Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptual Competence in Psychiatry: Recommendations for Education and Training

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ghaemi SN. Pluralism in psychiatry: Karl Jaspers on science. Philos Psychiatry Psychol. 2007;14(1):57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banner NF, Thornton T. The new philosophy of psychiatry: its (recent) past, present and future: a review of the Oxford University Press series International Perspectives in Philosophy and Psychiatry. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2007;2(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Szasz TS. The myth of mental illness. Am Psychol. 1960;15(2):113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Steingard S. Critical psychiatry: controversies and clinical implications. Cham: Springer; 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Gardner C, Kleinman A. Medicine and the mind-the consequences of psychiatry’s identity crisis. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(18):1697–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Althoff RR, Waterman GS. Commentary: psychiatric training for physicians: a call to modernize. Acad Med. 2011;86(3):285–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aftab A, Nassir Ghaemi S, Stagno S. A didactic course on “philosophy of psychiatry” for psychiatry residents. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42(4):559–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karter JM. An ecological model for conceptual competence in psychiatric diagnosis. J Humanist Psychol 2019:0022167819852488. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167819852488.

  9. Schwartz ZH. Psychiatric skepticism in medical education: why we need philosophy. Acad Psychiatry. 2019;43(4):461–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kendler KS. DSM issues: incorporation of biological tests, avoidance of reification, and an approach to the “box canyon problem”. Am J Psychiatr. 2014;171(12):1248–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghaemi SN. The rise and fall of the biopsychosocial model. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195(1):3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bolton D. What is mental disorder? An essay in philosophy, science, and values: Oxford University press; 2008.

  13. Spitzer RL. The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III: a reformulation of the issues. Am J Psychiatry. 1981;138(2):210–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Spitzer RL. Harmful dysfunction and the DSM definition of mental disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2019;108(3):430–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.108.3.430.

  15. Spitzer RL, Endicott J. Medical and mental disorder: proposed definition and criteria. In: Spitzer RL, Klein DF, editors. Critical issues in psychiatric diagnosis. New York: Raven Press; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frances A. Saving normal: an insider’s revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, big pharma and the medicalization of ordinary life. New York: William Morrow & Co; 2013.

  17. Frances A. DSM in philosophyland: curiouser and curiouser. Making the DSM-5: Springer; 2013. p. 95–103.

  18. Kendler K, Zachar P. The incredible insecurity of psychiatric nosology. In: Kendler K, Parnas J, editors. Philosophical issues in psychiatry: explanation, phenomenology, and nosology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 2015.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Wakefield JC. The concept of mental disorder: diagnostic implications of the harmful dysfunction analysis. World Psychiatry. 2007;6(3):149–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bolton D. The usefulness of Wakefield’s definition for the diagnostic manuals. World Psychiatry. 2007;6(3):164–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Brulde B. Wakefield’s hybrid account of mental disorder. World Psychiatry. 2007;6(3):163–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Fulford KM, Thornton T. Fanatical about “harmful dysfunction”. World Psychiatry. 2007;6(3):161–2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jablensky A. Does psychiatry need an overarching concept of “mental disorder”? World Psychiatry. 2007;6(3):157–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Phillips J, Frances A, Cerullo MA, Chardavoyne J, Decker HS, First MB, et al. The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: a pluralogue part 1: conceptual and definitional issues in psychiatric diagnosis. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2012;7:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bulletin of the Association for the Advancement of Philosophy and Psychiatry. 2017;4(1):1–57 (https://philosophyandpsychiatry.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/aapp-bulletin-vol-24-1-7.pdf).

  26. Wells LA. Philosophy and psychiatry: a new curriculum for child and adolescent psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2002;26(4):257–61.

  27. Potter NN, El-Mallakh RS. Collaborative integration of ethics education. Acad Psychiatry. 2017;41(4):556–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghaemi SN. The concepts of psychiatry: a pluralistic approach to the mind and mental illness. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Waterman GS. Why I am not a psychiatrist. Bulletin of the Association for the Advancement of Philosophy and Psychiatry. 2019;26(1):2–3. (https://philosophyandpsychiatry.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/aappbulletin-vol-26-1-2019-.pdf)

  30. Kendler K, Zachar P. Toward a philosophical approach to psychiatry: the writings of Kenneth Kendler. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the members of the executive council of the “Association for the Advancement of Philosophy and Psychiatry” for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Awais Aftab.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aftab, A., Waterman, G.S. Conceptual Competence in Psychiatry: Recommendations for Education and Training. Acad Psychiatry 45, 203–209 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-020-01183-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-020-01183-3

Navigation