Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation of hepatic and abdominal tumors not eligible for surgery or thermal ablation: a western report on safety and efficacy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To report our first results on sixteen patients affected by liver and abdominal malignant tumors, unfit for surgery or thermal ablation, treated with US-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE).

Methods

From June 2014 to December 2016, all patients meeting the inclusion criteria (malignant hepatic or abdominal tumors not eligible for resection or thermal ablation) and not meeting the exclusion criteria (heart arrhythmia, pro-hemorrhagic hematological alterations, tumor size > 8 cm, presence of a biliary metallic stent) referred to our institutions were prospectively enrolled to undergo percutaneous US-guided irreversible electroporation (IRE). Sixteen patients (age range 59–68 years, mean 63; 7 females) with 18 tumors (diameter range 1.3–7.5 cm) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Data concerning efficacy (tested by a 1-week CEUS and a 4-week enhanced CT and/or enhanced MRI) and safety were recorded during a 18-month follow up.

Results

All patients completed a 35–50-min procedure without complications. One patient with 6 cm Klatskin tumor also underwent a second session for 1 month. A 1-week CEUS and a 4-week e-CT and/or e-MRI arterial phase contrast enhancement analysis showed an overall reduction of arterial flow with confirmation of unenhanced lesions for seven nodules. After 1–18 months of follow up, no major complications were recorded and no tumor-related death occurred. The lesions of two patients disappeared 3 and 6 months after their treatment, respectively.

Conclusions

IRE is a promising ablation modality in the treatment of malignant hepatic and abdominal tumors unsuitable for resection or thermal ablation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Narayanan G, Froud T, Suthar R, Barbery K (2013) Irreversible electroporation of hepatic malignancy. Semin Interv Radiol 30:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1333655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH (1982) Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J 1:841–845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Okino M, Mohri H (1987) Effects of a high-voltage electrical impulse and an anticancer drug on in vivo growing tumors. Jpn J Cancer Res 78:1319–1321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davalos RV, Mir IL, Rubinsky B (2005) Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation. Ann Biomed Eng 33:223–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee EW, Chen C, Prieto VE, Dry SM, Loh CT, Kee ST (2010) Advanced hepatic ablation technique for creating complete cell death: irreversible electroporation. Radiology 255:426–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomson KR, Cheung W, Ellis SJ et al (2011) Investigation of the safety of irreversible electroporation in humans. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:611–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubinsky B, Onik G, Mikus P (2007) Irreversible electroporation: a new ablation modality—clinical implications. Technol Cancer Res Treat 6:37–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dollinger M et al (2015) Adverse effects of irreversible electroporation of malignant liver tumors under CT fluoroscopic guidance: a single-center experience. Diagn Interv Radiol 21(6):471–475. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2015.14442

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Niessen C et al (2016) Percutaneous ablation of hepatic tumors using irreversible electroporation: a prospective safety and midterm efficacy study in 34 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 27(4):480–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.025 (Epub 2016 Feb 26)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Distelmaier M et al (2017) Midterm safety and efficacy of irreversible electroporation of malignant liver tumors located close to major portal or hepatic veins. Radiology 285(3):1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161561 (Epub 2017 Aug 11)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lencioni R, Llovet JM (2010) Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 30:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1247132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lyu T, Wang X, Su Z, Shangguan J, Sun C et al (2017) Irreversible electroporation in primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies: a review. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e6386. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sugimoto K, Moriyasu F, Kobayashi Y, Saito K, Takeuchi H et al (2015) Irreversible electroporation for nonthermal tumor ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: initial clinical experience in Japan. Jpn J Radiol 33:424–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0442-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng RG, Bhattacharya R, Yeh MM, Padia SA (2015) Irreversible electroporation can effectively ablate hepatocellular carcinoma to complete pathologic necrosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 26:1184–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.05.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ball C, Thomson KR, Kavnoudias H (2010) Irreversible electroporation: a new challenge in “out of operating theater” anesthesia. Anesth Analg 110:1305–1309. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d27b30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Niessen C, Igl J, Pregler B, Beyer L, Noeva E et al (2015) Factors associated with short-term local recurrence of liver cancer after percutaneous ablation using irreversible electroporation: a prospective single-center study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 26:694–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Giorgio A, Tarantino L, de Stefano G, Perrotta A, Aloisio V, del Viscovo L et al (2000) Ultrasound-guided percutaneous ethanol injection under general anesthesia for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis: long-term results in 268 patients. Eur J Ultrasound 12:145–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Giorgio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

The institutional review board approved the study and all patients gave their informed written consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giorgio, A., Amendola, F., Calvanese, A. et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation of hepatic and abdominal tumors not eligible for surgery or thermal ablation: a western report on safety and efficacy. J Ultrasound 22, 53–58 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-019-00372-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-019-00372-7

Keywords

Navigation