Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

On the impact of dysarthric speech on contemporary ASR cloud platforms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spread of voice-driven devices has a positive impact for people with disabilities in smart environments, since such devices allow them to perform a series of daily activities that were difficult or impossible before. As a result, their quality of life and autonomy increase. However, the speech recognition technology employed in such devices becomes limited with people having communication disorders, like dysarthria. People with dysarthria may be unable to control their smart environments, at least with the needed proficiency; this problem may negatively affect the perceived reliability of the entire environment. By exploiting the TORGO database of speech samples pronounced by people with dysarthria, this paper compares the accuracy of the dysarthric speech recognition as achieved by three speech recognition cloud platforms, namely IBM Watson Speech-to-Text, Google Cloud Speech, and Microsoft Azure Bing Speech. Such services, indeed, are used in many virtual assistants deployed in smart environments, such as Google Home. The goal is to investigate whether such cloud platforms are usable to recognize dysarthric speech, and to understand which of them is the most suitable for people with dysarthria. Results suggest that the three platforms have comparable performance in recognizing dysarthric speech and that the accuracy of the recognition is related to the speech intelligibility of the person. Overall, the platforms are limited when the dysarthric speech intelligibility is low (80–90% of word error rate), while they improve up to reach a word error rate of 15–25% for people without abnormality in their speech intelligibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Ballati F, Corno F, De Russis L (2018) Assessing virtual assistant capabilities with italian dysarthric speech. In: Proceedings of the 20th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility, ASSETS ’18, ACM, New York, pp 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236354

  2. Ballati F, Corno F, De Russis L (2018) Hey siri, do you understand me?: Virtual assistants and dysarthria. In: Intelligent environments 2018: workshop proceedings of the 14th international conference on intelligent environments, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 557–566. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-874-7-557

  3. Bigham JP, Kushalnagar R, Huang THK, Flores JP, Savage S (2017) On how deaf people might use speech to control devices. In: Proceedings of the 19th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility-ASSETS’17. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3134821

  4. DeRosier R, Farber RS (2005) Speech recognition software as an assistive device: a pilot study of user satisfaction and psychosocial impact. Work 25(2):125–134

    Google Scholar 

  5. Enderby P (1980) Frenchay dysarthria assessment. Int J Lang Commun Disord 15(3):165–173. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682828009112541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Glasser AT, Kushalnagar KR, Kushalnagar RS (2017) Feasibility of using automatic speech recognition with voices of deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. In: Proceedings of the 19th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility-ASSETS’17. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3134819

  7. Google (2018) Cloud speech-to-text. https://cloud.google.com/speech-to-text/. Accessed 15 May 2019

  8. Hawley MS (2002) Speech recognition as an input to electronic assistive technology. Br J Occup Therap 65(1):15–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260206500104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. IBM (2018) Watson speech to text. https://www.ibm.com/cloud/watson-speech-to-text. Accessed 15 May 2019

  10. Joy NM, Umesh S (2018) Improving acoustic models in torgo dysarthric speech database. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 26(3):637–645. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2802914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kent RD (2000) Research on speech motor control and its disorders: a review and prospective. J Commun Disord 33:391–427 quiz 428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim H, Hasegawa-Johnson M, Perlman A, Gunderson J, Huang T, Watkin K, Frame S (2008) Dysarthric speech database for universal access research. In: Interspeech, pp 1741–1744

  13. Kim M, Kim Y, Yoo J, Wang J, Kim H (2017) Regularized speaker adaptation of kl-hmm for dysarthric speech recognition. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 25(9):1581–1591. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2681691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim M, Wang J, Kim H (2016) Dysarthric speech recognition using kullback-leibler divergence-based hidden markov model. In: Interspeech 2016, pp 2671–2675. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2016-776

  15. Koester HH (2004) Usage, performance, and satisfaction outcomes for experienced users of automatic speech recognition. J Rehabil Res Dev 41(5):739. https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2003.07.0106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Menendez-Pidal X, Polikoff JB, Peters SM, Leonzio JE, Bunnell HT (1996) The nemours database of dysarthric speech. In: Proceeding of 4th international conference on spoken language processing. ICSLP ’96, 3:1962–1965. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSLP.1996.608020

  17. Microsoft (2018) Bing speech. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/cognitive-services/speech/. Accessed 15 May 2019

  18. Pradhan A, Mehta K, Findlater L (2018) “Accessibility came by accident”: use of voice-controlled intelligent personal assistants by people with disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’18, pp 459:1–459:13. ACM, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174033

  19. Rudzicz F (2012) Using articulatory likelihoods in the recognition of dysarthric speech. Speech Commun 54(3):430–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2011.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rudzicz F, Namasivayam AK, Wolff T (2012) The TORGO database of acoustic and articulatory speech from speakers with dysarthria. Lang Resour Evaluat 46(4):523–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-011-9145-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu J, Xie X, Liu S, Hu S, Lam MWY, Wu X, Wong KH, Liu X, Meng H (2018) Development of the cuhk dysarthric speech recognition system for the ua speech corpus. In: Proceedings of Interspeech 2018, pp 2938–2942. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2018-1541

  22. Zue V, Seneff S, Glass J (1990) Speech database development at MIT: timit and beyond. Speech Commun 9(4):351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(90)90010-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Fabio Ballati for his contribution to the data analysis and for the software implementation to interact with each ASR cloud platform.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Politecnico di Torino Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129, Turin, Italy

    Luigi De Russis & Fulvio Corno

Authors
  1. Luigi De Russis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fulvio Corno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi De Russis.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Russis, L., Corno, F. On the impact of dysarthric speech on contemporary ASR cloud platforms. J Reliable Intell Environ 5, 163–172 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-019-00085-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-019-00085-y

Keywords