Abstract
Background
Since primary membranous nephropathy is a heterogeneous disease with variable outcomes and multiple possible therapeutic approaches, all 13 Nephrology Units of the Italian region Emilia Romagna decided to analyze their experience in the management of this challenging glomerular disease.
Methods
We retrospectively studied 205 consecutive adult patients affected by biopsy-proven primary membranous nephropathy, recruited from January 2010 through December 2017. The primary outcome was patient and renal survival. The secondary outcome was the rate of complete remission and partial remission of proteinuria. Relapse incidence, treatment patterns and adverse events were also assessed.
Results
Median (IQR) follow-up was 36 (24–60) months. Overall patient and renal survival were 87.4% after 5 years. At the end of follow-up, 83 patients (40%) had complete remission and 72 patients (35%) had partial remission. Among responders, less than a quarter (23%) relapsed. Most patients (83%) underwent immunosuppressive therapy within 6 months of biopsy. A cyclic regimen of corticosteroid and cytotoxic agents was the most commonly used treatment schedule (63%), followed by rituximab (28%). Multivariable analysis showed that the cyclic regimen significantly correlates with complete remission (odds ratio 0.26; 95% CI 0.08–0.79) when compared to rituximab (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
In our large study, both short- and long-term outcomes were positive and consistent with those published in the literature. Our data suggest that the use of immunosuppressive therapy within the first 6 months after biopsy appears to be a winning strategy, and that the cyclic regimen also warrants a prominent role in primary membranous nephropathy treatment, since definitive proof of rituximab superiority is lacking.
Graphic Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data cannot be shared for privacy reasons. The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to the privacy of individuals that participated in the study. The laboratory data, owned by the patients, comes from the company database of the laboratory of each Hospital involved. Data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
Glassock RJ (2003) Diagnosis and natural course of membranous nephropathy. Semin Nephrol 23:324–332
Polanco N, Gutiérrez E, Covarsì A et al (2010) Spontaneous remission of nephrotic syndrome in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 21:697–704
Donadio JV Jr, Torres VE, Velosa JA et al (1988) Idiopathic membranous nephropathy: the natural history of untreated patients. Kidney Int 33:708–715
Ponticelli C, Zucchelli P, Passerini P et al (1995) A 10-years follow-up of a randomized study with methylprednisolone and chlorambucil in membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int 48:1600–1604
Schieppati A, Mosconi L, Perna A et al (1993) Prognosis of untreated patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Eng J Med 329:85–89
Waldman M, Austin HA 3rd (2012) Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 23:1617–1630
Disease K (2012) Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) Glomerulonephritis Work Group: KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int Suppl 2:186–197
Disease K (2021) Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) Glomerulonephritis Work Group: KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int Suppl 100:S128–S139
Hofstra JM, Fervenza FC, Wetzels JF (2013) Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Nat Rev Nephrol 9:443–458
Rojas-Rivera J, Carriazo S, Ortiz A (2019) Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults: KDIGO 2012, cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine A are out, rituximab is the new normal. Clin Kidney J 12:629–638
Ponticelli C, Altieri P, Scolari F et al (1998) A randomized study comparing methylprednisolone plus chlorambucil versus methylprednisolone plus cyclophosphamide in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 9:444–450
Jha V, Ganguli A, Saha TH et al (2007) A randomized, controlled trial of steroids and cyclophosphamide in adults with nephrotic syndrome caused by idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 18:1899–1904
Cattran DC, Appel GB, Hebert LA et al (2001) Cyclosporine in patients with steroid-resistant membranous nephropathy: a randomized trial. Kidney Int 59:1484–1490
Praga M, Barrio V, Juarez GF et al (2007) Tacrolimus monotherapy in membranous nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Kidney 71:924–930
Beck LH Jr, Bonegio RG, Lambeu G et al (2009) M-type phospholipase A2 receptor as target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med 361:11–20
Tomas NM, Beck LH Jr, Meyer-Schwesinger C et al (2014) Thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med 371:2277–2287
Beck LH Jr, Fervenza FC, Beck DM et al (2021) Rituximab-induced depletion of anti-PLA2R autoantibodies predicts response in membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Neprhol 22:1543–1550
De Vriese AS, Glassock RJ, Nath KA et al (2017) A proposal for a serology-based approach to membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 28:421–430
Ruggenenti P, Fervenza FC, Remuzzi G (2017) Treatment of membranous nephropathy: time for a paradigm shift. Nat Rev Neprhol 13:563–579
Fervenza FC, Abraham RS, Erickson SB et al (2010) Rituximab therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a 2-years study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5:2188–2198
Ruggenenti P, Cravedi P, Chianca A et al (2012) Rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 23:1416–1425
Dahan K, Debiec H, Plaisier E et al (2017) Rituximab for severe membranous nephropathy: a 6-months trial with extended follow-up. J Am Soc Neprhol 28:348–358
Fervenza FC, Apple GB, Barbou SJ et al (2019) Rituximab or cyclosporine in the treatment of membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med 381:36–46
Fernández-Juárez G, Rojas-Rivera J, van de Logt AE et al (2021) The STARMEN trial indicates that alternating treatment with corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide is superior to sequential treatment with tacrolimus and rituximab in primary membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int 99:986–998
Scolari F, Delbarba E, Santoro D et al (2021) Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide in the treatment of membranous nephropathy: the RI-CYCLO randomized trial. J Am Soc Neprhol 32:972–982
Churg J, Ehrenreich T (1973) Membranous nephropathy. Perspect Nephrol Hypertens 1:443–448
du Buf-Vereijken PW, Branten AJ, Wetzels JF (2004) Cytotoxic therapy for membranous nephropathy and renal insufficiency: improved renal survival but high relapse rate. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19:1142–1148
Gaucker P, Shin JI, Alberici F et al (2021) Rituximab in membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int Rep 6:881–893
Cattran DC, Alexopoulos E, Heering P et al (2007) Cyclosporin in idiopathic glomerular disease associated with nephrotic syndrome: workshop recommendations. Kidney Int 72:1429–1447
Thompson A, Cattran DC, Blank M et al (2015) Complete and partial remission as surrogate end points in membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 26:2930–2937
Stangou MJ, Marinaki S, Papachristou E et al (2019) Histological grading in primary membranous nephropathy is essential for clinical management and predicts outcome of patients. Histopathology 75:660–671
O’Shaughnessy MM, Troost JP, Bomback AS et al (2019) Treatment patterns among adults and children with membranous nephropathy in the Cure Glomerulonephropathy Network (CureGN). Kidny Int Rep 4:1725–1734
Leeaphorn N, Kue-A-Pai P, Thamcharoen N et al (2014) Prevalence of cancer in membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Nephrol 40:29–35
Caro J, Gutiérrez-Solìs E, Rojas-Rivera J et al (2015) Predictors of response and relapse in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy treated with tacrolimus. Neprhol Dial Transplant 30:467–474
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Enrico Fabrizi, Professor of the Business and Economics Statistics at the Piacenza campus of the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy, for the support in statistical analysis of the data and drawing of the figures. All participating centers provided a comparable number of cases. We thank the study staff at all participating centers.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
All authors were involved in conception and study design; Drs. Albertazzi, Fontana, Giberti, Aiello, Battistoni, Catapano, Graziani, Cimino, Schichilone, Forcellini, De Fabritiis, Signorotti, and Del Sante participated in data collection; Dr. Scarpioni and Dr. Albertazzi analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The local Ethical Committee of Area Vasta Nord of Emilia Romagna and all other local Ethics Committees in the region approved the study.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Albertazzi, V., Fontana, F., Giberti, S. et al. Primary membranous nephropathy in the Italian region of Emilia Romagna: results of a multicenter study with extended follow-up. J Nephrol 37, 471–482 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-023-01803-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-023-01803-9