Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Bioactive glass ceramic can improve the bond strength of sealant/enamel?

  • Original Scientific Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Evaluate the influence of enamel pre-treatment using Biosilicate, associated or not to other treatments; on the bond strength (BS) of pit-and-fissure sealant, with or without saliva contamination.

Methods

Ninety slices (4 mm × 4 mm) were obtained from 30 bovine incisors. Each slice was embedded in acrylic resin with their buccal surface exposed and polished to obtain a flat enamel surface. Half of them were contaminated with human saliva. All specimens were randomly divided into five groups (n = 9) according to the surface pre-treatment tested: acid etching (AE); AE + Biosilicate (B); AE + B + total-etch adhesive (Ad); Biosilicate; control (no treatment). Then, a 1 mm layer of sealant (Clinpro XT Varnish, 3M ESPE) was applied; and to provide support, a composite resin (Opallis, FGM) block was built up over it. Samples were thermocycled (500 cycles/5–55 °C) and sectioned obtaining sticks (1 × 1 × 10 mm) for microtensile BS testing (0.5 mm/min). Data were analysed with two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni test, p < 0.05. Failure patterns were evaluated using a stereomicroscope.

Results

There was no difference among contaminated and non-contaminated groups, and between non-contaminated groups (p > 0.05). When contaminated, AE + B + Ad Group showed the highest BS values, differing (p < 0.05) from B Group and Control; similar between them (p > 0.05). Cohesive fractures were found in AE + B + Ad Group, submitted or not to contamination.

Conclusions

Since a surface pre-treatment was used, whether Biosilicate was applied or not, the sealant/enamel BS was the same in saliva-contaminated or non-contaminated enamel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on restorative dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38:250–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashwin R, Arathi R. Comparative evaluation for microleakage between Fuji-VII glass ionomer cement and light-cured unfilled resin: a combined in vivo in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007;25(2):86–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Askarizadeh N, Norouzi N, Nemati S. The effect of bonding agents on the microleakage of sealant following contamination with saliva. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008;26(2):64–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barroso JM, Torres CP, Lessa FC, et al. Shear bond strength of pit-and-fissure sealants to saliva-contaminated and noncontaminated enamel. J Dent Child (Chic). 2005;72(3):95–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp J, Caufield PW, Crall JJ, et al. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(3):257–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beslot-Neveu A, Courson F, Ruse ND. Physico-chemical approach to pit and fissure sealant infiltration and spreading mechanisms. Pediatr Dent. 2012;34(3):57–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borem LM, Feigal RJ. Reducing microleakage of sealants under salivary contamination: digital-image analysis evaluation. Quintessence Int. 1994;25(4):283–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botton G, Morgental CS, Scherer MM, et al. Are self-etch adhesive systems effective in the retention of occlusal sealants? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26(6):402–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chinelatti MA, Tirapelli C, Corona SAM, et al. Effect of a bioactive glass ceramic on the control of enamel and dentin erosion lesions. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(4):489–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Condò R, Cioffi A, Riccio A, et al. Sealants in dentistry: a systematic review of the literature. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2014;6(3):67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correr GM, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Alonso RC, et al. Effect of saliva contamination and re-etching time on the shear bond strength of a pit and fissure sealant. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004;12(3):200–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crovace MC, Souza MT, Chinaglia CR, Peitl O, Zanotto ED. Biosilicate-A multipurpose, highly bioactive glass-ceramic. In vitro, in vivo and clinical trials. J Non Cryst Solids. 2016;432:90–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis RW, Latta MA, Westerman GH. Effect of air abrasion and acid etching on sealant retention: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21(6):316–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eskandarian T, Baghi S, Alipoor A. Comparison of clinical success of applying a kind of fissure sealant on the lower permanent molar teeth in dry and wet conditions. J Dent (Shiraz). 2015;16(3):162–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone JD. Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999;27(1):31–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hench LL. The story of Bioglass. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006;17(11):967–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hench LL. An Introduction to Bioceramics. 2nd ed. London: Imperial College Press; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jurić H. Current possibil ities in occlusal caries management. Acta Med Acad. 2013;42(2):216–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khoroushi M, Karimi B. Saliva contaminated and re-etched all-in-one adhesive: influence on bond strength. J Dent Res. 2006;3(1):10–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd EA. Microleakage: a review. J Dent. 1976;4(5):199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Hong S, Choi Y, Park S. The effect of saliva decontamination procedures on dentin bond strength after universal adhesive curing. Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40(4):299–305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Manhart J, Huth KC, Chen HY, Hickel R. Influence of the pretreatment of occlusal pits and fissures on the retention of a fissure sealant. Am J Dent. 2004;17(1):12–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moura J, Teixeira LN, Ravagnani C, et al. In vitro osteogenesis on a highly bioactive glass-ceramic (Biosilicate). J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;82(3):545–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naaman R, El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi N. The use of pit and fissure sealants—a literature review. Dent J. 2017;5(4):1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayana SS, Deepa VK, Ahamed S, et al. Remineralization efficiency of bioactive glass on artificially induced carious lesion an in-vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32(1):19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pardi A, Sindhoreti MA, Pereira AC, Ambrosano GM, Meneghim C. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of different materials used as pit and fissure sealants. Braz Dent J. 2006;17(1):49–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park JW, Lee KC. The influence of salivary contamination on shear bond strength of dentin adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 2004;29(4):437–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, et al. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1(4):299–309.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peitl O, Zanotto ED, Hench LL. Highly bioactive P2O5–Na2O–CaO-SiO2 glass-ceramics. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2001;292:115–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinar A, Sepet E, Aren G, et al. Clinical performance of sealants with and without primer and bond. Quintessence Int. 2005;36(5):355–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pires-de-Souza FCP, Marco FF, Casemiro LA, Panzeri H. Desensitizing bioactive agents improves bond strength of indirect resin-cemented restorations: preliminary results. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007;15(2):120–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pires-de-Souza FCP, Silveira RE, Abuna G, et al. Morphology of sealant/enamel interface after surface treatment with bioactive glass. Microsc Res Tech. 2015;78(12):1062–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad M, Mohamed S, Nayak K, Shetty SK, Talapaneni AK. Effect of moisture, saliva, and blood contamination on the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a conventional bonding system and self-etched bonding system. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014;5(1):123–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reis A, Loguercio AD. A 36-month clinical evaluation of ethanol/water and acetone-based etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent. 2009;34(4):384–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa CB, Cavalcanti AN, Fontes CM, Mathias P. Effect of salivary contamination at different steps of the bonding process on the microleakage around Class V restorations. Braz J Oral Sci. 2007;6(23):1445–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwendicke F, Jäger AM, Paris S, Hsu LY, Tu YK. Treating pit-and-fissure caries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2015;94(4):522–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scotti N, Cavalli G, Gagliani M, Breschi L. New adhesives and bonding techniques. Why and when? Int J Esthet Dent. 2017;12(4):524–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sen Tunc E, Bayrak S, Tuloglu N, Ertas E. Evaluation of microtensile bond strength of different fissure sealants to bovine enamel. Aust Dent J. 2012;57(1):79–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, et al. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017;8(1):1–17.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Taha AA, Patel MP, Hill RG, Fleming PS. The effect of bioactive glasses on enamel remineralization: a systematic review. J Dent. 2017;67:9–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tirapelli C, Panzeri H, Soares RG, Peitl O, Zanotto ED. A novel bioactive glass-ceramic for treating dentin hypersensitivity. Braz Oral Res. 2010;24(4):381–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tirapelli C, Panzeri H, Lara EHG, et al. The effect of a novel crystallised bioactive glass-ceramic powder on dentine hypersensitivity: a long-term clinical study. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(4):253–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend RD, Dunn WJ. The effect of saliva contamination enamel and dentine using a selfetching adhesive. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(7):895–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tulunoglu O, Bodur H, Uctasl M, Alacam A. The effect of bonding agents on the microleakage and bond strength of sealant in primary teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(5):436–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unal M, Hubbezoglu I, Zan R, Oznurhan F. The effect of Er: YAG laser and different surface conditioning procedures on microtensile bond strength of the fissure sealant containing amorphous calcium phosphate after artificial aging. Dent Mater J. 2014;33(1):21–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welbury R, Raadal M, Lygidakis N. EAPD guidelines for the use of pit and fissure sealants. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2004;5(3):179–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang SY, Piao YZ, Kim SM, et al. Acid neutralizing, mechanical and physical properties of pit and fissure sealants containing melt-derived 45S5 bioactive glass. Dent Mater. 2013;29(12):1228–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (FORP-USP), Av. Do Café, s/n, Bairro Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, CEP 14040-904, Brazil

    R. E. Silveira, R. G. Vivanco, R. C. de Morais, G. Da Col dos Santos Pinto & F. de C. P. Pires-de-Souza

Authors
  1. R. E. Silveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. G. Vivanco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. C. de Morais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Da Col dos Santos Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. de C. P. Pires-de-Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. de C. P. Pires-de-Souza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silveira, R.E., Vivanco, R.G., de Morais, R.C. et al. Bioactive glass ceramic can improve the bond strength of sealant/enamel?. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 20, 325–331 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-018-0409-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-018-0409-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation