Skip to main content
Log in

Bioreduction of toxic hexavalent chromium by novel indigenous microbe Brevibacillus agri isolated from tannery wastewater

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study is focused on the microbial bioreduction of hexavalent chromium generated from tannery waste. For the study, the treated and untreated tannery effluents were collected from an unexplored site of Manpura, Macheri, Jaipur (India). A few bacterial strains capable of tolerating and reducing hexavalent chromium were isolated, and the most capable one that reduced 85% of hexavalent chromium was identified to be Brevibacillus agri by 16S rDNA gene sequencing. This isolate could tolerate high concentrations of chromium up to 850 mg/l of potassium dichromate and showed maximum reduction of about 85% for 100 mg/l of hexavalent chromium at temperature 37 °C and pH 7.0 in 48 h. The potential of the partially purified enzyme to reduce hexavalent chromium was measured by diphenyl carbazide assay. Purified enzyme showed 0.26 units bioactivity to reduce Cr, in the presence of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and Km and Vmax were observed to be 1.9 mM and 0.045 mM/min (mg protein), respectively. The current study, therefore, showed Brevibacillus agri capable of reducing hexavalent chromium without usage of toxic chemicals and, henceforth, prevented generation of harmful by-products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Babich H, Statzky G, Schiffenbauer M (1982) Comparative toxicity of trivalent and hexavalent chromium to fungi. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 28:452–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett RJ, James BR (1996) Chromium. In: Sparks DL et al (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. SSSA, Madison, pp 683–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaventura C, Johnson FM (1997) Healthy environments for healthy people: bioremediation today and tomorrow. Environ Health Perspect 105(1):5–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cappuccino JG, Sherman N (2005) Microbiology: a laboratory manual, 7th edn. Dorling and Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd., Noida

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervantes C, Campos GJ, Devars S, Gutierrez-Corona F, Loza-Tavera H, Torres Guzman JC, Moreno-Sanchez R (2001) Interactions of chromium with microorganisms and plants. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25:335–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung KH, Gu JD (2007) Mechanism of hexavalent chromium detoxification by microorganisms and bioremediation application potential: a review. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 59:8–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dey S, Paul AK (2012) Optimization of chromate reduction by whole cells of Arthrobacter sp. SUK 1205 isolated from metalliferous chromite mine environment. Earth and Environ Sci 2(4):73–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles H (1999) Treatment of metal- contaminated wastes: why select a biological process? Trends Biotechnol 17:462–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elangovan R, Abhipsa S, Rohit B, Ligy P, Chandraraj K (2006) Reduction of Cr(VI) by a Bacillus sp. Biotechnol Lett 28:247–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol N, Escudero C, Villaescusa I (2008) Chromium sorption and Cr(VI) reduction to Cr(III) by grape stalks and yohimbe bark. Bioresour Technol 99:5030–5036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gadd GM, White C (1993) Microbial treatment of metal pollution—a working biotechnology? Trends Biotechnol 11:353–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horikoshi K (2011) Extremophiles handbook. Springer Reference, vol 1 and 2

  • James BR (1996) The challenge of remediating chromium- contaminant soil. Environ Sci Technol 30(6):248A–257A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James BR (2002) Chemical transformations of chromium in soils relevance to mobility, bio-availability and remediation. In: the chromium file, International Chromium Development Association, Paris, pp 1–8

  • Kurniawan TA, Chan GYS, Lo WH, Babel S (2006) Physicochemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals. Chem Eng J 118:83–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li YS, Liu CC, Chiou CS (2004) Adsorption of Cr(III) from wastewater by wine processing waste sludge. J Colloid Interface Sci 273:95–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd JR, Mabbett A, Williams DR, Macaskie LE (2001) Metal reduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria: physiological diversity and metal specificity. Hydrometallurgy 59:327–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maiti SK (2003) Handbook of methods in environmental studies, Water and waste water analysis, vol 1. ABD Publishers, Jaipur

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangal M, Agarwal M, Bargava D (2013) A case study of impacts of tannery effluent of leather industry of Manpura Machedi on ground water quality of that area. J Pharmacog Phytochem 2(2):229–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers CR, Carstens BP, Antholine WE, Myers JM (2000) Chromium (VI) reductase activity is associated with the cytoplasmic membrane of anaerobically grown Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1. J Appl Microbiol 88(1):98–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naja G, Mustin C, Berthelin B, Volisky B (2005) Lead biosorption study with Rhizopusarrhizus using a metal based titration technique. J Colloid Interface Sci 292:537–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Opperman DJ, Plater LA, Heerden E (2008) A novel chromate reductase from Thermusscotoductus SA-01 related to old yellow enzyme. J Bacteriol 190(8):3076–3082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piroeva I, Atanassova- Vladimirova S, Dimowa L, Sbirkova H, Radoslavov G, Hristov P, Shivachev BL (2013) A simple and rapid scanning electron microscopic preparative technique for observation of biological samples: application on bacteria and DNA samples. Bulg Chem Commun 45(4):510–575

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Adholeya A (2011) Detoxification and accumulation of chromium from tannery effluent and spent chrome effluent by Paecilomyceslilacinus fungi. Int Bioterior Biodegrad 65:309–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shivkumar D, Shankar D, Kandaswamy AN, Ammaiappan M (2014) Role of electro-dialysis cum adsorption for Cr(VI) reduction. Pollut Res 33:547–552

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the generosity of the authorities of Manpura, Macheri Tannery Treatment Plant for providing the wastewater sample. The authors are also grateful to Birla Institute of Scientific Research, Jaipur and Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board, Jaipur, for permitting the use of their research facilities and conducting AAS, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Gupta.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 94 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (TIFF 124 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chatterjee, S., Shekhawat, K. & Gupta, N. Bioreduction of toxic hexavalent chromium by novel indigenous microbe Brevibacillus agri isolated from tannery wastewater. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 3549–3556 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1885-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1885-6

Keywords

Navigation