Abstract
It has been widely perceived that three-dimensional bioprinted synthetic tissues and organ can be a clinical treatment option for damaged or diseased tissue repair and replacement. Conventional tissue engineering approaches have limited control over the regeneration of scaffold geometries and cell distribution. With the advancement of new biomaterials and additive manufacturing techniques, it is possible to develop physiologically relevant functional tissues or organs with living cells, bioactive molecules and growth factors within predefined complex 3D geometries. In this perspective, this review discusses how hydrogel-based bioinks can be used to mimic native tissue-like extracellular matrix environment, with optimal mechanical and structural integrity for patient-specific tissue regeneration, in reference to advanced bioprinting technologies to bioprint multitude of multicomponent bioinks. This review also summarizes various bioprinting techniques, the gelation and biodegradation mechanisms of hydrogel-based bioinks, the properties required for ideal bioink, challenges to design bioinks, as well as reviews the fabrication of 3D printed cardiac tissue, cartilages, brain-like tissue, bionic ear, and urinary system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mironov V et al (2009) Biofabrication: a 21st century manufacturing paradigm. Biofabrication 1(2):022001
Liu C, Xia Z, Czernuszka J (2007) Design and development of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering. Chem Eng Res Des 85(7):1051–1064
Chan B, Leong K (2008) Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations. Eur Spine J 17(4):467–479
Bajaj P et al (2014) 3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16:247–276
Fong ELS et al (2013) Modeling Ewing sarcoma tumors in vitro with 3D scaffolds. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(16):6500–6505
Lee MK et al (2015) A bio-inspired, microchanneled hydrogel with controlled spacing of cell adhesion ligands regulates 3D spatial organization of cells and tissue. Biomaterials 58:26–34
Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32(8):773
Ozbolat IT, Yu Y (2013) Bioprinting toward organ fabrication: challenges and future trends. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60(3):691–699
Malda J et al (2013) 25th anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater 25(36):5011–5028
Melchels FP et al (2012) Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs. Prog Polym Sci 37(8):1079–1104
Norotte C et al (2009) Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials 30(30):5910–5917
Jakab K et al (2010) Tissue engineering by self-assembly and bio-printing of living cells. Biofabrication 2(2):022001
Yu Y et al (2016) Three-dimensional bioprinting using self-assembling scalable scaffold-free “tissue strands” as a new bioink. Sci Rep 6:28714
Pourchet LJ et al (2017) Human skin 3D bioprinting using scaffold-free approach. Adv Healthc Mater 6(4):1601101
Yu Y, Ozbolat IT (2014) Tissue strands as “bioink” for scale-up organ printing. in 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2014, IEEE
Wu Z et al (2016) Bioprinting three-dimensional cell-laden tissue constructs with controllable degradation. Sci Rep 6:24474
Chua CK, Yeong WY (2014) Bioprinting: principles and applications, vol 1. World Scientific, Singapore
Schuurman W et al (2011) Bioprinting of hybrid tissue constructs with tailorable mechanical properties. Biofabrication 3(2):021001
Chimene D et al (2016) Advanced bioinks for 3D printing: a materials science perspective. Ann Biomed Eng 44(6):2090–2102
Derby B (2012) Printing and prototyping of tissues and scaffolds. Science 338(6109):921–926
Chia HN, Wu BM (2015) Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng 9(1):4
Kumar A et al (2016) Low temperature additive manufacturing of three dimensional scaffolds for bone-tissue engineering applications: processing related challenges and property assessment. Mater Sci Eng 103:1–39
Panwar A, Tan L (2016) Current status of bioinks for micro-extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Molecules 21(6):685
Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M (2016) Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials 76:321–343
Arai K et al (2011) Three-dimensional inkjet biofabrication based on designed images. Biofabrication 3(3):034113
Cui X et al (2012) Thermal inkjet printing in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul 6(2):149–155
Guillemot F et al (2010) Laser-assisted cell printing: principle, physical parameters versus cell fate and perspectives in tissue engineering. Nanomedicine 5(3):507–515
Hribar KC et al (2014) Light-assisted direct-write of 3D functional biomaterials. Lab Chip 14(2):268–275
Aguado BA et al (2011) Improving viability of stem cells during syringe needle flow through the design of hydrogel cell carriers. Tissue Eng Part A 18(7–8):806–815
Chang R, Nam J, Sun W (2008) Effects of dispensing pressure and nozzle diameter on cell survival from solid freeform fabrication–based direct cell writing. Tissue Eng Part A 14(1):41–48
Kang K, Hockaday L, Butcher J (2013) Quantitative optimization of solid freeform deposition of aqueous hydrogels. Biofabrication 5(3):035001
Cui X et al (2010) Cell damage evaluation of thermal inkjet printed Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 106(6):963–969
Gurkan UA et al (2014) Engineering anisotropic biomimetic fibrocartilage microenvironment by bioprinting mesenchymal stem cells in nanoliter gel droplets. Mol Pharm 11(7):2151–2159
Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I (2016) A comprehensive review on droplet-based bioprinting: past, present and future. Biomaterials 102:20–42
Ferris CJ et al (2013) Bio-ink for on-demand printing of living cells. Biomater Sci 1(2):224–230
Arslan-Yildiz A et al (2016) Towards artificial tissue models: past, present, and future of 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication 8(1):014103
Guillotin B, Guillemot F (2011) Cell patterning technologies for organotypic tissue fabrication. Trends Biotechnol 29(4):183–190
Koch L et al (2012) Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing. Biotechnol Bioeng 109(7):1855–1863
Skardal A, Atala A (2015) Biomaterials for integration with 3-D bioprinting. Ann Biomed Eng 43(3):730–746
Schiele NR et al (2010) Laser-based direct-write techniques for cell printing. Biofabrication 2(3):032001
Ahmed EM (2015) Hydrogel: preparation, characterization, and applications: a review. J Adv Res 6(2):105–121
Seliktar D (2012) Designing cell-compatible hydrogels for biomedical applications. Science 336(6085):1124–1128
Gungor-Ozkerim PS et al (2018) Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview. Biomater Sci 6(5):915–946
Gasperini L, Mano JF, Reis RL (2014) Natural polymers for the microencapsulation of cells. J R Soc Interface 11(100):20140817
Tan H, Marra KG (2010) Injectable, biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Materials 3(3):1746–1767
Hennink WE, van Nostrum CF (2012) Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:223–236
Jungst T et al (2015) Strategies and molecular design criteria for 3D printable hydrogels. Chem Rev 116(3):1496–1539
Chenite A et al (2000) Novel injectable neutral solutions of chitosan form biodegradable gels in situ. Biomaterials 21(21):2155–2161
Ikada Y et al (1987) Stereocomplex formation between enantiomeric poly (lactides). Macromolecules 20(4):904–906
Lim DW, Park TG (2000) Stereocomplex formation between enantiomeric PLA–PEG–PLA triblock copolymers: characterization and use as protein-delivery microparticulate carriers. J Appl Polym Sci 75(13):1615–1623
Na K et al (2018) Effect of solution viscosity on retardation of cell sedimentation in DLP 3D printing of gelatin methacrylate/silk fibroin bioink. J Ind Eng Chem 61:340–347
Stratesteffen H et al (2017) GelMA-collagen blends enable drop-on-demand 3D printablility and promote angiogenesis. Biofabrication 9(4):045002
Kessler L et al (2017) Methacrylated gelatin/hyaluronan-based hydrogels for soft tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng 8:2041731417744157
Billiet T et al (2014) The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials 35(1):49–62
Pawar AA et al (2016) High-performance 3D printing of hydrogels by water-dispersible photoinitiator nanoparticles. Sci Adv 2(4):e1501381
Fairbanks BD et al (2009) Photoinitiated polymerization of PEG-diacrylate with lithium phenyl-2, 4, 6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate: polymerization rate and cytocompatibility. Biomaterials 30(35):6702–6707
Martinez PR et al (2017) Fabrication of drug-loaded hydrogels with stereolithographic 3D printing. Int J Pharm 532(1):313–317
Wang Z, et al. (2017) Visible light-based stereolithography bioprinting of cell-adhesive gelatin hydrogels in 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2017, IEEE
Wang Z et al (2015) A simple and high-resolution stereolithography-based 3D bioprinting system using visible light crosslinkable bioinks. Biofabrication 7(4):045009
Ehsan SM et al (2014) A three-dimensional in vitro model of tumor cell intravasation. Integr Biol 6(6):603–610
Sperinde JJ, Griffith LG (1997) Synthesis and characterization of enzymatically-cross-linked poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Macromolecules 30(18):5255–5264
Yang C et al (2015) Hyaluronic acid nanogels with enzyme-sensitive cross-linking group for drug delivery. J Control Release 205:206–217
Lee F, Chung JE, Kurisawa M (2008) An injectable enzymatically crosslinked hyaluronic acid–tyramine hydrogel system with independent tuning of mechanical strength and gelation rate. Soft Matter 4(4):880–887
Jin R et al (2010) Enzymatically-crosslinked injectable hydrogels based on biomimetic dextran–hyaluronic acid conjugates for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31(11):3103–3113
Raia NR et al (2017) Enzymatically crosslinked silk-hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Biomaterials 131:58–67
Bakota EL et al (2010) Enzymatic cross-linking of a nanofibrous peptide hydrogel. Biomacromolecules 12(1):82–87
Das S et al (2015) Bioprintable, cell-laden silk fibroin–gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three-dimensional tissue constructs. Acta Biomater 11:233–246
Bouhadir KH et al (2001) Degradation of partially oxidized alginate and its potential application for tissue engineering. Biotechnol Prog 17(5):945–950
Jia J et al (2014) Engineering alginate as bioink for bioprinting. Acta Biomater 10(10):4323–4331
Grigore A et al (2014) Behavior of encapsulated MG-63 cells in RGD and gelatine-modified alginate hydrogels. Tissue Eng Part A 20(15–16):2140–2150
Schloßmacher U et al (2013) Alginate/silica composite hydrogel as a potential morphogenetically active scaffold for three-dimensional tissue engineering. RSC Adv 3(28):11185–11194
Lee JM, Yeong WY (2016) Design and printing strategies in 3D bioprinting of cell-hydrogels: a review. Adv Healthc Mater 5(22):2856–2865
Busilacchi A et al (2013) Chitosan stabilizes platelet growth factors and modulates stem cell differentiation toward tissue regeneration. Carbohydr Polym 98(1):665–676
Kim P et al (2014) Fabrication of poly (ethylene glycol): gelatin methacrylate composite nanostructures with tunable stiffness and degradation for vascular tissue engineering. Biofabrication 6(2):024112
Miri AK et al (2019) Effective bioprinting resolution in tissue model fabrication. Lab Chip 19(11):2019–2037
Tirella A et al (2009) A phase diagram for microfabrication of geometrically controlled hydrogel scaffolds. Biofabrication 1(4):045002
Pepelanova I et al (2018) Gelatin-methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels with defined degree of functionalization as a versatile toolkit for 3D cell culture and extrusion bioprinting. Bioengineering 5(3):55
Kirschner CM, Anseth KS (2013) Hydrogels in healthcare: from static to dynamic material microenvironments. Acta Mater 61(3):931–944
Ahearne M (2014) Introduction to cell–hydrogel mechanosensing. Interface Focus 4(2):20130038
Kyle S et al (2017) Printability of candidate biomaterials for extrusion based 3D printing: state-of-the-art. Adv Healthc Mater 6(16):1700264
Ramon-Azcon J et al (2012) Gelatin methacrylate as a promising hydrogel for 3D microscale organization and proliferation of dielectrophoretically patterned cells. Lab Chip 12(16):2959–2969
Hutson CB et al (2011) Synthesis and characterization of tunable poly (ethylene glycol): gelatin methacrylate composite hydrogels. Tissue Eng Part A 17(13–14):1713–1723
Rutz AL et al (2015) A multimaterial bioink method for 3D printing tunable, cell-compatible hydrogels. Adv Mater 27(9):1607–1614
Xiao W et al (2011) Synthesis and characterization of photocrosslinkable gelatin and silk fibroin interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels. Acta Biomater 7(6):2384–2393
Xavier JR et al (2015) Bioactive nanoengineered hydrogels for bone tissue engineering: a growth-factor-free approach. ACS Nano 9(3):3109–3118
Shin SR et al (2011) Carbon nanotube reinforced hybrid microgels as scaffold materials for cell encapsulation. ACS Nano 6(1):362–372
Modaresifar K, Hadjizadeh A, Niknejad H (2018) Design and fabrication of GelMA/chitosan nanoparticles composite hydrogel for angiogenic growth factor delivery. Artif Cells Nanomedicine Biotechnol 46(8):1799–1808
Pekkanen AM et al (2017) 3D printing polymers with supramolecular functionality for biological applications. Biomacromolecular 18(9):2669–2687
Highley CB, Rodell CB, Burdick JA (2015) Direct 3D printing of shear-thinning hydrogels into self-healing hydrogels. Adv Mater 27(34):5075–5079
Li H et al (2018) A highly tough and stiff supramolecular polymer double network hydrogel. Polymer 153:193–200
Hospodiuk M et al (2017) The bioink: a comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. Biotechnol Adv 35(2):217–239
Levato R et al (2014) Biofabrication of tissue constructs by 3D bioprinting of cell-laden microcarriers. Biofabrication 6(3):035020
Ashammakhi N et al (2019) Bioinks and bioprinting technologies to make heterogeneous and biomimetic tissue constructs. Mater Today Bio 1:100008
Liu W et al (2018) Coaxial extrusion bioprinting of 3D microfibrous constructs with cell-favorable gelatin methacryloyl microenvironments. Biofabrication 10(2):024102
Gao Q et al (2015) Coaxial nozzle-assisted 3D bioprinting with built-in microchannels for nutrients delivery. Biomaterials 61:203–215
Mistry P et al (2017) Bioprinting using mechanically robust core–shell cell-laden hydrogel strands. Macromol Biosci 17(6):1600472
Liu W et al (2017) Rapid continuous multimaterial extrusion bioprinting. Adv Mater 29(3):1604630
Colosi C et al (2016) Microfluidic bioprinting of heterogeneous 3D tissue constructs using low-viscosity bioink. Adv Mater 28(4):677–684
Miri AK et al (2018) Microfluidics-enabled multimaterial maskless stereolithographic bioprinting. Adv Mater 30(27):1800242
Gaebel R et al (2011) Patterning human stem cells and endothelial cells with laser printing for cardiac regeneration. Biomaterials 32(35):9218–9230
Gaetani R et al (2015) Epicardial application of cardiac progenitor cells in a 3D-printed gelatin/hyaluronic acid patch preserves cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Biomaterials 61:339–348
Schuurman W et al (2013) Gelatin-methacrylamide hydrogels as potential biomaterials for fabrication of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. Macromol Biosci 13(5):551–561
Apelgren P et al (2017) Chondrocytes and stem cells in 3D-bioprinted structures create human cartilage in vivo. PLoS One 12(12):e0189428
Shi W et al (2017) Structurally and functionally optimized silk-fibroin–gelatin scaffold using 3D printing to repair cartilage injury in vitro and in vivo. Adv Mater 29(29):1701089
Mannoor MS et al (2013) 3D printed bionic ears. Nano Lett 13(6):2634–2639
Pati F et al (2013) 3D printing of cell-laden constructs for heterogeneous tissue regeneration. Manuf Lett 1(1):49–53
Lee J-S et al (2014) 3D printing of composite tissue with complex shape applied to ear regeneration. Biofabrication 6(2):024103
Kang H-W et al (2016) A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol 34(3):312
Markstedt K et al (2015) 3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose–alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules 16(5):1489–1496
Lozano R et al (2015) 3D printing of layered brain-like structures using peptide modified gellan gum substrates. Biomaterials 67:264–273
Lozano R et al (2016) Brain on a bench top. Mater Today 19(2):124–125
Heinrich MA et al (2019) 3D-bioprinted mini-brain: a glioblastoma model to study cellular interactions and therapeutics. Adv Mater 31(14):1806590
Pi Q et al (2018) Digitally tunable microfluidic bioprinting of multilayered cannular tissues. Adv Mater 30(43):1706913
Zhang K et al (2017) 3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: an in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment. Acta Biomater 50:154–164
Imamura T et al (2018) Biofabricated structures reconstruct functional urinary bladders in radiation-injured rat bladders. Tissue Eng Part A 24(21–22):1574–1587
Gopinathan J, Noh I (2018) Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing. Biomater Res 22(1):11
Hong S et al (2015) 3D printing of highly stretchable and tough hydrogels into complex, cellularized structures. Adv Mater 27(27):4035–4040
Pati F et al (2014) Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat Commun 5:3935
Duan B et al (2014) Three-dimensional printed trileaflet valve conduits using biological hydrogels and human valve interstitial cells. Acta Biomater 10(5):1836–1846
Visser J et al (2015) Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres. Nat Commun 6:6933
Kaemmerer E et al (2014) Gelatine methacrylamide-based hydrogels: an alternative three-dimensional cancer cell culture system. Acta Biomater 10(6):2551–2562
Wang Y et al (2018) Development of a photo-crosslinking, biodegradable GelMA/PEGDA hydrogel for guided bone regeneration materials. Materials 11(8):1345
Shin H, Olsen BD, Khademhosseini A (2012) The mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of cell-laden double-network hydrogels based on photocrosslinkable gelatin and gellan gum biomacromolecules. Biomaterials 33(11):3143–3152
Berger AJ et al (2017) Decoupling the effects of stiffness and fiber density on cellular behaviors via an interpenetrating network of gelatin-methacrylate and collagen. Biomaterials 141:125–135
Shin SR et al (2013) Cell-laden microengineered and mechanically tunable hybrid hydrogels of gelatin and graphene oxide. Adv Mater 25(44):6385–6391
Navaei A et al (2016) Gold nanorod-incorporated gelatin-based conductive hydrogels for engineering cardiac tissue constructs. Acta Biomater 41:133–146
Shin SR et al (2013) Carbon-nanotube-embedded hydrogel sheets for engineering cardiac constructs and bioactuators. ACS Nano 7(3):2369–2380
Shin SR et al (2016) Reduced graphene oxide-gelMA hybrid hydrogels as scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Small 12(27):3677–3689
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Das, S., Basu, B. An Overview of Hydrogel-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting of Soft Tissues. J Indian Inst Sci 99, 405–428 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-019-00129-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-019-00129-5