Abstract
YouTube has emerged as a growing educational resource for medical learners and educators; yet, its broad implementation may lack guidance from evidence-based evaluations. This article presents a scoping review of the utility, effectiveness, and validity of YouTube video resources in medical education. Of the 113 articles identified, 31 articles met inclusion criteria that focused on use of YouTube in medical education. Only 19.4% of the articles (n = 6) reported evaluative outcomes related to the use of YouTube for instructional purposes. Recommendations are offered for improving the usefulness and quality of YouTube videos as an educational resource in medical education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
A supplementary table on characteristics of video review articles was submitted along with the article.
References
Ellaway RH, Fink P, Graves L, Campbell A. Left to their own devices: medical learners’ use of mobile technologies. Med Teach. 2014;36(2):130–8.
Joshi NK, Yarris LM, Doty CI, Lin M. Social media responses to the annals of emergency medicine residents’ perspective article on multiple mini-interviews. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(3):320–5.
Parsons K, Woolley AB. Use of an instant messaging application to facilitate pharmacy students’ learning during medical rounds. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(19):1654–5.
Curran V, Matthews L, Fleet L, Simmons K, Gustafson DL, Wetsch L. A review of digital, social, and mobile technologies in health professional education. JCEHP. 2017;37(3):195–206.
Mesko B, Győrffy Z, Kollár J. Digital literacy in the medical curriculum: a course with social media tools and gamification. JMIR Med Educ. 2015;1(2):e6.
Hollinderbäumer A, Hartz T, Uckert F. Education 2.0 - how has social media and web 2.0 been integrated into medical education? A systematical literature review. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2013;30(1):Doc14.
Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81(3):207–12.
Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300(10):1181–96.
Curran V, Gustafson DL, Simmons K, Lannon H, Wang C, Garmsiri M, Fleet L, Wetsch L. Adult learners’ perceptions of self-directed learning and digital technology usage in continuing professional education: an update for the digital age. J Adult Contin Educ 2019;25(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1477971419827318.
Azer SA. Mechanisms in cardiovascular diseases: how useful are medical textbooks, eMedicine, and YouTube? Adv Physiol Educ. 2015;38(2):124–34.
Bramstedt KA, Ierna BN, Woodcroft-Brown V. Using SurveyMonkey® to teach safe social media strategies to medical students in their clinical years. Commun Med. 2014;11(2):117–24.
Guraya SY. The usage of social networking sites by medical students for educational purposes: a meta-analysis and systematic review. N Am J Med Sci. 2016;8(7):268–78.
Addar A, Marwan Y, Algarni N, Berry G. Assessment of “YouTube” content for distal radius fracture immobilization. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(5):799–804.
Kay RH. Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: a comprehensive review of the literature. Comput Hum Behav. 2012;28(3):820–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.011.
Allen WA, Smith AR. Effects of video podcasting on psychomotor and cognitive performance, attitudes and study behavior of student physical therapists. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2012;49(4):401–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.728876.
Lloyd SA, Robertson CL. Screencast tutorials enhance student learning of statistics. Teach Psychol. 2012;39(1):67–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311430640.
Rackaway C. Video killed the textbook star? Use of multimedia supplements to enhance student learning. J Polit Sci Educ. 2012;8(2):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2012.667684.
Hsin WJ, Cigas J. Short videos improve student learning in online education. J Comput Sci Coll. 2013;28(5):253–9.
Brame CJ. Effective educational videos: principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016;15(4):es6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125.
Garside MJ, Fisher JM, Blundell AG, Gordon AL. The development and evaluation of mini-GEMs - short, focused, online e-learning videos in geriatric medicine. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2018;39(2):132–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2016.1165217.
Koya KD, Bhatia KR, Hsu JTS, Bhatia AC. YouTube and the expanding role of videos in dermatologic surgery education. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2012;31(3):163–7.
Topps D, Helmer J, Ellaway R. YouTube as a platform for publishing clinical skills training videos. Acad Med. 2013;88(2):192–7.
Schmidt RS, Shi LL, Sethna A. Use of streaming media (YouTube) as an educational tool for surgeons-a survey of AAFPRS members. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18(3):230–1.
Raikos A, Waidyasekara P. How useful is YouTube in learning heart anatomy? Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(1):12–8.
Arskey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
Barr H, Koppel I, Reeves S, Hammick M, Freeth S. Effective interprofessional education: argument, assumption, and evidence: Wiley; 2005. ISBN:9781405116541
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Rayner S, Marlow G, Leslie SJ. YouTube: a solution to increased dissemination of guidelines? Med Educ. 2017;51(5):550–1.
Desai T, Sanghani V, Fang X, Christiano C, Ferris M. Assessing a nephrology-focused YouTube channel’s potential to educate health care providers. J Nephrol. 2013;26(1):81–5.
Jaffar AA. YouTube: an emerging tool in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(3):158–64.
Poon C, Stevens SM, Golub JS, Pensak ML, Samy RN. Pilot study evaluating the impact of otology surgery videos on otolaryngology resident education. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(3):423–8.
Rapp AK, Healy MG, Charlton ME, Keith JN, Rosenbaum ME, Kapadia MR. YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(6):1072–6.
Azer S. Can “YouTube” help students in learning surface anatomy? Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34(5):465–8.
Azer S, AlEshaiwi S, AlGrain H, AlKhelaif R. Nervous system examination on YouTube. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:126.
Azer S, AlGrain H, AlKhelaif R, AlEshaiwi S. Evaluation of the educational value of YouTube videos about physical examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e241.
Azer S. Understanding pharmacokinetics: are YouTube videos a useful learning resource? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(13):1957–67.
Borgersen NJ, Henriksen MJ, Konge L, Sorensen TL, Thomsen AS, Subhi Y. Direct ophthalmoscopy on YouTube: analysis of instructional YouTube videos’ content and approach to visualization. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1535–41.
Rössler B, Lahner D, Schebesta K, Chiari A, Plöchl W. Medical information on the internet: quality assessment of lumbar puncture and neuroaxial block techniques on YouTube. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(6):655–8.
Sasmaz MI, Akca AH. Reliability of trauma management videos on YouTube and their compliance with ATLS® (9th edition) guideline. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018;44(5):753–7.
Sood A, Sarangi S, Pandey A, Murugiah K. YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease. Urology. 2011;77(3):558–62.
Barry DS, Marzouk F, Chulak-Oglu K, Bennett D, Tierney P, O’Keeffe GW. Anatomy education for the YouTube generation. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(1):90–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1550.
Miller GW, Lewis TL. Anatomy education for the YouTube generation: technical, ethical, and educational considerations. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(5):496–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1622.
Bezner SK, Hodgman EI, Diesen DL, Clayton JT, Minkes RK, Langer JC, et al. Pediatric surgery on YouTube™: is the truth out there? J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(4):586–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.08.004.
Farnan JM, Landon E, Arora VM. Concerns about publishing on YouTube. Acad Med. 2013;88(9):1194.
Ibrahim JE, Bandopadhayay P. Social media and medical education: making an animated video for YouTube Medical. Journal of Australia. 2013;199(9):627–8. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja13.10490.
Sunderland N, Camm CF, Glover K, Watts A, Warwick G. A quality assessment of respiratory auscultation material on YouTube. Clin Med (London). 2014;14(4):391–5.
Cartledge P, Miller M, Phillips B. The use of social-networking sites in medical education. Med Teach. 2013;35(10):847–57.
Cheston CC, Flickinger TE, Chisolm MS. Social media use in medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;8(6):893–901.
Davis WM, Ho K, Last J. Advancing social media in medical education. CMAJ. 2015;187(8):549–50. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.141417.
Camm CF, Sunderland N, Camm AJ. A quality assessment of cardiac auscultation material on YouTube. Clin Cardiol. 2013;36(2):77–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.22080.
Pelletier SG. Integrating digital literacy into medical education. Future Practice. 2014:9–10 http://www.webcitation.org/6y8g95RVF. Accessed 23 June 2020.
Sutherland S, Jalali A. Social media as an open-learning resource in medical education: current perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8(8):369–75.
Hurtubise L, Martin B, Gilliland A, Mahan J. To play or not to play: leveraging video in medical education. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(1):13–8. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-05-01-32.
Clark JM, Paivio A. Dual coding theory and education. Educ Psychol Rev. 1991;3(3):149–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076.
Sternberg RJ, Mio JS. Cognitive psychology. 4th ed. Belmon: Thomson Wadsworth; 2006. ISBN: 0534514219 9780534514211
Funding
This study was funded by an Insight Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
VC conceived of this paper. VC, KS, LM, LF, and DLG screened and reviewed selected articles, and reviewed the analysis and the final draft of the manuscript. VC, KS, NF, and XX wrote and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethics Approval
This is a scoping review of literature. No ethical approval is required.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 89.1 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Curran, V., Simmons, K., Matthews, L. et al. YouTube as an Educational Resource in Medical Education: a Scoping Review. Med.Sci.Educ. 30, 1775–1782 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01016-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01016-w