Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off points in the Brief Questionnaire for Measuring Disordered Eating Behaviors in Mexican Women

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Evidence suggests that disordered eating behaviors can result in eating disorders, which is already a reality for the Mexican population, representing an increasingly complex public health problem. Early detection is therefore essential.

Aim of the study

To obtain the sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off points of the Brief Questionnaire for Measuring Disordered Eating Behaviors to identify eating disorders in Mexican women.

Methods

The Eating Disorders Examination-Questionnaire and the Brief Questionnaire for Disordered Eating Behaviors were applied to patients diagnosed with eating disorders at two public health institutions and university students. ROC analysis was performed to determine sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and cut-off points.

Results

Three cut-off points were obtained: first: eight points (Sensitivity = 60.7%, Specificity = 92.2%), showing low risk; second: 11 points (sensitivity = 24.1%; specificity = 98.9%), detecting moderate risk; and, finally, 15 points and over (sensitivity = 4.46%; specificity = 100%), indicating high risk.

Conclusions

The instrument adequately identifies those individuals who are not at risk for eating disorders, making it possible to channel prevention efforts towards those who do have DEB, thus optimizing resources.

Level of evidence

Level III: case–control analytic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Unikel C, Gómez G (2004) Validez de constructo de un instrumento para la detección de factores de riesgo en los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria en mujeres mexicanas. Salud Ment 27:38–49

    Google Scholar 

  2. Palma O, Hernández MI, Villalobos A, Unikel C, Olaiz G, Bojorquez I (2011) Association of socioeconomic status, problem behaviors, and disordered eating in Mexican adolescents: results of the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2006. J Adolesc Health 49:400–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gutiérrez JP, Rivera JA, Shamah T, Villalpando S, Franco A, Cuevas L et al (2012) Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición: Resultados nacionales. Mexico, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

    Google Scholar 

  4. Unikel C, Bojorquez I, Villatoro JA, Fleiz C, Medina ME (2006) Conductas alimentarias de riesgo en población estudiantil del Distrito Federal: tendencias 1997–2003. Rev Invest Clin 58(1):15–27

    Google Scholar 

  5. Unikel C, Bojorquez I, Carreño S (2004) Validación de un cuestionario breve para medir conductas alimentarias de riesgo. Salud Pública Mex 46:509–515. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0036-36342004000600005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fairburn CG, Beglin SJ (1994) Assessment of eating disorders: Interview or self-report questionnaire? Int J Eat Disord 16:363–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(199412)16:4%3c363::AID-EAT2260160405%3e3.0.CO;2-#

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Unikel C, Bojorquez I, Díaz De Léon C, Vázquez V, Rivera JA, Galván G et al (2018) Validation of Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire in Mexican women. Int J Eat Disord 51(2):146–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grilo CM, Reas DL, Hopwood CJ, Crosby RD (2015) Factor structure and construct validity of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire in college students: further support for a modified brief version. Int J Eat Disord 48(3):284–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39(4):561–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Díaz MC, Bilbao GM, Parra A, Unikel C, Muñoz A, Escalante EI (2019) Relación entre estado de nutrición, insatisfacción corporal y conductas alimentarias de riesgo en estudiantes de primer semestre de la carrera de Nutrición de una universidad privada. Rev Mex Trastor Aliment 10(1):53–65. https://doi.org/10.22201/fesi.20071523e.2019.1.490

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Unikel-Santoncini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for the protocol was obtained from the Ramón de la Fuente National Institute of Psychiatry Ethical Committee, the Salvador Zubirán National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition, and the Academic Committee of the Biological and Health Sciences of the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco.

Informed consent

Informed consent was requested from both patients and students. In the case of minors, informed consent was requested from the child’s parents or guardian.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Unikel-Santoncini, C., Muñoz-Espinosa, A., de León-Vázquez, C.D. et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off points in the Brief Questionnaire for Measuring Disordered Eating Behaviors in Mexican Women. Eat Weight Disord 26, 2401–2405 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-01073-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-01073-5

Keywords

Navigation