Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of Caspase-8 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Breast Cancer—A Pilot Study in Central India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Caspase-8 is an initiator caspase, which regulates apoptosis and stimulates cell proliferation, malignant transformation and tumour progression. The CASP8 gene often disrupts the apoptotic mechanism and poses a risk of developing various types of cancer. The prognostic role of caspase-8 in breast cancer has been a subject of great interest and has not been validated yet. This pilot study was aimed to evaluate the expression of caspase-8 in breast cancer patients and its correlation with the disease outcome.

Design

In this study, 50 patients of breast cancer were enrolled. The immunohistochemical expression of Caspase-8, Estrogen Receptor (ER) and Progesterone Receptor (PR) and Her2/neu was studied and correlated with other prognostic factors.

Results

In case of weak/negative caspase-8 staining, 60% cases had 2 to 5 cm size followed by 36% which were > 5 cm in size. Out of 28 cases with moderate caspase-8 staining, 78.5% cases had tumour of 2 to5 cm in size and 21.4% had size > 5 cm size and out of 17 cases with strong caspase-8 staining, 58.8% had > 5 cm size, followed by 29.4% which had 2 to 5 cm and 11.7% with < 2 cm size. Both the cases (100%) with tumour size < 2 cm had strong caspase-8 staining (p = 0.05). There was no significant correlation between caspase-8 staining with histological grade, lymph node involvement, ER, PR and Her2/neu (p = 0.50, 0.50, 0.68, 0.55 and 0.26, respectively) staining. Except for lymph node involvement (p = 0.01), there was no significant caspase-8 staining correlation with survival, tumour size and histological tumour grade on follow-up (p = 0.42, 0.87 and 0.36, respectively).

Conclusion

Most of the breast cancers overexpress caspase-8. Survival of patients correlated only with lymph node involvement. It was better when there was weak or negative caspase-8 staining, though not statistically significant. Caspase-8 may have a potential for use in future as one of the prognostic biomarker if the larger study is able to establish the significance in breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nagata S, Tanaka M. Programmed cell death and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(5):333–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(4):495–516.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Julien O, Wells J. Caspases and their substrates. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24:1380–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Siegmund D, Mauri D, Peters N, Juo P, Thome M, Reichwein M, Blenis J, Scheurich P, Tschopp J, Wajant H. Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD) and caspase-8 mediate up-regulation of c-Fos by Fas ligand and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) via a FLICE inhibitory protein (FLIP)-regulated pathway. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(35):32585–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tummers B, Green DR. Caspase-8: regulating life and death. Immunol Rev. 2017;277(1):76–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jager R, Zwacka RM. The enigmatic roles of caspases in tumor development. Cancers. 2010;2(4):1952–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grenet J, Teitz T, Wei T, Valentine V, Kidd VJ. Structure and chromosome localization of the human CASP8 gene. Gene. 1999;226(2):225–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McGuffog L, Antoniou AC, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Sinilnikova OM, Barjhoux L, Frenay M, Michel C, et al. Association of the variants CASP8 D302H and CASP10 V410I with breast and ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(11):2859–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang S, Liu J, Thor AD, Yang X. Caspase expression profile and functional activity in a panel of breast cancer cell lines. Oncol Rep. 2007;17(5):1229–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Blasio A, Di Fiore R, Morreale M, Carlisi D, Drago-Ferrante R, Montalbano M, et al. Unusual roles of caspase-8 in triple-negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. Int J Oncol. 2016;48:2339–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pingoud-Meier C, Lang D, Janss AJ, Rorke LB, Phillips PC, Shalaby T, Grotzer MA. Loss of caspase-8 protein expression correlates with unfavorable survival outcome in childhood medulloblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(17):6401–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Skiriute D, Vaitkiene P, Saferis V, Asmoniene V, Skauminas K, Deltuva VP, et al. MGMT, GATA6, CD81, DR4, and CASP8 gene promoter methylation in glioblastoma. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bray F, McCarron P, Parkin DM. The changing global patterns of female breast cancer incidence and mortality. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(6):229–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. National Centre for Disease informatics and Research. National Cancer Registry Programme: Five years Report of Population Based Cancer Registry, Wardha District: 2010–14, Maharashtra, India. Indian Council of Medical Research; 2016:14.

  15. Vakkala M, Paakko P, Soini Y. Expression of caspases 3, 6 and 8 is increased in parallel with apoptosis and histological aggressiveness of the breast lesion. Br J Cancer. 1999;81(4):592–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma H, Lu Y, Marchbanks PA, Folger SG, Strom BL, McDonald JA, et al. Quantitative measures of estrogen receptor expression in relation to breast cancer-specific mortality risk among white women and black women. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(5):R90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bansal C, Sharma A, Pujani M, Pujani M, Sharma KL, Srivastava AN, Singh US. Correlation of hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2/neu expression in breast cancer with various clinicopathologic factors. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2017;38(4):483–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pu X, Storr SJ, Zhang Y, Rakha EA, Green AR, Ellis IO, Martin SG. Caspase-3 and caspase-8 expression in breast cancer: caspase-3 is associated with survival. Apoptosis. 2017;22(3):357–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Virkajarvi N, Paakko P, Soini Y. Apoptotic index and apoptosis influencing proteins bcl-2, mcl-1, bax and caspases 3, 6 and 8 in pancreatic carcinoma. Histopathology. 1998;33(5):432–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kang Z, Goldstein SD, Yu Y, Meltzer PS, Loeb DM, Cao L. Caspase-8 expression is predictive of tumour response to death receptor 5 agonist antibody in Ewing’s sarcoma. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(6):894–901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu D, Xu W, Ding X, Yang Y, Lu Y, Fei K, Su B. Caspase 8 polymorphisms contribute to the prognosis of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients after platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2017;18(12):948–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Polanski R, Vincent J, Polanska UM, Petreus T, Tang EK. Caspase-8 activation by TRAIL monotherapy predicts responses to IAPi and TRAIL combination treatment in breast cancer cell lines. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6(10):e1893.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zoli W, Ulivi P, Tesei A, Fabbri F, Rosetti M, Maltoni R, et al. Addition of 5-fluorouracil to doxorubicin-paclitaxel sequence increases caspase-dependent apoptosis in breast cancer cell lines. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:R681.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fulda S, Kufer MU, Meyer E, van Valen F, Dockhorn-Dworniczak B, Debatin KM. Sensitization for death receptor- or drug-induced apoptosis by re-expression of caspase-8 through demethylation or gene transfer. Oncogene. 2001;20(41):5865–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitin M. Gangane.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kotalwar, K.S., Deshmukh, A.V. & Gangane, N.M. Role of Caspase-8 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Breast Cancer—A Pilot Study in Central India. Indian J Gynecol Oncolog 19, 74 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-021-00572-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-021-00572-2

Keywords

Navigation