Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessments of Non-academic Attributes in Applicants for Undergraduate Medical Education: an Overview of Advantages and Limitations

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Marrin ML, McIntosh KA, Keane D, Schmuck ML. Use of the paired-comparison technique to determine the most valued qualities of the McMaster Medical Programme admissions process. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2004;9:129–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Segouin C, Hodges B. Educating doctors in France and Canada: are the differences based on evidence or history? Med Educ. 2005;39:1205–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McManus IC, Chris D, Sandra N, Dowel JS, Katherine W, Potts HWW. Construct-level predictive validity of educational attainment and intellectual aptitude tests in medical student selection: meta-regression of six UK longitudinal studies. BMC Med. 2013;11:243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wouters A, Croiset G, Schripsema NR, Cohen-Schotanus J, Spaai GWG, Hulsman RL, et al. A multi-site study on medical school selection, performance, motivation and engagement. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22:447–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ten Tate O. Medical education in the Netherlands. Medical Teacher. 2007;29:752–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kreiter CD, Stansfield B, James PA, Solow C. A model for diversity in admissions: a review of issues and methods and an experimental approach. Teach Learn Med. 2003;15:116–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Koenig TW, Parrish SK, Terregino CA, Williams JP, Dunleavy D, Volsch JM. Core personal competencies important to entering students’ success in medical school: what are they and how could they be assessed early in the admission process? Acad Med. 2013;88:603–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Monroe A, Quinn E, Samuelson W, Dunleavy D, Dowd KW. An overview of the medical school admission process and use of applicant data in decision making: what has changed since the 1980s? Acad Med. 2013;88:672–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Patterson F, Knight A, Dowell J, Nicholson S, Cousans F, Cleland J. How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review. Med Educ. 2016;50:36–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pau A, Jeevaratnam K, Chen YS, Fall AA, Khoo C, Nadarajah VD. The multiple mini-interview (MMI) for student selection in health professions training - a systematic review. Medical Teacher. 2013;35:1027–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reiter H, Eva K. Vive la Différence: the freedom and inherent responsibilities when designing and implementing multiple mini-interviews. Acad Med. 2018;93:969–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Leng WE, Stegers-Jager KM, Husbands A, Dowell JS, Born M, Themmen APN. Scoring method of a situational judgment test: influence on internal consistency reliability, adverse impact and correlation with personality? Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22:243–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O'Neill LD, Korsholm L, Wallstedt B, Eika B, Hartvigsen J. Generalizability of a composite student selection program. Med Educ. 2009;43:58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haight SJ, Chibnall JT, Schindler DL, Slavin SJ. Associations of medical student personality and health/wellness characteristics with their medical school performance across the curriculum. Acad Med. 2012;87:476–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McLarnon MJW, Rothstein MG, Goffin RD, Rieder MJ, Poole A, Krajewski HT, et al. How important is personality in the selection of medical school students? Personal Individ Differ. 2017;104:442–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Libbrecht N, Lievens F, Carette B, Cote S. Emotional intelligence predicts success in medical school. Emotion. 2014;14:64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Arora S, Ashrafian H, Davis R, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Sevdalis N. Emotional intelligence in medicine: a systematic review through the context of the ACGME competencies. Med Educ. 2010;44:749–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cook CJ, Cook CE, Hilton TN. Does emotional intelligence influence success during medical school admissions and program matriculation? A systematic review. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016;13:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hojat M, Erdmann JB, Gonnella JS. Personality assessments and outcomes in medical education and the practice of medicine: AMEE guide no. 79. Medical Teacher. 2013;35:e1267–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Functions and structure of a medical school. Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the M.D. Degree (2016). Accessed on July 2019 at https://med.virginia.edu/ume-curriculum/wp-content/uploads/sites/216/2016/07/2017-18_Functions-and-Structure_2016-03-24.pdf.

  21. Hamby T, Taylor W, Snowden AK, Peterson RA. A meta-analysis of the reliability of free and for-pay big five scales. J Psychol. 2016;150:422–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Knorr M, Hissbach J. Multiple mini-interviews: same concept, different approaches. Med Educ. 2014;48:1157–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rees EL, Hawarden AW, Denta G, Hays R, Bates J, Hassell AB. Evidence regarding the utility of multiple mini-interview (MMI) for selection to undergraduate health programs: a BEME systematic review. BEME guide no. 37. Medical Teacher. 2016;38:443–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jerant A, Henderson MC, Griffin E, Rainwater JA, Hall TR, Kelly CJ, et al. Reliability of multiple mini-interviews and traditional interviews within and between institutions: a study of five California medical schools. BMC Med Ed. 2017;17:190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lievens F, De Soete B. Situational judgment test. In: Wright JD, editor. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, vol. 22. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015. p. 13–9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Patterson F, Zibarras L, Ashworth V. Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: research, theory and practice: AMEE guide no. 100. In: Medical Teacher, vol. 38; 2016. p. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gafni N, Moshinsky A, Eisenberg O, Zeigler D, Ziv A. Reliability estimates: behavioral stations and questionnaires in medical school admissions. Med Educ. 2012;46:277–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hadad A, Gafni N, Moshinsky A, Turvall E, Ziv A, Israeli A. The multiple mini-interviews as a predictor of peer evaluations during clinical training in medical school. Medical Teacher. 2016;38:1172–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Patterson F, Cousans F, Edwards H, Rosselli A, Nicholson S, Wright B. The predictive validity of a text-based situational judgment test in undergraduate medical and dental school admissions. Acad Med. 2017;92:1250–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Neill L, Hartvigsen J, Wallstedt B, Korsholm L, Eika B. Medical school dropout – testing at admission versus selection by highest grades as predictors. Med Educ. 2011;45:1111–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rotthoff T, Ostapczuk MS, Kroncke KD, Zimmerhofer A, Decking U, Schneider M, et al. Criterion validity of a competency-based assessment center in medical education – a 4-year follow-up study. Med Ed Online. 2014;19:252–4.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Benbassat J, Baumal R. What is empathy, and how can it be promoted during clinical clerkships? Acad Med. 2004;79:832–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Carrothers RM, Gregory SW, Gallagher TJ. Measuring emotional intelligence of medical school applicants. Acad Med. 2000;75:456–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hecker K, Norman G. Have admissions committees considered all the evidence? Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22:573–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ferguson E, Lievens F. Future directions in personality, occupational and medical selection: myths, misunderstandings, measurement, and suggestions. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22:387–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Patterson F, Cleland J, Cousans F. Selection methods in healthcare professions: where are we now and where next? Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22:229–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Niessen ASM, Meijer RR. Selection of medical students on the basis of nonacademic skills: is it worth the trouble? Clin Med. 2016;16:339–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Patterson F, Zibarras LD. Selecting for creativity and innovation potential: implications for practice in healthcare education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22:417–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McManus IC, Keeling A, Paice E. Stress, burnout and doctors’ attitudes to work are determined by personality and learning style: a 12-year longitudinal study of UK medical graduates. BMC Med. 2004;2:29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lamothe M, Boujut E, Zenasni F, Sultan S. To be or not to be empathic: the combined role of empathic concern and perspective taking in understanding burnout in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Weng HC, Hung CM, Liu YT, Cheng YJ, Yen CY, Chang CC, et al. Associations between emotional intelligence and doctor burnout, job satisfaction and patient satisfaction. Med Educ. 2011;45:835–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tyssen R, Dolatowski FC, Røvik JO, Thorkildsen RF, Ekeberg Ø, Hem E, et al. Personality traits and types predict medical school stress: a six-year longitudinal and nationwide study. Med Educ. 2007;41:781–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Arora S, Russ S, Petrides KV, Sirimanna P, Aggarwal R, Darzi A, et al. Emotional intelligence and stress in medical students performing surgical tasks. Acad Med. 2011;86:1311–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tone EB, Tully EC. Empathy as a “risky strength”: a multilevel examination of empathy and risk for internalizing disorders. Dev Psychopathol. 2014;26:1547–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Adam J, Bore M, Childs R, Dunn J, Mckendree J, Munro D, et al. Predictors of professional behavior and academic outcomes in a UK medical school: a longitudinal cohort study. Medical Teacher. 2015;37:868–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. MacKenzie RK, Dowell J, Ayansina D, Cleland JA. Do personality traits assessed on medical school admission predict exit performance? A UK-wide longitudinal cohort study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22:365–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Dr. Naomi Benbassat for her comments on former versions of this paper. The presented ideas do not represent those of the institutions that the author is or was affiliated in the past.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Smokler Center for Health Policy Research, Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, PO Box 3886, 91037, Jerusalem, Israel

    Jochanan Benbassat

Authors
  1. Jochanan Benbassat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jochanan Benbassat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benbassat, J. Assessments of Non-academic Attributes in Applicants for Undergraduate Medical Education: an Overview of Advantages and Limitations. Med.Sci.Educ. 29, 1129–1134 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00791-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00791-5

Search

Navigation