Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy and Efficiency Analysis of the Beam Elements for Nonlinear Large Deformation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to study that which beam element should be adopted to achieve the required high accuracy and efficiency in different projects. Three kinds of beam elements commonly used to analyze the nonlinear dynamics of flexible multibody systems are compared and analyzed, which are fully parameterized beam and gradient-deficient beam elements based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation, and geometrically exact beam element, respectively.

Methods

The governing equations are established based on the fully parameterized beam element, the gradient-deficient beam element and the geometrically exact beam element, and the generalized-α implicit time stepping algorithm is used to study the dynamic responses of system.

Results and Conclusion

In this study, the solution accuracy and efficiency of the three kinds of element are analyzed in both statics and dynamics in detail and compared with each other. It is found that the geometrically exact beam element is superior to other two elements when the discretized element is subjected to axial deformation and torsion. Both gradient-deficient beam element and geometrically exact beam element show the high accuracy and efficiency when the element is bent. Moreover, the Young’s modulus and time step have a great effect on displacement responses when the beam element is in dynamic state. All the results should be helpful for selection of a high-precision calculation method in engineering applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu JG, Jia JG (2001) Study on dynamics, stability and control of multi-body flexible structure system in functional space. Appl Math Mech (English Edition) 22:1410–1421

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Yong A, Huang ZC, Deng LX (2007) Dynamic analysis of a rotating rigid-flexible coupled smart structure with large deformations. Appl Math Mech (English Edition) 28:1349

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu ZD, Hong JZ (1999) Modeling and analysis of a coupled rigid-flexible system. Appl Math Mech (English Edition) 20(10):1167–1174

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu ZF, Yan SJ, Fu Z (2013) Dynamic analysis on generalized linear elastic body subjected to large scale rigid rotations. Appl Math Mech (English Edition) 34:1001–1016

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Shabana AA (1996) An absolute nodal coordinates formulation for the large rotation and deformation analysis of flexible bodies. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shabana AA (1997) Flexible multibody dynamics review of past and recent development. Multibody SysDyn 1:189–222

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Schienlen W (2007) Research trends in multibody system dynamics. Multibody SysDyn 18:3–13

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Escalona JL, Hussien HA, Shabana AA (1998) Application of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation to multibody system dynamic. J Sound Vib 214:833–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shabana AA, Yakoub RY (2001) Three-dimensional absolute nodal coordinate formulation for beam elements: theory. J Mech Design 123:606–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yakoub RY, Shabana AA (2001) Three-dimensional absolute nodal coordinate formulation for beam elements implementation and applications. J Mech Design 123:614–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berzeri M, Campanelli M, Shabana AA (2001) Definition of the elastic forces in the finite-element absolute nodal coordinate formulation and the floating frame of reference formulation. Multibody SysDyn 5:21–55

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerstmayr J, Shabana AA (2006) Analysis of thin beams and cables using the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Nonlinear Dyn 45:109–130

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwarze M, Reese S (2010) A reduced integration solid shell finite element based on the EAS and the ANS concept-Large deformation problems. Int J Numer Meth Eng 85:289–329

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu J, Zhao ZH, Ren GX (2012) Dynamic analysis of space structure deployment with transient thermal load. Adv Mater Res 479:803–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sopanen JT, Mikkola AM (2003) Description of elastic forces in absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Nonlinear Dyn 34:53–74

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Omar MA, Shabana AA, Mikkola A (2004) Multibody system modeling of leaf springs. J Vib Control 10:1601–1638

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu JY, Lu H (2007) Rigid-flexible coupling dynamics of a flexible beam with three-dimensional large overall motion. Multibody SysDyn 18:487–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu J, Hong J, Cui L (2007) An exact nonlinear hybrid-coordinate formulation for flexible multibody systems. Acta Mech Sin 23:699–706

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu JY, Lu H (2007) Rigid-flexible coupling dynamics of three-dimensional hub-beams system. Multibody SysDyn 18:487–510

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Tian Q, Zhang YQ, Chen LP, Yang JZ (2010) Simulation of planar flexible multibody systems with clearance and lubricated revolute joints. Nonlinear Dyn 60:489–511

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Tian Q, Zhang YQ, Chen LP (2009) Dynamics of spatial flexible multibody systems with clearance and lubricated spherical joints. Comput Struct 87:913–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tian Q, Chen LP, Zhang YQ (2009) An efficient hybrid method for multibody dynamics simulation based on absolute nodal coordinate formulation. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 4:0210091

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu C, Tian Q, Hu HY (2011) Dynamics of a large-scale rigid-flexible multibody system composed of composite laminated plates. Multibody SysDyn 26:283–305

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Reissne E (1972) On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: the plane problem. Zeitschrift F Fur Angewandte Mathematik Und Physik 23:795–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Simo JC, Vu-Quoc L (1988) On the Dynamics in space of rods undergoing large motions-a geometrically exact approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 66:125–161

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Crisfield MA, Jelenic G (1999) Objectivity of strain measures in the geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theory and its finite-element implementation [J]. Proc Royal Soc Math Phys Eng Sci 455:1125–1147

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang G, Zhong P, Yang G (2016) Frame-invariance in finite element formulations of geometrically exact rods. Appl Math Mech (English Edition) 37:12

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Romero I (2008) A comparison of finite elements for nonlinear beams: the absolute nodal coordinate and geometrically exact formulations. Multibody SysDyn 20:51–68

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Bauchau OA, Han S, Mikkola A (2014) Comparison of the absolute nodal coordinate and geometrically exact formulations for beams. Multibody SysDyn 32:67–85

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu C (2013) Deployment dynamics of flexible space structures described by Absolute-Coordinate-Based Method [D]. Beijing Institute of Technology

  31. Bonet J, Wood RD (2008) Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite element analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Jelenc G, Crisfield MA (1998) Interpolation of rotational variables in nonlinear dynamics of 3D beams. Int J Numer Meth Eng 43:1193–1222

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Shabana AA (2005) Dynamics of multibody systems. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Shabana A (2010) Computational dynamics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Arnold M, Brüls O (2007) Convergence of the generalized-a scheme for constrained mechanical systems. Multibody SysDyn 18:185–202

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Tian Q, Liu C, Machado M, Flores P (2011) A new model for dry and lubricated cylindrical joints with clearance in spatial flexible multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn 64:25–67

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu C, Tian Q, Hu H (2012) Dynamics and control of a spatial rigid–flexible multibody system with multiple cylindrical clearance joints. Mech Mach Theory 52:106–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Timoshenko S, Gere J (1972) Mechanics of materials. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.12102041; 52130512) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2021M690401) and Graduate Technological Innovation Project of Beijing Institute of Technology (Project No. 2019CX10005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Xiang, C., Liu, H. et al. Accuracy and Efficiency Analysis of the Beam Elements for Nonlinear Large Deformation. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 11, 319–328 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00581-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00581-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation