Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Empirical Research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Framework in Health Professions Education: A Literature Review

  • Review
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of twenty-first-century information and communication technologies, the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework is a new way of conceptualizing categories of knowledge required by teachers to achieve technology integration in educational practice. The main purpose of this review is to identify research on the TPACK framework in the field of health professions education. Journal empirical studies from 4 databases are included in this review. Of the 76 selected articles, nine met the selection criteria. The findings in the examined papers highlighted four themes: TPACK level measurement, TPACK relationship with other variables, TPACK application, and professional development. Research on the TPACK framework in the health professions education area is still lacking; however, the finding indicates that the TPACK as a theoretical foundation generated positive outcomes that can guide practitioners and researchers’ future practice and investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

© 2012 by tpack.org

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

A descriptive table of the selected articles’ characteristics was included in the article.

References

  1. Fossland T, Tomte CE. Technology as Quality Work? Educational Leaders and Teachers’ Use of Digital Technology. High Educ Dyn. 2020;54:57–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41757-4_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jayatilleke A, Shah M. Examining the technological pedagogical content characteristics of games for medical education. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30:529–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00891-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies HC, Eynon R. Is digital upskilling the next generation our ‘pipeline to prosperity’?. SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England; 2018;20:3961–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818783102.

  4. Sinacori BC. How nurse educators perceive the transition from the traditional classroom to the online environment: A qualitative inquiry. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2020;41:16–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roney LN, Westrick SJ, Acri MC, Aronson BS, Rebeschi LM. Technology use and technological self-efficacy among undergraduate nursing faculty. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2017;38:113–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boéchat-Heer S. L’implantation du portfolio électronique et le développement des environnements personnels d’apprentissage des étudiants. Can J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2018. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.3.11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lachner A, Fabian A, Franke U, Preiß J, Jacob L, Führer C, et al. Fostering pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A quasi-experimental field study. Comput Educ. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang H, Yu L, Cui Y, Ji M, Wang Y. Mining classroom observation data for understanding teacher’s teaching modes. Interact Learn Environ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1734029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Suárez-Rodríguez J, Almerich G, Orellana N, Díaz-García I. A basic model of integration of ICT by teachers: competence and use. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2018;66:1165–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9591-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blazar D, Kraft MA. Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors.. SAGE PublicationsSage CA: Los Angeles, CA; 2017;39:146–70. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260.

  11. Islam AYMA, Mok MMC, Gu X, Spector J, Hai-Leng C. ICT in higher education: an exploration of practices in Malaysian universities. IEEE Access IEEE. 2019;7:16892–908. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koehler MJ, Mishra P. Teachers learning technology by design. J Comput Teach Educ. 2005;213:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402454.2005.10784518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rossi M De, Trevisan O. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the literature: how TPCK is defined and implemented in initial teacher education. Ital J Educ Technol. 2018;26:7–23. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/988.

  14. Koehler MJ, Mishra P. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teach Coll Rec. 2006;108:1017–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koehler MJ, Mishra P. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? J Educ. 2009;193:13–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmid M, Brianza E, Petko D. Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Comput Human Behav. 2021;115:106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wekerle C, Daumiller M, Kollar I. Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes. J Res Technol Educ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tamim RM, Bernard RM, Borokhovski E, Abrami PC, Schmid RF. What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: a second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Rev Educ Res. 2011;81:4–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmid RF, Bernard RM, Borokhovski E, Tamim RM, Abrami PC, Surkes MA, et al. The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: a meta-analysis of classroom applications. Comput Educ Pergamon. 2014;72:271–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2013.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sierra FAC. Review of the technological pedagogical content knowledge model as part of technological integration in higher education. Rev Cuba Educ Medica Super. Universidad De Las Ciencias Informáticas, La Habana, Cuba: Editorial Ciencias Medicas; 2021;35.

  21. Koehler MJ, Mishra P. Teachers Learning Technology by Design Downloaded. J Comput Teach Educ. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402454.2005.10784518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baram E, Uygun E. Putting technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) in action: An integrated TPACK-design-(DBL) approach based learning. Australas J Educ Technol. ASCILITE; 2016;32:47–63. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2551.

  23. Chai CS, Koh JHL, Tsai CC. A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educ Technol Soc. 2013;16:31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lee CJ, Kim CM. An implementation study of a TPACK-based instructional design model in a technology integration course. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2014;62:437–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9335-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maor D, Roberts P. Does the TPACK framework help to design a more engaging learning environment? Proc World Conf Educ Multimedia, Hypermedia Telecommun. 2011;2011:3498–504.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tai HC, Pan MY, Lee BO. Applying Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model to develop an online English writing course for nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:782–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Graham CR, Cantrell P, Burgoyne N, Smith L, St. Clair L, Harris R. TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends. 2009;53:70–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rahmadi IF, Hayati E, Nursyifa A. Comparing pre-service civic education teachers’ tpack confidence across course modes. Res Soc Sci Technol. 2020;5:113–33. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.05.02.7.

  29. Jaikaran-Doe S, Doe PE. Assessing technological pedagogical content knowledge of engineering academics in an Australian regional university. Australas J Eng Educ. 2015;20:157–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2015.1133515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schmidt DA, Baran E, Thompson AD, Mishra P, Koehler MJ, Shin TS. Technological pedagogical content knowledge (Track): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. J Res Technol Educ. 2009;42:123–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yeh YF, Hsu YS, Wu HK, Hwang FK, Lin TC. Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-practical) through the Delphi survey technique. Br J Educ Technol. 2014;45:707–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Porras-Hernández LH, Salinas-Amescua B. Strengthening TPACK: A broader notion of context and the use of teacher’s narratives to reveal knowledge construction. J Educ Comput Res. 2013;48:223–44. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.2.f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Brantley-Dias L, Ertmer PA. Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the construct “just right?” J Res Technol Educ. 2013;46:103–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Archambault LM, Barnett JH. Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Comput Educ. 2010;55:1656–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenberg JM, Koehler MJ. Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. J Res Technol Educ. 2015;47:186–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. MacKinnon G. highlighting the importance of context in the TPACK model: three cases of non-traditional settings. Issues Trends Educ Technol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_itet_v5i1_mackinnon.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Voogt J, Fisser P, Pareja Roblin N, Tondeur J, van Braak J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge - A review of the literature. J Comput Assist Learn. 2013;29:109–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. De Rossi M, Trevisan O. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the literature: how TPCK is defined and implemented in initial teacher education Technological Pedagogical Context Knowledge (TPCK) in letteratura: come viene definito e implementato il modello TPCK nei conte. Ital J Educ Technol. 2018;26:7–23. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/988.

  39. Willermark S. Technological pedagogical and content knowledge: a review of empirical studies published from 2011 to 2016. J Educ Comput Res. 2017;56:315–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Koehler MJ, Shin TS, Mishra P. How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. Educ Technol Teach Knowledge, Classr Impact A Res Handb Fram Approaches. 2011;16–31. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-750-0.ch002.

  41. Chen H-J, Liao L-L, Chang Y-C, Hung C-C, Chang L-C. Factors influencing technology integration in the curriculum for Taiwanese health profession educators: a mixed-methods study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. King C, MacKinnon G. Exploring Technology Integration in Canadian Athletic Therapy Education. Can J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.3.9455.

  43. Youm J, Corral J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge among medical educators: what is our readiness to teach with technology? Acad Med United States. 2019;94:S69-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Karadag E. Turkish medical educators’ TPACK components and characters: an analysis within the framework of simulation-based medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1664-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chee EJM, Prabhakaran L, Neo LP, Carpio GAC, Tan AJQ, Lee CCS, et al. Play and learn with patients-designing and evaluating a serious game to enhance nurses’ inhaler teaching techniques: A randomized controlled trial. Games Health J. 2019;8:187–94. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2018.0073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bartlett A, Schneider CR, Penm J, Mirzaei A, Kebodeaux C. Use of visual dashboards to enhance pharmacy teaching. mdpi.com. 2021; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9020093.

  47. Nave R, Ackerman R, Dori YJ. Medical community of inquiry: a diagnostic tool for learning, assessment, and research. Interdiscip J e-Skills Lifelong Learn. 2017;1–17. https://doi.org/10.28945/3632.

  48. Kraglund-Gauthier W, Xavier SF, Moseley J, Francis S. Building Teaching–Learning Capacities of Online Nurse Educators: Using TPACK to Frame Pedagogical Processes and Identify Required Supports | Renforcer les capacités d’enseignement et d’apprentissage des éducateurs en ligne en soins infirmiers : utiliser le modèle TPACK pour encadrer les processus pédagogiques et repérer les soutiens requis. Can J Learn Technol. 2019;45. https://doi.org/10.21432/CJLT27595.

  49. Kraglund-Gauthier W, Moseley J. Building teaching–learning capacities of online nurse educators: Using TPACK to frame pedagogical processes and identify required supports [Renforcer les capacités d’enseignement et d’apprentissage des éducateurs en ligne en soins infirmiers: Utiliser le. Can J Learn Technol. 2019;45. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27595.

  50. Roussinos D, Jimoyiannis A. Examining primary education teachers’ perceptions of TPACK and the related educational context factors. Routledge. 2019;51:377–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1666323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Castéra J, Marre CC, Yok MCK, Sherab K, Impedovo MA, Sarapuu T, et al. Self-reported TPACK of teacher educators across six countries in Asia and Europe. Educ Inf Technol. 2020;25:3003–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-020-10106-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mutanga P, Mutanga P, Nezandonyi J, Bhukuvhani C. Enhancing engineering education through technological pedagogical and content. Int J Educ Dev using ICT. 2018;14.

  53. Niess ML. Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teach Teach Educ. 2005;21:509–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2005.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Setiawan H, Phillipson S, Sudarmin, Isnaeni W. Current trends in TPACK research in science education: a systematic review of literature from 2011 to 2017. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rienties B, Townsend D. Integrating ICT in business education: Using TPACK to reflect on two course redesigns. Learn Crossroads Theory Pract Res Innov Learn Pract. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2846-2_10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Baram E, Uygun E. Putting technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) in action: An integrated TPACK-design-(DBL) approach based learning. Australas J Educ Technol. 2016;32:47–63. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2551.

  57. Voithofer R, Nelson MJ, Han G, Caines A. Factors that influence TPACK adoption by teacher educators in the US. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2019;67:1427–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09652-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.A conceived the idea of the article and wrote the manuscript; data research and articles screening were carried out by A.E, S.E, and O.M. F.S and HK provided the critical feedback of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Driss Ait Ali.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate and for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ait Ali, D., El Meniari, A., El Filali, S. et al. Empirical Research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Framework in Health Professions Education: A Literature Review. Med.Sci.Educ. 33, 791–803 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01786-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01786-z

Keywords

Navigation