Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assembly-oriented reliability analysis method for the top-connection structure of a nuclear fuel assembly

  • Published:
Nuclear Science and Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nuclear fuel assembly is the core component of a nuclear reactor. In a pressurized water reactor fuel assembly, the top-connection structure connects the top nozzle to the guide thimble. Its performance reliability is essential for the stability of the nuclear fuel assembly. In this study, an assembly-oriented reliability analysis method for top-connection structures is presented by establishing an assembly-oriented top-connection structure parameter modeling method and a nonlinear contact gap and penetration correction method. A reliability model of the top-connection assembly structure, including multiple stochastic design variables, was constructed, and the overall reliability of the top-connection assembly structure was obtained via a Kriging model and Monte Carlo simulation. The acquired experimental data were consistent with real-world failure conditions, which verified the practicability and feasibility of the reliability analysis method proposed in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Science Data Bank at https://www.doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.j00186.00077 and https://cstr.cn/31253.11.sciencedb.j00186.00077.

References

  1. E.B. Agyekum, M.N.S. Ansah, K.B. Afornu, Nuclear energy for sustainable development: SWOT analysis on Ghana’s nuclear agenda. Energy Rep. 6, 107–115 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.11.163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. X.P. Guo, X.D. Guo, Nuclear power development in China after the restart of new nuclear construction and approval: a system dynamics analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 57, 999–1007 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S.T. Ling, W.Q. Li, C.X. Li et al., Flow field fusion simulation method based on model features and its application in CRDM. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33(3), 32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-022-01022-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Fan, T. Peng, Y. Tang et al., Periodicity and transversal pressure distribution in a wire-wrapped 19-Pin fuel assembly. Int. J. Energy Res. 45(8), 11837–11850 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. V.I. Skalozubov, I.L. Kozlov, Y.A. Komarov et al., Analysis of nuclear safety in diversification of Westinghouse fuel assemblies at WWER-1000. Ядepнa фiзикa тa eнepгeтикa. 20(2), 159–163 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. X. Wang, D. Wang, Q. Deng et al., Simulation of dynamic characteristics of NHR200-II fuel assembly. Nucl. Eng. Des. 379, 111255 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. NB/T 20057.3-2012. Reactor system design for pressurized water reactor nuclear power plants-core part 3: fuel assemblies (2012)

  8. G. Yadigaroglu, M. Andreani, J. Dreier et al., Trends and needs in experimentation and numerical simulation for LWR safety. Nucl. Nucl. Eng. Des. 221, 205–223 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(02)00339-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Mourtzis, Simulation in the design and operation of manufacturing systems: state of the art and new trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58(7), 1927–1949 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1636321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Wang, Y. Wang, W. Tian et al., Recent progress of CFD applications in PWR thermal hydraulics study and future directions. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 150, 107836 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Wang, M. Wang, H. Ju et al., CFD simulation of flow and heat transfer characteristics in a 5× 5 fuel rod bundles with spacer grids of advanced PWR. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52, 1386–1395 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Zhang, M. Wang, C. Chen et al., CFD investigation of the cold wall effect on CHF in a 5× 5 rod bundle for PWRs. Nucl. Eng. Des. 387, 111589 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Wang, Z. Pu, F. Zhu et al., Simulation and analysis of new-type fuel assembly top connection structure. Nucl. Power Eng. 38(06), 163–166 (2017). https://doi.org/10.13832/j.jnpe.2017.06.0163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Liu, Strength Analysis of Pipe Seat Transport and Hoisting Conditions on PWR Fuel Assembly (Southwest Petroleum University, 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Yoo, K. Kim, K. Eom et al., Finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of a nuclear fuel assembly spacer grid. Nucl. Eng. Des. 352, 110179 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M.H. Duan, M.F. Zhao, A numerical research of the resistance characteristics of the bottom nozzle in the annular fuel assembly, in International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, vol. 51494 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018), p. V06BT08A046. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE26-82259

  17. C.Y. Wu, M.T. Kao, C.C. Chieng et al., CFD analysis of PWR core top region: Top fuel assembly and top nozzle regions, in International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. ICONE18-29463 (2010), pp. 557–564. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE18-29463

  18. M. Su, P. Chen, L. Kuang et al., Mechanical property study of CF3 fuel assembly bottom nozzle. Nucl. Power Eng. 39(S1), 62–65 (2018). https://doi.org/10.13832/j.jnpe.2018.S1.0062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Wei, S. Du, X. Wang et al., Numerical simulation study on resistance characteristics of top nozzle in fuel assembly based on CFD. Nucl. Power Eng. 38(S2), 29–33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.13832/j.jnpe.2017.S2.0029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Š Dyk, V. Zeman, Impact vibrations of guide thimbles in nuclear fuel assembly. Arch. Appl. Mech. 87(2), 231–244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-016-1189-6

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Xu, M. Conner, K. Yuan et al., Study of impact of the AP1000® reactor vessel upper internals design on fuel performance. Nucl. Eng. Des. 252, 128–134 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.06.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Zhao, S. Xu, W. Pan et al., A detailed model to predict mechanical characteristics of fuel assembly, in International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, vol. 86366 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2022), p. V002T02A043. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE29-91931

  23. ASME. Section III Division 1-Subsection NG, Core support structures (2003)

  24. D. Meng, Y. Li, C. He et al., Multidisciplinary design for structural integrity using a collaborative optimization method based on adaptive approximation modelling. Mater. Des. 206, 109789 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Ling, W. Li, T. Yu et al., Analysis and optimization research on latch life of control rod drive mechanism based on approximate model. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53(12), 4166–4178 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Jin, W. Chen, T.W. Simpson, Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 23(1), 1–13 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-001-0160-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. T. Chai, R.R. Draxle, Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?—Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geosci. Model Dev. 7(3), 1247–1250 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. R.Y. Rubinstein, B. Melamed, Modern Simulation and Modeling (Wiley, New York, 1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Q. Pan, D. Dias, An efficient reliability method combining adaptive support vector machine and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct. Saf. 67, 85–95 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Z. Wang, M. Broccardo, J. Song, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods for subset simulation in reliability analysis. Struct. Saf. 76, 51–67 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. D.V. Dao, H. Adeli, H.B. Ly et al., A sensitivity and robustness analysis of GPR and ANN for high-performance concrete compressive strength prediction using a Monte Carlo simulation. Sustainability 12(3), 830 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. B.T. Pham, M.D. Nguyen, D.V. Dao et al., Development of artificial intelligence models for the prediction of compression coefficient of soil: an application of Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 679, 172–184 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.061

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. S. Mordechai, Applications of Monte Carlo Method in Science and Engineering (InTech, 2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. S.A. Olatubosun, Z. Zhang, Dependency consideration of passive system reliability by coupled stress–strength interference/functional relations of parameters approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 188, 549–560 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Ying-Dong Liu, Wen-Qiang Li, Jia-Hao Chen, Si-Tong Ling and Chang-Fu Wan. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ying-Dong Liu, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Qiang Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52075350), the Major Science and Technology Projects of Sichuan Province (No. 2022ZDZX0001), and the Special City School Strategic Cooperation Project of Sichuan University and Zigong (No. 2021CDZG-3).

Appendices

Appendix 1: Pre-experimental design matrix and experiment results

See Table 8.

Table 8 Pre-experimental design matrix and experiment results

Appendix 2: Experimental design matrix and experimental results

See Table 9.

Table 9 Experimental design matrix and experimental results

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, YD., Li, WQ., Chen, JH. et al. Assembly-oriented reliability analysis method for the top-connection structure of a nuclear fuel assembly. NUCL SCI TECH 34, 82 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01247-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01247-7

Keywords

Navigation