Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

School autonomy reform and public education in Australia: implications for social justice

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The renewed commitment to school autonomy reform in Australia is based on the view that it will drive up academic standards. There remains, however, little conclusive evidence to support this view. Simply instating the structural changes to bring about greater autonomy for schools within public education systems across the world has not led consistently to an improvement in academic outcomes. Indeed, in some systems, this reform is associated with increasing social injustices. As Australian education is engaging in new iterations of this reform at federal and state levels, it is both urgent and timely to reconsider the relationship between school autonomy and social justice. This paper provides a review of largely Australian-based research concerning school autonomy reform within public education. It considers how such reform has supported and detracted from social justice outcomes in relation to political representation, cultural recognition and economic redistribution. The paper’s contribution to the field is theoretical in presenting a multidimensional account of the social justice implications of school autonomy policy and practice in Australia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apple, M. (2010). Global crises, social justice and education. New York: Routledge.

  • Australian Government (2015). Independent Public Schools. https://www.studentsfirst.gov.au/independent-public-schools. Accessed 6 June, 2016.

  • Australian Schools Commission (1973). Schools in Australia. Canberra, Australia.

  • Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bandaranayake, B. (2013). Formula-based public school funding system in Victoria: An empirical analysis of equity, NCPEA. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 8(2), 191–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (1999) Troubling women: Feminism, leadership, and educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2011). Bureaucratic, corporate/market and network governance: Shifting spaces for gender equity in education. Gender, Work and Organization, 18(5), 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2016). Educational leadership and Nancy Fraser. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. (2008). Reconceptualizing the self-managing school. Educational Management & Leadership, 36(2), 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. (2015). A contribution to the International Study of School Autonomy and Learning (ISSAL), Educational Transformations, Australian Government: Department of Education and Training.

  • Cobbold, T. (2014). Pyne’s school autonomy myth, Save our Schools. http://www.saveourschools.com.au/choice-and-competition/pynes-school-autonomy-myth. Accessed 11 May 2014.

  • Cole, P. (2011). School autonomy and system leadership, Report of a national invitational symposium hosted by the Queensland Education Leadership Institute and the Centre for Strategic Education. http://ptrconsulting.com.au/sites/default/files/Report_of_the_School_Autonomy_and_System_Leadership_Symposium_0.pdf. Accessed 21 April 2017.

  • Connell, R. W. (1994). Poverty and education. Harvard Educational Review, 642, 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranston, N., Ehrich, L., & Billott, J. (2003). The secondary school principalship in Australia and New Zealand: An investigation of changing roles. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(3), 159–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling Hammond, L., & Montgomery, K. (2008). Keeping the promise: the role of policy in reform. In L. Dingerson, B. Peterson, & B. Miner (Eds.), Keeping the promise?: The debate over charter schools (pp. 91–108). Milwaukee: Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the ‘postsocialist’ condition. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2007). Feminist politics in the age of recognition: A two-dimensional approach to gender justice. Studies in Social Justice, 1(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2008). Rethinking recognition: overcoming displacement and reification in cultural politics. In K. Olson (Ed.), Adding insult to injury: Nancy Fraser debates her critics (pp. 129–141). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T., & Densmore, K. (2000). Just schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R., Keddie, A., Lingard, B., Mills, M., & Renshaw, P. (2011). Equity and education research, policy and practice: A review. Carlton, Victoria: Australian College of Educators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2003). Public pedagogy and the politics of resistance: Notes on a critical theory of educational struggle. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobby, B. (2013). Principal self-government and subjectification: the exercise of principal autonomy in the Western Australian Independent Public Schools Programme. Critical Studies in Education, 54(3), 273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H. (2012). Leadership and the reform of education. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H., Hall, D., & Apple, M. (Eds.). (2017). Corporate elites and the reform of public education. Cambridge: The University of Bristol, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H., & Mills, C. (2017). Consultants and consultancy: the case of education. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (2011). The neoliberal revolution. Cultural Studies, 25(6), 705–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton & Associates (2015). School autonomy: building conditions for school success, Western Australian Department of Education. https://www.education.wa.edu.au/documents/2548175/2664299/FINAL+School+Autonomy+Building+the+conditions+for+the+student+success.pdf/e6d0bc09-423b-4a1e-b569-fb1b596c462e. Accessed 10 January 2017.

  • Hogan, A. (2015). Boundary spanners, network capital and the rise of edu-businesses: the case of News Corporation and its emerging education agenda. Critical Studies in Education, 56(3), 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huttunen, R. (2007). Critical adult education and the political-philosophical debate between Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth. Educational Theory, 57(4), 423–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, B., Weidmann, B., & Farmer, J. (2013). The myth of markets in school education. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, A. (2012). Educating for diversity and social justice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, A. (2015a). New modalities of state power: neoliberal responsibilisation and the work of chains. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(11), 1190–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, A. (2015b). School autonomy as ‘the way of the future’: issues of equity, public purpose and moral leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 44(5), 713–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, A. (2016). Maintaining the integrity of public education: a comparative analysis of school autonomy in the US and Australia. Comparative Education Review, 60(2), 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J. (2013). Challenging inequality in Australian schools: Gonski and beyond. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 286–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, M., & Ehrich, L. C. (2011). The democratic deficit and school-based management in Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, M. (2013). A systemless system: Designing the disarticulation of English state education. European Educational Research Journal, 12(2), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Menzies, T. (1998). A review of research concerning the implementation of site-based management. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(3), 233–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Hayes, D., & Mills, M. (2002). Developments in school-based management. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(1), 6–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2012). A policy sociology reflection on school reform in England: from the ‘Third Way’ to the ‘Big Society’. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 44(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). ‘Catalyst data’: Perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 634–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Sellar, S., Hogan, A., & Thompson, G. (2017). Commercialisation in Public Schooling (CIPS). Sydney, NSW: News South Wales Teachers Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, P. (2008). Paradoxes of teaching in neo-liberal times. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism (pp. 67–80). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, P., Hextall, I., & Menter, I. (2004). Building dams in Jordan, assessing teachers in England: A case study in edu-business. Globalization, Societies and Education, 2(2), 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (1997). Markets in education. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M. (2012). The work of Nancy Fraser and a socially just education system, The handbook of education theories. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C., & Gale, T. (2010). Schooling in disadvantaged communities. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Musset, P. (2012). School Choice and Equity: Current Policies in OECD Countries and a Literature Review, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 66, OECD Publishing, Paris. 10.1787/5k9fq23507vc-en.

  • Niesche, R. (2011). Foucault and Educational leadership: Disciplining the Principal. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niesche, R., & Thomson, P. (2017). Freedom to what ends? School autonomy in neoliberal times. In D. Waite & I. Bogotch (Eds.), The Wiley International handbook of educational leadership (pp. 193–206). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011). School autonomy and accountability: Are they related to school performance? http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisainfocus/48910490.pdf. Accessed 6 May 2014.

  • Olson, K. (2008). Adding insult to injury: Nancy Fraser debates her critics. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, L., & McWilliam, E. (2007). Accountability, responsibility and school leadership. Journal of Educational Inquiry, 7(1) 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Government (no date). Independent public schools, policy framework. http://education.qld.gov.au/schools/independent-public-schools/resources/ips-policy-framework.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2017.

  • Rizvi, F. (1994). Devolution in education: three contrasting perspectives. In R. Martin, J. McCollow, L. McFarlane, G. McMurdo, J. Graham, & R. Hull (Eds.), Devolution, decentralisation and recentralisation: The structure of Australian schooling (pp. 1–5). Melbourne: Australian Education Union Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalising education policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2011). The disaster of the ‘self-managing school’—genesis, trajectory, undisclosed agenda, and effects. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 43(2), 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The State of Queensland (2014). Independent public schools. http://education.qld.gov.au/schools/independent-public-schools/. Accessed 4 May 2014.

  • Thomson, P. (2010). Headteacher autonomy: A sketch of a Bourdieuian field analysis of position and practice. Critical Studies in Education, 51(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tikly, L., & Barrett, A. M. (2011). Social justice, capabilities and the quality of education in low income countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, C. (2015). Changing headship, changing schools: how management discourse gives rise to the performative professionalism in England (1980s–2010s). Journal of Education Policy, 30(4), 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watterston, J., & Caldwell, B. (2011). System alignment as a key strategy in building capacity for school transformation. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 637–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2014. School autonomy and accountability. http://saber.worldbank.org/index.cfm?indx=8&tb=4. Accessed 4 May 2014.

Download references

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank Professor Jill Blackmore and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research for Educational Impact, Deakin University, Burwood, 3125, Australia

    Amanda Keddie

Authors
  1. Amanda Keddie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda Keddie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keddie, A. School autonomy reform and public education in Australia: implications for social justice. Aust. Educ. Res. 44, 373–390 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0243-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0243-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation