Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Practical Approach to Integrating Communication Skills and Early Clinical Experience into the Preclinical Medical School Curriculum

  • Original research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Effective integration of early clinical experiences (ECE) with preclinical curricula is challenging, given the limited knowledge-base of students and the unpredictability of clinical environments. Integration of ECE with communication skills (CS) training presents an attractive opportunity since CSs apply to all types of clinical encounters and are independent of students’ medical knowledge. We present an ECE program that integrates formal CS training with the realities of clinical practice.

Methods

Five ECE sessions occur throughout the first year of medical school, each focusing on a specific set of CSs previously introduced in class. Students actively observe preceptors use these skills, briefly practice them, write a critical analysis on each experience, and discuss these in small groups. To identify the perceived usefulness and impact of the ECE on students’ CS learning, we analyzed the critical analyses and post intervention evaluations from students and preceptors. Descriptive analyses used SAS for Windows. Thematic content analysis using constant comparison was used to review and code narrative data, and the most commonly referred to impacts, strengths, and limitations of ECE were identified.

Results

Analysis of the students’ critical analyses identified the following main themes: (1) integration between ECE and formal CS teaching, (2) importance of effective CS to the delivery of good patient care, and (3) adaptability of CS to specific clinical contexts. Preceptors did not perceive the program as an added burden.

Conclusions

ECE with focused goals, critical analyses, and small group debriefing can be used to effectively teach and reinforce formal classroom CS training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because they contain protected student information and curricular content, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

COM:

College of Medicine

CS:

Communication skills

ECE:

Early clinical experience

HPI:

History of present illness

ROS:

Review of systems

US:

United States

References

  1. Petek Šter M. Teaching communication at the medical school in Ljubljana. Acta Med Acad. 2012;41:38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Galinsky D, Cohen R, Schneirman C, Gelper Y, Nir Z. A programme in undergraduate geriatric education: the Beer Sheva experiment. Med Educ. 1983;17:100–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ottenheijm RP, Zwietering PJ, Scherpbie AJ, Metsemakers JF. Early student-patient contacts in general practice: an approach based on educational principles. Med Teach. 2008;30:802–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blumenthal DS, McNeal-Steele MS, Bullard LL, Daniel SL, Satcher D. Introducing preclinical students to primary care through a community preceptorship program. J Med Educ. 1983;58:179–85.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaufman A, Mennin S, Waterman R, Duban S, Hansbarger C, Silverblatt H, et al. The New Mexico experiment: educational innovation and institutional change. Acad Med. 1989;64:285–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rooks L, Watson RT, Harris JO. A primary care preceptorship for first-year medical students coordinated by an Area Health Education Center program: a six-year review. Acad Med. 2001;76:489–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Skochelak S, Thaler S, Gjerde C. The Interdisciplinary Generalist Curriculum Project at the University of Wisconsin Medical School: the Generalist Partners Program. Acad Med. 2001;76(4 Suppl):S131–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Steele D, Susman J, McCurdy F, O'Dell D, Paulman P, Stott J. The Interdisciplinary Generalist Project at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Acad Med. 2001;76(4 Suppl):S121–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Steele DJ, Susman JL. Integrated clinical experience: University of Nebraska Medical Center. Acad Med. 1998;73:41–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carney PA, Bar-on ME, Grayson MS, Klein M, Cochran N, Eliassen MS, et al. The impact of early clinical training in medical education: a multi-institutional assessment. Acad Med. 1999;74(1 Suppl):S59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matson CC, Ullian JA, Boisaubin EV. Integrating early clinical experience curricula at two medical schools: lessons learned from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Generalist Physician Initiative. Acad Med. 1999 Jan;74(1 Suppl):S53–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Matson C, Ullian JA, Hubbard T. The Interdisciplinary Generalist Curriculum Project at Eastern Virginia Medical School. Acad Med. 2001;76(4 Suppl):S93–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crump WJ, Chambers DL, Bolt J. Initial community site development for first--and second-year medical students. Fam Med. 1996;28:634–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crump WJ, Boisaubin E, Camp L. The community continuity experience: generalist training for preclinical medical students. Tex Med. 1998;94:58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Freeman J, Cash C, Yonke A, Roe B, Foley R. A longitudinal primary care program in an urban public medical school: three years of experience. Acad Med. 1995;70(1 Suppl):S64–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lesky L, Yonke A. The Interdisciplinary Generalist Curriculum Project at the University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine. Acad Med. 2001;76(4 Suppl):S117–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hook KM, Pfeiffer CA. Impact of a new curriculum on medical students’ interpersonal and interviewing skills. Med Educ. 2007;41:154–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernald DH, Staudenmaier AC, Tressler CJ, Main DS, O'Brien-Gonzales A, Barley GE. Student perspectives on primary care preceptorships: enhancing the medical student preceptorship learning environment. Teach Learn Med. 2001;13:13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Madray H, Pfeiffer CA, Ardolino A. Teaching patient wellness to first-year medical students: the impact on future ability to perform the history of present illness. Med Educ. 2000;34:404–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Howe A, Dagley V, Hopayian K, Lillicrap M. Patient contact in the first year of basic medical training-feasible, educational, acceptable? Med Teach. 2007;29:237–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frank D, Handfield-Jones R, Dawson DJ, Russell R, Steinert Y, Boillat M, et al. An integrated curriculum for teaching preparatory clinical skills at a traditional medical school. Teach Learn Med. 1996;8:4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McLean M. Sometimes we do get it right! Early clinical contact is a rewarding experience. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004;17:42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hampshire AJ. Providing early clinical experience in primary care. Med Educ. 1998;32:495–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Başak O, Yaphe J, Spiegel W, Wilm S, Carelli F, Metsemakers JF. Early clinical exposure in medical curricula across Europe: an overview. Eur J Gen Pract. 2009;15:4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haffling AC, Håkansson A, Hagander B. Early patient contact in primary care: a new challenge. Med Educ. 2001;35:901–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hopayian K, Howe A, Dagley V. A survey of UK medical schools’ arrangements for early patient contact. Med Teach. 2007;29:806–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. von Below B, Hellquist G, Rödjer S, Gunnarsson R, Björkelund C, Wahlqvist M. Medical students’ and facilitators’ experiences of an Early Professional Contact course: active and motivated students, strained facilitators. BMC Med Educ. 2008;8:56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dornan T, Littlewood S, Margolis SA, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, Ypinazar V. How can experience in clinical and community settings contribute to early medical education? A BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2006;28:3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nathanson L, Backer K, Long L. A first-year medical school pilot program for early clinical exposure. J Cancer Educ. 1987;2:107–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kwiatkowski T, Rennie W, Fornari A, Akbar S. Medical students as EMTs: skill building, confidence and professional formation. Med Educ Online. 2014;19:24829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Helmich E, Bolhuis S, Laan R, Koopmans R. Early clinical experience: do students learn what we expect? Med Educ. 2011;45:731–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hannay D, Mitchell C, Chung MC. The development and evaluation of a community attachment scheme for first-year medical students. Med Teach. 2003;25:161–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dornan T, Bundy C. What can experience add to early medical education? Consensus survey. BMJ. 2004;329:834–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Diemers AD, Dolmans DH, Verwijnen MG, Heineman E, Scherpbier AJ. Students’ opinions about the effects of preclinical patient contacts on their learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13:633–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yardley S, Littlewood S, Margolis SA, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, Ypinazar V, et al. What has changed in the evidence for early experience? Update of a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2010;32:740–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Malhotra A, Gregory I, Darvill E, Goble E, Pryce-Roberts A, Lundberg K, et al. Mind the gap: learners’ perspectives on what they learn in communication compared to how they and others behave in the real world. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76:385–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rosenbaum MR. Dis-integration of communication in healthcare education: workplace learning challenges and opportunities. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;11:2054–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gray J, Fine B. General practitioner teaching in the community: a study of their teaching experience and interest in undergraduate teaching in the future. Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47:623–6.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wilson A, Fraser R, McKinley RK, Preston-Whyte E, Wynn A. Undergraduate teaching in the community: can general practice deliver? Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46:457–60.

    Google Scholar 

  40. O'Brien-Gonzales A, Blavo C, Barley G, Steinkohl DC, Loeser H. What did we learn about early clinical experience? Acad Med. 2001;76(4 Suppl):S49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hartley S, Macfarlane F, Gantley M, Murray E. Influence on general practitioners of teaching undergraduates: qualitative study of London general practitioner teachers. BMJ. 1999;319:1168–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Radcliffe C, Lester H. Perceived stress during undergraduate medical training: a qualitative study. Med Educ. 2003;37:32–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Alexander DA, Haldane JD. Medical education: a student perspective. Med Educ. 1979;13:336–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Firth J. Levels and sources of stress in medical students. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292:1177–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pitkala KH, Mantyranta T. Professional socialization revised: medical students’ own conceptions related to adoption of the future physician’s role—a qualitative study. Med Teach. 2003;25:155–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ASR performed the descriptive analyses. ASR, AB, and MR performed the qualitative analyses. All authors contributed to the editing of the manuscript, and read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amal Shibli-Rahhal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This research was submitted to the University of Iowa institutional review board, which deemed it as exempt from human subject approval.

Informed Consent

NA

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shibli-Rahhal, A., Brenneman, A., McVancel, M. et al. A Practical Approach to Integrating Communication Skills and Early Clinical Experience into the Preclinical Medical School Curriculum. Med.Sci.Educ. 29, 947–957 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00779-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00779-1

Keywords

Navigation