Skip to main content
Log in

Increase of patients co-colonised or co-infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium or extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

  • Clinical and Epidemiological Study
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the incidence of patients co-colonised or co-infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in four German tertiary care hospitals.

Methods

This study was conducted at four tertiary care hospitals (all with >1,000 beds) in different geographic regions in Germany (Berlin in the east, Luebeck in the north, Freiburg in the southwest and Nuernberg in the southeast). Routine surveillance data on MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and ESBL-producing bacteria were analysed from 2007 to 2009. Co-colonisation or co-infection was defined as a patient having positive cultures for at least two of the following resistant pathogens: MRSA, VRE faecium or different species of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae within one calendar year.

Results

A total of 896,822 patients were analysed, of which 10,066 patients harboured MRSA, VRE faecium and/or ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, and 542 patients co-harboured at least two of those resistant pathogens. In 2009, 7.6% of the MRSA patients, 13.7% of the VRE faecium patients and even 16.1% of the ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae patients were co-colonised or co-infected. The incidence of patients with co-infection or co-colonisation increased steadily from 5 (2007) to 7 per 10,000 patients (2009).

Conclusions

Patients harbouring ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae or VRE faecium had a higher risk of being co-colonised or co-infected compared to what was to be extrapolated from their overall incidence. This might be linked to their gastrointestinal reservoir and impracticality to decolonise the gut of resistant VRE and ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Han SH, Chin BS, Lee HS, Jeong SJ, Choi HK, Kim CK, Kim CO, Yong D, Choi JY, Song YG, Lee K, Kim JM. Recovery of both vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from culture of a single clinical specimen from colonized or infected patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:130–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Warren DK, Nitin A, Hill C, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. Occurrence of co-colonization or co-infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a medical intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25:99–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Furuno JP, Perencevich EN, Johnson JA, Wright MO, McGregor JC, Morris JG Jr, Strauss SM, Roghman MC, Nemoy LL, Standiford HC, Hebden JN, Harris AD. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci co-colonization. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1539–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ho PL. Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, ceftazidime-resistant gram-negative bacilli, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci before and after intensive care unit admission. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1175–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reyes K, Malik R, Moore C, Donabedian S, Perri M, Johnson L, Zervos M. Evaluation of risk factors for coinfection or cocolonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:628–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z, Cao B, Liu YM, Gu L, Wang C. Investigation of the prevalence of patients co-colonized or infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci in China: a hospital-based study. Chin Med J. 2009;122:1283–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Franchi D, Climo MW, Wong AH, Edmond MB, Wenzel RP. Seeking vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:1566–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harris AD, Nemoy L, Johnson JA, Martin-Carnahan A, Smith DL, Standiford H, Perencevich EN. Co-carriage rates of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria among a cohort of intensive care unit patients: implications for an active surveillance program. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25:105–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang S, Sievert DM, Hageman JC, Boulton ML, Tenover FC, Downes FP, Shah S, Rudrik JT, Pupp GR, Brown WJ, Cardo D, Fridkin SK. Infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the vanA resistance gene. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1342–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer E, Serr A, Schneider C, Utzolino S, Kern WV, Scholz R, Dettenkofer M. Should we screen patients for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae in intensive care units? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:103–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ryan Plocher for his help in preparing the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

All authors: none to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Meyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, E., Ziegler, R., Mattner, F. et al. Increase of patients co-colonised or co-infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium or extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae . Infection 39, 501–506 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-011-0154-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-011-0154-0

Keywords

Navigation