Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Setting Standards for Pregnancy Registries

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 24 August 2017

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bird ST, Gelperin K, Taylor L, et al. Enrollment and retention on thirty-four United States pregnancy registries contrasted with the manufacturer’s capture of spontaneous reports for exposed pregnancies. Drug Saf. 2017. doi:10.1007/s40264-017-0591-5 [Epub ahead of print].

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chavez N. The key role of social media in registry recruitment. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2017;109:626.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holmes LB. Common Malfromations. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feldkamp ML, Carey JC, Byrne JL, et al. Etiology and clinical presentation of birth defects: population based study. BMJ. 2017;357:j2249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Toufaily MH, Westgate M-N, Lin AE, Holmes LB. The causes of congenital malformations. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2017 (in press).

  6. Correa A, Cragan JD, Kucik JE, et al. Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP): reporting birth defects surveillance: comparison between findings at birth and age one year. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2017 (in press).

  7. Holmes LB, Westgate M-N. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for malformations in newborn infants exposed to potential teratogens. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011;91(9):807–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas E, Higgins C, Westgate M-N, et al. Malformations surveillance: comparison between findings at birth and age one year. Birth Defects Res. 2017. doi:10.1002/bdr2.1096 [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hanslik A, Pospisil U, Salzer-Muhar U, et al. Predictors of spontaneous closure of isolated secundum atrial septal defect in children: a longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):1560–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Genetics Unit, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, 175 Cambridge Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA

    Lewis B. Holmes

Authors
  1. Lewis B. Holmes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lewis B. Holmes.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist with the preparation of this commentary.

Conflict of interest

Lewis B. Holmes has no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this commentary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holmes, L.B. Setting Standards for Pregnancy Registries. Drug Saf 41, 7–9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-017-0600-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-017-0600-8

Search

Navigation