Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation on surface integrity and fatigue performance in abrasive waterjet peening

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abrasive waterjet peening is a promising method for surface strengthening and anti-fatigue processing, which has the advantages such as cleanness, high efficiency and low thermal effect. The surface integrity and fatigue performance of the specimens processed by abrasive waterjet peening are still lack of attention to be paid. In this paper, a numerical model was utilized to study the residual stress distribution and the surface roughness of the Ti–6Al–4V specimen surface in abrasive waterjet peening. The validity of the model were then verified by experiments. Moreover, the fatigue performance of the abrasive waterjet peened specimen were investigated numerically, and the fatigue life tests were also conducted under various loading conditions. The effects of different parameters on the surface integrity and the fatigue property were analyzed. The results indicates that higher residual stress can be obtained by implementing high particle velocity and large particle diameter. The fatigue life of the specimen will be decreased when using larger abrasive particles due to the deteriorated surface roughness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Code availability

The software used in the present study is authorized.

References

  1. Sadasivam B, Hizal A, Arola D (2009) Abrasive waterjet peening with elastic prestress: a parametric evaluation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu M, Zheng Q, Wang X, Xu C (2022) Characterization of distribution of residual stress in shot-peened layer of nickel-based single crystal superalloy DD6 by nanoindentation technique. Mech Mater 164:104143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.104143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang T, Zhou W, Tang J, Zhao X, Zhao J, Liu H (2022) Constitutive modelling of AISI 9310 alloy steel and numerical calculation of residual stress after shot peening. Int J Impact Eng 166:104235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frija M, Hassine T, Fathallah R, Bouraoui C, Dogui A (2006) Finite element modelling of shot peening process: prediction of the compressive residual stresses, the plastic deformations and the surface integrity. Mater Sci Eng A 426:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miao HY, Larose S, Perron C, Lévesque M (2009) On the potential applications of a 3D random finite element model for the simulation of shot peening. Adv Eng Softw 40:1023–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.03.013

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong X, Zhang H, Duan X (2010) Finite element simulation of residual stress field with water jet peening strengthening. Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/J Mech Eng 46:189–194. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2010.18.189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsu CY, Liang CC, Teng TL, Nguyen AT (2013) A numerical study on high-speed water jet impact. Ocean Eng 72:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cho JR (2015) Simulation of the repeated waterdrop impact onto the AL6061-T6. J Mech Sci Technol 29:3679–3683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0812-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He Z, Cui B, Zhao S, Liu Z, Yu J, Li C, Yu H, Chen L (2021) Numerical simulation of surface topography and residual stress after abrasive water jet sequential peening. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 235:777–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420720978513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. He Z, Zhao S, Fu T, Chen L, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Wang P (2018) Experimental and numerical analysis of water jet peening on 6061 aluminum alloy. J Press Vessel Technol Trans ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang J, Yao C, Tan L, Cui M, Lin Z, Han W, Min X (2021) Shot peening parameters optimization based on residual stress-induced deformation of large fan blades. Thin-Walled Struct 161:107467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ongtrakulkij G, Khantachawana A, Kajornchaiyakul J, Kondoh K (2022) Effects of the secondary shot in the double shot peening process on the residual compressive stress distribution of Ti–6Al–4V. Heliyon 8:e08758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohta T, Sato Y (2022) Effect of saturation peening on shape and residual stress distribution after peen forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119:4659–4675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08473-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu J, Liu H, Wei P, Lin Q, Zhou S (2020) Effect of shot peening coverage on residual stress and surface roughness of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel. Int J Mech Sci 183:105785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghanbari S, Bahr DF (2020) Predictions of decreased surface roughness after shot peening using controlled media dimensions. J Mater Sci Technol 58:120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.03.075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bao L, Li K, Zheng J, Zhang Y, Zhan K, Yang Z, Zhao B, Ji V (2022) Surface characteristics and stress corrosion behavior of AA 7075–T6 aluminum alloys after different shot peening processes. Surf Coat Technol 440:128481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu YG, Li MQ, Liu HJ (2017) Nanostructure and surface roughness in the processed surface layer of Ti–6Al–4V via shot peening. Mater Charact 123:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2016.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qin Z, Li B, Zhang H, Youani Andre Wilfried T, Gao T, Xue H (2022) Effects of shot peening with different coverage on surface integrity and fatigue crack growth properties of 7B50-T7751 aluminum alloy. Eng Fail Anal 133:106010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.106010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Soyama H, Chighizola CR, Hill MR (2021) Effect of compressive residual stress introduced by cavitation peening and shot peening on the improvement of fatigue strength of stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 288:116877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Y, Zhang Y, Song G, Niu W, Xu Z, Huang C (2020) Effect of shot peening on fatigue crack propagation of Ti6Al4V. Mater Today Commun 25:101430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seddik R, Bahloul A, Atig A, Fathallah R (2017) A simple methodology to optimize shot-peening process parameters using finite element simulations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:2345–2361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9532-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ElTobgy MS, Ng E, Elbestawi MA (2005) Finite element modeling of erosive wear. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1337–1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hlaváč LM (2009) Investigation of the abrasive water jet trajectory curvature inside the kerf. J Mater Process Technol 209:4154–4161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arola DD, Mccain ML (2015) Abrasive waterjet peening: A new method of surface preparation for metal orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 53:536–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taro M, Chaise T, Nélias D (2015) A methodology to predict the roughness of shot peened surfaces. J Mater Process Technol 217:65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Arola D, Williams CL (2002) Estimating the fatigue stress concentration factor of machined surfaces. Int J Fatigue 24:923–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00012-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020ME154).

Funding

This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020ME154).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255000, China

    Zhe Lv, Rongguo Hou, Rui Wang, Yulong Zhang & Miaomiao Zhang

Authors
  1. Zhe Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rongguo Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yulong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Miaomiao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZL completed the main work of writing, simulation and experimental works; RH conducted parts of the modeling and analyzing; RW and YZ conducted parts of the experimental works; MZ organized the data of simulations and experiments.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhe Lv.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Marcelo Areias Trindade.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, Z., Hou, R., Wang, R. et al. Investigation on surface integrity and fatigue performance in abrasive waterjet peening. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 44, 520 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03820-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03820-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation