Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Race Versus Education and Race Versus Income on Patients’ Motivation to Participate in Clinical Trials

  • Published:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our study investigates whether levels of motivation and barriers to participation in clinical trials vary with patients’ education and income. A self-administered survey asked outpatients to rank potential influential factors on a “0” to “4” significance scale for their motivation to participate in clinical trials. Principal component analysis (PCA), analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests analyzed the impact of race, education, and income on their motivation to participate. Analysis included 1841 surveys; most respondents had a high school education or some college, and listed annual income < $30,000. There was a significant interaction between race and income on our motivation scale 1 scores (p = .0261). Compared with their counterparts, subjects with less education/lower income ranked monetary compensation (p = .0420 and p < .0001, respectively) as a higher motivator. Minorities and patients with less education and lower income appear to be more influenced by their desire to please the doctor, the race and sex of the doctor, and the language spoken by the doctor being the same as theirs. For all races, education appeared to have a direct relationship with motivation to participate, except for African-Americans, whose motivation appeared to decline with more education. Income appeared to have an inverse relationship with motivation to participate for all races.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colby SL, Ortman JM. Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060, Population Estimates and Projections, Current Population Reports. In: United States Census Bureau, 2014 National Population Projections: Publications. 2015. http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2014/publications.html. Accessed 14 Sept 2016.

  2. National Institutes of Health. AHRQ policy on the inclusion of priority populations in research. In: Notice #NOT-HS-03-010. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. 2003. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-HS-03-010.html. Accessed 14 Sept 2016.

  3. National Institutes of Health. NIH policy and guidelines on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research (amendment to the 1994 Federal Register). In: Notice #NOT-OD-02-001. 2001. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-001.html. Accessed 14 Sept 2016.

  4. Newman PA, Duan N, Roberts KJ, Seiden D, Rudy ET, Swendeman D, et al. HIV vaccine trial participation among ethnic minority communities: barriers, motivators, and implications for recruitment. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41(2):210–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.qai.0000179454.93443.60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen MS Jr, Lara PN, Dang JH, Paterniti DA, Kelly K. Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials. Cancer. 2014;120(Suppl 7):1091–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28575.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Eshera N, Itana H, Zhang L, Soon G, Fadiran EO. Demographics of clinical trials participants in pivotal clinical trials for new molecular entity drugs and biologics approved by FDA from 2010 to 2012. Am J Ther. 2015;22(6):435–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000000177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher JA, Kalbaugh CA. Challenging assumptions about minority participation in US clinical research. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(12):2217–22. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, St George DM. Distrust, race, and research. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(21):2458–63. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.21.2458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giuliano AR, Mokuau N, Hughes C, Tortolero-Luna G, Risendal B, Ho RCS, et al. Participation of minorities in cancer research: the influence of structural, cultural, and linguistic factors. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10(8 Suppl):S22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00195-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hornbulm A. Acres of skin: human experiments at Holmesburg Prison. A true story of abuse and exploitation in the name of medical science. 1st ed. Medical History: Routledge; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stones M, McMillan J. Payment for participation in research: a pursuit for the poor? J Med Ethics 2010;36(1):34–6, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.030965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grann VR, Jacobson JS, Troxel AB, Hershman D, Karp J, Myers C, et al. Barriers to minority participation in breast carcinoma prevention trials. Cancer. 2005;104(2):374–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ford JG, Howerton MW, Lai GY, Gary TL, Bolen S, Gibbons MC, et al. Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review. Cancer. 2008;112(2):228–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Langford A, Resnicow K, An L. Clinical trial awareness among racial/ethnic minorities in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic, attitudinal, and knowledge correlates. J Healthc Commun. 2010;15(Suppl 3):92–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.525296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Braunstein JB, Sherber NS, Schulman SP, Ding EL, Powe NR. Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2008;87(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0b013e3181625d78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gross CP, Filardo G, Mayne ST, Krumholz H. The impact of socioeconomic status and race on trial participation for older women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2005;103(3):483–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20792.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Svensson K, Ramírez OF, Peres F, Barnett M, Claudio L. Socioeconomic determinants associated with willingness to participate in medical research among a diverse population. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33(6):1197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2012.07.014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoberman A, Shaikh N, Bhatnagar S, Haralam MA, Kearney D, Colborn DK, et al. Factors that influence parental decisions to participate in clinical research: consenters vs nonconsenters. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(6):561–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1050.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiminez R, Zhang B, Joffe S, Nilsson M, Rivera L, Mutchler J, et al. Clinical trial participation among ethnic/racial minority and majority patients with advanced cancer: what factors most influence enrollment? J Palliat Med. 2013;16(3):256–62. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2012.0413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bernstein SL, Feldman J. Incentive to participate in clinical trials: practical and ethical considerations. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(9):1197–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.05.020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Walter JK, Burke JF, Davis MM. Research participation by low-income and racial/ethnic minority groups: how payment may change the balance. Clin Transl Sci. 2013;6(5):363–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12084.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurt A, Semler L, Jacoby JL, Johnson MB, Careyva BA, Stello B, et al. Racial differences among factors associated with participation in clinical research trials. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016;104(2):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carifio J, Perla RJ. Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. J Social Sci. 2007;3(3):106–16.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dinno A. Nonparametric pairwise multiple comparisons in independent groups using Dunn’s test. Stata J. 2015;15(1):292–300.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kurt A, Kincaid HM, Curtis C, Semler L, Meyers M, Johnson M, et al. Factors influencing participation in clinical trials: emergency medicine vs. other specialties. West JEM. 2017;18(5):846–55.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jagsi R, Motomura AR, Amarnath S, Jankovic A, Sheets N, Ubel PA. Under-representation of women in high-impact published clinical cancer research. Cancer. 2009;115(14):3293–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex, and age-based disparities. JAMA. 2004;291(22):2720–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.22.2720.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. George S, Duran N, Norris K. A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African American, Latinos, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(2):e16–31. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Street RL, O’Malley KJ, Cooper LA, Haidet P. Understanding concordance in patient-physician relationships: personal and ethnic dimensions of shared identity. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(3):198–205. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.821.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Albrecht TL, Eggly SS, Gleason ME, Harper FW, Foster TS, Peterson AM, et al. Influence of clinical communication on patients’ decision making on participation in clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(16):2666–73. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hooghe M, Marien S, de Vroome T. The cognitive basis of trust. The relation between education, cognitive ability, and generalized and political trust. Intelligence. 2012;40(6):604–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Katz RV, Green BL, Kressin NR, Green BL, Wang MQ, James SA, et al. Exploring the “legacy” of the Tuskegee Syphilis study: a follow-up study from the Tuskegee legacy project. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009;101(2):179–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30833-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Emmons WR, Noeth BJ, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Why didn’t higher education protect Hispanic and Black wealth? In the Balance. 2015;12:1–3. https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/in-the-balance/issue12-2015/why-didnt-highereducation-protect-hispanic-and-black-wealth. Accessed 14 Sept 2016.

  34. Patten E, Fact tank news in the numbers. Racial, gender wage gaps persist in U.S. despite some progress. Pew Research Center. 2016. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/07/01/racial-gender-wage-gaps-persist-in-u-s-despite-some-progress/

  35. Kurt A, Semler L, Meyers M, Glenn-Porter B, Jacoby JL, Stello B. Research professionals’ perspectives, barriers and recommendations regarding minority participation in clinical trials. J Racial Ethn Health Disp. 2016;4(6):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Powell JH. Clinical trial diversity, drug development, and health disparities: A perspective from Project IMPACT. Monitor (newsletter). 2008;12:29–33. http://www.africanamericanhealthmatters.com/uploads/JPowell-Clinicaltrialdiversity-drugdevelopment-healthdisparities.pdf. Accessed April 25, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  37. Valcarcel M, Diaz C, Santiago-Borrero PJ. Training and retaining of underrepresented minority physician scientists—a Hispanic perspective: NICHD-AAP workshop on research in neonatology. J Perinatol. 2006;26(Suppl 2):S49–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jeste DV, Twamley EW, Cardenas V, Lebowitz B, Reynolds CF III. A call for training the trainers: focus on mentoring to enhance diversity in mental health research. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(Suppl 1):S31–7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.154633.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Getz K, Faden L. Racial disparities among clinical research investigators. Am J Ther. 2008;15(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0b013e31815fa75a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. National Institutes of Health FAQ, ClinicalTrials.gov - Clinical Trial Phases. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2008. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/services/ctphases.html. Accessed 2 Jun 2017.

  41. Adeyemi OF, Evans A, Bahk M. HIV-infected adults from minority ethnic groups are willing to participate in research if asked. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2009;23(10):859–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2009.0008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gollin L, Harrigan R, Perez J, Easa D. Improving Hawaiian and Filipino involvement in clinical research opportunities qualitative findings from Hawai’i. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(4 Suppl 5):S5-111. 9

    Google Scholar 

  43. Farmer DF, Jackson SA, Camacho F, Hall M. Attitudes of African American and low socioeconomic status white women toward medical research. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007;18(1):85–99. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2007.0008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Tyler Adams, BS for figure development as well as Micaela Wilson, BA and Manuel Colón, BS for editing and formatting material for this manuscript. We also thank Matthew Meyers, BS for his help with data entry and maintenance of the database.

Funding

This study was supported by an unrestricted research grant funding from a non-philanthropic trust, the Anne and Carl Anderson Trust.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita Kurt.

Ethics declarations

All persons listed as authors meet the criteria for authorship established by the ICMJE and take responsibility for the article’s content.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human subjects were in accordance with the ethical standards of the IRB and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

This anonymous and voluntary survey study was IRB-approved as “exempt;” therefore, an alteration of informed consent was granted.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurt, A., Kincaid, H., Semler, L. et al. Impact of Race Versus Education and Race Versus Income on Patients’ Motivation to Participate in Clinical Trials. J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 5, 1042–1051 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-017-0452-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-017-0452-z

Keywords

Navigation