Skip to main content
Log in

Using Computer Tablets to Assess Preference for Videos in Children with Autism

  • BAP Brief Practices
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using computer tablets, we assessed preference for videos in five children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Then, we provided access to most preferred and less preferred videos contingent on sitting on one of two chairs within a concurrent schedule design. All participants spent consistently more time sitting on the chair associated with the video selected the most often during the preference assessment, indicating that practitioners may use the tablet-based assessment procedure to identify potential video reinforcers for children with ASD in applied settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brodhead, M. T., Al-Dubayan, M. N., Mates, M., Abel, E. A., & Brouwer, L. (2015). An evaluation of a brief video-based multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment. Behavior Analysis in Practice. doi:10.1007/s40617-015-0081-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. R., Donaldson, J. M., & Kahng, S. (2015). Are video-based preference assessments without access to selected stimuli effective? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. doi:10.1002/jaba.246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dattilo, J. (1986). Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 445–448. doi:10.1901/jaba.1986.19-445.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. N., Fuentes, L., & Durand, S. (2014). Examination of systematic durations of presession reinforcer access on functional communication training. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 263–270. doi:10.1007/s10882-013-9360-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Sleven, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mechling, L. C., Gast, D. L., & Cronin, A. B. (2006). The effects of presenting high-preference items, paired with choice via computer-based video programming on task completion of students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 7–13. doi:10.1177/10883576060210010201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, K., Higbee, T. S., & Dayton, E. (2012). Preliminary investigation of a video-based stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 413–418. doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-413.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research project was supported in part by a doctoral research scholarship from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec–Société et Culture to the first author and an Insight Development Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (no. 430-2013-000836) to the second author. We thank Marie-Michèle Dufour for her assistance with the data collection and the École de l’Étincelle for their collaboration in conducting the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc J. Lanovaz.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in this study were approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Faculté des Arts et Sciences of the Université de Montréal and were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Canadian Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the parents of all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Author Note

This paper was written in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the PhD degree in Psychoeducation at the Université de Montréal by the first author.

1. Prior to using video recordings as reinforcers, practitioners should assess preference.

2. Practitioners may use computer tablets to assess preference for videos in children with autism spectrum disorder.

3. To assess preference, practitioners can vertically split the screen of a tablet into two and present the videos within a paired-choice format.

4. The video selected the most often may be used as a potential reinforcer to teach novel behavior.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chebli, S.S., Lanovaz, M.J. Using Computer Tablets to Assess Preference for Videos in Children with Autism. Behav Analysis Practice 9, 50–53 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0109-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0109-0

Keywords

Navigation