Skip to main content
Log in

Building a Culture of Scholarship Within a Family Medicine Department: a Successful Eight-Year Journey of Incremental Interventions Following a Historical Perspective of Family Medicine Research

  • Original research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Family medicine (FM), a discipline that eschewed worshiping the ivory tower of research in favor of patient care, has struggled with its role in the world of scholarly activity. FM residencies mirror this conflict despite the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s requirements for creating an environment of inquiry and scholarship. Because of this, the faculty within the Department of Family and Community Health (dFCH) at Marshall University changed its culture of scholarship.

Methods

A faculty-driven needs-based assessment of the department’s strengths and deficiencies for enhancing scholarship was conducted. A three-pronged approach of creating motivation, developing an infrastructure, and consolidating resources was created. This process was periodically re-evaluated and augmented. Departmental scholarly activity, defined as both publications and presentations, was tracked for an eight year period.

Results

Scholarly output increased by 483% (6 to 29) in year 1 and 10-fold by year 8 (6 to 60) from the pre-culture change baseline. This represents one- and eight-year increases for both publications (4 to 6 and 4 to 18 respectively) and presentations (2 to 23 and 2 to 42 respectively). Scholarly involvement became more widespread among faculty (n = 30) and increased linearly for residents (n = 19) and students (n = 13).

Conclusion

Through a series of needs-based interventions with consistent reanalysis, the dFCH changed its culture of scholarship. Understanding that other departments have similar competing interests to negotiate, the principles of creating motivation, developing research infrastructure, and consolidating resources could be successfully applied elsewhere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All present in the manuscript.

References

  1. Gotler RS. Unfinished business: the role of research in family medicine. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17(1):70–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowman MA, Lucan SC, Rosenthal T, et al. Family research in the United States: from the late 1960’s into the future. Fam Med. 2017;49(4):289–95.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ledford CW, Seehusen DA, Villagran MM, et al. Resident scholarship expectations and experiences: sources of uncertainty as barriers to success. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(4):564–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koo J, Bains J, Collins MB, Dharamsi S. Residency research requirements and the CanMEDS-FM scholar role: perspectives of residents and recent graduates. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(6):e330–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grady EC, Roise A, Barr D, et al. Defining scholarly activity in graduate medical education. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(4):558–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Weidner A, Peterson LE, Mainous AG 3rd, Datta A, Ewigman B. The current state of research capacity in US family medicine departments. Fam Med. 2019 Feb;51(2):112–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wood W, McCollum J, Kukreja P, et al. Graduate medical education scholarly activities initiatives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zimmerman R, Alweis R, Short A, et al. Interventions to increase research publications in graduate medical education trainees: a systemic review. Arch Med Sci. 2019;15(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carek PJ. Integrating scholarly activity into residency training. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(1):87–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seehusen DA, Mainous AG, Chessman AW. Creating a centralized infrastructure to facilitate medical education research. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(3):257–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown SR, Miser WF. Meeting scholarly activity requirements in a family medicine residency program. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(5):487–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carek PJ, Dickerson LM, Diaz VA, Steyer TE. Addressing the scholarly activity requirements for residents: one program’s solution. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3(3):379–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chase SM, Miller WL, Shaw E, et al. Meeting the challenge of practice quality improvement: a study of seven family medicine residency training practices. Acad Med. 2011;86(12):1583–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carek PJ. Scholarly activity in family medicine residency programs: the need for skilled and successful faculty members. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(2):186.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Penrose LL, Yeomans ER, Praderio C, Prien SD. An incremental approach to improving scholarly activity. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(4):496–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mainous AG 3rd, Hueston WJ, Ye X, Bazell C. A comparison of family medicine research in research intense and less intense institutions. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(10):1100–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bourgeois JA, Hategan A, Azzam A. Competency-based medical education and scholarship: creating an active academic culture during residency. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:254–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Amgad M, Man Kin Tsui M, Liptrott SJ, Shash E. Medical student research: an integrated mixed- methods systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0127470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pasarica M, Bailey M, Cendán JC. Increasing students’ publication productivity: could launching a university scientific journal be a catalyst. Cureus. 2019;11(1):e3953.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Katerndahl D. Evolution of the research collaboration network in a productive department. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(1):195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Katerndahl D. Co-evolution of departmental research collaboration and scholarly outcomes. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(6):1241–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. DeHaven MJ, Wilson GR, Murphree DD. Developing a research program in a community-based department of family medicine: one department’s experience. Fam Med. 1994;26(5):303–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors claim authorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam M. Franks.

Ethics declarations

This project was given exempt status by the Marshall University IRB.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code Availability

Not applicable

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franks, A.M., Petrany, S.M. Building a Culture of Scholarship Within a Family Medicine Department: a Successful Eight-Year Journey of Incremental Interventions Following a Historical Perspective of Family Medicine Research. Med.Sci.Educ. 31, 75–80 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01107-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01107-8

Keywords

Navigation