Abstract
Arguably, the Gini index is the best known and the most widely applied inequality index in socioeconomics in particular, and across the sciences in general. On the other hand, far less known and less applied is the Bonferroni index. Addressed via Lorenz curves, the Gini index can be formulated as the average of two continuums of inequality indices that, respectively, stem from two sets of Lorenz-based distances: vertical and horizontal. These Gini-index formulations use one natural type of Lorenz-based distances. However, there is another natural type of Lorenz-based distances, and when using this type: (1) averaging the vertical continuum of inequality indices yields the known Bonferroni index; (2) averaging the horizontal continuum of inequality indices yields a new Bonferroni index. This paper explores comprehensively the two Bonferroni indices, and presents the many analogies between these indices and the Gini index. This paper also unifies the Bonferroni indices and the Gini index via two families of inequality induces: (1) a “vertical family” of which the known Bonferroni index and the Gini index are special cases; (2) a “horizontal family” of which the new Bonferroni index and the Gini index are special cases. These two families are shown to be counterparts of the Tsallis family of entropy measures, and the two Bonferroni indices are shown to be counterparts of the Shannon entropy. Written in an entirely self-contained manner, this paper is accessible also to audiences with no prior knowledge of inequality indices.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Here \(\mathcal {L}_{1}\) and \(\mathcal {L}_{2}\) are two Lorenz sets, \(I_{1}\) is the inequality-index value of \(\mathcal {L}_{1}\), and \(I_{2}\) is the inequality-index value of \(\mathcal {L}_{2}\).
Formulated alternatively, the digamma function is the logarithmic derivative of the gamma function: \(\Psi \left( t\right) =\frac{d}{dt}\ln \left[ \Gamma \left( t\right) \right] \).
The right-hand side of Eq. (43) manifests the asymptotic behavior of \( I_{n}\left( X\right) \) as \(n\rightarrow \infty \).
References
Arnold, B.C.: Pareto Distributions. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2015)
Barcena-Martin, E., Silber, J.: On the generalization and decomposition of the Bonferroni index. Soc. Choice Welf. 41(4), 763–787 (2013)
Bernasco, W., Steenbeek, W.: More places than crimes: Implications for evaluating the law of crime concentration at place. J. Quant. Criminol. 33(3), 451–467 (2017)
Betti, G., Lemmi, A. (eds.): Advances on income inequality and concentration measures. Routledge, Abingdon (2008)
Bonferroni, C.E.: Elementi di statistica generale. Libreria Seber (1930)
Chotikapanich, D. (ed.): Modeling income distributions and Lorenz curves, vol. 5. Springer, New York (2008)
Clauset, A., Shalizi, C.R., Newman, M.E.: Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51(4), 661–703 (2009)
Coulter, P.B.: Measuring inequality: A methodological handbook. Routledge, Abingdon (2018)
Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of information theory. Wiley, New York (2012)
Cowell, F.: Measuring inequality. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)
Eliazar, I.: From moving averages to anomalous diffusion: a Renyi-entropy approach. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 48(3), 03FT01 (2014)
Eliazar, I.: The sociogeometry of inequality: Part I. Phys. A 426, 93–115 (2015)
Eliazar, I.: The sociogeometry of inequality: Part II. Phys. A 426, 116–137 (2015)
Eliazar, I.: Harnessing inequality. Phys. Rep. 649, 1–29 (2016)
Eliazar, I.: Zipf law: an extreme perspective. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 49(15), 15LT01 (2016)
Eliazar, I.: Inequality spectra. Phys. A 469, 824–847 (2017)
Eliazar, I.: A tour of inequality. Ann. Phys. 389, 306–332 (2018)
Eliazar, I.: Average is over. Phys. A 492, 123–137 (2018)
Eliazar, I.: Power Laws: A statistical trek. Springer Complexity, New York (2020)
Eliazar, I.I., Cohen, M.H.: Power-law connections: From Zipf to Heaps and beyond. Ann. Phys. 332, 56–74 (2012)
Eliazar, I.I., Cohen, M.H.: Topography of chance. Phys. Rev. E 88(5), 052104 (2013)
Eliazar, I., Cohen, M.H.: Hierarchical socioeconomic fractality: The rich, the poor, and the middle-class. Phys. A 402, 30–40 (2014)
Eliazar, I.I., Sokolov, I.M.: Measuring statistical evenness: A panoramic overview. Phys. A 391(4), 1323–1353 (2012)
Gastwirth, J.L.: A general definition of the Lorenz curve. Econom. J. Econom. Soc., 1037–1039 (1971)
Gell-Mann, M., Tsallis, C. (eds.): Nonextensive entropy: interdisciplinary applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)
Gini, C.: Variabilita e mutabilita. In: Pizetti, E., Salvemini, T. (eds.) Memorie di metodologica statistica (Libreria Eredi Virgilio Veschi, Rome, 1955) (1912)
Gini, C.: Sulla misura della concentrazione e della variabilita dei caratteri. Atti del Reale Istituto veneto di scienze lettere ed arti 73, 1203–1248 (1914)
Gini, C.: Measurement of inequality of incomes. Econ. J. 31(121), 124–126 (1921)
Giorgi, G.M.: Gini coefficient. In: Atkinson, P.A., Cernat, A., Delamont, S., Sakshaug, J.W., Williams, R. (eds.) SAGE Research Methods Foundations (2019). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036
Giorgi, G.M.: Gini’s scientific work: an evergreen. Metron 63(3), 299–315 (2005)
Giorgi, G.M., Crescenzi, M.: A proposal of poverty measures based on the Bonferroni inequality index. Metron 59(3–4), 3–16 (2001)
Giorgi, G.M., Gigliarano, C.: The Gini concentration index: a review of the inference literature. J. Econ. Surv. 31(4), 1130–1148 (2017)
Giorgi, G.M., Gubbiotti, S.: Celebrating the memory of Corrado Gini: a personality out of the ordinary. Int. Stat. Rev. 85(2), 325–339 (2017)
Giorgi, G.M., Nadarajah, S.: Bonferroni and Gini indices for various parametric families of distributions. Metron 68(1), 23–46 (2010)
Glottometrics 5: The entire issue is on Zipf’s law (2002)
Hao, L., Naiman, D.Q.: Assessing inequality, vol. 166. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2010)
Hardy, M.: Pareto’s law. Math. Intell. 32(3), 38–43 (2010)
Hasisi, B., Perry, S., Ilan, Y., Wolfowicz, M.: Concentrated and close to home: the spatial clustering and distance decay of lone terrorist vehicular attacks. J. Quant. Criminol., 1–39 (2019)
Imedio-Olmedo, L.J., Parrado-Gallardo, E.M., Barcena-Martin, E.: The \(\beta \) Family of Inequality Measures. Working paper 289, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality (2013)
Imedio-Olmedo, L.J., Barcena-Martin, E., Parrado-Gallardo, E.M.: A class of Bonferroni inequality indices. J. Public Econ. Theory 13(1), 97–124 (2011)
Imedio-Olmedo, L.J., Parrado-Gallardo, E.M., Barcena-Martin, E.: Income inequality indices interpreted as measures of relative deprivation/satisfaction. Soc. Indic. Res. 109(3), 471–491 (2012)
Jaynes, E.T.: Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. 106(4), 620 (1957)
Lorenz, M.O.: Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publ. Am. Stat. Assoc. 9(70), 209–219 (1905)
Martinez-Mekler, G., Martinez, R.A., del Rio, M.B., Mansilla, R., Miramontes, P., Cocho, G.: Universality of rank-ordering distributions in the arts and sciences. PLoS One 4(3), e4791 (2009)
Mitzenmacher, M.: A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Math. 1(2), 226–251 (2004)
Newman, M.E.: Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp. Phys. 46(5), 323–351 (2005)
Nygard, F., Sandstrum, A.: Measuring income inequality. Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm (1981)
O’Hagan, S., Muelas, M.W., Day, P.J., Lundberg, E., Kell, D.B.: GeneGini: Assessment via the Gini coefficient of reference “housekeeping” genes and diverse human transporter expression profiles. Cell Syst. 6(2), 230–244 (2018)
Pareto, V.: Cours d’economie politique. Librairie Droz. Pareto, V. Manual of political economy: a critical and variorum edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014) (1896)
Reed, W.J.: Advances in distribution theory, order statistics, and inference. In: Balakrishnan, N., Castillo, E., Sarabia Alegria, J.M. (eds.), pp. 61–74 . Springer, New York (2007)
Reed, W.J., Hughes, B.D.: From gene families and genera to incomes and internet file sizes: Why power laws are so common in nature. Phys. Rev. E 66(6), 067103 (2002)
Reed, W.J., Jorgensen, M.: The double Pareto-lognormal distribution—a new parametric model for size distributions. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 33(8), 1733–1753 (2004)
Renyi, A.: On measures of entropy and information. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1: Contributions to the Theory of Statistics. The Regents of the University of California (1961)
Saichev, A.I., Malevergne, Y., Sornette, D.: Theory of Zipf’s law and beyond, vol. 632. Springer, New York (2009)
Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27(3), 379–423 (1948)
Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W.: The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois press, Urbana (1949)
Tarsitano, A.: Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty. In: Dagum, C., Zenga, M. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Income Distribution by Size: Generation, Distribution, Measuremente and Applications, held at the University of Pavia, Italy, September 28-30, pp. 228–242. Springer, New York (1989)
Tsallis, C.: Possible generalization of Boltzmann–Gibbs statistics. J. Stat. Phys. 52(1–2), 479–487 (1988)
Tsallis, C.: Introduction to nonextensive statistical mechanics: approaching a complex world. Springer, New York (2009)
Tu, J., Sui, H., Feng, W., Sun, K., Xu, C., Han, Q.: Detecting building facade damage from oblique aerial images using local symmetry feature and the GINI index. Remote Sens. Lett. 8(7), 676–685 (2017)
Yitzhaki, S.: More than a dozen alternative ways of spelling Gini. Res. Econ. Inequal. 8, 13–30 (1998)
Yitzhaki, S., Lambert, P.J.: The relationship between the absolute deviation from a quantile and Gini’s mean difference. Metron 71(2), 97–104 (2013)
Yitzhaki, S., Schechtman, E.: The Gini methodology: A primer on a statistical methodology, vol. 272. Springer, New York (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Preliminaries
-
A) Consider the general random variable \(\xi \), as described at the beginning of Sect. 2.1. In terms of its density function \(f_{\xi }\left( t\right) \), as well as in terms of its survival function \(\bar{F}_{\xi }\left( t\right) \) and distribution function \(F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \), the mean of the random variable is given by
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf {E}\left[ \xi \right]= & {} \int _{0}^{\infty }tf_{\xi }\left( t\right) dt \nonumber \\= & {} \int _{0}^{\infty }\bar{F}_{\xi }\left( t\right) dt=\int _{0}^{\infty }\left[ 1-F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \right] dt. \end{aligned}$$(51) -
B) Consider n IID copies \(\left\{ \xi _{1},\ldots ,\xi _{n}\right\} \) of the random variable \(\xi \). The distribution function of the maximum \(\xi _{1}\vee \cdots \vee \xi _{n}=\max \left\{ \xi _{1},\ldots ,\xi _{n}\right\} \) is given by
$$\begin{aligned} F_{\xi _{1}\vee \cdots \vee \xi _{n}}\left( t\right)= & {} \Pr \left( \xi _{1}\vee \cdots \vee \xi _{n}\le t\right) \nonumber \\= & {} \Pr \left( \xi _{1}\le t\right) \cdots \Pr \left( \xi _{n}\le t\right) =F_{\xi }\left( t\right) ^{n}. \end{aligned}$$(52)Differentiating Eq. (52) implies that the density function of the maximum \(\xi _{1}\vee \cdots \vee \xi _{n}\) is given by
$$\begin{aligned} f_{\xi _{1}\vee \cdots \vee \xi _{n}}\left( t\right) =nF_{\xi }\left( t\right) ^{n-1}f_{\xi }\left( t\right) . \end{aligned}$$(53)The survival function of the minimum \(\xi _{1}\wedge \cdots \wedge \xi _{n}=\min \left\{ \xi _{1},\ldots ,\xi _{n}\right\} \) is given by
$$\begin{aligned} \bar{F}_{\xi _{1}\wedge \cdots \wedge \xi _{n}}\left( t\right)= & {} \Pr \left( \xi _{1}\wedge \cdots \wedge \xi _{n}>t\right) \nonumber \\= & {} \Pr \left( \xi _{1}>t\right) \cdots \Pr \left( \xi _{n}>t\right) =\bar{F} _{\xi }\left( t\right) ^{n}. \end{aligned}$$(54)Differentiating Eq. (54) implies that the density function of the minimum \(\xi _{1}\wedge \cdots \wedge \xi _{n}\) is given by
$$\begin{aligned} f_{\xi _{1}\wedge \cdots \wedge \xi _{n}}\left( t\right) =n\bar{F}_{\xi }\left( t\right) ^{n-1}f_{\xi }\left( t\right) \text { .} \end{aligned}$$(55) -
C) Set the focus now on the minimum \(\xi _{1}\wedge \xi _{2}\). Conditioning implies that
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf {E}\left[ \xi _{1}\wedge \xi _{2}\right]= & {} \int _{0}^{\infty }\mathbf {E} \left[ \xi _{1}\wedge \xi _{2}{{\vert } }\xi _{2}=t\right] f_{\xi }\left( t\right) dt \nonumber \\= & {} \int _{0}^{\infty }\mathbf {E}\left[ \min \left\{ \xi _{1},t\right\} \right] f_{\xi }\left( t\right) dt=\int _{0}^{\infty }\mathbf {E}\left[ \min \left\{ \xi ,t\right\} \right] f_{\xi }\left( t\right) dt. \end{aligned}$$(56)From Eq. (56) we obtain that
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\mathbf {E}\left[ \xi _{1}\wedge \xi _{2}\right] }{\mathbf {E}\left[ \xi \right] }=\int _{0}^{\infty }\frac{\mathbf {E}\left[ \min \left\{ \xi ,t\right\} \right] }{\mathbf {E}\left[ \xi \right] }f_{\xi }\left( t\right) dt . \end{aligned}$$(57)Equations (51) and (54) imply that
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf {E}\left[ \xi _{1}\wedge \xi _{2}\right] =\int _{0}^{\infty }\bar{F} _{\xi _{1}\wedge \xi _{2}}\left( t\right) dt=\int _{0}^{\infty }\bar{F}_{\xi }\left( t\right) ^{2}dt. \end{aligned}$$(58)In turn, Eqs. (51) and (58) imply that
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf {E}\left[ \xi \right] -\mathbf {E}\left[ \xi _{1}\wedge \xi _{2}\right]= & {} \int _{0}^{\infty }\bar{F}_{\xi }\left( t\right) dt-\int _{0}^{\infty }\bar{F} _{\xi }\left( t\right) ^{2}dt \nonumber \\= & {} \int _{0}^{\infty }\left[ \bar{F}_{\xi }\left( t\right) -\bar{F}_{\xi }\left( t\right) ^{2}\right] dt=\int _{0}^{\infty }\bar{F}_{\xi }\left( t\right) \left[ 1-\bar{F}_{\xi }\left( t\right) \right] dt \nonumber \\= & {} \int _{0}^{\infty }\left[ 1-F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \right] F_{\xi }\left( t\right) dt. \end{aligned}$$(59)From Eq. (59) we obtain that
$$\begin{aligned} 1-\frac{\mathbf {E}\left[ \xi _{1}\wedge \xi _{2}\right] }{\mathbf {E}\left[ \xi \right] }=\frac{1}{\mathbf {E}\left[ \xi \right] }\int _{0}^{\infty }F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \left[ 1-F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \right] dt. \end{aligned}$$(60) -
D) Note that
$$\begin{aligned}&\int _{0}^{\infty }sf_{\xi }\left( s\right) \ln \left[ F_{\xi }\left( s\right) \right] ds \nonumber \\&\quad =\int _{0}^{\infty }\left( \int _{0}^{s}dt\right) \left\{ f_{\xi }\left( s\right) \ln \left[ F_{\xi }\left( s\right) \right] \right\} ds \nonumber \\&\quad =\int _{0}^{\infty }\left\{ \int _{t}^{\infty }f_{\xi }\left( s\right) \ln \left[ F_{\xi }\left( s\right) \right] ds\right\} dt. \end{aligned}$$(61)Integration-by-parts implies that
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{t}^{\infty }f_{\xi }\left( s\right) \ln \left[ F_{\xi }\left( s\right) \right] ds=-\left[ 1-F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \right] -F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \ln \left[ F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \right] . \end{aligned}$$(62)Integrating Eq. (62) over the non-negative half-line, and using Eq. (51), we have
$$\begin{aligned}&\int _{0}^{\infty }\left\{ \int _{t}^{\infty }f_{\xi }\left( s\right) \ln \left[ F_{\xi }\left( s\right) \right] ds\right\} dt \nonumber \\&\int _{0}^{\infty }\left\{ -\left[ 1-F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \right] -F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \ln \left[ F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \right] \right\} dx \nonumber \\&\quad =-\int _{0}^{\infty }\left[ 1-F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \right] dt-\int _{0}^{\infty }F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \ln \left[ F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \right] dt \nonumber \\&\quad =-\mathbf {E}\left[ \xi \right] -\int _{0}^{\infty }F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \ln \left[ F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \right] dt. \end{aligned}$$(63)Combined together, Eqs. (61) and (63) imply that
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{0}^{\infty }sf_{\xi }\left( s\right) \ln \left[ F_{\xi }\left( s\right) \right] ds=-\mathbf {E}\left[ \xi \right] -\int _{0}^{\infty }F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \ln \left[ F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \right] dt. \end{aligned}$$(64)In turn, we can re-write Eq. (64) as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} -\int _{0}^{\infty }sf_{\xi }\left( s\right) \ln \left[ F_{\xi }\left( s\right) \right] ds=\mathbf {E}\left[ \xi \right] -\int _{0}^{\infty }F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \ln \left[ 1/F_{\xi }\left( t\right) \right] dt. \end{aligned}$$(65)
1.2 Eqs. (12)–(15)
Equations (11) and (7) imply that
Equation (66) yields Eq. (12).
Using the change-of-variables \(u=F_{X}\left( t\right) \) and Eq. (3) we have
In turn, using Eq. (53) (for the random variable \(\xi =X\) and \(n=2\)) we have
Equations (67)–(68) imply that
Substituting Eq. (69) into Eq. (66) yields Eq. (15).
Equation (1) implies that
In turn, using Eq. (53) (for the random variable \(\xi =Y\) and \(n=2\)), and then the reciprocation \(Z=1/Y\), we have:
where \(Z_{1}\) and \(Z_{2}\) are IID copies of the random variable Z. Equation (67) and Eqs. (70)–(71), together with the fact that \( \mathbf {E}\left[ Z\right] =1/\mu \), imply that
In turn, Eqs. (66) and (72) imply that
Equations (73) and (57) (for \(\xi =Z\)) yield Eq. (14). Equations (73) and (60) (for \(\xi =Z\)) yield Eq. (13).
1.3 Eqs. (17)–(20)
Equations (16) and (8) imply that
Equation (74) yields Eq. (17).
Using the change-of-variables \(u=\bar{F}_{Y}\left( t\right) \) and Eq. (6) we have
In turn, using Eq. (55) (for the random variable \(\xi =Y\) and \(n=2\)) we have
Equations (75)–(76) imply that
Substituting Eq. (77) into Eq. (74) yields Eq. (20).
Equation (1) implies that
In turn, using Eq. (55) (for the random variable \(\xi =X\) and \(n=2\)) we have:
Equation (75) and Eqs. (78)–(79), together with the fact that \(\mathbf {E}\left[ X\right] =\mu \), imply that
In turn, Eqs. (74) and (80) imply that
Equations (81) and (57) (for \(\xi =X\)) yield Eq. (19). Equations (81) and (60) (for \(\xi =X\)) yield Eq. (18).
1.4 Eq. (21) and Eqs. (23)–(25)
Equation (7) implies the coincidence of Eq. (21):
Using the change-of-variables \(u=F_{X}\left( t\right) \) and Eq. (3) we have
Equations (22) and (83) yield Eq. (25).
Using Eq. (1) we have
The integral appearing on the bottom line of Eq. (84) is the conditional mean of the random variable X, given the information that \( X\le t\). Hence, Eq. (84) implies that
Substituting Eq. (85) into Eq. (83) yields
In turn, Eqs. (22) and (86) yield Eq. (24).
Note that
Using Eq. (1), and then Eq. (65) (for \(\xi =X\)), we have
Equation (83) and Eqs. (87)–(88) imply that
In turn, Eqs. (22) and (89) yield Eq. (23).
1.5 Eq. (26) and Eqs. (28)–(30)
Equation (8) implies the coincidence of Eq. (26):
Using the change-of-variables \(u=\bar{F}_{Y}\left( t\right) \) and Eq. (6) we have
Equations (27) and (91) yield Eq. (30).
Using Eq. (1) we have
The integral appearing on the bottom line of Eq. (92) is the conditional mean of the random variable 1/Y, given the information that \( Y>t\). Note that, as Y is an absolutely continuous random variable, the information \(Y>t\) is effectively identical to the information \(Y\ge t\). Hence, using the fact that \(Z=1/Y\) and \(\mathbf {E}\left[ Z\right] =1/\mu \), Eq. (92) implies that
Substituting Eq. (93) into Eq. (91), and using the change of variables \(s=1/t\) and the fact that \(Z=1/Y\), we have
In turn, Eqs. (27) and (94) yield Eq. (29).
Note that
Using Eq. (1), the change of variables \(s=1/x\), the fact that \(Z=1/Y\) and \(\mathbf {E}\left[ Z\right] =1/\mu \), and Eq. (65) (for \(\xi =Z\)), we have
Equation (91) and Eqs. (95)–(96) imply that
In turn, Eqs. (27) and (97) yield Eq. (28).
1.6 Eq. (32), Eq. (33), and Eq. (35)
For \(n=2\) note that
and
Summing Equations (98) and (99) up we have
Applying expectation to Eq. (100) implies that
and hence
Substituting Eq. (102) into Eq. (31) yields Eq. (32).
Using Eqs. (51) and (52) we have
In turn, using Equations (103) and (51) we have
Substituting Eq. (104) into Eq. (31) yields Eq. (33).
Equation (31) implies that
Using Eqs. (51) and (53) we have
Substituting Eq. (106) into Eq. (105) yields Eq. (35).
1.7 Eqs. (36)–(39)
Differentiating Eq. (3) with respect to the variable t implies that
Equations (107) and (1) imply that
Using Eqs. (51) and (53) (for \(\xi =X\)), then Eq. (108), and then the change-of-variables \(u=F_{X}\left( t\right) \), we have
and hence
Substituting Eq. (110) into Eq. (105) (for \(\xi =X\)) yields Eq. (36). Using the change-of-variables \(u=F_{X}\left( t\right) \) and Eq. (3), and then using Eq. (53) (for \(\xi =X\)), we have
Substituting Eq. (111) into Eq. (36) yields Eq. (38).
Differentiating Eq. (6) with respect to the variable t implies that
Equations (112) and (1) imply that
As \(Z=1/Y\), note that \(Z_{1}\vee \cdots \vee Z_{n}=1/\left( Y_{1}\wedge \cdots \wedge Y_{n}\right) \). Consequently, using Eqs. (51) and (55) (for \(\xi =Y\)), then Eq. (113) and the fact that \(\mathbf {E} \left[ Z\right] =1/\mu \), and then the change-of-variables \(u=\bar{F} _{Y}\left( t\right) \), we have
and hence
Substituting Eq. (115) into Eq. (105) (for \(\xi =Z\)) yields Eq. (37). Using the change-of-variables \(u=\bar{F}_{Y}\left( t\right) \) and Eq. (6), and then using Eq. (55) (for \(\xi =Y\)), we have
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eliazar, I., Giorgi, G.M. From Gini to Bonferroni to Tsallis: an inequality-indices trek. METRON 78, 119–153 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-020-00171-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-020-00171-9