Abstract
In China today, the idea of “soft power” has become important in various realms of society. We analyze the nexus between climate change and soft power with specific emphasis on China. First, we will discuss the concept of soft power, its role in the Chinese context, and the reasons why China has had difficulties to gain soft power up to now. Second, we lay out how international climate change politics are an important arena in which soft power can be won and how the issue has gained importance in China. In a third step, we discuss how the current political environment, in which the US government has changed its stance on climate change and international climate politics, impacts China. Our thesis is that the current political situation represents a “window of opportunity” for China to expand its soft power substantially both in degree and scope. In line with this thesis, so far, China has reacted swiftly after the election of US president Donald Trump and aims to present itself as the future climate leader.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In addition, authoritarian countries such as Russia or China advance their own, potentially politically motivated interpretations of the concept in ways that conform to their foreign and domestic policy interests (Edney 2012).
The CKNI database 9305 journals and other forms of academic publications such as dissertations or proceeding. The data was exported and then analysed and visualized in R. Mingjiang (2008) and Wang and Lu (2008) also analysed in their articles the popularity of the concept with data from the CNKI database. We include an updated version of this analysis in our article.
The database covers more than 630 national and local Chinese newspapers. We used the analytics index tool of the CNKI database. The data was exported and then analysed and visualized in R.
Only articles were counted that fully mentioned the search term.
Such rankings have to be taken with a grain of salt because they reduce soft power as a non-tangible element of international relations to a few measurable indicators. Also the weighting of the indicators (e.g. cultural aspects have a lower weight than social media use of head of states) shows that the creators of the ranking are mostly interested “public relation” parts of soft power.
The name “South China Sea” is highly contested. Each country in the area has its own name for the sea.
All three search terms were used together in order to compare the popularity. The absolute search volume is not shown. However, we can compare the volume of the three keywords to each other.
The increased environmental awareness of the Chinese public is perfectly illustrated by the documentary “Under the Dome”, produced by former journalist Chai Jing. When she released her documentary in Spring 2015 on the Chinese Internet, the video went viral with over 100 million views in the first 24 h Yang (2015).
All three search terms were used together in order to compare the popularity. Google trends does not indicate the absolute search volume. However, the highest peak in a time series of all search terms together gets the value 100 and all other values are calculated in comparison to this peak. In our case this makes sense as we want to compare different issues. The data was exported and then analysed and visualized in R.
References
Aldred, J. 2007. Full text: Ban-Ki moon speech. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2007/dec/12/bali.climatechange1.
Blanchard, J.-M.F., and F. Lu. 2012. Thinking Hard About Soft Power: A Review and Critique of the Literature on China and Soft Power. Asian Perspective 36 (4): 565–589. https://doi.org/10.5555/0258-9184-36.4.565.
Blas, J., & Shankleman, J. (2017). Davos Elite Focus on Climate Change, Ignoring Trump’s Skepticism. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-15/ignoring-trump-s-skepticism-davos-elite-bets-on-climate-change.
Broadbent, J., J. Sonnett, I. Botetzagias, M. Carson, A. Carvalho, Y.-J. Chien, et al. 2016. Conflicting Climate Change Frames in a Global Field of Media Discourse. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 2 (6): 237802311667066. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023116670660.
Brownell, S. 2012. Human rights and the Beijing Olympics: imagined global community and the transnational public sphere. The British Journal of Sociology 63 (2): 306–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01411.x.
Brunnengräber, A. 2012. Die neue Klima-Geopolitik. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen. https://doi.org/10.1515/fjsb-2012-0204.
Buchholz, L. (2013). The Global Rules of Art. Dissertation. Columbia University, New York.
CarbonBrief. (2015). Carbon Brief’s 15 numbers for 2015. https://www.carbonbrief.org/carbon-briefs-15-numbers-for-2015.
Carrington, D. (2016). China’s coal peak hailed as turning point in climate change battle. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jul/25/china-coal-peak-hailed-turning-point-climate-change-battle.
Climate Action Tracker. (2017). China. http://climateactiontracker.org/countries/china.html. Accessed 30 August 2017.
Conrad, B. 2012. China in Copenhagen: Reconciling the “Beijing Climate Revolution” and the “Copenhagen Climate Obstinacy”. The China Quarterly 210: 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741012000458.
Cornelissen, S. 2010. The Geopolitics of Global Aspiration: Sport Mega-events and Emerging Powers. The International Journal of the History of Sport 27 (16–18): 3008–3025. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2010.508306.
Creemers, R. 2015. Never the Twain Shall Meet? Rethinking China’s Public Diplomacy Policy. Chinese Journal of Communication 8 (3): 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2015.1046187.
Daly, M., L. Gifford, G. Luedecke, L. McAllister, A. Nacu-Schmidt, K. Andrews, et al. 2017. World Newspaper Coverage of Climate Change or Global Warming, 2004–2017. Denver: Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Web.
DARA, Climate Vulnerable Forum. (2012). Climate Vulnerability Monitor: A Guide to the Cold Calculus of a Hot Planet. DARA and the Climate Vulnerable Forum. http://daraint.org/climate-vulnerability-monitor/climate-vulnerability-monitor-2012/.
Davenport, C., & Lipton, E. (2016). Trump Picks Scott Pruitt, Climate Change Denialsit, to Lead E.P.A. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/07/us/politics/scott-pruitt-epa-trump.html.
Dietz, T., N. Dolšak, E. Ostrom, and P. Stern. 2010. The Drama of the Commons. In The Drama of the Commons, 2nd ed, ed. E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolšak, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E.U. Weber, 3–35. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ding, S., and R.A. Saunders. 2006. Talking Up China: An Analysis of China’s Rising Cultural Power and Global Promotion of the Chinese Language. East Asia 23 (2): 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-006-0021-2.
Ding, S. 2010. Analyzing Rising Power from the Perspective of Soft Power: A New Look at China’s Rise to the Status Quo Power. Journal of Contemporary China 19 (64): 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560903444207.
Ding, S. 2012. Is Human Rights the Achilles’ Heel of Chinese Soft Power? A New Perspective on Its Appeal. Asian Perspective 36 (4): 641–665. https://doi.org/10.5555/0258-9184-36.4.641.
Dryzek, J.S., R.B. Norgaard, and D. Schlosberg. 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. London: Oxford University Press.
Economy, E.C., and A. Segal. 2008. China’s Olympic Nightmare: What the Games Mean for Beijing’s Future. Foreign Affairs 84 (4): 47–56.
Edney, K. 2012. Soft Power and the Chinese Propaganda System. Journal of Contemporary China 21 (78): 899–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2012.701031.
Fiore, A.M., V. Naik, D.V. Spracklen, A. Steiner, N. Unger, M. Prather, et al. 2012. Global Air Quality and Climate. Chemical Society Reviews 41 (19): 6663–6683. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35095E.
Freedom House. (2017). Freedom in the World 2017. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FH_FIW_2017_Report_Final.pdf.
Gill, B., and Y. Huang. 2006. Sources and Limits of Chinese ‘Soft Power’. Survival 48 (2): 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396330600765377.
Grennfieldboyce, N. (2017). Trump’s Budget Slashes Climate Change Funding. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/03/16/520399205/trumps-budget-slashes-climate-change-funding.
Gries, P.H., H.M. Crowson, and T. Sandel. 2010. The Olympic Effect on American Attitudes towards China: beyond personality, ideology, and media exposure. Journal of Contemporary China 19 (64): 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560903444181.
Guo, X. (2010). 西方媒体对中国的环境形象建构——以 《纽约时报》 全球气候变化风险报道为例. 新闻与传播研究(4), 18–30.
Gupta, J. 2010. A History of International Climate Change Policy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1 (5): 636–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.67.
Harrison, K., and L.M. Sundstrom. 2007. The Comparative Politics of Climate Change. Global Environmental Politics 7 (4): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2007.7.4.1.
Hartig, F. 2012. Confucius Institutes and the Rise of China. Journal of Chinese Political Science 17 (1): 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-011-9178-7.
Heng, Y.-K. 2010. Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, who is the Softest of Them All? Evaluating Japanese and Chinese Strategies in the ‘Soft’ Power Competition Era. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 10 (2): 275–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcp023.
Hilton, I. (2016). China Emerges as Global Climate Leader in Wake of Trump’s Triumph. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/nov/22/donald-trump-success-helps-china-emerge-as-global-climate-leader.
Holland, S., & Volcovici, V. (2017). Trump Clears Way for Controversial Oil Pipelines. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-pipeline-idUSKBN15820N.
Hooghe, I. d. (2010). The Limits of China’s Soft Power in Europe: Beijing’s Public Diplomacy Puzzle (Clingendael diplomacy papers, no. 25). The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations “Clingendael”.
Hu, A., Zhang, J., & Gao, Y. (2017). 对外援助与国家软实力:中国的现状与对策. 武汉大学学报(人文科学版), 70 (3): 5–13.
Huang, E., & Lahiri, T. (2017). Xi Jinping to China: Any Harm We Inflict on Nature will Eventually Return to Haunt Us. https://qz.com/1105119/watch-what-xi-jinpings-19th-chinese-communist-party-congress-work-report-said-on-climate-change/.
Hunter, A. 2009. Soft Power: China on the Global Stage. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2 (3): 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop001.
IPCC. (2014). Fifth Assessment Report. Geneva.
Johannessen, J. 2015. Worldview Struggles under a New Climate Regime. Nordicom Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0004.
Keohane, R.O., and D.G. Victor. 2011. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. Perspectives on Politics 9 (01): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710004068.
Konieczny, E. 2014. Gipfel Krisen Konferenzen Die Entstehung Diskursiver Macht in transnationalen Kommunikationsereignissen. Wiesbade: Springer.
Lanteigne, M. 2012. Water Dragon? China, Power Shifts and Soft Balancing in the South Pacific. Political Science 64 (1): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032318712447732.
Leng, S. (2017). Dumping of Untreated Acid in Chinese Canal Highlights Nation’s Water Pollution Woes. http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/2059329/dumping-untreated-acid-chinese-canal-highlights-nations-water-pollution.
Liang, X., J.-Y. Tsai, K. Mattis, M. Konieczna, and S. Dunwoody. 2014. Exploring Attribution of Responsibility in a Cross-National Study of TV News Coverage of the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 58 (2): 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.906436.
Ma, Q., S. Cai, S. Wang, B. Zhao, R.V. Martin, M. Brauer, et al. 2017. Impacts of Coal Burning on Ambient PM < sub > 2.5 </sub > Pollution in China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 17 (7): 4477–4491. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4477-2017.
Manzenreiter, W. 2010. The Beijing Games in the Western Imagination of China: The Weak Power of Soft Power. Journal of Sport and Social Issues 34 (1): 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723509358968.
McClory. (2017). The Soft Power 30. A Global Ranking of Soft Power 2017. https://softpower30.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/The-Soft-Power-30-Report-2017-Web-1.pdf.
Michaelowa, A., and K. Michaelowa. 2015. Do rapidly developing countries take up new responsibilities for climate change mitigation? Climatic Change 133 (3): 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1528-6.
Mingjiang, L. 2008. China Debates Soft Power. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2 (2): 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pon011.
Nordin, A. 2012. How Soft Is “Soft Power”? Unstable Dichotomies at Expo 2010. Asian Perspective 36 (4): 591–613. https://doi.org/10.5555/0258-9184-36.4.591.
Nye, J.S. 1990a. Soft Power. Foreign Policy 80: 153–171.
Nye, J.S. 1990b. The Changing Nature of World Power. Political Science Quarterly 105 (2): 177. https://doi.org/10.2307/2151022.
Nye, J.S. 2002. The Information Revolution and American Soft Power. Asia-Pacific Review 9 (1): 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439000220141596.
Nye, J. S. (2005a). Soft Power and Higher Education (EDUCAUSE). http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ffpiu043.pdf.
Nye, J.S. 2005b. The Rise of China’s Soft Power. Wall Street Journal Asia. 29: 6–8.
Nye, J.S. 2008. Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699.
Obama, B. 2017. The Irreversible Momentum of Clean Energy. Science 355 (6321): 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam6284.
Otmazgin, N.K. 2007. Contesting Soft Power: Japanese Popular Culture in East and Southeast Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 8 (1): 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcm009.
Painter, J. 2011. Poles Apart. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Paradise, J.F. 2009. China and International Harmony: The Role of Confucius Institutes in Bolstering Beijing’s Soft Power. Asian Survey 49 (4): 647–669. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2009.49.4.647.
Pew Research Center. (2016a). Chinese Public Sees More Powerful Role in World, Names U.S. as Top Threat. http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/10/Pew-Research-Center-China-Report-FINAL-October-5-2016.pdf.
Pew Research Center. (2016b). Europeans Face the World Divided. http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/06/14095145/Pew-Research-Center-EPW-Report-FINAL-June-13-2016.pdf.
Phillips, T. (2016). Climate Change a Chinese hoax? Beijing gives Donald Trump a Lesson in History. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/17/climate-change-a-chinese-plot-beijing-gives-donald-trump-a-history-lesson.
Post, S., Kleinen-von Königslöw, K., & Schäfer, M. S. (2018). Between guilt and obligation: Debating the responsibility for climate change and climate politics in the media. Environmental Communication.
Qin, A., & Tatlow, D. K. (2014). What’s in a Word? A Chinese Dictionary Updates. https://sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/08/31/whats-in-a-word-a-chinese-dictionary-updates/.
Ross, K., & Song, R. (2017). China Making Progress on Climate Goals Faster than Expected. http://www.wri.org/blog/2017/03/china-making-progress-climate-goals-faster-expected.
Ryoo, W. 2009. Globalization, or the Logic of Cultural Hybridization: The Case of the Korean Wave. Asian Journal of Communication 19 (2): 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980902826427.
Schmidt, A., A. Ivanova, and M.S. Schäfer. 2013. Media Attention for Climate Change Around the world: A Comparative Analysis of Newspaper Coverage in 27 Countries. Global Environmental Change 23 (5): 1233–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.020.
Schmidt, A., and M.S. Schäfer. 2015. Constructions of Climate Justice in German, Indian and US Media. Climatic Change 133 (3): 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1488-x.
Schreurs, M.A., and Y. Tiberghien. 2007. Multi-Level Reinforcement: Explaining European Union Leadership in Climate Change Mitigation. Global Environmental Politics 7 (4): 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2007.7.4.19.
Segerberg, A. (2017). Online and Social Media Campaigns for Climate Change Engagement. http://climatescience.oxfordre.com/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228620-e-398.
Servaes, J. 2015. The Chinese Dream Shattered Between Hard and Soft Power? Media, Culture and Society 38 (3): 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716631283.
Shankleman, J. (2016). China Tells Trump That Climate Change Is No Hoax It Invented. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-16/china-tells-trump-that-climate-change-is-no-hoax-it-invented.
Simon-Lewis, A. (2017). How China is Leading the World in Solar Energy Production. http://www.wired.co.uk/article/china-climate-change-policy-solar-production.
Spence, A., W. Poortinga, C. Butler, and N.F. Pidgeon. 2011. Perceptions of Climate Change and Willingness to Save Energy Related to Flood Experience. Nature Climate Change 1 (1): 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE1059.
The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2017). Democracy Index 2016. Revenge of the “deplorables”. http://felipesahagun.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Democracy-Index-2016.pdf.
The Federal Council. (2017). China’s Head of State XI Jinping to Make State Visit Next Week. https://www.admin.ch/gov/en/start/documentation/media-releases.msg-id-65164.html.
The Guardian. (2016). Trump Seeking Quickest Way to Quit Paris Climate Agreement, Says Report. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/13/trump-looking-at-quickest-way-to-quit-paris-climate-agreement-says-report.
Thomas, D.C. 2001. The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wang, H., and Y.-C. Lu. 2008. The Conception of Soft Power and its Policy Implications: A Comparative Study of China and Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China 17 (56): 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560802000191.
Wang, Y. 2008. Public Diplomacy and the Rise of Chinese Soft Power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312757.
World Economic Forum. (2017). The Global Risks Report 2017. 12th Edition. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GRR17_Report_web.pdf.
Wu, Z., and I. Taylor. 2011. From Refusal to Engagement: Chinese Contributions to Peacekeeping in Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 29 (2): 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2011.555190.
Xi, J. (2008). 关于中国特色社会主义理论体系的几点学习体会和认识 (2). http://theory.people.com.cn/GB/41038/7069571.html.
Xi, J. (2012). 全面贯彻落实党的十八大精神要突出抓好六个方面工作. http://www.qstheory.cn/zxdk/2013/201301/201212/t20121227_202448.htm.
Xu, P. 2010. China: Emerging Player with a Historical Legacy. In Global Climate, Local Journalism: A Transnational Study of How Media Make Sense of Climate Summits, ed. E. Eide, and R. Kunelius, 131–145. Bochum: ProjektVerlag.
Yahuda, M. 2013. China’s New Assertiveness in the South China Sea. Journal of Contemporary China 22 (81): 446–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2012.748964.
Yang, G. (2015). The Affective Publics of Under the Dome. https://mediaactivism.org/2015/04/12/the-affective-publics-of-under-the-dome/.
Yang, G., and C. Calhoun. 2016. Media, Civil Society, and the Rise of a Green Public Sphere in China. China Information 21 (2): 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203x07079644.
Zeitoun, M., N. Mirumachi, and J. Warner. 2011. Transboundary Water Interaction II: The Influence of ‘Soft’ Power. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 11 (2): 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-010-9134-6.
Acknowledgements
We thank the two anonymous reviewers as well as Marko Kovic for their substantial feedback. Our article is based on a short blog post written by Adrian Rauchfleisch in January 2017: https://zipar.org/current-events/climate-change-and-chinas-window-of-opportunity-to-gain-soft-power/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rauchfleisch, A., Schäfer, M.S. Climate change politics and the role of China: a window of opportunity to gain soft power?. Int. Commun. Chin. Cult 5, 39–59 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40636-018-0114-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40636-018-0114-9