Skip to main content
Log in

The Evolution of Endoscopic Intracranial Surgeries

  • Rhinology: Advances in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (R Sacks, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The challenging surgical field of endoscopic skull base surgery has undergone tremendous advancement in the past years. The aim of this review was to discuss the important factors that contributed to the evolution of this exciting field.

Recent Findings

Endoscopic skull base surgery started with pituitary surgeries and closure of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. As the field progresses, it is now possible to operate on selected lesions located in areas ranging from the cribriform plate down to the second cervical vertebra and laterally to the infratemporal fossa and petrous apex. The key factors that contributed to the evolution of endoscopic intracranial surgeries include the development of modern endoscopy equipment, advancement of endoscopic anatomy knowledge, and improvement in skills to perform endoscopic surgical resection, reconstruction, and hemostasis.

Summary

Extended endonasal approaches can provide skull base surgeons with safe and effective access to the anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossae in selected cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of Particular Interest, Published recently, Have Been Highlighted as: • Of Importance •• Of Major Importance

  1. Doglietto F, Prevedello DM, Jane Jr JA, Han J, Laws Jr ER. Brief history of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery-from Philipp Bozzini to the first world congress of endoscopic Skull Base surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reuter M. The historical development of endophotography. World J Urol. 2000;18:299–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson C. Bronchoscopy and Esophagoscopy: a manual of Peroral endoscopy and laryngeal surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Modlin I, Kidd M, Lye KD. From the lumen to laparoscope. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1110–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mouton WG, Bessell JR, Maddern GJ. Looking back to the advent of modern endoscopy: 150th birthday of Maximilian Nitze. World J Surg. 22:1256–8.

  6. Linder TE, Simmen D, Stool SE. Revolutionary inventions in the twentieth century. The history of endoscopy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:1161–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reuter HJ, Reuter MA. Philipp Bozzini and endoscopy in the nineteenth century. Stuttgart: Max Nitze Museum; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hirschmann A. Über Endoskopie der Nase und deren Nebenhöhlen. Arch Laryngol Rhinol (Berl). 1993;14:194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jennings CR. Harold Hopkins. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:1042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gow JG. Harold Hopkins and optical systems for urology - an appreciation. Urology. 1998;52:152–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirschowitz BI. Endoscopic examination of the stomach and duodenal cap with the fiberscope. Lancet. 1961;1:1074–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Messerklinger W. Diagnosis and endoscopic surgery of the nose and its adjoining structures. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1980;34:170–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stammberger H, Possawetz W. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Concepts, indications and results of the Messerklinger technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolarynol. 1990;247:63–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kennedy DW. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Technique Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111:643–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu JK, Das K, Weiss MH, Laws Jr ER, Couldwell WT. The history and evolution of transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg. 2001;95:1083–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Apuzzo MLJ, Heifetz M, Weiss MH, Kurze T. Neurosurgical endoscopy using the side-viewing telescope. Technical note J Neurosurg. 1977;16:398–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bushe KA, Halves E. Modifizierte Technik bei transnasaler Operation der Hypophysengeschwulste. Acta Neurochir. 1978;41:163–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jankowski R, Auque J, Simon C, Marchal JC, Hepner H, Wayoff M. Endoscopic pituitary tumor surgery. Laryngoscope. 1992;02:198–202.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sethi DS, Pillay PK. Endoscopic management of lesions of the Sella turcica. J Laryngol Otol. 1995;109:956–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodziewicz GS, Kelley RT, Kellman RM, Smith MV. Transnasal endoscopic surgery of the pituitary gland: technical note. Neurosurgery. 1996;39:189–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jho HD, Carrau RL. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:44–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cappabianca P, Aleri A, de Divitiis E. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the Sella: towards functional endoscopic pituitary surgery (FEPS). Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1998;41:66–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fraser JF, Allen B, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Three-dimensional neurostereoendoscopy: subjective and objective comparison to 2D. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2009;52:25–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cappabianca P, Decq P, Schroeder HWS. Future of endoscopy in neurosurgery. Advantages and limitations of endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base. Surg Neurol. 2007;67:496–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. •• Kasemsiri P, Carrau RL, Ditzel Filho LF, Prevedello DM, Otto BA, Old M, et al. Advantages and limitations of endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:12–21. Excellent review article

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I: crista galli to the sella turcica Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part II: posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kassam AB, Gardner P, Snyderman C, Mintz A, Carrau R. Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Paluzzi A, Gardner P, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman C. The expanding role of endoscopic skull base surgery. Br J Neurosurg. 2012;26:649–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P, Beal T, Beham A, et al. European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base. European rhinologic society advisory board on endoscopic techniques in the management of nose, paranasal sinus and skull base tumours. Rhinol Suppl. 2010;1:1–143.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Valentine R, Wormald PJ. Carotid artery injury after endonasal surgery. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2011;44:1059–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Valentine R, Wormald PJ. Controlling the surgical field during a large endoscopic vascular injury. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:562–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. •• Soudry E, Turner JH, Nayak JV, Hwang PH. Endoscopic reconstruction of surgically created skull base defects: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150:730–8. Excellent review about different skull base reconsruction options

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kassam AB, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Gardner P, Mintz A. Evolution of reconstructive techniques following endoscopic expanded endonasal approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hadad G, Bassagaisteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Synderman CH, et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1882–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Vescan A, Prevedello D, et al. Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rivero-Serrano CM, Snyderman CH, Gardner P, Prevedello D, Wheless S, Kassam AB, et al. Nasoseptal ‘rescue’ flap: a novel modification of the nasoseptal flap technique for pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:990–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Caicedo-Granados E, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Prevedello D, Fernandez-Miranda J, Gardner P, et al. Reverse rotation flap for reconstruction of donor site after vascular pedicled nasoseptal flap in skull base surgery. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:1550–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. • Kasemsiri P, Carrau RL, Otto BA, Tang IP, Prevedello DM, Muto J, et al. Reconstruction of the pedicled nasoseptal flap donor site with a contralateral reverse rotation flap: technical modifications and outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:2601–4. Good article with an important modification in technique

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hadad G, Rivero-Serrano CM, Bassagaisteguy LH, Carrau RL, Fernandez-Miranda J, Prevedello DM, et al. Anterior pedicle lateral nasal wall flap: a novel technique for the reconstruction of anterior skull base defects. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:1606–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rivera-Serrano CM, Bassagisteguy LH, Hadad G, Carrau RL, Kelly D, Prevedello DM, et al. Posterior pedicle lateral nasal wall flap: new reconstructive technique for large defects of the skull base. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011;25:212–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Prevedello DM, Barges-Coll J, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Morera V, Jacobson D, Madhok R, et al. Middle turbinate flap for skull base reconstruction: cadaveric feasibility study. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:2094–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. David SK, Cheney SL. Ananatomy study of the temporoparietal fascial flap. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121:1153–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fortes FS, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Kassam A, Prevedello D, Vescan A, et al. Transpterygoid transposition of a temporoparie- tal fascia flap: a new method for skull base reconstruction after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:970–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yoshioka N, Rhoton Jr AL. Vascular anatomy of the anteriorly based pericranial flap. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:11–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Price JC, Loury M, Carson B, Johns ME. The pericranial flap for reconstruction of anterior skull base defects. Laryngoscope. 1988;98:1159–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Smith JE, Ducic Y. The versatile extended pericranial flap for closure of skull base defects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:704–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. •• Tang IP, Carrau RL, Otto BA, Prevedello DM, Kasemsiri P, Ditzel L, Muto J, et al. Technical nuances of commonly used vascularised flaps for skull base reconstruction. J Laryngol Otol. 2015;129:752–61. Excellent overview of vascularised flaps for skull base reconstruction

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Verillaud B, Bresson D, Sauvaget E, Mandonnet E, Georges B, Kania R, et al. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2012;129:190–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for petrous apex lesions. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Dehdashti AR, Ganna A, Witterick I, Gentili F. Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for anterior cranial base and suprasellar lesions: indications and limitations. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:677–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Snyderman CH, Fernandez-Miranda J, Gardner PA. Training in neurorhinology: the impact of case volume on the learning curve. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2011;44:1223–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Smith SJ, Eralil G, Woon K, Sama A, Dow G, Robertson I. Light at the end of the tunnel: the learning curve associated with endoscopic transsphenoidal skull base surgery. Skull Base. 2010;20:69–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Snyderman C, Kassam A, Carrau R, Mintz A, Garnder P, Prevedello DM. Acquisition of surgical skills for endonasal skull base surgery: a training program. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:699–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Snyderman CH, Pant H, Carrau RL, Prevedello D, Gardner P, Kassam AB. What are the limits of endoscopic sinus surgery? The expanded endonasal approach to the skull base. Keio J Med. 2009;58:152–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. O’Malley Jr BW, Grady MS, Gabel BC, Cohen MA, Heuer GG, Pisapia J, et al. Comparison of endoscopic and microscopic removal of pituitary adenomas: single-surgeon experience and the learning curve. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25:E10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. de Almeida JR, Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Gardner PA, et al. Defining the nasopalatine line: the limit for endonasal surgery of the spine. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:239–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Thomas A, Gardner P, et al. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors’ initial 800 patients. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:1544–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Castelnuovo P, Dallan I, Battaglia P, Bignami M. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: past, present and future. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267:649–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Pasquini E, Sciaretta V, Frank G, Cantaroni C, Modugno GC, Mazzatenta D, et al. Endoscopic treatment of benign tumors of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;131:180–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Zanation A, Prevedello D, Gardner P, et al. Endoscopic skull base surgery: principles of endonasal oncological surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:658–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Nicolai P, Battaglia P, Bignami M, Bolzoni Villaret A, Delù G, Khrais T, et al. Endoscopic surgery for malignant tumors of the sinonasal tract and adiacent skull base: a 10-year experience. Am J Rhinol. 2008;222:308–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. • Farag A, Rosen M, Evans J. Surgical Techniques for Sinonasal Malignancies. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2015;26:403–12. Article focusing on surgical techniques

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. • Husain Q, Patel SK, Soni RS, Patel AA, Liu JK, Eloy JA. Celebrating the golden anniversary of anterior skull base surgery: reflections on the past 50 years and its historical evolution. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:64–72. Review with a historical overview and summary of the evolution of the field

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Eloy JA, Vivero RJ, Hoang K, Civantos FJ, Weed DT, Morcos JJ, et al. Comparison of transnasal endoscopic and open craniofacial resection for malignant tumors of the anterior skull base. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:834–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Wood JW, Eloy JA, Vivero RJ, Sargi Z, Civantos FJ, Weed DT, et al. Efficacy of transnasal endoscopic resection for malignant anterior skull-base tumors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012;2:487–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Cohen MA, Liang J, Cohen IJ, Grady MS, O’Malley Jr BW, Newman JG. Endoscopic resection of advanced anterior skull base lesions: oncologically safe? ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2009;71:123–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N Prepageran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Y Brand, Dr. IP Tang, Dr. V Waran, Dr. E Wong, and Dr. N Prepageran declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Rhinology: Advances in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brand, Y., Tang, I., Waran, V. et al. The Evolution of Endoscopic Intracranial Surgeries. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 5, 16–23 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-017-0141-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-017-0141-9

Keywords

Navigation