Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of ultrasonic vibration-assisted pelleting of cellulosic biomass on sugar yield for biofuel manufacturing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasonic vibration-assisted (UV-A) pelleting can increase the bulk density of cellulosic biomass, thus reduce the feedstock transportation cost in cellulosic biofuel manufacturing. UV-A pelleting can also increase the biomass sugar yield in enzymatic hydrolysis. There are two major processes in the sugar conversion of cellulosic biomass: pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Sugar yield definition used in reported UV-A pelleting studies is enzymatic hydrolysis sugar yield. This definition is based on enzymatic hydrolysis this single process without considering the pretreatment process. In fact, converting cellulosic biomass into fermentable sugar (glucose) is the combined effort of pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. There are no papers in the literature investigating whether UV-A pelleting could increase the total sugar yield when both pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis are considered. This paper reports the first study using total sugar yield to investigate the effects UV-A pelleting on biomass sugar yield. Experimental results show that, for all the four types of cellulosic biomass (wheat straw, corn stover, switchgrass, and sorghum stalk) used in this study, total sugar yield of biomass processed with UV-A pelleting was 30 to 43 % higher than that of biomass not processed with UV-A pelleting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Energy Information Administration (2012) Annual energy review 2011. http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/pdf/aer.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2013

  2. US Energy Information Administration (2011) Short-term energy outlook. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/steo/pdf/steo_full.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2013

  3. Greene DL, Schafer A (2011) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. transportation. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. http://www.c2es.org/docUploads/reducing-transportation-ghg.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2013

  4. US Department of Energy (2010) Environmental benefits. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/printable_versions/environmental.html. Accessed 3 Jan 2013

  5. RFA (2011) Ethanol facts: environment. http://www.ethanolrfa.org/pages/ethanol-facts-environment. Accessed 20 Dec 2012

  6. Lynd LR (1996) Overview and evaluation of fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass: technology, economics, the environment, and policy. Annu Rev Energy Environ 21:403–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu JY, Wang GS, Pan XJ, Gleisner R (2009) Specific surface to evaluate the efficiencies of milling and pretreatment of wood for enzymatic saccharification. Chem Eng Sci 64:474–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu JY, Pan XJ, Wang GS, Gleisner R (2009) Sulfite pretreatment (SPORL) for robust enzymatic saccharification of spruce and red pine. Bioresour Technol 100:2411–2418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu W, Zhu JY, Gleisner R, Pan XJ (2010) On energy consumption for size-reduction and yields from subsequent enzymatic saccharification of pretreated lodgepole pine. Bioresour Technol 101:2782–2792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Von Sivers M, Zacchi G (1996) Ethanol from lignocellulosics: a review of the economy. Bioresour Technol 56:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rubin EM (2008) Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature 454:841–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. US Department of Energy (2005) Breaking the biological barriers to cellulosic ethanol: a joint research agenda. http://genomicscience.energy.gov/biofuels/b2bworkshop.shtml. Accessed 20 Dec 2012

  13. Huber GW (2008) Breaking the chemical and engineering barriers to lignocellulosic biofuels: next generation hydrocarbon biorefineries. In: Huber GW (ed) University of Massachusetts Amherst, National Science Foundation, Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems Division, Washington, DC

  14. Falk D (1985) Pelleting cost center. In: McEllhiney MM (ed) Feed manufacturing technology, 3rd edn. American Feed Industry Association, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hess JR, Wright CT, Kenney KL (2007) Cellulosic biomass feedstocks and logistics for ethanol production. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 1(3):181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sokhansanj S, Turhollow AF (2004) Biomass densification—cubing operations and costs for corn stover. Appl Eng Agric 20(4):495–499

    Google Scholar 

  17. Song XX, Zhang M, Pei ZJ, Deines T (2010) Ultrasonic-vibration-assisted pelleting of cellulosic biomass: effects of moisture content. Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC)

  18. Cong W, Pei Z, Zhang P, Qin N, Deines T, Lin B (2011) Ultrasonic-vibration-assisted pelleting of switchgrass: effects of ultrasonic vibration. Transactions of Tianjin University 17:313–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang PF, Deines TW, Nottingham D, Pei ZJ, Wang D, Wu X (2010) Ultrasonic vibration-assisted pelleting of biomass: a designed experimental investigation on pellet quality and sugar yield. Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC)

  20. Seino T, Yoshioka A, Fujiwara M, Chen KL, Erata T, Tabata M, Takai M (2001) ESR studies of radicals generated by ultrasonic irradiation of lignin solution. An application of the spin trapping method. Wood Science and Technology 35(1):97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chuanyun D, Bochu W, Huan Z, Conglin H, Chuanren D, Wangqian L, Toyama Y, Sakanishi A (2004) Effect of low frequency ultrasonic stimulation on the secretion of siboflavin produced by Ecemothecium Ashbyii. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 34(1):7–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yaldagard M, Mortazavi SA, Tabatabaie F (2008) The effect of ultrasound in combination with thermal treatment on the germinated barley’s alpha-amylase activity. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 25(3):517–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Toma M, Bandow H, Vinatoru M, Maeda Y (2006) Ultrasonically assisted conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol. Proceeding of the AIChE annual meeting. http://www.nt.ntnu.no/users/skoge/prost/proceedings/aiche-2006/data/papers/P70141.pdf Accessed 22 Feb 2013

  24. Ninomiya K, Kamide K, Takahashi K, Shimizu N (2012) Enhanced enzymatic saccharification of kenaf powder after ultrasonic pretreatment in ionic liquids at room temperature. Bioresour Technol 103(1):259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Velmurugan R, Muthukumar K (2012) Ultrasound-assisted alkaline pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse for fermentable sugar production: optimization through response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol 112:293–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang PF, Pei ZJ, Wang D, Wu X, Cong WL, Zhang M, Deines TW (2011) Ultrasonic vibration-assisted pelleting of cellulosic biomass for biofuel manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 133: 011012–1–011012–7

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sluiter A, Hames B, Hyman D, Payne C, Ruiz R (2008) Determination of total solids in biomass and total dissolved solids in liquid process samples. NREL Laboratory Analytical Procedure Technical Report No. NREL/TP-510–42621

  28. Hu G, Heitmann JA, Rojas OJ (2008) Feedstock pretreatment strategies for producing ethanol from wood, bark, and forest residues. Bioresources 3(1):270–294

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xu F, Theerarattananoona K, Wu X, Pena L, Shi Y, Staggenborg S, Wang D (2011) Process optimization for ethanol production from photoperiod-sensitive sorghum: focus on cellulose conversion. Ind Crop Prod 34(1):1212–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Donohoe BS, Decker SR, Tucker MP, Himmel ME, Vinzant TB (2008) Visualizing lignin coalescence and migration through maize cell walls following thermochemical pretreatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 101(5):913–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tang YJ, Zhang PF, Liu DF, Pei ZJ (2012) Effects of pellet weight in ultrasonic vibration-assisted pelleting for cellulosic biofuel manufacturing. Int J Manuf Res 7:397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Q, Zhang PF, Deines T, Pei ZJ, Wang D, Wu X, Pritchett G (2010) Ultrasonic vibration-assisted pelleting of sorghum stalks: effects of pressure and ultrasonic power. Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC)

  33. Zhang PF, Zhang Q, Pei ZJ, Pei L (2011) An experimental investigation on cellulosic biofuel manufacturing: effects of biomass particle size on sugar yield. Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE)

  34. Theerarattananoon K, Xu F, Wilson J, Staggenborg S, McKinney L, Vadlani P, Pei Z, Wang D (2012) Effects of the pelleting conditions on chemical composition and sugar yield of corn stover, big bluestem, wheat straw, and sorghum stalk pellets. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35:615–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the U.S. NSF for providing funding (Award Number 0970112) for this research and China Scholarship Council for providing scholarships for the first two authors. The authors also acknowledge Mr. Ke Zhang and Dr. Feng Xu in the Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at Kansas State University for their assistance in sugar analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA

    Xiaoxu Song, Meng Zhang & Z. J. Pei

Authors
  1. Xiaoxu Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Z. J. Pei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. J. Pei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, X., Zhang, M. & Pei, Z.J. Effects of ultrasonic vibration-assisted pelleting of cellulosic biomass on sugar yield for biofuel manufacturing. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 3, 231–238 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-013-0078-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-013-0078-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation