Abstract
In this manuscript, eight hand motions were classified using ten different extracted features from sEMG signals. These signals were collected from four different muscles placed on the forearm. It was found out that the performance of a classifier was improved through the implementation of more than one feature. We tested two feature combinations; the classification accuracy rate of 94 % was achieved using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based on wavelength (WAVE), Wilson amplitude (WAMP), and root mean square combination. The performance of four wavelet families was tested to select the proper wavelet family that leads to highest classification rate. Our experimental results demonstrate that the highest average classification accuracy was 95 % achieved by implementing general neural network (GRNN) classification method based on energy of wavelet coefficients (using Sym4 family). Moreover, this study investigated the performance of three SVM-kernel functions (support vector machine) and found that polynomial function is the optimal choice in most cases. The highest achieved classification accuracy was 93 % using extracted wavelet coefficients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Oskoei MA, Hu H (2007) A survey-myoelectric control systems. Biomed Signal Process Control 2:275–294
Zecca M, Micera S, Carrozza M, Dario P (2002) Control of multifunctional prosthetic hands by processing the electromyographic signal. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 30:459–485
Nayan MK, Adity S, Shyamanta MH (2013) Exploring a family of wavelet transforms for EMG-based grasp recognition. Signal Image Video Process. doi:10.1007/s11760-013-0477-7
Kim KS, Choi HH, Moon CS, Mun CW (2011) Comparison of k-nearest neighbor, quadratic discriminant and linear discriminant analysis in classification of electromyogram signals based on the wrist-motion directions. Curr Appl Phys 11:740–745
Chen X, Wang ZJ (2013) Pattern recognition of number gestures based on a wireless surface EMG system. Biomed Signal Process Control 8:184–192
Hu H, Hong-Bo X, Guo JY, Chen HJ (2012) Ant colony optimization-based feature selection method for surface electromyography signals classification. Comput Biol Med 42:30–38
Phinyomark A, Limsakul C, Phukpattaranont P (2009) A novel feature extraction for robust EMG pattern recognition. J Comput 1:71–80
Fougner (2007) Proportional myoelectric control of a multifunction upper limb prosthesis. Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technologies
Flandrin P (1999) Wavelet analysis and its applications. Academic Press, San Diego
Grasp A (1995) An introduction to wavelets. IEEE Comput Sci Eng 2:50–61. doi:10.1109/99.388960
Crowe JA, Gibson NM, Woolfson MS, Somekh MG (1992) Wavelet transform as a potential tool for ECG analysis and compression. J Biomed Eng 14:268–272
Mallat S (2008) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, Stanford
Abo-Zahhad M, Ahmeda SM, AlShroufb A (2000) ECG data compression using optimal non-orthogonal wavelet transform. Med Eng Phys 22:39–46
Roshan Joy Martisa URA, Mina Lim Choo (2013) ECG beat classification using PCA, LDA, ICA and discrete wavelet transform. Biomed Signal Process Control 8:437–448
Saurabh Pal MM (2010) Detection of ECG characteristic points using multiresolution wavelet analysis based selective coefficient method. Measurement 43:255–261
Misiti M, Misiti Y, Oppenheim G, Poggi J-M (1996) Wavelet toolbox for use with MATLAB-user’s guide. The MathWorks, Massachusetts
Kumar DK, Pah ND, Bradley A (2003) Wavelet analysis of surface electromyography to determine muscle fatigue. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 11:400–406
Kilby J, Gholam HH (2004) Wavelet analysis of surface electromyography signals. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:384–387
Phinyomark A, Quaine F, Charbonnier S, Serviere C, Tarpin BF, Laurillau Y (2013) EMG feature evaluation for improving myoelectric pattern recognition robustness. Expert Syst Appl 40:4832–4840
Englehart K, Hudgins B, Parker PA (2001) A wavelet-based continuous classification scheme for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48:302–311
Chen LF, Liao HYM, Ko MT, Lin JC, Yu GJ (2000) A new LDA-based face recognition system which can solve the small sample size problem. J Pattern Recognit 33:1713–1726
Hua Y, Jie Y (2001) A direct LDA algorithm for high-dimensional data with application to face recognition. J Pattern Recognit 34:2067–2070
Juwei L, Kostantinos NP, Anastasios NV (2003) Face recognition using LDA based algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14:195–200
Wang J, Plataniotis KN, Lu J, Venetsanopoulos AN (2008) Kernel quadratic discriminant analysis for small sample size problem. J Pattern Recognit 41:1528–1538
Subasi A (2013) Classification of EMG signals using PSO optimized SVM for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Comput Biol Med 43:576–586
Vapnik V (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York
Wang A, Wenjing Y, Junfang L, Yu Z, Hua L (2009) A novel pattern recognition algorithm: combining ART network with SVM to reconstruct a multi-class classifier. Comput Math Appl 57:1908–1914
Subasi A, Gursoy MI (2011) EEG signal classification using PCA, ICA, LDA and support vector machines. Expert Syst Appl 37:8659–8666
Oskoei MA, Hu H (2008) Support vector machine-based classification scheme for myoelectric control applied to upper limit. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55:1956–1965
Specht D (1991) A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2:568–576
Hariharan M, Fook CY, Sindhu R, Bukhari I, Sazali Y (2012) A comparative study of wavelet families for classification of wrist motions. Comput Electr Eng 38:1798–1807
Khushaba RN, Kodagoda S, Liu D (2013) Muscle computer interfaces for driver distraction reduction. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 110:137–149
Srisuwan N, Phukpattaranont P, Limsakul C (2012) Feature selection for Thai tone classification based on surface EMG. Procedia Eng 32:253–259
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al Omari, F., Hui, J., Mei, C. et al. Pattern Recognition of Eight Hand Motions Using Feature Extraction of Forearm EMG Signal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci. 84, 473–480 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-014-0148-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-014-0148-2