Skip to main content
Log in

Visualization of a hole and accident preventive measures based on the Swiss cheese model developed by risk management and process approach

  • Article
  • Published:
WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is important to find the characteristics of holes theorized in the Swiss cheese model created by Reason when preventive measures are taken. Reason does not explain where the holes open and how the holes move and shut. The objectives of this research are to find the characteristics of a hole, visualize the development of the hole and propose accident preventive measures to shut the hole. I investigated four real cases of three types of marine accidents using risk management and process approach. The focus of the study was on the processes both of the Safety Management System and risk management imbedded in the procedures at the time of the accidents. I found the following results. A hole in a defensive layer opened during the process of plan or check imbedded in the Safety Management System and moved through the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle. The hole in the defensive layer moved or affected the development of the hole in another defensive layer at the local workplace. The hole in another defensive layer at the local workplace opened during the process of risk identification or risk analysis and moved through risk management process. Shutting the hole was drawn in a structured manner by the method of risk reduction. With a focus on process, the development of holes was visualized. These findings indicate that the characteristics of holes and their visualization can show the location where efforts toward preventive measures should be directed effectively and efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hawkins F (1987) Human factors in flight. Gower Technical Press Ltd, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Honda K (2008) Sousen Tsuron, 8th edn. Seizand -Shoten Publishing Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japanese

    Google Scholar 

  • IEC (2009) IEC/ISO 31010:2009 Risk Management—Risk Assessment Techniques

  • IMO (1993) The International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention (International Safety Management (ISM) Code), Resolution A; 741(18)

  • IMO (2000a) Amendments to the Code for the Investigation of Marine Casualties and Incidents, Resolution A; 884(21)

  • IMO (2000b) Guidelines for Voyage Planning, Resolution A; 893(21)

  • IMO (2011) Revised Recommendations for Entering Enclosed Spaces Aboard Ships, Resolution A; 1050(27)

  • ISO (2008a) ISO 9000 Introduction and Support Package: Guidance on the Concept and Use of the Process Approach for Management Systems, ISO/TC 176/SC 2/N 544R3

  • ISO (2008b) ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management Systems—Requirements

  • ISO (2009) ISO 31000:2009 Risk Management—Principles and Guidelines

  • ISO/IEC (1999) ISO/IEC GUIDE 51:1999(E) (1999) Safety Aspects—Guidelines for their Inclusion in Standards

  • Japan Transport Safety Board (2011a) Marine Accident Investigation Report MA2011-6, 17: Grounding of cargo vessel LANA. (Japanese) Available from http://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/ship/rep-acci/2011/MA2011-6-17_2009yh0293.pdf

  • Japan Transport Safety Board (2011b) Marine Accident Investigation Report MA2011-7, 11: Fatality of a crewmember of chemical tanker KYOKUHO-MARU No 2. (Japanese) Available from http://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/ship/rep-acci/2011/MA2011-7-11_2010yh0032.pdf

  • Japan Transport Safety Board (2012) Marine Accident Investigation Report MA2012-9, 2: Collision of cargo vessel MEDEA and fishing vessel KOSEI-MARU. (Japanese) Available from http://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/ship/rep-acci/2012/MA2012-9-2_2012tk0028.pdf

  • Japan Transport Safety Board (2013) Annual Report 2013. Available from http://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/annualreport2013e/annualreport2013e.pdf

  • Japan Transport Safety Board (2014) Marine Accident Investigation Report MA2014-2: Fatalities of crewmembers of container vessel ANNA MAERSK. Available from http://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/eng-mar_report/2014/2012tk0018e.pdf

  • Maritime and Coastguard Agency (2004) Merchant Shipping Notice MSN 1781(M + F): The Merchant Shipping (Distress Signals and Prevention of Collision) Regulations 1996

  • Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reason J (1997) Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift AJ (1993) Bridge team management: a practical guide. O’Sullivan Printing Corporation, Southhall

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Japan Transport Safety Board when I conducted marine accident investigations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koji Fukuoka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukuoka, K. Visualization of a hole and accident preventive measures based on the Swiss cheese model developed by risk management and process approach. WMU J Marit Affairs 15, 127–142 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-015-0076-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-015-0076-2

Keywords

Navigation