Abstract
As waves in China seas are not high, a wave energy converter consisting of a coaxial annular buoy and a cylindrical buoy that extracts wave energy using two generators through the relative heave motion between the buoys and the pitch motion of the cylinder could be a more efficient choice. A dynamic model considering constraints and assuming linear power take-off is established to evaluate the power performance of the device. The influences of two key factors, the diameter of the annular buoy and the power take-off stiffness of the pitching generator, and their couplings on the power performance are analyzed. The power of the pitching generator accounts for a major proportion of the total power. An increase in the annular buoy diameter increases the power of the heaving generator while greatly decreases the power of the pitching generator. An increase in the power take-off stiffness of the pitching generator greatly decreases its power while has little influence on the power of the heaving generator. These two factors also influence the peak period of the total power. Based on the findings and practical limitations, an optimization strategy is proposed. Further, the device is optimized based on a real wave environment in Shandong Province, China.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ning D., Wang R., Zou Q. et al. An experimental investigation of hydrodynamics of a fixed OWC wave energy converter [J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 168: 636–648.
Zhang H., Zhou B., Zang J. et al. Optimization of a three-dimensional hybrid system combining a floating breakwater and a wave energy converter array [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 247: 114717.
Zhang H., Zhou B., Zang J. et al. Effects of narrow gap wave resonance on a dual-floater WEC-breakwater hybrid system [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 225: 108762.
Zhang H., Zhou B., Vogel C. R. et al. Hydrodynamic performance of a floating breakwater as an oscillating-buoy type wave energy converter [J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 257: 113996.
Budar K., Falnes J. A resonant point absorber of ocean-wave power [J]. Nature, 1975, 256(5517): 478–479.
Li S., Teng B. Numerical examination of wave power absorption by the Edinburgh Duck wave energy converter device [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2021, 33(2): 323–333.
Whittaker T., Folley M. Nearshore oscillating wave surge converters and the development of oyster [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2012, 370(1959): 345–364.
Lucas J., Livingstone M., Vuorinen M. et al. Development of a wave energy converter (WEC) design tool-application to the WaveRoller WEC including validation of numerical estimates [C]. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ocean Energy, Dublin, Ireland, 2012.
Engström J., Kurupath V., Isberg J. et al. A resonant two body system for a point absorbing wave energy converter with direct-driven linear generator [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2011, 110(12): 124904.
Falnes J., Kurniawan A. Ocean waves and oscillating systems: Linear interactions including wave-energy extraction [M]. Vol. 8, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Newman J. N. The interaction of stationary vessels with regular waves [C]. Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, London, UK, 1976.
Crowley S., Porter R., Evans D. V. A submerged cylinder wave energy converter [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 716: 566–596.
Faraggiana E., Whitlam C., Chapman J. et al. Computational modelling and experimental tank testing of the multi float WaveSub under regular wave forcing [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 152: 892–909.
Chaplin R. V., Aggidis G. A. An investigation into power from pitch-surge point-absorber wave energy converters [C]. IEEE 2007 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power, Capri, Italy, 2007, 520–525.
Rahmati M. T., Aggidis G. A. Numerical and experimental analysis of the power output of a point absorber wave energy converter in irregular waves [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016, 111: 483–492.
Jin P., Zhou B., Göteman M. et al. Performance optimization of a coaxial-cylinder wave energy converter [J]. Energy, 2019, 174: 450–459.
Davis A. F., Thomson J., Mundon T. R. et al. Modeling and analysis of a multi degree of freedom point absorber wave energy converter [C]. 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, San Francisco, USA, 2014.
Galván-Pozos D. E., Ocampo-Torres F. J. Dynamic analysis of a six-degree of freedom wave energy converter based on the concept of the Stewart-Gough platform [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 146: 1051–1061.
Gao H., Yu Y. The dynamics and power absorption of cone-cylinder wave energy converters with three degree of freedom in irregular waves [J]. Energy, 2018, 143: 833–845.
Guo W., Zhou Y. H., Zhang W. C. et al. Hydrodynamic analysis and power conversion for point absorber WEC with two degrees of freedom using CFD [[J]. China Ocean Engineering, 2018, 32(6): 718–729.
Yang C., Zhang Y. L. Numerical study of hydrodynamic behavior and conversion efficiency of a two-buoy wave energy converter [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(2): 235–248.
Ye Y., Chen W. Frequency-and time-domain analysis of a multi-degree-of-freedom point absorber wave energy converter [J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 9(12): 1687814017722081.
Son D., Belissen V., Yeung R. W. Performance validation and optimization of a dual coaxial-cylinder ocean-wave energy extractor [J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 92: 192–201.
Al Shami E., Wang X., Ji X. A study of the effects of increasing the degrees of freedom of a point-absorber wave energy converter on its harvesting performance [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 133: 106281.
McCabe A. P. Constrained optimization of the shape of a wave energy collector by genetic algorithm [J]. Renewable Energy, 2013, 51: 274–284.
Hu J., Zhou B., Vogel C. et al. Optimal design and performance analysis of a hybrid system combing a floating wind platform and wave energy converters [J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 269: 114998.
Mei C. C., Stiassnie M., Yue D. K. P. Theory and applications of ocean surface waves: Nonlinear aspects [M]. Vol. 23, Singapore: World Scientific, 2005.
Shabana A. A. Computational dynamics [M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2009.
Sun L., Taylor R. E., Choo Y. S. Responses of intercon-nectted floating bodies [J]. The IES Journal Part A: Civil and Structural Engineering, 2011, 4(3): 143–156.
Ruehl K., Michelen C., Kanner S. et al. Preliminary verification and validation of WEC-Sim, an open-source wave energy converter design tool [C]. 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, San Francisco, USA, 2014.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2022B1515020036), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangzhou City (Grant No. 202201010055) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2022ZYGXZR014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52071096, 52201322 and 52222109).
Biography: Bin-zhen Zhou (1984-), Female, Ph. D., Professor
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, Bz., Wang, Y., Hu, Jj. et al. Evaluation and optimization of a hybrid wave energy converter using excited motion response in two degrees of freedom. J Hydrodyn 35, 145–154 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-023-0013-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-023-0013-3