Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Beta-lactam Allergy Review: Implications for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

  • Antimicrobial Stewardship (M Stevens, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

Beta-lactam allergies, and specifically penicillin allergies, result in receipt of therapy that is not considered first line in many instances. Being labeled as allergic many times comes via subjective history from the patient. Carrying this label can cause a patient to receive broad-spectrum therapy with increased side effects and resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship programs can play a role in allergy evaluation and intervention based on resources. This review provides an update on beta-lactam allergies and emphasizes incorporation of evaluating these patients as a core tenant of antimicrobial stewardship.

Recent findings

Many patients with a listed beta-lactam allergy are not truly allergic and can have the allergy removed with proper evaluation. Patients who have low-risk histories that are unlikely to be IgE mediated can safely be re-challenged. High-risk patients or those with an unknown history can be desensitized or skin tested (if allergic to penicillin). All strategies should result in proper labeling or de-labeling in the electronic health record. Antimicrobial stewardship programs are recommended to be involved in allergy assessments to create testing and treatment strategies.

Summary

Deciding whether an allergic patient is a candidate for re-challenge or graded-challenge, penicillin skin testing, or desensitization is paramount to antimicrobial stewardship programs in conjunction with an allergist, if available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Solensky R, Khan DA, Bernstein IL, Oppenheimer J, Tilles S, Dowling PJ, et al. Drug allergy: an updated practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;105:259–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bland CM, Bookstaver PB, Griffith NC, Heil EL, Jones BM, Justo JA, et al. A practical guide for pharmacists to successfully implement penicillin allergy skin testing. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019;76(3):136–47 This article offers practical guidance on multiple ways to implement penicillin skin testing in the healthcare setting depending on resources available.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. King EA, Challa S, Curtin P, Bielory L. Penicillin skin testing in hospitalized patients with β-lactam allergies: effect on antibiotic selection and cost. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016;117:67–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Unger NR, Gauthier TP, Cheung LW. Penicillin skin testing: potential implications for antimicrobial stewardship. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33:867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. •• Shenoy ES, Macy E, Rowe T, Blumenthal KG. Evaluation and management of penicillin allergy: a review. JAMA. 2019;321(2):188–99 This study provides risk stratification for patients with a listed penicillin allergy and how to approach evaluation and treatment.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Albin S, Agarwal S. Prevalence and characteristics of reported penicillin allergy in an urban outpatient adult population. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2014;35:489–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Picard M, Begin P, Bouchard H, Cloutier J, Lacombe-Barrios J, Paradis J, et al. Treatment of patients with a history of penicillin allergy in a large tertiary-care academic hospital. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013;1:252–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gell PGH, Coombs RA. The classification of allergic reactions underlying disease. Oxford: Blackwell; 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Riedl MA, Casillas AM. Adverse drug reactions: types and treatment options. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68(9):1781–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sogn DD, Evans R, Shepherd GM, Casale TB, Condemi J, Greenberger PA. Results of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases collaborative clinical trial to test the predictive value of skin testing with major and minor penicillin derivatives in hospitalized adults. Ann Intern Med. 1992;152:1025–32 IIa.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blanca M, Torres MJ, Garcia JJ, et al. Natural evolution of skin test sensitivity in patients allergic to beta-lactam antibiotics. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103:918–24 III.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoetzenecker W, Nageli M, Mehra ET, Jensen AN, Saulite I, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, et al. Adverse cutaneous drug eruptions: current understanding. Semin Immunopathol. 2016;38(1):75–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sivagnanam S, Deleu D. Red man syndrome. Crit Care. 2003;7(2):119–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Campbell RL, Li JTC, Nicklas RA, Sadosty AT, Members of the Joint Task Force. Practice Parameter/Workgroup. Emergency department diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis: a practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014;113(6):599–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Executive summary of disease management of drug hypersensitivity: a practice parameter. Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999;83:665–700.

  16. Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation. Approved: new antimicrobial stewardship standard. Jt Comm Perspect. 2016;36(7):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM, MacDougall C, Schuetz AN, Septimus EJ, et al. Implementing an antibiotic stewardship program: guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(10):e51–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Trubiano JA, Beekmann SE, Worth LJ, et al. Improving antimicrobial stewardship by antibiotic allergy delabeling: evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practices throughout the emerging infections network. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016;(3):ofw153 eCollection 2016 Sep.

  19. Trubiano JA, Thursky KA, Stewardson AJ, Urbancic K, Worth LJ, Jackson C, et al. Impact of an integrated antibiotic allergy testing program on antimicrobial stewardship: a multicenter evaluation. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(1):166–74 This study describes an integrated program focused on de-labeling antibiotic allergies, while promoting improving antibiotic usage from incorporation into antimicrobial stewardship.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramsey A, Staicu ML. Use of a penicillin allergy screening algorithm and penicillin skin testing for transitioning hospitalized patients to first-line antibiotic therapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(4):1349–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones BM, Bland CM. Penicillin skin testing as an antimicrobial stewardship initiative. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017;74(4):232–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gugkaeva Z, Crago JS, Yasnogorodsky M. Next step in antibiotic stewardship: pharmacist-provided penicillin allergy testing. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017;42(4):509–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Staicu ML, Brundige ML, Ramsey A, Brown J, Yamshchikov A, Peterson DR, et al. Implementation of a penicillin allergy screening tool to optimize aztreonam use. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016;73(5):298–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen JR, Tarver SA, Alvarez KS, Wei W, Khan DA. Improving aztreonam stewardship and cost through a penicillin allergy testing clinical guideline. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018;5(6):ofy106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Caplinger C, Smith G, Remington R, Madaras-Kelly K. Evaluation of a computerized decision support intervention to decrease use of anti-pseudomonal carbapenems in penicillin allergic patients. Antibiotics (Basel). 2016;5(1):E7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Staicu ML, Holly AM, Conn KM, Ramsey A. The use of telemedicine for penicillin allergy skin testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(6):2033–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McDanel JS, Perencevich EN, Diekema DJ, Herwaldt LA, Smith TC, Chrischilles EA, et al. Comparative effectiveness of beta-lactams versus vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections among 122 hospitals. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(3):361–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Phan A, Allen B, Epps K, Alikhil M, Kamataris K, Tucker C. Initiative to reduce aztreonam use in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy: Effects on clinical outcomes and antibiotic prescribing patterns. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018;75(17 Supplement 3):S58–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chiriac AM, Banerji A, Gruchalla RS, Thong BYH, Wickner P, Mertes PM, et al. Controversies in drug allergy: drug allergy pathways. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(1):46–60.e4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Torda A, Chan V. Antibiotic allergy labels-the impact of taking a clinical history. Int J Clin Pract. 2018;72:e13058.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Romano A, Valluzzi RL, Caruso C, Maggioletti M, Quaratino D, Gaeta F. Cross-reactivity and tolerability of cephalosporins in patients with IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to penicillins. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(5):1662–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Romano A, Viola M, Guéant-Rodriguez RM, Gaeta F, Valluzzi R, Guéant JL. Brief communication: tolerability of meropenem in patients with IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to penicillins. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(4):266–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Romano A, Viola M, Guéant-Rodriguez RM, Gaeta F, Pettinato R, Guéant JL. Imipenem in patients with immediate hypersensitivity to penicillins. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(26):2835–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, Folwer VG, Tleyjeh IM, Rybak MJ, et al. Infective endocarditis in adults: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132(15):1435–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Workowski KA, Bolan GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015;64(RR-03):1–137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tunkel AR, Hasbun R, Bhimraj A, Byers K, Kaplan SL, Scheld WM, et al. 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America’s Clinical Practice Guidelines for Healthcare-Associated Ventriculitis and Meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(6):701–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas K, Muscedere J, Sweeney DA, Palmer LB, et al. Management of adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(5):e61–e111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Mattingly TJ, Fulton A, Lumish RA, Williams AMC, Yoon S, Yuen M, et al. The cost of self-reported penicillin allergy: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6:1649–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Dijk SM, Gardarsdottir H, Wassenbery MWM, Oosterheert JJ, de Groot MCH, Rockmann H, et al. The High Impact of Penicillin Allergy Registration in Hospitalized Patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4:926–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sousa-Pinto B, Cardoso-Fernandes Á, Araújo L, Fonseca JA, Freitas A, Delgado L. Clinical and economic burden of hospitalizations with registration of penicillin allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;120:190–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Macy E, Vyles D. Who needs penicillin allergy testing? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;121:523–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Trubiano JA, Smibert O, Douglas A, Devhand M, Lambros B, Holmes NE, et al. The safety and efficacy of an oral penicillin challenge program in cancer patients: a multicenter pilot study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018;5(12):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Iammatteo M, Alvarez Arangeo S, Ferastraoaru D, Akbar N, Lee AY, Cohen HW, et al. Safety and outcomes of oral graded challenges to amoxicillin without prior skin testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(1):236–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Legendre DP, Muzny CA, Marshall GD, Swialto E. Antibiotic hypersensitivity reactions and approaches to desensitization. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(8):1140–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sacco KA, Cochran BP, Epps K, Parkulo M, Gonzalez-Estrada A. Inpatient B-lactam test-dose protocol and antimicrobial stewardship in patients with a history of penicillin allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;122:184–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sacco KA, Bates A, Brigham TJ, Inam JS, Burton MC. Clinical outcomes following inpatient penicillin allergy testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy. 2017;72(9):1288–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Confino-Cohen R, Rosman Y, Meir-Shafrir K, Stauber T, Lachover-Roth I, Hershko A, et al. Oral challenge without skin testing safely excludes clinically significant delayed-onset penicillin hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5:669–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jones B, Crosby J, Bland C. Use of penicillin skin testing as an antimicrobial stewardship initiative: clinical and economic evaluation at a community health system. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(Suppl 1):S491–2.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Estep PM, Fierreira JA, Dupree LH, Aldridge PJ, Jankowski CA. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016;73(5 Suppl 1):S8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines: Syphilis. https://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/syphilis.htm. Reviewed 2015.

  51. Wendell GD, Stark BJ, Jamison RB, Molina RD, Sullivan TJ. Penicillin allergy and desensitization in serious infections during pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:1229–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Magpantay G, Cardile AP, Madar CS, Hsue G, Belnap C. Antibiotic desensitization therapy in secondary syphilis and Listeria infection: case reports and review on desensitization therapy. Hawaii Med J. 2011;70(12):266–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Warrington RJ, Lee KR, McPhillips S. The value of skin testing for penicillin allergy in an inpatient population: analysis of the subsequent patient management. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2000;21:297–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rimawi RH, Shah KB, Cook PP. Risk of redocumenting penicillin allergy in a cohort of patients with negative penicillin skin tests. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(11):615–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Blumenthal KG, Shenoy ES, Hurwitz S, Varughese CA, Hooper DC, Banerji A. Effect of a drug allergy educational program and antibiotic prescribing guideline on inpatient clinical providers’ antibiotic prescribing knowledge. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014;2(4):407–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce M. Jones Pharm.D., BCPS.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

B.J. and C.B. have received research funding from ALK-Abello and have both served as consultants for ALK-Abello. C.M. declares she has no conflict of interest S.M. declares that she has no conflict of interest. E.W. declares that she has no conflict of interest. C.J. declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Antimicrobial Stewardship

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, B.M., Jozefczyk, C., Maguire, C. et al. Beta-lactam Allergy Review: Implications for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis 11, 103–114 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-019-00186-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-019-00186-5

Keywords

Navigation