Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pattern Recognition of Eight Hand Motions Using Feature Extraction of Forearm EMG Signal

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this manuscript, eight hand motions were classified using ten different extracted features from sEMG signals. These signals were collected from four different muscles placed on the forearm. It was found out that the performance of a classifier was improved through the implementation of more than one feature. We tested two feature combinations; the classification accuracy rate of 94 % was achieved using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based on wavelength (WAVE), Wilson amplitude (WAMP), and root mean square combination. The performance of four wavelet families was tested to select the proper wavelet family that leads to highest classification rate. Our experimental results demonstrate that the highest average classification accuracy was 95 % achieved by implementing general neural network (GRNN) classification method based on energy of wavelet coefficients (using Sym4 family). Moreover, this study investigated the performance of three SVM-kernel functions (support vector machine) and found that polynomial function is the optimal choice in most cases. The highest achieved classification accuracy was 93 % using extracted wavelet coefficients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oskoei MA, Hu H (2007) A survey-myoelectric control systems. Biomed Signal Process Control 2:275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zecca M, Micera S, Carrozza M, Dario P (2002) Control of multifunctional prosthetic hands by processing the electromyographic signal. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 30:459–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nayan MK, Adity S, Shyamanta MH (2013) Exploring a family of wavelet transforms for EMG-based grasp recognition. Signal Image Video Process. doi:10.1007/s11760-013-0477-7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kim KS, Choi HH, Moon CS, Mun CW (2011) Comparison of k-nearest neighbor, quadratic discriminant and linear discriminant analysis in classification of electromyogram signals based on the wrist-motion directions. Curr Appl Phys 11:740–745

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen X, Wang ZJ (2013) Pattern recognition of number gestures based on a wireless surface EMG system. Biomed Signal Process Control 8:184–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu H, Hong-Bo X, Guo JY, Chen HJ (2012) Ant colony optimization-based feature selection method for surface electromyography signals classification. Comput Biol Med 42:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Phinyomark A, Limsakul C, Phukpattaranont P (2009) A novel feature extraction for robust EMG pattern recognition. J Comput 1:71–80

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fougner (2007) Proportional myoelectric control of a multifunction upper limb prosthesis. Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technologies

  9. Flandrin P (1999) Wavelet analysis and its applications. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grasp A (1995) An introduction to wavelets. IEEE Comput Sci Eng 2:50–61. doi:10.1109/99.388960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crowe JA, Gibson NM, Woolfson MS, Somekh MG (1992) Wavelet transform as a potential tool for ECG analysis and compression. J Biomed Eng 14:268–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mallat S (2008) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abo-Zahhad M, Ahmeda SM, AlShroufb A (2000) ECG data compression using optimal non-orthogonal wavelet transform. Med Eng Phys 22:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roshan Joy Martisa URA, Mina Lim Choo (2013) ECG beat classification using PCA, LDA, ICA and discrete wavelet transform. Biomed Signal Process Control 8:437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saurabh Pal MM (2010) Detection of ECG characteristic points using multiresolution wavelet analysis based selective coefficient method. Measurement 43:255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Misiti M, Misiti Y, Oppenheim G, Poggi J-M (1996) Wavelet toolbox for use with MATLAB-user’s guide. The MathWorks, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar DK, Pah ND, Bradley A (2003) Wavelet analysis of surface electromyography to determine muscle fatigue. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 11:400–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kilby J, Gholam HH (2004) Wavelet analysis of surface electromyography signals. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:384–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Phinyomark A, Quaine F, Charbonnier S, Serviere C, Tarpin BF, Laurillau Y (2013) EMG feature evaluation for improving myoelectric pattern recognition robustness. Expert Syst Appl 40:4832–4840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Englehart K, Hudgins B, Parker PA (2001) A wavelet-based continuous classification scheme for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48:302–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen LF, Liao HYM, Ko MT, Lin JC, Yu GJ (2000) A new LDA-based face recognition system which can solve the small sample size problem. J Pattern Recognit 33:1713–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hua Y, Jie Y (2001) A direct LDA algorithm for high-dimensional data with application to face recognition. J Pattern Recognit 34:2067–2070

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Juwei L, Kostantinos NP, Anastasios NV (2003) Face recognition using LDA based algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang J, Plataniotis KN, Lu J, Venetsanopoulos AN (2008) Kernel quadratic discriminant analysis for small sample size problem. J Pattern Recognit 41:1528–1538

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Subasi A (2013) Classification of EMG signals using PSO optimized SVM for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Comput Biol Med 43:576–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vapnik V (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang A, Wenjing Y, Junfang L, Yu Z, Hua L (2009) A novel pattern recognition algorithm: combining ART network with SVM to reconstruct a multi-class classifier. Comput Math Appl 57:1908–1914

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Subasi A, Gursoy MI (2011) EEG signal classification using PCA, ICA, LDA and support vector machines. Expert Syst Appl 37:8659–8666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Oskoei MA, Hu H (2008) Support vector machine-based classification scheme for myoelectric control applied to upper limit. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55:1956–1965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Specht D (1991) A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2:568–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hariharan M, Fook CY, Sindhu R, Bukhari I, Sazali Y (2012) A comparative study of wavelet families for classification of wrist motions. Comput Electr Eng 38:1798–1807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Khushaba RN, Kodagoda S, Liu D (2013) Muscle computer interfaces for driver distraction reduction. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 110:137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Srisuwan N, Phukpattaranont P, Limsakul C (2012) Feature selection for Thai tone classification based on surface EMG. Procedia Eng 32:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Firas Al Omari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al Omari, F., Hui, J., Mei, C. et al. Pattern Recognition of Eight Hand Motions Using Feature Extraction of Forearm EMG Signal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci. 84, 473–480 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-014-0148-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-014-0148-2

Keywords

Navigation