Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Psychometric properties of the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) among a sample of overweight/obese French-speaking adolescents

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) was recently developed to assess the internalization of weight stigma among English-speaking overweight and obese adults. The objective of the present study was to develop and examine the psychometric properties of a French version of the WSSQ, as well as its applicability to adolescents.

Methods

The sample comprised 156 overweight and obese adolescents (81 boys, 75 girls, Mage = 16.31). The factor validity and the convergent validity of the French version of the WSSQ were examined using a confirmatory factor analysis and a structural equation model, respectively.

Results

The a priori two-factor structure of the WSSQ and the composite reliability of its subscales (self-devaluation and fear of enacted stigma) were supported. Convergent validity analyses revealed that both WSSQ subscales were significantly and (a) negatively correlated with measures of self-esteem and physical appearance, and (b) positively correlated with measures of anxiety, depression, fear of negative appearance evaluation, and eating-related pathology (fear of getting fat, eating-related control, food preoccupation, vomiting-purging behaviors, and eating-related guilt subscales). However, no significant relation was found between the WSSQ subscales and body mass index.

Conclusion

These results suggest that the French version of the WSSQ has acceptable psychometric properties and can be used to assess weight self-stigma among overweight and obese adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DePierre JA, Puhl RM (2012) Experiences of weight stigmatization: a review of self-report assessment measures. Obes Facts 5:897–918. doi:10.1159/000346259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ruggs EN, King EB, Hebl M, Fitzsimmons M (2010) Assessment of weight stigma. Obes Facts 3:60–69. doi:10.1159/000273208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ratcliffe D, Ellison N (2015) Obesity and internalized weight stigma: a formulation model for an emerging psychological problem. Behav Cogn Psychother 43:239–252. doi:10.1017/S1352465813000763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lillis J, Luoma JB, Levin ME, Hayes SC (2010) Measuring weight self-stigma: the Weight Self-stigma Questionnaire. Obesity 18:971–976. doi:10.1038/oby.2009.353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hain B, Langer L, Hünnemeyer K, Rudofsky G, Zech U, Wild B (2015) Translation and validation of the German version of the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ). Obes Surg 25:750–753. doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1598-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Farhangi MA, Emam-Alizadeh M, Hamedi F, Jahangiry L (2016) Weight self-stigma and its association with quality of life and psychological distress among overweight and obese women. Eating Weight Disord Studies Anorexia Bulimia Obesity. doi:10.1007/s40519-016-0288-2 (Advanced Online Prepublication)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roberto CA, Sysko R, Bush J, Pearl R, Puhl RM, Schvey NA, Dovidio JF (2012) Clinical correlates of the weight bias internalization scale in a sample of obese adolescents seeking bariatric surgery. Obesity 20:533–539. doi:10.1038/oby.2011.123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Farhat T (2015) Stigma, obesity and adolescent risk behaviors: current research and future directions. Curr Opin Psychol 5:56–66. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Puhl RM (2011) Weight stigmatization toward youth: a significant problem in need of societal solutions. Childhood Obesity 7:359–363. doi:10.1089/chi.2011.0500.pers

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van Geel M, Vedder P, Tanilon J (2014) Are overweight and obese youths more often bullied by their peers? A meta-analysis on the relation between weight status and bullying. Int J Obes 38:1263–1267. doi:10.1038/ijo.2014.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carels RA, Burmeister J, Oehlhof MW, Hinman N, LeRoy M, Bannon E, Ashrafloun L (2013) Internalized weight bias: ratings of the self, normal weight, and obese individuals and psychological maladjustment. J Behav Med 36:86–94. doi:10.1007/s10865-012-9402-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Innamorati M, Imperatori C, Lamis DA, Contardi A, Castelnuovo G, Tamburello S, Fabbricatore M (2016) Weight Bias Internalization Scale discriminates obese and overweight patients with different severity levels of depression: the Italian version of the WBIS. Curr Psychol. doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9406-6 (Advance online publication)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Brien KS, Latner JD, Puhl RM, Vartanian LR, Giles C, Griva K, Carter A (2016) The relationship between weight stigma and eating behavior is explained by weight bias internalization and psychological distress. Appetite 102:70–76. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Durso LE, Latner JD, Ciao AC (2016) Weight bias internalization in treatment-seeking overweight adults: psychometric validation and associations with self-esteem, body image, and mood symptoms. Eat Behav 21:104–108. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.01.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brettschneider AK, Schaffrath Rosario A, Wiegand S, Kollock M, Ellert U (2015) Development and validation of correction formulas for self-reported height and weight to estimate BMI in adolescents. Obes Facts 8:30–42. doi:10.1159/000375109

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cole TJ, Lobstein T (2012) Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut-offs for thinness, overweight and obesity. Pediatric Obesity 7:284–294. doi:10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00064.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van de Vrijver FJR, Hambleton RK (1996) Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. Eur Psychol 1:89–99. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guérin F, Marsh HW, Famose JP (2003) Construct validation of the Self-Description Questionnaire II with a French sample. Eur J Psychol Assess 19:142–150. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.19.2.142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marsh HW (1990) Self-Description Questionnaire-II: manual and research monograph. Psychological Corp, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  20. Savard J, Laberge B, Gauthier JG, Ivers H, Bergeron MG (1998) Evaluating anxiety and depression in HIV-infected patients. J Pers Assess 71:349–367. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7103_5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maïano C, Morin AJS, Monthuy-Blanc J, Garbarino J-M (2010) Construct validity of the Fear of Negative Appearance Evaluation Scale in a French adolescent’s community sample. Eur J Psychol Assess 26:19–27. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lundgren JD, Anderson DA, Thompson JK (2004) Fear of negative appearance evaluation: development and evaluation of a new construct for risk factor work in the field of eating disorders. Eat Behav 5:75–84. doi:10.1016/S1471-0153(03)00055-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maïano C, Morin AJS, Lanfranchi M-C, Therme P (2013) The eating attitudes test-26 revisited using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). J Abnorm Child Psychol 41:775–788. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9718-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Garner DM, Olmstead MP, Bohr Y, Garfinkel PE (1982) The eating attitude test: psychometric features and correlates. Psychol Med 12:871–878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leichner P, Steiger H, Puentes-Neuman G, Perreault M, Gottheil N (1994) Validation d’une échelle d’attitudes alimentaires auprès d’une population québécoise francophone. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie 39:49–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Marsh HW, Hau K-T, Grayson D (2005) Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. In: Maydeu-Olivares A, McArdle J (eds) Contemporary psychometrics. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 275–340

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yu CY (2002) Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. University of California, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lai K, Green SB (2016) The problem with having two watches: assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivar Behav Res. doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306 (Advance online publication)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McDonald RP (1970) Theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis, canonical factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol 23:1–21. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1970.tb00432.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Morin AJS, Marsh HW, Nagengast B (2013) Exploratory structural equation modeling. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO (eds) Structural equation modeling: a second course, 2nd edn. Information Age, Charlotte, pp 395–438

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen FF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement. Struct Equ Model 14:464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model 9:233–255. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Morin AJS, Marsh HW (2015) Disentangling shape from level effects in person-centered analyses: an illustration based on university teacher multidimensional profiles of effectiveness. Struct Equ Model 22:33–59. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.919825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Skrondal A, Laake P (2001) Regression among factor scores. Psychometrika 66:563–576. doi:10.1007/BF02296196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide 7th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles

  38. Muthén BO (1998–2004) Mplus technical appendices. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles

  39. Finney SJ, DiStefano C (2013) Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO (eds) Structural equation modeling: a second course. 2nd edn. IAP, Greenwich, pp 439–492

    Google Scholar 

  40. Asparouhov T, Muthén BO (2010) Weighted least square estimation with missing data. http://www.statmodel.com/download/GstrucMissingRevision.pdf. Accessed 6 May 2016

  41. Maydeu-Olivares A, Joe H (2014) Assessing approximate fit in categorical data analysis. Multivar Behav Res 49:305–328. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.911075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Monroe S, Cai L (2015) Evaluating structural equation models for categorical outcomes: a new test statistic and a practical challenge of interpretation. Multivar Behav Res 50:569–583. doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1032398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Carels RA, Wott CB, Young KM, Gumble A, Koball A, Oehlhof MW (2010) Implicit, explicit, and internalized weight bias and psychosocial maladjustment among treatment-seeking adults. Eat Behav 11:180–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Morrison TG, Roddy S, Ryan TA (2009) Methods for measuring attitudes about obese people. In: Allison DB, Baskin ML (eds) Handbook of assessment methods for eating behaviors and weight-related problems: measures, theory, and research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 79–113

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data collection was supported in part by a Grant from the Public Health Agency of Canada (6262-05-2012/0381194) awarded to the Association pour la santé publique du Québec. Preparation of this article was also supported in part by grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430-2012-0091, 435-2014-0909) and the Australian Research Council (DP140101559) awarded to the first and last authors.

ASPQ Team: Chantal Bayard, Émilie Dansereau-Trahan, Lucie Granger, Amandine Vallerian.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cyberpsychology Laboratory, Département de Psychoéducation et de Psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais (UQO), Gatineau, Canada

    Christophe Maïano & Annie Aimé

  2. Département de Psychoéducation et de Psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais (UQO), Saint-Jérôme, Canada

    Christophe Maïano, Annie Aimé & Geneviève Lepage

  3. Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada

    Alexandre J. S. Morin

Authors
  1. Christophe Maïano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annie Aimé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Geneviève Lepage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexandre J. S. Morin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

ASPQ Team

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Maïano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants complied with the ethical standards of the institutional or national research committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Additional information

The members of the ASPQ Team are listed in acknowledgement.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 English and French back-translated items from the WSSQ
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maïano, C., Aimé, A., Lepage, G. et al. Psychometric properties of the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) among a sample of overweight/obese French-speaking adolescents. Eat Weight Disord 24, 575–583 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-017-0382-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-017-0382-0

Keywords