Skip to main content
Log in

Maneuverable Capsule Endoscope Based on Gimbaled Ducted-Fan System: Concept and Simulation Results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless capsule endoscopes are a growing research area because they can be easily swallowed by patients to capture images of the digestive system without pain. However, a drawback of current capsule endoscopes is that most use passive motion. To overcome this drawback, a maneuverable capsule endoscope (MCE) based on a gimbaled ducted-fan (GDF) system is proposed in this study. The system design, prototype development of the GDF system, and associated modeling and simulation are presented. The concept of the GDF is adopted from the thrust-vector control algorithm of a space shuttle. To prevent organ damage, the ducted fan, which generates and controls the thrust required for achieving maneuverability, is mounted on a gimbal structure. A scaled-up prototype of the GDF system was manufactured. The overall conceptual design of the MCE based on the GDF system is presented. A flow simulation and a three-dimensional path-following simulation are performed to evaluate the proposed MCE’s applicability. The mean terminal velocity of the 6:1 scaled-up MCE prototype was calculated from flow simulation to be 0.6047, 0.5941, and 0.9204 m/s for the three postures of the GDF system, respectively, which represented the three translational degrees of freedom. For the 1:1 scale prototype, the mean terminal velocity was calculated to be 0.1147, 0.1127, and 0.1746 m/s for the above three postures, respectively. The proposed MCE dynamic model follows the desired path profile when the Lyapunov stability-based path-following algorithm was applied to it. In summary, the terminal velocity achieved in this research is sufficient for maneuvering inside the stomach organ. The results show that the MCE concept could be used for detecting and diagnosing abnormalities in the digestive system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CDC/NCHS National Hospital Discharge Survey: United States 2010. (2010). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhds/10Detaileddiagnosesprocedures/2010det10_numberalldiagnoses.pdf.

  2. Wilcox, C. M. (2009). Fifty years of gastroenterology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham: A festschrift for Dr. Basil I. Hirschowitz. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 338, 84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shapiro, J. A., Klabunde, C. N., Thompson, T. D., Nadel, M. R., Seeff, L. C., & White, A. (2012). Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiology, 21, 895–904.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seeff, L. C., Richards, T. B., Shapiro, J. A., Nadel, M. R., Manninen, D. L., Given, L. S., et al. (2004). How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC’s survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology, 127, 1670–1677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore, L. E. (2003). The advantages and disadvantages of endoscopy. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice, 18, 250–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iddan, G., Meron, G., Glukhovsky, A., & Swain, P. (2000). Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature, 405, 417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hara, K., Leighton, J. A., Sharma, V. K., Heigh, R. I., & Fleischer, D. E. (2005). Imaging of small bowel disease: Comparison of capsule endoscopy, standard endoscopy, barium examination and CT 1. RadioGraphics, 25, 697–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis, B. S., & Swain, P. (2002). Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: Results of a pilot study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 56, 349–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mylonaki, M., Fritscher-Ravens, A., & Swain, P. (2003). Wireless capsule endoscopy: A comparison with push enteroscopy in patients with gastroscopy and colonoscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut, 52, 1122–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Menciassi, A., Quirini, M., & Dario, P. (2007). Microrobotics for future gastrointestinal endoscopy. Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies, 16, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moglia, A., Menciassi, A., Schurr, M. O., & Dario, P. (2007). Wireless capsule endoscopy: From diagnostic devices to multipurpose robotic systems. Biomedical Microdevices, 9, 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Delvaux, M., & Gay, G. (2008). Capsule endoscopy: Technique and indications. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 22, 813–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakamura, T., & Terano, A. (2008). Capsule endoscopy: Past, present, and future. Journal of Gastroenterology, 43, 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mosse, C. A., Mills, T. N., Appleyard, M. N., Kadirkamanathan, S. S., & Swain, C. P. (2001). Electrical stimulation for propelling endoscopes. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 54, 79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Woo, S. H., Kim, T. W., Mohy-Ud-Din, Z., Park, I. Y., & Cho, J. H. (2011). Small intestinal model for electrically propelled capsule endoscopy. BioMedical Engineering Online, 10, 108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Phee, L., Accoto, D., Menciassi, A., Stefanini, C., Carrozza, M. C., & Dario, P. (2002). Analysis and development of locomotion devices for the gastrointestinal tract. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 49, 613–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, K., Yan, G., Ma, G., & Ye, D. (2009). An earthworm-like robotic endoscope system for human intestine: Design, analysis, and experiment. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 37, 210–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carpi, F., Galbiati, S., & Carpi, A. (2006). Magnetic shells for gastrointestinal endoscopic capsules as a means to control their motion. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 60, 370–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Carpi, F., & Pappone, C. (2009). Magnetic maneuvering of endoscopic capsules by means of a robotic navigation system. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 56, 1482–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liao, Z., Duan, X., Xin, L., Bo, L., Wang, X., Xiao, G., et al. (2012). Feasibility and safety of magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy system in examination of human stomach: A pilot study in healthy volunteers. Journal of Interventional Gastroenterology, 2, 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Keller, J., Fibbe, C., Volke, F., Gerber, J., Mosse, A. C., Reimann-Zawadzki, M., et al. (2011). Inspection of the human stomach using remote-controlled capsule endoscopy: A feasibility study in healthy volunteers. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 73, 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Space Shuttle Main Engine. (2014). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_main_engine.

  23. Digestion (2014). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digestion.

  24. Kim, S., Kim, Y., & Lee, C. (2014). Capsule endoscope. U.S. Patent 8,702,593, issued April 22, 2014.

  25. Connor, A., Evans, P., Doto, J., Ellis, C., & Martin, D. E. (2009). An oral human drug absorption study to assess the impact of site of delivery on the bioavailability of bevirimat. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 49, 606–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chi, B., Yao, J., Han, S. G., Xie, X., Li, G., & Wang, Z. (2007). Low-power transceiver analog front-end circuits for bidirectional high data rate wireless telemetry in medical endoscopy applications. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 54, 1291–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, X., Zhang, L., Li, X., Qi, N., Jiang, H., & Wang, Z. (2009). A wireless capsule endoscope system with low-power controlling and processing ASIC. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 3, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Worsøe, J., Fynne, L., Gregersen, T., Schlageter, V., Christensen, L. A., Dahlerup, J. F., et al. (2011). Gastric transit and small intestinal transit time and motility assessed by a magnet tracking system. BMC Gastroenterology, 11, 145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lithium Battery. (2015). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_battery.

  30. Woods, S. P., & Constandinou, T. G. (2013). Wireless capsule endoscope for targeted drug delivery: Mechanics and design considerations. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 60, 945–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Encarnacao, P., & Pascoal, A. (2000). 3D path following for autonomous underwater vehicle. In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE conference on decision and control (Vol. 3, pp. 2977–2982).

  32. Enderle, G., Kansy, K., & Pfaff, G. (1984) Coordinate systems and transformations. In Computer graphics programming (pp. 25–28). Berlin: Springer.

  33. Drag Equation. (2014). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_equation.

  34. White, F. M. (2008). Fluid mechanics (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Csendes, A., & Burgos, A. M. (2005). Size, volume and weight of the stomach in patients with morbid obesity compared to controls. Obesity Surgery, 15, 1133–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Grant 0320140030 from the SNUH Research Fund and Global Ph. D. Fellowship Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (Grant 2014H1A2A1020384).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sungwan Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M., Lee, C., Lee, Y. et al. Maneuverable Capsule Endoscope Based on Gimbaled Ducted-Fan System: Concept and Simulation Results. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 36, 132–143 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-016-0105-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-016-0105-4

Keywords

Navigation