References
Gorski D. ICD-11: a triumph of the “integration” of quackery with real medicine. Science-Based Medicine; 2018. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/icd-11-a-triumph-of-the-integration-of-quackery-with-real-medicine/. Accessed 3 Aug 2019.
Singh RH, Rastogi S. WHO ICD-11 showcasing of traditional medicine: lesson from a lost opportunity. Ann Ayurvedic Med. 2018;7(3–4):66–71.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) information sheet. https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/factsheet/en/. Accessed 3 Aug 2019.
Lu W, Dean-Clower E, Doherty-Gilman A, Rosenthal DS. The value of acupuncture in cancer care. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 2008;22(4):631–48.
Johnson L. ICD-11: hurry up and wait. ICD10 Monitor. https://www.icd10monitor.com/icd-11-hurry-up-and-wait. Accessed 3 Aug 2019.
Liu SH, Chuang WC, Lam W, Jiang Z, Cheng YC. Safety surveillance of traditional Chinese medicine: current and future. Drug Saf. 2015;38(2):117–28.
Xiao X, Tang J, Mao Y, et al. Guidance for the clinical evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine-induced liver injury. Issued by China Food and Drug Administration. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2019;9(3):648–58.
Lam WC, Lyi A, Bian Z. ICD-11: impact on traditional Chinese medicine and world healthcare systems. Pharm Med. 2019;33(5):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-019-00295-y (page numbers to be added at issue build).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No sources of funding were used to support the writing of this commentary.
Conflict of interest
Stewart Geary is an employee of Eisai Co., Ltd but has no financial interest for or against Traditional Chinese Medicine.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geary, S. Including Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnoses in ICD-11 May Not Advance the Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapies. Pharm Med 33, 369–371 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-019-00297-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-019-00297-w