Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the Relation Between CHC Cognitive Factors and Selected Components of Executive Functioning

  • Published:
Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Executive functioning remains an elusive paradigm in regard to their underlying constructs. The Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory of cognitive functions is the predominant theory of the measurement of human intelligence in psychology in regard to test construction and interpretation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relations between components of the Tower Test and Color-Word Interference Test from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) and CHC theory, as measured by the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ-III-COG). Participants were 64 undergraduate students (women, n = 38; men, n = 26), with a mean age of 19.88 years. Results of a Structured Equation Model indicated a correlation between the two factors modeled for Intelligence and Executive functioning was estimated to be 0.575 (0.331), and was statistically significant (p < .001), with a 95% credible interval of (0.551, 0.599). Thus, approximately 33% of the variance for measures of Intelligence was accounted for by measures of Executive Functioning; the biggest CHC contributor was Numbers Reversed which argues for the importance of attention and working memory being an important component of executive functioning. The results suggest that despite a relation between some components of executive function and cognitive ability, much variance between the D-KEFS and WJ-III-COG remains unaccounted for. These findings have implications for evaluation and intervention planning within vocational and educational settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, P. J. (2008). Towards a developmental model of executive function. In V. Anderson, R. Jacobs, & P. J. Anderson (Eds.), Executive functions and the frontal lobes (pp. 3–21). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardila, A., Pineda, D., & Rosselli, M. (1999). Correlation between intelligence test scores and executive function measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J. (2004). Measuring intelligence: facts and fallacies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, J. S., Simamura, A. P., & Knight, R. T. (2004). Frontal lobe contributions to executive control of cognitive and social behavior. In M. S. Gasaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences III (pp. 1091–1104). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, E. E., Heeren, A., & McNally, R. J. (2017). Unpacking rumination and executive control: a network perspective. Clinical Psychological Science, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617702717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (2005). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 69–76). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Pscychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colom, R., Rebollo, I., Palacios, A., Jaun-Espinosa, M., & Kyllonen, P. C. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 32, 277–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Scott, R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 547–552.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. S., Pierson, E. E., & Finch, W. H. (2011). A canonical correlation analysis of intelligence and executive functioning. Applied Neuropsychology, 18, 61–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Frais, C. M., Dixon, R. A., & Strauss, E. (2006). Structure of four executive functioning tests in healthy older adults. Neuropsychology, 20, 206–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, S. L., Hill, S. K., & Dean, R. S. (2007). Evidence of construct similarity in executive functions and fluid reasoning abilities. International Journal of Neuroscience, 117, 735–748.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, S. L., Davis, A. S., Eason, M., Bridges, R., & Vasel, L. (2016). Assessment of Executive Functions Using the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities (Woodcock-Johnson IV Assessment Service Bulletin No. 9). Itasca: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

  • Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis Kaplan executive function system: examiner’s manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denckla, M. B., & Reiss, A. L. (1997). Prefrontal-subcortical circuits in developmental disorders. In N. A. Krasnegor, G. R. Lyon, & P. S. Goldman-Rakic (Eds.), Development of the prefrontal cortex: evolution, neurobiology, and behavior (pp. 283–293). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. (2002). Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood: cognitive functions, anatomy, and biochemistry. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe functions (pp. 466–503). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. (2012). Activities and programs that improve children’s executive functions. Current Directions is Psychological Science, 21, 335–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T. M., Rhodes, A., & Crowder, S. D. (2013). Resilience of the tower test to response bias. Universal Journal of Psychology 1(1), 1–9.

  • Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, W., & Conway, A. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, R. G., McCormack, A. C., Ingram, E. L., Davis, A. E., Bergeron, R., & Hamilton, G. (2006). Relations between the Woodcock-Johnson III clinical clusters and measures of executive functions from the Delis-Kaplan executive function system. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 303–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, R. G., Bergeron, R., Hamilton, G., & Parra, G. R. (2010). How do executive functions fit with the Cattell-Horn-Carroll model? Some evidence from a joint factor analysis of the Delis-Kaplan executive function system and the Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 721–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17, 172–179.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, M. W., & Day, J. D. (2010). Verbal ability and executive functioning development in preschoolers at head start. Developmental Psychology, 47, 404–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerig, D. C., Davis, A. S., & D’Amato, R. C. (2002). Evaluating the relationship between memory and intelligence in children with learning disabilities. Psychological Reports, 91, 1169–1173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1988). Thinking about human abilities. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate psychology (pp. 645–685). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1991). Measurement of intellectual capabilities: a review of theory. In K. S. McGrew, J. K. Werder, & R. W. Woodcock (Eds.), Woodcock-Johnson technical manual (pp. 197–232). Chicago: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L., & Blankson, N. (2005). Foundations for better understanding of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 41–68). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L., & Noll, J. (1997). Human cognitive capabilities: Gf-Gc theory. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: theories, tests, and issues (pp. 53–91). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrold, C., & Towse, J. N. (2006). Individual differences in working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 39–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jewsbury, P. A., & Bowden, S. C. (2016). Construct validity of fluency and implications for the factorial structure of memory. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35, 547–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewsbury, P. A., Bowden, S. C., & Strauss, M. E. (2016). Integrating the switching, inhibition, and updating model of executive function with the Cattell-Horn-Carroll model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 220–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurado, M. B., & Rosselli, M. (2007). The elusive nature of executive functions: a review of our current understanding. Neuropsychology Review, 17, 213–233.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity?! Intellignece, 14, 389–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latzman, R. D., & Markon, K. E. (2010). The factor structure and age-related factorial invariance of the Delis-Kapan executive function system (D-KEFS). Assessment, 17(2), 172–184.

  • Lee, K., & Bull, R. (2016). Developmental changes in working memory, updating, and math achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(6), 869–882. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu000090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, R., & Choi, L. (2013). Bayesian structural equation models. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: a second course. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, G., Perkins, L. A., & Divner, B. V. (2009). Assessment and intervention for executive function difficulties. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, K. S. (2014). CHC theory 101: from general intelligence g to CHC theory [PowerPoint Slides]. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/iapsych/chc-theory-101-from-general-intelligence-g-to-chc-theory.

  • McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Technical manual: Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, J. L., Markos, V. H., & Gonter, R. (1978). A new persective on sequential testing procedures in canonical analysis: a Monte Carlo evaluation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13, 371.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. C. (2007). Essentials of school neuropsychological assessment. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 313–335.

  • Naylor, M. G., Lin, X., Weiss, S. T., Raby, B. A., & Lange, C. (2010). Using canonical correlation analysis to discover genetic regulatory variants. PLoS One, 5(5), e10395.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Otero, T. M., Barker, L. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2014). Executive function treatment and intervention in schools. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 3, 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, L. A., Paolillo, E., & Barr, W. B. (2016). Stability in test-usage practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada over a 10-year period: a follow-up survey of INS and NAN members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31, 206–230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richland, L. E., & Burchinal, M. R. (2013). Early executive function predicts reasoning development. Psychological Science, 24, 87–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. (2003). Hit or miss? Insight into executive functions (test review). Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 962–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 99–144). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2018). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & E. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary cognitive assessment: theories, tests, and issues (4th ed., pp. 73–163). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2014). Woodcock-Johnsom IV tests of cognitive abilities. Rolling Meadows: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shunk, A. W., Davis, A. S., & Dean, R. S. (2007). Test review: Dean C. Delis, Edith Kaplan & Joel H. Kramer, Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS), The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX, 2001. $415.00 (complete kit). Applied Neuropsychology, 13(4), 275–279.

  • Sotelo-Dynega, M., & Dixon, S. G. (2014). Cognitive assessment practices: a survey of school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 51, 1031–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sub, H. M., Oberauer, K., Wittman, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working memory capacity explains reasoning ability – and a bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchy, Y. (2009). Executive functioning: overview, assessment, and research issues for non-neuropsychologists. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9097-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titz, C., & Karbacj, J. (2014). Working memory and executive functions: effects of training on academic achievement. Psychological Research, 78, 852–868.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Miller, J. D., Lakey, C. E., Young, D. L., Meeks, J. T., Campbell, W. K., & Goodie, A. S. (2009). Exploring the relations among executive functions, fluid intelligence, and personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 30, 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. S., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psychoeducational battery-revised. Itasca: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. Itasca: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook, N. A., Davalos, D. B., DeLosh, E. L., & Davis, H. P. (2004). Working memory, inhibition, and fluid intelligence as predictors of performance on tower of Hanoi and London tasks. Brain and Cognition, 56, 286–292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zook, N., Welsh, M. C., & Ewing, V. (2006). Performance of healthy, older adults on the tower of London revised: associations with verbal and nonverbal abilities. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ball State University Neuropsychology Laboratory, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA

    Elizabeth Roberds Lemann, Andrew S. Davis, W. Holmes Finch & Eric E. Pierson

Authors
  1. Elizabeth Roberds Lemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew S. Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. Holmes Finch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eric E. Pierson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew S. Davis.

Ethics declarations

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lemann, E.R., Davis, A.S., Finch, W.H. et al. Evaluating the Relation Between CHC Cognitive Factors and Selected Components of Executive Functioning. J Pediatr Neuropsychol 5, 152–162 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40817-019-00073-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40817-019-00073-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation