Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation and optimization of a hybrid wave energy converter using excited motion response in two degrees of freedom

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As waves in China seas are not high, a wave energy converter consisting of a coaxial annular buoy and a cylindrical buoy that extracts wave energy using two generators through the relative heave motion between the buoys and the pitch motion of the cylinder could be a more efficient choice. A dynamic model considering constraints and assuming linear power take-off is established to evaluate the power performance of the device. The influences of two key factors, the diameter of the annular buoy and the power take-off stiffness of the pitching generator, and their couplings on the power performance are analyzed. The power of the pitching generator accounts for a major proportion of the total power. An increase in the annular buoy diameter increases the power of the heaving generator while greatly decreases the power of the pitching generator. An increase in the power take-off stiffness of the pitching generator greatly decreases its power while has little influence on the power of the heaving generator. These two factors also influence the peak period of the total power. Based on the findings and practical limitations, an optimization strategy is proposed. Further, the device is optimized based on a real wave environment in Shandong Province, China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ning D., Wang R., Zou Q. et al. An experimental investigation of hydrodynamics of a fixed OWC wave energy converter [J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 168: 636–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang H., Zhou B., Zang J. et al. Optimization of a three-dimensional hybrid system combining a floating breakwater and a wave energy converter array [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 247: 114717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang H., Zhou B., Zang J. et al. Effects of narrow gap wave resonance on a dual-floater WEC-breakwater hybrid system [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 225: 108762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang H., Zhou B., Vogel C. R. et al. Hydrodynamic performance of a floating breakwater as an oscillating-buoy type wave energy converter [J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 257: 113996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Budar K., Falnes J. A resonant point absorber of ocean-wave power [J]. Nature, 1975, 256(5517): 478–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li S., Teng B. Numerical examination of wave power absorption by the Edinburgh Duck wave energy converter device [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2021, 33(2): 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Whittaker T., Folley M. Nearshore oscillating wave surge converters and the development of oyster [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2012, 370(1959): 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lucas J., Livingstone M., Vuorinen M. et al. Development of a wave energy converter (WEC) design tool-application to the WaveRoller WEC including validation of numerical estimates [C]. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ocean Energy, Dublin, Ireland, 2012.

  9. Engström J., Kurupath V., Isberg J. et al. A resonant two body system for a point absorbing wave energy converter with direct-driven linear generator [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2011, 110(12): 124904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Falnes J., Kurniawan A. Ocean waves and oscillating systems: Linear interactions including wave-energy extraction [M]. Vol. 8, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Newman J. N. The interaction of stationary vessels with regular waves [C]. Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, London, UK, 1976.

  12. Crowley S., Porter R., Evans D. V. A submerged cylinder wave energy converter [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 716: 566–596.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Faraggiana E., Whitlam C., Chapman J. et al. Computational modelling and experimental tank testing of the multi float WaveSub under regular wave forcing [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 152: 892–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chaplin R. V., Aggidis G. A. An investigation into power from pitch-surge point-absorber wave energy converters [C]. IEEE 2007 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power, Capri, Italy, 2007, 520–525.

  15. Rahmati M. T., Aggidis G. A. Numerical and experimental analysis of the power output of a point absorber wave energy converter in irregular waves [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016, 111: 483–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin P., Zhou B., Göteman M. et al. Performance optimization of a coaxial-cylinder wave energy converter [J]. Energy, 2019, 174: 450–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis A. F., Thomson J., Mundon T. R. et al. Modeling and analysis of a multi degree of freedom point absorber wave energy converter [C]. 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, San Francisco, USA, 2014.

  18. Galván-Pozos D. E., Ocampo-Torres F. J. Dynamic analysis of a six-degree of freedom wave energy converter based on the concept of the Stewart-Gough platform [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 146: 1051–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gao H., Yu Y. The dynamics and power absorption of cone-cylinder wave energy converters with three degree of freedom in irregular waves [J]. Energy, 2018, 143: 833–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo W., Zhou Y. H., Zhang W. C. et al. Hydrodynamic analysis and power conversion for point absorber WEC with two degrees of freedom using CFD [[J]. China Ocean Engineering, 2018, 32(6): 718–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang C., Zhang Y. L. Numerical study of hydrodynamic behavior and conversion efficiency of a two-buoy wave energy converter [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(2): 235–248.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Ye Y., Chen W. Frequency-and time-domain analysis of a multi-degree-of-freedom point absorber wave energy converter [J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 9(12): 1687814017722081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Son D., Belissen V., Yeung R. W. Performance validation and optimization of a dual coaxial-cylinder ocean-wave energy extractor [J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 92: 192–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Al Shami E., Wang X., Ji X. A study of the effects of increasing the degrees of freedom of a point-absorber wave energy converter on its harvesting performance [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 133: 106281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McCabe A. P. Constrained optimization of the shape of a wave energy collector by genetic algorithm [J]. Renewable Energy, 2013, 51: 274–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hu J., Zhou B., Vogel C. et al. Optimal design and performance analysis of a hybrid system combing a floating wind platform and wave energy converters [J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 269: 114998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mei C. C., Stiassnie M., Yue D. K. P. Theory and applications of ocean surface waves: Nonlinear aspects [M]. Vol. 23, Singapore: World Scientific, 2005.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Shabana A. A. Computational dynamics [M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sun L., Taylor R. E., Choo Y. S. Responses of intercon-nectted floating bodies [J]. The IES Journal Part A: Civil and Structural Engineering, 2011, 4(3): 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ruehl K., Michelen C., Kanner S. et al. Preliminary verification and validation of WEC-Sim, an open-source wave energy converter design tool [C]. 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, San Francisco, USA, 2014.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2022B1515020036), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangzhou City (Grant No. 202201010055) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2022ZYGXZR014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Jin.

Ethics declarations

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52071096, 52201322 and 52222109).

Biography: Bin-zhen Zhou (1984-), Female, Ph. D., Professor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Bz., Wang, Y., Hu, Jj. et al. Evaluation and optimization of a hybrid wave energy converter using excited motion response in two degrees of freedom. J Hydrodyn 35, 145–154 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-023-0013-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-023-0013-3

Key words

Navigation