Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Entrustable Professional Activities in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review

  • Systematic and Other Review
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) represent discrete clinical tasks that can be entrusted to trainees in psychiatry. They are increasingly being used as educational framework in several countries. However, the empirical evidence available has not been synthesized in the field of psychiatry. Therefore, the authors conducted a systematic review in order to summarize and evaluate the available evidence in the field of EPAs in undergraduate and graduate medical education in psychiatry.

Methods

The authors searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, ERIC, Embase, PsycINFO, all Ovid journals, Scopus, Web of Science, MedEdPORTAL, and the archives of Academic Psychiatry for articles reporting quantitative and qualitative research as well as educational case reports on EPAs in undergraduate and graduate psychiatry education published since 2005. All included articles were assessed for content (development, implementation, and assessment of EPAs) and quality using the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs.

Results

The authors screened 2807 records and included a total of 20 articles in the final data extraction. Most studies were expert consensus reports (n = 6, 30%) and predominantly conducted in English-speaking countries (n = 17, 85%). Papers reported mainly EPA development and/or EPA implementation studies (n = 14, 70%), whereas EPA assessment studies were less frequent (n = 6, 30%). Publications per year showed an increasing trend both in quantity (from 1 in 2011 to 7 in 2018) and quality (from a QATSDD score of 27 in 2011 to an average score of 39 in 2018). The main focus of the articles was the development of individual EPAs for different levels of training for psychiatry or on curricular frameworks based on EPAs in psychiatry (n = 10, 50%). The lack of empirical controlled studies does currently not allow for meta-analyses of educational outcomes.

Conclusions

The concept of EPA-based curricula seems to become increasingly present, a focus in the specialty of psychiatry both in UME and GME. The lack of empirical research in this context is an important limitation for educational practice recommendations. Currently there is only preliminary but promising data available for using EPAs with regard to educational outcomes. EPAs seem to be effectively used from a curriculum design perspective for UME and GME in psychiatry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cate Ot. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Med Educ. 2005;39(12):1176–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ten Cate O, et al. Curriculum development for the workplace using entrustable professional activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99. Med Teach. 2015;37(11):983–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O'Dowd E, et al. A systematic review of 7 years of research on entrustable professional activities in graduate medical education, 2011–2018. Med Educ. 2019.

  4. Meyer EG, et al. Scoping review of entrustable professional activities in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 2019.

  5. Hauer KE, ten Cate O, Boscardin C, Irby DM, Iobst W, O'Sullivan PS. Understanding trust as an essential element of trainee supervision and learning in the workplace. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2014;19(3):435–56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holzhausen Y, Maaz A, Cianciolo AT, ten Cate O, Peters H. Applying occupational and organizational psychology theory to entrustment decision-making about trainees in health care: a conceptual model. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(2):119–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dauphinee WD, Boulet JR, Norcini JJ. Considerations that will determine if competency-based assessment is a sustainable innovation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018.

  8. Bhugra D, Tasman A, Pathare S, Priebe S, Smith S, Torous J, et al. The WPA-Lancet psychiatry commission on the future of psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(10):775–818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giacco D, Amering M, Bird V, Craig T, Ducci G, Gallinat J, et al. Scenarios for the future of mental health care: a social perspective. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(3):257–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Priebe S. Where can psychiatry go from here? Nervenarzt. 2018;89(11):1217–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer EG, Chen HC, Uijtdehaage S, Durning SJ, Maggio LA. Scoping review of entrustable professional activities in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 2019;94(7):1040–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shorey S, et al. Entrustable professional activities in health care education: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2019.

  13. Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, et al. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 2011;33(3):206–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sirriyeh R, Lawton R, Gardner P, Armitage G. Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(4):746–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koelkebeck K, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a revised curriculum for psychiatry and psychotherapy. Nervenarzt. 2019.

  17. ten Cate O, Young JQ. The patient handover as an entrustable professional activity: adding meaning in teaching and practice. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(Suppl 1):i9–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kealy-Bateman W, Kotze B, Lampe L. When should I attempt my centrally administered summative assessments in the RANZCP competency-based training program? Australas Psychiatry. 2016;24(6):615–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jurd S, de Beer W, Aimer M, Fletcher S, Halley E, Schapper C, et al. Introducing a competency based fellowship programme for psychiatry in Australia and New Zealand. Australas Psychiatry. 2015;23(6):699–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fage B, et al. Competency-based medical education: objectives for a foundational emergency psychiatry experience. Acad Psychiatry. 2018:1–4.

  21. Shelton PG, Corral I, Kyle B. Advancements in undergraduate medical education: meeting the challenges of an evolving world of education, healthcare, and technology. Psychiatr Q. 2017;88(2):225–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Holt SRMDMS, et al. The addiction recovery clinic: a novel, primary-care-based approach to teaching addiction medicine. Acad Med. 2017;92(5):680–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Menezes N, Hawa R, Oswald R, Lee EK. Does one size truly fit all? The COUPE undergraduate perspective on competency-based medical education in psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry. 2018;63(6):356–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Young JQ, Hasser C, Hung EK, Kusz M, O'Sullivan PS, Stewart C, et al. Developing end-of-training entrustable professional activities for psychiatry: results and methodological lessons. Acad Med. 2018;93(7):1048–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grabovac A, Burrell E. Standardizing training in mindfulness-based interventions in Canadian psychiatry postgraduate programs: a competency-based framework. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42(2):248–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vietz E, März E, Lottspeich C, Wölfel T, Fischer MR, Schmidmaier R. Ward round competences in surgery and psychiatry - a comparative multidisciplinary interview study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):137.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Boyce P, et al. Using entrustable professional activities to guide curriculum development in psychiatry training. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11(1).

  28. Port N, Weiss A, Maudsley I. Electroconvulsive therapy training: can it be a model of an entrustable professional activity in a competency program? Australas Psychiatry. 2012;20(3):242–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weiss A, Ozdoba A, Carroll V, DeJesus F. Entrustable professional activities: enhancing meaningful use of evaluations and milestones in a psychiatry residency program. Acad Psychiatry. 2016;40(5):850–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sadhu JM, Lee PC, Stewart C, Carson NJ, Usher C, Maneta E, et al. Lessons from the launch: program directors reflect on implementing the child and adolescent psychiatry milestones. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42(4):510–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schatte D, Gavero G, Thomas L, Kovach J. Field guide to boot camp curriculum development. Acad Psychiatry. 2019;43(2):224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Klapheke M, Johnson T, Cubero M. Assessing entrustable professional activities during the psychiatry clerkship. Acad Psychiatry. 2017;41(3):345–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Klapheke M, Johnson T, Cubero M. Third-and fourth-year medical student self-assessment in entrustable professional activities. Med Sci Educ. 2017;27(2):159–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Young JQ, Irby DM, Kusz M, O'Sullivan PS. Performance assessment of pharmacotherapy: results from a content validity survey of the psychopharmacotherapy-structured clinical observation (P-SCO) tool. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42(6):765–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Young JQ, Rasul R, O’Sullivan PS. Evidence for the validity of the psychopharmacotherapy-structured clinical observation tool: results of a factor and time series analysis. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42(6):759–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brown DR, Warren JB, Hyderi A, Drusin RE, Moeller J, Rosenfeld M, et al. Finding a path to entrustment in undergraduate medical education: a progress report from the AAMC core entrustable professional activities for entering residency entrustment concept group. Acad Med. 2017;92(6):774–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Michaud PA, Jucker-Kupper P, G. The profiles working. the "profiles" document: a modern revision of the objectives of undergraduate medical studies in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2016;146:w14270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fazio SB, Ledford CH, Aronowitz PB, Chheda SG, Choe JH, Call SA, et al. Competency-based medical education in the internal medicine clerkship: a report from the alliance for academic internal medicine undergraduate medical education task force. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):421–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hamui-Sutton A, et al. Specific entrustable professional activities for undergraduate medical internships: A method compatible with the academic curriculum. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1).

  40. Ten Cate O. Entrustment decisions: bringing the patient into the assessment equation. Acad Med. 2017;92(6):736–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. AAMC. Association of American Medical Colleges. Core entrustable professional activities for entering residency: curriculum developers’ guide. 2014 [cited 2019 January 1st, 2019]; Available from: https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Core%20EPA%20Curriculum%20Dev%20Guide.pdf.

  42. Murray KE, et al. Crossing the gap: using competency-based assessment to determine whether learners are ready for the undergraduate-to-graduate transition. Acad Med. 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are most grateful for the support and advice of John Q. Young.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Severin Pinilla, Werner Strik & Christoph Nissen

  2. University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Eric Lenouvel & Stefan Klöppel

  3. Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Sören Huwendiek

Authors
  1. Severin Pinilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric Lenouvel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Werner Strik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefan Klöppel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christoph Nissen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sören Huwendiek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Severin Pinilla.

Ethics declarations

This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pinilla, S., Lenouvel, E., Strik, W. et al. Entrustable Professional Activities in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review. Acad Psychiatry 44, 37–45 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-019-01142-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-019-01142-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation