–1332. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1327:KEIPOT]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santana CE (2019) Ecofascism and anti-Mexican terrorism, Nexos 16 August 2019 [in Spanish]. https://www.nexos.com.mx/?p=43931

  • Savoy L (2015) Trace: memory, history, race, and the American landscape. Counterpoint Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Savoy L (2016) Honoring MLK Day: recognizing the ties of race and place. Outlook (Aldo Leopold Foundation), 14 January 2016. https://www.aldoleopold.org/post/ties-of-race-and-place/

  • Sayre NF (2005) Working wilderness: the Malpai Borderlands Group and the future of the western range. Rio Nuevo Publishers, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Schabel HG (2011) Deer and dauerwald in Germany: any progress? Wildlife Soc Bull 29(3):888–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears PB (1950) Charles Darwin: the naturalist as a cultural force. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilling D (2009) Aldo Leopold listens to the Southwest. J Southwest 51(3):317–350. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsw.2009.0019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoreman-Ouimet E, Kopnina H (2015) Reconciling ecological and social justice to promote biodiversity conservation. Biol Cons 184:320–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikor T, Martin A, Fisher J, He J (2014) Toward an empirical analysis of justice in ecosystem governance. Conserv Lett 7(6):524–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliz S (2019) Pueblo activists and allies against the Bursum Bill of 1921, School for Advanced Research blog, 22 August 2019. https://sarweb.org/pueblo-activists-and-allies-against-the-bursum-bill-of-1921/

  • Spears EG (2019) Rethinking the American environmental movement post-1945. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spence MD (1999) Dispossessing the wilderness: Indian removal and the making of the national parks. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber G (1994) Deer and dauerwald: the “German” problem”. Nationalwald 4:4–9 (In German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro JP (2009) Defending the master race: conservation, eugenics and the legacy of Madison Grant. University Press of New England, Lebanon NH

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Broadgate W, Deutsch L, Gaffney O, Ludwig C. (2015) The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review 2(11):81–98.

  • Stern AM (2016) Eugenic nation: faults and frontiers of better breeding in modern America. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter PS (2009) Driven wild: how the fight against automobiles launched the modern wilderness movement. University of Washington Press, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner T (ed) (1987) Aldo Leopold: the man and his legacy, 3rd edn. Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny IA

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B (2013) “It's not all about us”: reflections on the state of American environmental history. J Am History 100(1):140–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jat099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor DE (2016) The rise of the American conservation movement: power, privilege, and environmental protection. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Temple S (2020a) Fran Hamerstrom: an unconventional life and career in conservation. Conserv Hist 4(1):33–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple T (2020b) Brina Kessel: pioneering Alaskan ornithologist. Conserv Hist 4(1):35

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran TC, Ban NC, Bhattacharyya J (2020) A review of successes, challenges, and lessons from indigenous protected and conserved areas. Biol Cons 241:108271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uekoetter F (2006) The green and the brown: a history of conservation in Nazi Germany. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Uenal F, Sidanius J, Maertens R, Hudson SKT, Davis G, Ghani A (2022) The roots of ecological dominance orientation: assessing individual preferences for an anthropocentric and hierarchically organized world. J Environ Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Auken P (2020) Towards a fusion of two lines of thought: creating convergence between Aldo Leopold and sociology through the community concept. Socio Ecol Pract Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-020-00042-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Horn G, Kimmerer RW, Hausdoerffer J (eds) (2021) Kinship: belonging in a world of relations. Center for Humans and Nature Press, Libertyville, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbos AK, Humphries M (2014) A Native American relational ethic: an indigenous perspective on teaching human responsibility. J Bus Ethics 123:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1790-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt W (1948) Road to survival. William Sloane Associates, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakild E (2011) Revolutionary parks: conservation, social justice, and Mexico’s national parks, 1910–1940. University of Arizona Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald SD, Vázquez DJ, Ybarra PS, Ray SJ (eds) (2019) Latinx environmentalisms: place, justice, and the decolonial. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardrope A (2020) Health justice in the Anthropocene: medical ethics and the land ethic. J Med Ethics 46(12):791–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren LS (1997) The hunter’s game: poachers and conservationists in twentieth-century America. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren JL (2016) Aldo Leopold’s odyssey: rediscovering the author of a sand county almanac. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren KJ (1998) The legacy of Leopold’s “The Land Ethic”. Reflections (August 1998). http://ruby.fgcu.edu/courses/bhalvers/ids3920/LeopoldEssay4.htm

  • Way AG (2011) Conserving southern longleaf: Herbert Stoddard and the rise of ecological land management. University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber H, Sciubba JD (2018) The effect of population growth on the environment: evidence from European regions. Eur J Popul 35(2):379–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9486-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West P, Igoe J, Brockington D (2006) Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas. Annu Rev Anthropol 35:251–277. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whaley C (1994) Nina Otero-Warren of Santa Fe. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  • White R (2004) From wilderness to hybrid landscapes: the cultural turn in environmental history. Historian 66(3):557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White C (2014) Grass, soil, hope: a journey through carbon country. Chelsea Green Publishing, Hartford VT

    Google Scholar 

  • White MM (2018) Freedom farmers: agricultural resistance and the Black freedom movement. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte KP, Cuomo CJ (2017) Ethics of caring in environmental ethics. In: Gardiner SM, Thompson A (eds) The Oxford handbook of environmental ethics. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 234–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte KP (2015) How similar are indigenous North American and Leopoldian environmental ethics? http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2022038

  • Wilson JR (2019) Historicizing presentism: toward the creation of a journal of the public humanities MLA Profession. https://profession.mla.org/historicizing-presentism-toward-the-creation-of-a-journal-of-the-public-humanities/

  • Wolfe ML, Berg F-C (1988) Deer and forestry in Germany: half a century after Leopold. J for 86(5):25–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Worster D (2020) John Muir biographer: he was no white supremacist. Californiasun.co, 30 July 2020. https://www.californiasun.co/stories/john-muir-biographer-he-was-no-white-supremacist/

  • Ybarra PS (2016) Writing the goodlife: Mexican American literature and the environment. University of Arizona Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra PS (2022) The forgotten history of wilderness, and a possible future. High County News, 12 March 2022. https://www.hcn.org/articles/books-wilderness-is-stolen-land

Download references

Acknowledgements

I write from the ancestral homelands of the Hoocąk (Ho-Chunk Nation) and am deeply grateful to the many members of the Nation who have informed the content of this article, especially Rhonda Funmaker, Jon Greendeer, William Quackenbush, Melanie Tallmadge Sainz, Samantha Greendeer Skenadore, Elena Terry, and Kristin WhiteEagle. Likewise I am grateful to all the other tribal communities and First Nations in what is now the State of Wisconsin (and beyond). Although I am solely responsible for the views expressed in this essay, I am indebted to many colleagues for their careful and constructive comments during its development, especially Steve Brower, J. Baird Callicott, John Hausdoerffer, Buddy Huffaker, Alanna Koshollek, Rick Knight, Jennifer Kobylecky, Patrice Kohl, J. Drew Lanham, Roberta Millstein, Gary Paul Nabhan, Michael Paul Nelson, Ufuk Özdağ, Qi Feng Lin, Eduardo Santana Castellón, Daniel Schneider, Dan Shilling, Stan Temple, Tim Van Deelen, and Priscilla Solis Ybarra. I would be remiss in not acknowledging so many friends and colleagues who have also contributed through countless conversations and communications over many years. Although too many to mention, I am especially mindful and appreciative of George Archibald, Ernie Atencio, Jeb Barzen, Rich Beilfuss, Fikret Berkes, Wendell Berry, Kim Blaeser, Jessie Conaway, David Blockstein, Peter Brown, William Cronon, John de Graaf, Alison Deming, Steve and Ann Dunsky, Sharon Dunwoody, Jane Elder, Ron and Joan Engel, Susan Flader, Peter Forbes, John Francis, Eric Freyfogle, Wendell Gilgert, Dina Gilio-Whitaker, Francesca Grifo, John Grim, David Groenfeldt, Katy Gwiazdon, Amelia and Michael Howard, Mac Hunter, Wes Jackson, Paul and Pat Johnson, Robin Kimmerer, Heather Knight, Richard Kyte, Jeannette Leehr, Patty Loew, Carolyn Merchant, James Edwards Mills, N. Scott Momaday, Kathleen Dean Moore, Laurie Monti, Milford Muskett, Michelle Nijhuis, Brian Norton, Rob Nurre, Riki Ott, Harry Peterson, Anna Pidgeon, Randy Poelma, Volker Radeloff, Jeannine Richards, Adena Rissman, Carl Safina, Jack Selzwedel, Lauret Savoy, Michelle Stevens, Gopi Sundar, Bron Taylor, Mary Evelyn Tucker, Alberto Vargas, Laura Dassow Walls, Julianne Warren, Courtney White, Kyle Whyte, Gabriela Zaldumbide, members of the Leopold family, and my colleagues at the Aldo Leopold Foundation, the Center for Humans and Nature, and the International Crane Foundation. I am indebted as well to Dr. Wei-Ning Xiang for his encouragement and constructive criticism in the development of this commentary. Two anonymous reviewers provided invaluable feedback. A previous, condensed version of this article was posted January 2, 2021, online on “The Conversation” website: https://theconversation.com/in-a-time-of-social-and-environmental-crisis-aldo-leopolds-call-for-a-land-ethic-is-still-relevant-147968.

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. The submitted work was self-funded, prepared solely by the author as an independent scholar. The author is affiliated with, and partially supported by, the Aldo Leopold Foundation, the Center for Humans and Nature, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. These institutions placed no restrictions, nor offered any specific guidance, on the content of this perspective essay.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CM is sole author and responsible for conception, research, preparation, writing, review, and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Curt Meine.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of myself as sole author, I state that I have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meine, C. Land, ethics, justice, and Aldo Leopold. Socio Ecol Pract Res 4, 167–187 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-022-00117-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-022-00117-7

Keywords

Navigation