Skip to main content
Log in

Intra-industry trade in the wine sector in the enlarged European Union

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International trade theory suggests that advanced trade integration may lead to a higher level of intra-industry trade. The enlargement of the European Union (EU) during the last decade is a good example to analyse the intra-industry trade in wine products. The aim of the paper is to analyse the pattern and drivers of horizontal intra-industry trade in the wine sector within the EU between 2000 and 2011. We employ an empirical strategy developed by Cieślik (2005) to test Helpman and Krugman (1985) model. We find a growing trend in intra-industry trade with dominance of vertical intra-industry trade. Estimations suggest that Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Germany report the highest level of intra-industry trade within the EU. The level of intra-industry trade is highest among old member states. Empirical evidence indicates that the standard intra-industry theory finds some support in our data when we control for the sum of capital to labour ratios in the estimated equations instead of relative country-size variables. We find that the EU enlargement positively influences total and vertical intra-industry trade while it has negative impacts on horizontal intra-industry trade. Distance has negative effects on all types of intra-industry trade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agostino M, Trivieri F (2014) Geographical indication and wine exports. An empirical investigation considering the major European producers. Food Policy 46:22–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson K, Wittwer G (2013) Modeling global wine markets to 2018: exchange rates, taste changes, and China’s import growth. J Wine Econ 8(2):131–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ando M (2006) Fragmentation and vertical intra-industry trade in East Asia. North Am J Econ Finance 17(3):257–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck N, Katz JN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. Am Polit Sci Rev 89(3):634–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck N, Katz JN (1996) Nuisance vs. substance: specifying and estimating time-series cross-section models. Polit Anal 6(1):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand JH (1990) The Heckscher–Ohlin–Samuelson model, the Linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade. Econ J 100(403):1216–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanes JV, Martín C (2000) The nature and causes of intra-industry trade: back to the comparative advantage explanation? The case of Spain. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 136(3):423–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bojnec S, Fertő I (2010) Quality differentiation in east–west European agro-food trade during the pre-accession. Transform Bus Econ 9(3):36–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślik A (2005) Intraindustry trade and relative factor endowments. Rev Int Econ 13(5):904–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christodolou M (1992) Intra-industry trade in agrofood sectors: the case of the EEC meat market. Appl Econ 24(8):875–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozet M, Head K, Mayer T (2012) Quality sorting and trade: firm-level evidence for French wine. Rev Econ Stud 79(2):609–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falvey RE (1981) Commercial policy and intra-industry trade. J Int Econ 11(4):495–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falvey RE, Kierzkowski H (1987) Product quality, intra-industry trade and (im)perfect competition. In: Kierzkowski H (ed) Protection and competition in international trade. Essays in honor of W.M. Corden. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fertő I, Jámbor A (2015) Drivers of vertical intra-industry trade: the case of the Hungarian agri-food sector. Agric Econ 46(1):113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flam H, Helpman E (1987) Vertical product differentiation and north-south trade. Am Econ Rev 77(5):810–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontagné L, Freudenberg M, Gaulier G (2006) A systematic decomposition of world trade into horizontal and vertical IIT. Rev World Econ 142(3):459–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabszewicz J, Shaked A, Sutton J, Thisse J-F (1981) International trade in differentiated products. Int Econ Rev 22(3):527–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway D, Hine R, Milner C (1994) Country-specific factors and the pattern of horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade in the UK. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 130(1):77–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway D, Hine RC, Milner CR (1995) Vertical and horizontal intra-industry trade: a cross-industry analysis for the United Kingdom. Econ J 105(403):1505–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubel HG, Lloyd P (1975) Intra-industry: trade the theory and measurement of international trade in differentiation products. The Macmillan Press, London, UK, 205 p

  • Helpman E (1981) International trade in the presence of product differentiation, economies of scale and monopolistic competition: a Chamberlin–Heckscher–Ohlin approach. J Int Econ 11(3):305–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E (1987) Imperfect competition and international trade: evidence from fourteen industrial countries. J Jpn Int Econ 1(1):62–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E, Krugman P (1985) Market structure and foreign trade. Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. The MIT Press, Cambridge 283 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Heston A., Summers R. and Aten B. (2011) Penn World Table Version 7.0. Center for International comparisons of production, income and prices at the University of Pennsylvania, May 2011

  • Hummels D, Levinsohn J (1995) Monopolistic competition and international trade: reconsidering the evidence. Q J Econ 110(3):799–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im K, Pesaran H, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jámbor A (2014) Country-specific determinants of horizontal and vertical intra-industry agri-food trade: the case of the EU new member states. J Agric Econ 65(3):663–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen L, Lüthje T (2009) Driving forces of vertical intra-industry trade in Europe 1996–2005. Rev World Econ 145(3):469–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman (1979) Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. J Int Econ 9:469–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster (1980) Intra-industry trade under perfect monopolistic competition. J Int Econ 10:151–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin A, Lin C, Chu C-S (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econ 108(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder SB (1961) An essay on trade and transformation. Wiley, New York, USA 167 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloni G, Swinnen J (2014) The rise and fall of the World’s largest wine exporter—and its institutional legacy. J Wine Econ 9(1):3–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram-Baleix J, Moro-Egido AI (2010) The asymmetric effect of endowments on vertical intra-industrial trade. World Econ 33(5):746–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng S, Perron P (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69(6):1519–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JUM, Lüthje T (2002) Tests of the empirical classification of horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 138(4):587–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieri R, Rama D, Venturini L (1997) Intra-industry trade in the European dairy industry. Eur Rev Agric Econ 24(3–4):411–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaked A, Sutton J (1984) Natural oligopolies and international trade. In: Kierzkowski H (ed) Monopolistic competition and international trade. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 34–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver M. (2007) Do unit value export, import, and terms of trade indices represent or misrepresent price indices? IMF Working Paper WP/07/121, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C., 34 p

  • Stiglitz JE (1987) The causes and consequences of the dependence of quality on prices. J Econ Lit 25(1):1–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this manuscript. This research was supported by the project NKFI-115788 “Economic crises and international agricultural trade”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Szilárd Podruzsik.

Appendix

Appendix

Specification tests for Table 4 (p values)

 

IIT

Horizontal IIT

Vertical IIT

IIT

Horizontal IIT

VerticalIIT

Hausman test

0.0213

0.3562

0.0165

0.0315

0.8364

0.0415

Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data

0.0000

0.9092

0.0000

0.0000

0.9075

0.0000

Modified Wald test for groupwise heteroscedasticity

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Pesaran’s test of cross-sectional independence

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Specification tests for Table 5 (p values)

 

IIT

Horizontal IIT

Vertical IIT

IIT

Horizontal IIT

VerticalIIT

Hausman test

0.5527

0.2026

0.2158

0.4989

0.9235

0.3338

Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data

0.0000

0.9083

0.0000

0.0000

0.9072

0.0000

Modified Wald test for groupwise heteroscedasticity

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Pesaran’s test of cross-sectional independence

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Specification tests for Table 6 (p values)

 

IIT

Horizontal IIT

Vertical IIT

IIT

Horizontal IIT

Vertical IIT

Hausman test

0.1749

0.0011

0.5691

0.0226

0.0176

0.0715

Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data

0.0000

0.9101

0.0000

0.0000

0.9086

0.0000

Modified Wald test for groupwise heteroscedasticity

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Pesaran’s test of cross-sectional independence

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Specification tests for Table 7 (p values)

 

IIT

Horizontal IIT

Vertical IIT

IIT

Horizontal IIT

Vertical IIT

Hausman test

0.2345

0.0069

0.5169

0.0650

0.1012

0.1400

Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data

0.0000

0.9102

0.0000

0.0000

0.9088

0.0000

Modified Wald test for groupwise heteroscedasticity

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Pesaran’s test of cross-sectional independence

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Specification tests for Table 8 (p values)

 

IIT

Horizontal IIT

Vertical IIT

IIT

Horizontal IIT

Vertical IIT

Hausman test

0.9234

0.0076

0.9900

0.6873

0.1550

0.6660

Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data

0.0000

0.9094

0.0000

0.0000

0.9085

0.0000

Modified Wald test for groupwise heteroscedasticity

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Pesaran’s test of cross-sectional independence

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Specification tests for Table 9 (p values)

 

IIT

Horizontal IIT

Vertical IIT

IIT

Horizontal IIT

Vertical IIT

Hausman test

0.3355

0.0006

0.4783

0.0335

0.0071

0.0548

Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data

0.0000

0.9109

0.0000

0.0000

0.9094

0.0000

Modified Wald test for groupwise heteroscedasticity

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Pesaran’s test of cross-sectional independence

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fertő, I., Podruzsik, S. & Balogh, J. Intra-industry trade in the wine sector in the enlarged European Union. Rev Agric Food Environ Stud 97, 159–172 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-016-0024-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-016-0024-3

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation